Turning family homes into rentals? Landlords may pay the price
If a landlord knowingly allows such misuse, they would face a fine. If unaware, the responsibility falls on the tenant.
Municipal inspectors will enforce the law, with fines set by the local authority—subject to approval by the minister in charge of municipal affairs—and capped at the property's annual rent. The minister will also establish rules for leasing homes for non-family use.
Officials say some areas have been overrun by renters, altering the character of neighbourhoods despite existing regulations.
The Public Utilities and Environment Committee has backed the proposal after reviewing a revised version that amends the Real Estate Leasing Law. The legislation was put forward by MPs Mohammed Al Olaiwi, Dr Hisham Al Ashiri, Abdulwahid Qarata, Jaleela Alawi, and Hassan BuKhammas.
The Ministry of Justice has raised concerns about enforcement, noting that multiple authorities would need to coordinate efforts to track violations. The Ministry of Municipalities Affairs, which oversees rental registrations, has stated that it has no role in policing breaches.
The Capital Municipal Council supports the proposal, while the Muharraq Municipal Council has also backed it, citing the growing issue of housing workers in family districts—especially in older neighbourhoods where companies have been caught using homes to accommodate drivers. The council is calling for fines to be paired with eviction orders.
However, the Northern Municipal Council opposes the plan. The Southern Municipal Council is in favour, arguing that penalties would help curb violations.
The Real Estate Regulatory Authority has noted that the proposal aligns with broader rental laws, including property classifications and lease oversight. The Survey and Land Registration Bureau has not raised objections, aside from minor wording adjustments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
20-07-2025
- Daily Tribune
UK Moves to Strip Citizenship from Terror Suspects
UK Home Secretary Theresa May introduced a last-minute amendment to the Immigration Bill in Parliament that would allow the government to strip naturalised British citizens of their nationality if they are suspected of being involved in terrorism — even if that leaves them stateless. The amendment targets individuals whose actions are deemed to pose a "serious threat to the UK's vital interests." Under current law, the Home Secretary already has the power to revoke citizenship from dual nationals. However, this new proposal extends that power to those born overseas who hold only British citizenship. The House of Commons passed the amendment with a strong majority — 297 votes in favour and just 34 against — despite growing protests over the treatment of foreign criminals and immigrants, especially from Romania and Bulgaria. According to the Home Office, this measure will not apply to individuals born in the UK and will be implemented in line with Britain's international obligations. The policy has also received backing from the Liberal Democrats, who believe it will affect only a small number of extreme cases. Theresa May's proposal follows a significant Supreme Court ruling last October that overturned the revocation of citizenship from Hilal al-Jedda, an Iraqi-born man suspected of terrorism. The decision left al-Jedda stateless, prompting legal challenges. He is currently living in Turkey as the Home Office appeals the ruling. Immigration Minister Mark Harper defended the proposal, stating, 'Citizenship is a privilege, not a right,' and emphasized that the new powers are necessary to protect public safety. However, human rights groups have raised alarms. Reprieve, a UK-based organisation, called the move "a worrying development," warning it gives the Home Secretary sweeping powers to revoke citizenship without due process. The push for stricter laws comes amid rising concern over European extremists returning from Syria. Intelligence reports suggest that more than 700 fighters — including 250 French, 200 Belgian, and 270 German nationals — have joined conflicts in Syria, with at least 60 killed. European governments fear these trained fighters could bring militant tactics back home, prompting tighter security measures. Parliament also debated two additional proposals yesterday. The first, supported by 70 Conservative MPs, seeks to extend work restrictions on Romanian and Bulgarian nationals until 2018. The second, backed by about 100 MPs and introduced by MP Dominic Raab, aims to prevent foreign criminals sentenced to at least one year in prison from appealing deportation orders. The new measures reflect mounting pressure on Prime Minister David Cameron from within his own party to take a harder stance on immigration and national security.
Gulf Insider
17-07-2025
- Gulf Insider
High Court Ends UK Govt's £7B Afghan Resettlement Cover-Up
The High Court has lifted a super-injunction obtained by the UK government that had concealed a massive £7 billion secret resettlement program for thousands of Afghan nationals, following a damning judgment that accused ministers of suppressing democratic accountability and misleading Parliament. The injunction, originally imposed in September 2023, blocked not only media reporting on a major data breach involving thousands of Afghan collaborators with British forces, but also the very existence of the injunction itself. Now, nearly two years later, Mr. Justice Chamberlain ruled that the order must be discharged, citing 'serious interference' with press freedom and a failure to justify continued leak, which occurred in early 2022, exposed personal details of tens of thousands of Afghans who had applied to relocate to the UK following the Taliban takeover. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) learned of the breach more than a year later, in August 2023, when names appeared on Facebook. Instead of acknowledging the error, the government initiated a covert admissions scheme to bring thousands of affected individuals — and their families — to Britain, while silencing any media inquiry under the cover of national security. With the approval of family reunification for all those affected, the true number of Afghans imported into Britain could be significantly higher than the number directly affected by the data breach. During closed hearings, Mr. Justice Chamberlain expressed alarm over the scale of the deception. At a behind-closed-doors hearing in November 2024, reported on Tuesday by The Telegraph, he remarked, 'When you are dealing with public expenditure of that magnitude — £7 billion — it's not possible to lose that amount of money down the back of the sofa.' He went on to highlight internal communications in which government officials discussed using a statement to Parliament as 'cover' for the scheme, rather than providing full disclosure. 'Am I going bonkers? This is a very, very striking thing,' the judge said. 'The statement to Parliament will 'provide cover'. It is a completely unprecedented situation.' The judge condemned the use of the courts to facilitate what barrister Jude Bunting KC called a deliberate effort 'to mislead the public.' The super-injunction, Bunting argued, prevented public scrutiny on key political issues such as immigration and public spending: 'It is corrosive of democracy. It prevents the public from being informed about the reason for billions of expenditure, at a time when immigration is at the forefront of debate.' Mr. Justice Chamberlain echoed this concern, saying the order had 'the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability which operate in a democracy.' He added: 'It not only prevents public discussion of the full reasons for the government's policy. It prevents the public from knowing of the very existence of the policy.' As reported by The Times, he told the government's barrister at one of the secret hearings, 'You're going to have to say something about all of this, because you're spending £7 billion and you're letting in many thousands of people that you wouldn't have been letting in before.' The U.K. newspaper noted: 'Almost 24,000 Afghans affected by the breach have been brought to the UK already or will be in the future.' Despite the magnitude, the government had not informed the public, Parliament, or even many of the individuals whose data was leaked until now. The judgment published on Tuesday also criticized the way intelligence assessments had been used to justify the injunction. In a review that ultimately led to the order's lifting, a retired civil servant concluded that the leaked dataset posed only marginal risk to individuals and that the Taliban were unlikely to use it to identify targets. The judge found this 'fundamentally undermines the evidential basis' for continued secrecy. Super-injunctions, usually associated with celebrities, were never intended to shield vast immigration schemes from public oversight. 'When the government obtains one,' Chamberlain said, 'it is likely to give rise to understandable suspicion that the Court's processes are being used for the purposes of censorship.' In the wake of the judgment, the government has been forced to admit that the data leak occurred in 2022 but was not publicly acknowledged until now; that it included a database of 33,000 records; that a new secret relocation program was launched in response, moving thousands of foreign nationals to Britain; and that the individual responsible for the leak has not been publicly identified or disciplined. In Parliament on Tuesday, Defence Secretary John Healey offered a 'sincere apology' and confirmed that affected individuals were only informed this week, over three years after their data had been exposed. While the government has now applied for a narrower injunction to prevent publication of sensitive personal data, the broader secrecy has been irreversibly broken. As Mr. Justice Chamberlain concluded, 'There is no tenable basis for the continuation of the super-injunction. This is particularly so given the serious interference it involves with the rights of the media defendants to freedom of expression and the correlative right of the public to receive the information they wish to impart.'Also read: 13 Pakistani Soldiers Killed In Suicide Bombing Near Afghan Border
Daily Tribune
14-07-2025
- Daily Tribune
Bahrain's Parliament Wins 2025 Digital Content Award for Innovation and Inclusion
The Council of Representatives (Parliament) of Bahrain has been awarded the prestigious Bahrain Digital Content Award (BDCA) 2025 in the category of Inclusion and Empowerment, in recognition of its innovative 'MP Portal' project. The award highlights Parliament's exceptional contribution to digital innovation and its growing role in supporting Bahrain's digital transformation journey. The MP Portal, a platform designed to enhance communication and transparency between MPs and the public, was praised for its impact in driving inclusive digital services and supporting parliamentary work. The award ceremony took place this morning at the Gulf Hotel under the patronage of the Chairman of the Shura Council. Dr. Saqr Al-Shirawi, Assistant Secretary-General for Resources and Services, received the award on behalf of Parliament. The event gathered top national leaders and experts in innovation and digital transformation. BTECH, the Bahrain Technology Companies Society and organizer of the BDCA, stated that the award reflects the quality and real impact of the MP Portal in promoting digital empowerment, aligning with Bahrain's vision of comprehensive digital transformation. This recognition is seen as a result of the forward-looking leadership of Parliament Speaker Ahmed bin Salman Al Musallam, whose support for cutting-edge digital initiatives has strengthened the performance and transparency of the parliamentary system. It also celebrates the efforts of Eng. Mohammed Ibrahim Al Sisi Al Buainain, Secretary-General of Parliament, who has led the development of smart, tech-driven solutions to enhance institutional readiness and work environments. Winning this national award reaffirms Bahrain's Parliament as a leading model in using modern technology to strengthen democratic processes and promote digital empowerment — a step that places Bahrain at the forefront of regional and international digital progress.
