&w=3840&q=100)
How did Saif Ali Khan inherit Nawab of Bhopal's Rs 15,000-cr properties? Has he lost them now?
Saif Ali Khan and his two sisters — Soha and Saba. Instagram/sabapataudi
In a big blow for Bollywood actor Saif Ali Khan and his kin, the Madhya Pradesh High Court last week set aside a decades-old trial court ruling that had made him, his two sisters and mother the sole legal heirs to the properties of the erstwhile Nawab of Bhopal.
Their inheritance was challenged in an appeal by the heirs of Nawab Hamidullah Khan. Saif Ali Khan is also fighting a separate legal battle over these properties.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What is the case? How did Saif Ali Khan inherit the Bhopal royal properties? Let's take a closer look.
Why Saif Ali Khan is an heir of Nawab of Bhopal's properties
Saif Ali Khan and his family came to inherit the properties of the erstwhile Nawab of the Bhopal princely state from his father's mother, Sajida Begum.
Sajida, the second daughter of Hamidullah Khan — the last ruling Nawab of Bhopal — became the legal heir of her father's properties after her elder sister Abida Begum migrated to Pakistan in 1950.
Sajida then went on to inherit the Nawab title as well as properties estimated to be worth over Rs 15,000 crore.
Sajida Sultan inherited the title of the Nawab of Bhopal. Wikimedia Commons
Sajida Begum married Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi, the Nawab of Pataudi. Their son was the popular cricketer, Mansoor Ali Khan 'Tiger Pataudi'. Mansoor and veteran actor Sharmila Tagore have three children — Saif, Soha, and Saba Ali Khan.
Saif Ali Khan, the grandson of Sajida and the Nawab of Pataudi, inherited a share of the Bhopal properties.
These include thousands of acres of land in and around Bhopal, along with estates such as Flag Staff House, Noor-Us-Sabah Palace Hotel, Dar-Us-Salam, and Ahmedabad Palace.
The dispute over Bhopal royal properties
A case was filed by other family members of Hamidullah Khan, including his third daughter, Rabia Begum, and his elder brother, Obaidullah Khan.
Hamidullah Khan had two wives, Maimoona Sultan and Aftab Jahan. Maimoona and Khan had three daughters: Abida Sultan, Sajida Sultan, and Rabia Sultan.
When the princely state of Bhopal merged with the Union of India in 1949, it was decided that the absolute ownership of the Nawab's personal property and the succession to the throne would be governed by the Bhopal Succession to the Throne Act, 1947.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Senior advocate Jagdish Chavan, who has represented Saif's father, told ThePrint that the Nawab's property would have gone to the eldest son as per the Bhopal Succession to the Throne Act. However, due to no male heir, Abida Sultan, the eldest daughter, would have inherited the throne and the property.
'If one goes by the succession act, Abida was the successor. But she was a resident of Pakistan and hence, the property would have simply been declared as enemy property,' Chavan said.
Sajida Sultan's husband's political friendship helped her to inherit the Nawab title and Bhopal properties.
'At the time, Jawaharlal Nehru was the Prime Minister and shared a friendship with Iftikhar Ali Khan, the grandfather of Saif Ali Khan. So, a year after the death of Nawab Hamidullah Khan, his second daughter, Sajida Sultan—after Abida Sultan—was made the successor. Sajida was married to Iftikhar,' the advocate added.
In the 1970s, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi abolished the privy purse, a payment made by the Indian government to the ruling families of former princely states as part of the merger of their states with India after Independence. Royal titles were also discontinued.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Following this, 'Maimoona Sultan and the third child, Rabiya Sultan, filed a partition suit and sought a rendition of accounts of the Nawab's property in the district court. They demanded partition under Muslim Personal Law (Shariat). This was in 1971,' Chavan told ThePrint.
Obaidullah Khan, Hamidullah Khan's brother, who also received privy purses filed another suit. The family members of Hamidullah and his brother are seeking partition and succession of the Nawab's private properties as per the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act, 1937.
In 2000, the district court in Bhopal ruled on both suits. 'As per the judgment, according to the Bhopal Throne Succession Act, 1947, and Notification of the Government of India, Sajida Sultan remained the successor of the entire property of Hamidullah Khan and no partition based on Muslim law was recognised,' Chavan said.
As the judgement was not in favour of the last ruling Nawab's other family members, they approached the Jabalpur bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court against the trial court's order.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The appellant heirs had argued in the High Court that the trial court incorrectly made the assumption that the Nawab's private properties were part of the throne and hence would automatically go to the successor to the throne, as per Indian Express.
On June 30, the Madhya Pradesh High Court HC dismissed the 25-year-old trial court order that upheld Saif Ali Khan and his family as the rightful owners of the properties of the Nawab of Bhopal.
It also directed 'the trial Court shall make all possible efforts to conclude and decide it expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year.'
The High Court has now ordered a fresh trial. After the setback, advocate Chavan believes the Bollywood actor and his kin would only get a small part of the Bhopal royal assets.
'Saif Ali Khan, by my calculation, will receive only two to three per cent of the Nawab's property,' he was quoted as saying by the digital news outlet. 'The family isn't left with much legal recourse now.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What's the Enemy Properties case?
The Bhopal royal properties that went to the Pataudi family were declared as ' enemy property' in 2014 by the Custodian of Enemy Property Department. The migration of Abida Sultan, the Nawab of Bhopal's heir apparent, to Pakistan was the government's basis for claiming the properties as 'enemy property.'
Under the Enemy Property Act, 1968, the Indian government can seize the properties and companies of individuals who took Pakistani nationality.
In 2015, the Pataudi family moved the MP High Court against the Custodian's notice. The HC put a temporary stay on the government's 'enemy property' order at the time.
Four years later, the court recognised Sajida Sultan as the Nawab's legal heir. However, in January this year, the High Court dismissed Saif's petition and lifted the stay.
It also asked the Bollywood actor to approach the appellate authority against the government order. It remains unclear whether Saif moved the tribunal by January 12.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Inter-ministerial committee to develop coordinated action plans to curb film piracy: I&B
Responding to an unstarred question on the unauthorised circulation of Indian films, Dr. Murugan said the government remains fully conscious of the adverse impact of digital piracy on the creative economy. He outlined several steps taken to curb piracy, particularly involving pre-release content and international piracy networks operating via the dark web and torrent platforms. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads An inter-ministerial committee has been constituted to strengthen anti-piracy strategies and develop coordinated action plans, Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting and Parliamentary Affairs Dr. L. Murugan informed the Rajya Sabha to an unstarred question on the unauthorised circulation of Indian films, Dr. Murugan said the government remains fully conscious of the adverse impact of digital piracy on the creative economy. He outlined several steps taken to curb piracy, particularly involving pre-release content and international piracy networks operating via the dark web and torrent also said that the government amended the Cinematograph Act , 1952, in 2023 to introduce stringent measures against digital piracy. The amendments include strict penalties, with a minimum ofthree months' imprisonment and a fine of Rs 3 lakh. The punishment can be extended up to three years' imprisonment and a fine of up to 5% of the audited gross production Sections 6AA and 6AB of the revised Act prohibit unauthorised recording and transmission of films, while Section 7(1B)(ii) empowers the government to issue necessary directions to intermediaries hosting pirated minister further stated that the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and the Central Board of Film Certification are now empowered to receive complaints from copyright holders or authorised persons and to issue necessary takedown directions to digital also pointed to the government's engagement with stakeholders and law enforcement agencies as part of its broader anti-piracy part of these efforts, the World Audio Visual Entertainment Summit (WAVES 2025) featured a competition focused on developing technical solutions to combat digital to The Rob Report released by EY and the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) in 2024, the size of India's piracy economy was Rs 22,400 crore in 2023, ranking fourth among the segment-wise revenues of India's Media and Entertainment this, Rs 13,700 crore was generated from pirated content originating from movie theaters, while Rs 8,700 crore came from pirated OTT platform content. Potential GST losses were estimated to be as high as Rs 4,300 India's entertainment ecosystem to improve, the report said it is imperative for the government and private players to take a unified stand against piracy. Policies need to evolve as swiftly as the piracy landscape. Stricter enforcement mechanisms must be set in place by both the government and private organisations, it also stated that large-scale awareness programmes, watermarking of premium content, innovations in pricing and bundling, and forging international alliances must take place simultaneously to curb India's growing piracy menace. An immediate regulatory overhaul, along with judicious enforcement action at a global level, will go a long way in addressing this threat.


India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Saiyaara Box Office Collection Day 8: Ahaan Panday, Aneet Padda's romantic saga continues to storm, beats Raid 2 lifetime, earns Rs...
Saiyaara madness is continuing to hold its presence at the theater halls. Helmed by Mohit Suri, the movie, which was released on July 18, has made the entire nation go gaga over the mushy romance. Featuring debutants Ahaan Panday and Aneet Padda, Saiyaara box office collection on day 8 stands at Rs 18 crore, as per early estimates given by industry tracker Sacnilk. Saiyaara Scripts History at the Box Office Saiyaara is one of those few films that earned in double digits despite starring debutants. Saiyaara's day 1 box office collection stood at Rs 21 crore. In the following days, the movie witnessed a huge increase in numbers, peaking on day 3 when Saiyaara collected Rs 35.75 crore — which also happened to be a Sunday. Mohit Suri's film maintained its magic by minting Rs 24 crore on its first Monday. It is often said that the first Monday for a film is extremely crucial as it decides the graph of the movie. Now, with Saiyaara's box office collection on day 8, the movie has grossed Rs 190 crore in India and will soon enter the Rs 200 crore club. Saiyaara Box Office Collection Worldwide While Mohit Suri's romantic saga is making waves in India, the worldwide collection is also noteworthy. According to a report by Hindustan Times, Saiyaara has grossed a little over $5 million (approximately Rs 43 crore) in overseas markets, pushing its worldwide total to Rs 256 crore. Saiyaara has now crossed the lifetime haul of Ajay Devgn's Raid 2, which stands at Rs 237 crore. The film is expected to hold steady during the second weekend and now aims to surpass the collections of Sitaara Zameen Par (Rs 264 crore) and Housefull 5 (Rs 289 crore).


India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
'Won't run for even a day...': Made for Rs 10 crore, this film was initially tagged a flop due to..., yet made the makers rich, movie is..
It is still a mystery what exactly can make a movie a superhit or a super flop. Maybe it's the casting, a scene, a song, or even a dialogue. Something similar happened with the film we're going to discuss today. This movie, made for Rs 10 crore, did not perform well in its initial days. However, as days passed, the film garnered attention and eventually turned out to be a huge hit. It earned the title of a cult classic, and perhaps in the coming days, we might even witness a franchise based on the movie. Twenty-three years ago, one of Bollywood's ace directors helmed the movie and cast three of the finest actors in the industry — Sanjay Dutt, Arshad Warsi, and Boman Irani. Now, all these characters might ring a bell in your mind, and let us tell you, we are talking about none other than Munna Bhai M.B.B.S. Munna Bhai M.B.B.S. Was Initially a Flop Would you believe it if we told you that Munna Bhai M.B.B.S. was initially a flop? Yes, the film initially faced challenges, with reports of empty theaters on the first day. No Distributors Wanted to Buy Munna Bhai M.B.B.S Vidhu Vinod Chopra is counted among Bollywood's top producers. He has produced films like Pradeep Sarkar's Parineeta, Rajkumar Hirani's Munna Bhai franchise, 3 Idiots, and PK. But in a recent interview with Screen, he revealed that no distributor from South India wanted to buy Munna Bhai M.B.B.S. Despite that, the movie made Vidhu rich. He recalled that the film opened to nearly empty theaters but became his most profitable venture, mainly because it wasn't sold outside Mumbai initially. Vidhu recalled a discussion with a South Indian distributor who purchased the movie for Rs 11 lakh. The distributor arrived to collect the film just four days before its release but expressed doubts after watching it. 'Sir, this film won't work even for a day. Nobody outside of Mumbai would understand the language of Munna Bhai,' Chopra recalled him saying. Adding further, the filmmaker revealed that he once offered to refund the Rs 5 lakh advance paid by another South Indian distributor. However, the distributor preferred to keep the money, expressing faith in Chopra and his belief that Chopra's next film might be a hit. Chopra explained, 'The bottom line is I had no distributor for South India. I had friends — Shyam Shroff and Bala Shroff — who had a company.' He shared that there was a cinema in Chennai where he secured only a single morning show at 11 a.m. He sold his print there for Rs 5 lakh, but the final business from that one centre crossed Rs 1 crore.