logo
The major PIP and universal credit changes in Labour's benefits bill, explained

The major PIP and universal credit changes in Labour's benefits bill, explained

Yahoo15 hours ago

The government will outline the concessions to its controversial welfare reform bill on Monday in the hope of averting an embarrassing rebellion in a crunch House of Commons vote.
Between 50 and 60 Labour MPs are reportedly still planning to vote against the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill in its second reading on Tuesday.
This is despite a stunning U-turn by the government before the weekend, when it said it would water down or scrap a number of the bill's proposals.
Originally, the government had hoped to slash about £5bn from the UK's benefits bill with significant changes to rules on personal independence payments (PIP) and universal credit (UC).
About 126 Labour MPs had voiced their disapproval at the planned cuts to benefits for disabled people, and had planned a reasoned amendment to the bill that would have scuppered its progress.
And while that scenario appears to have been avoided, with about half of those MPs now planning to back the altered bill, the government did not rule out further changes.
On Monday, disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms will publish details of a review of the PIP assessment, which the government says is "co-produced with disabled people". Health secretary Wes Streeting refused to rule out further changes following the publication of the Timms review, telling BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme "we have got to listen" on PIP.
The government will amend the bill at the Commons committee stage to put the changes in place .
Welfare reforms laid out in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill – as the draft law is known – were announced in March this year. They included controversial reforms to tighten the eligibility criteria for disabled people receiving PIP.
Applications for PIP are based on an assessment of a person's ability to complete everyday tasks, such as washing or preparing food.
Some estimates had suggested more than one million people could lose out if changes to these eligibility tests were approved.
And in the wake of growing outrage among its own MPS, the government has now promised to protect payments to existing claimants, with the new rules only applying to new claimants from November 2026.
In a letter to MPs, work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall said: 'We recognise the proposed changes have been a source of uncertainty and anxiety.
'We will ensure that all of those currently receiving PIP will stay within the current system. The new eligibility requirements will be implemented from November 2026 for new claims only."
In his review of PIP assessments, "co-produced" with disabled people, disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms will say that £300m in employment support will also be brought forward over the next three years.
Universal credit (UC) is the main benefit for working-age people and is currently worth about £400 per month to a single person aged over 25.
Someone with disability – or long-term health condition that limits their ability to work – could potentially see this more than double, with payments for incapacity worth an extra £423.27 per month.
Previously, changes would have limited eligibility for the incapacity top-up limited to claimants aged over 22.
The value of the top-up was also due to fall significantly by 2030 for new claimants and be frozen for new applicants.
Ministers have now promised payments to UC health benefits claimants will be "fully protected in real terms".
From next year to 2030, all those who already receive the health element of universal credit – and new claimants with severe conditions and 12 months or less to live – will see an annual rise to their combined standard and limited capacity for work allowance at least in line with inflation.
In her letter to MPs, Kendall said: "l adjust the pathway of universal credit payment rates to make sure all existing recipients of the UC health element – and any new claimant meeting the severe conditions criteria – have their incomes fully protected in real terms.'
In addition, 200,000 people with the most severe, lifelong conditions who are unlikely to recover will not be called for a universal credit reassessment.
Changes to the existing regimes for PIP and universal credit are expected to remain, but will apply to new applicants only, with existing claimants protected.
Changes to assessments for PIP are also expected to go ahead, but ministers have offered further concessions to rebels on this in the form of the Timms review.
A merger of jobseeker's allowance and employment and support allowances is also still expected to go ahead, as is a "right to try" initiative to encourage people back into the workplace.
For the first time, draft regulations for the 'right to try' will be laid in parliament, to enshrine in law the right for people receiving health and disability benefits to try work without fear of reassessment.
The £300m in employment support announced by Timms will be brought forward over the next three years, the government says, part of its commitment to spend £1bn per year by the end of the decade helping disabled people find work, something that is due to remain in the bill.
The bill had also been slated to include inflation-busting rises to universal credit payments over the next four years.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nixing visas is a wise US response to Bob Vylan's naked Jew-hate
Nixing visas is a wise US response to Bob Vylan's naked Jew-hate

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Nixing visas is a wise US response to Bob Vylan's naked Jew-hate

Kudos to the State Department for revoking the visas for British punk-rappers Bob Vylan: Our country doesn't need to let naked antisemites in for a tour. The pair led the Glastonbury Musical Festival crowd in chants of raw hate, including 'From the river to the sea, Palestine must be, will be, inshallah, it will be free,' and 'Death, death to the IDF.' The first is a demand to expel or kill all the Jews of Israel; the latter, transparently, is an outright call for the slaughter of the Jewish state's defenders. With tens of thousands joining in from the audience, it was a truly Hitler-worthy spectacle. But also ample reason for the feds to nix the duo's visas for a coming tour: No foreigner has a right to visit this nation and make big money for promoting hate and terrorism. Bob Vylan also faces backlash back home: Prime Minster Keir Starmer and a host of other pols have denounced them; the BBC is squirming over having broadcast the performance and the United Talent Agency says it will stop repping the band. They also face a police investigation, but the UK's efforts to police speech are a mess full of double- and triple-standards. To be clear: US citizens have the right to blare hate speech as vile as Bob Vylan's, but the First Amendment doesn't mean we need to let Nazis come visit. Cheers to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Justice Department's Leo Terrell for their attention to this matter.

U.K. Culture Sec. condemns Bob Vylan Glastonbury performance, demands answers from BBC
U.K. Culture Sec. condemns Bob Vylan Glastonbury performance, demands answers from BBC

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

U.K. Culture Sec. condemns Bob Vylan Glastonbury performance, demands answers from BBC

The British culture minister condemned punk-rap duo Bob Vylan during a June 30 statement to Parliament that noted that statements made during a June 28 performance at the Glastonbury festival were under criminal investigation. "Let me be clear that this government will not tolerate anti-Semitism," Lisa Nandy, U.K. Secretary for Culture, Media and Sport, told the House of Commons from the Labour's dispatch box. "It has no place in our society. It is a poison and a cancer that must be rooted out, and we will be relentless in our work to do so." Avon and Somerset Police said in a June 30 statement that "further enquiries are required and a criminal investigation is now being undertaken" regarding the performances of Bob Vylan and Irish rap trio Kneecap. Bob Vylan led chants of "Death, death, to the IDF" referring to the Israel Defense Forces, the formal name of the Israeli military. Kneecap frontman Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh led chants against Labour Prime Minister Kier Starmer and accused Israel of committing war crimes, saying: "There's no hiding it." The U.S. State Department revoked the visas of Bob Vylan members on June 30, citing the performance. Culture secretary demands answers from BBC, health secretary tells Israel to get "house in order" Nandy told the Commons that she would seek answers from the BBC, which streamed the festival, on why the feed from the West Holts stage was not cut. "Given the concerns regarding other acts in the weeks preceding the festival, why the feed wasn't immediately cut when the chants of death to the IDF began and what due diligence was done prior to the decision to broadcast this particular act to the nation," Nandy said. The BBC said in a statement condemning the performance that it regretted not pulling the stream. "The judgment on Saturday to issue a warning on screen while streaming online was in line with our editorial guidelines," the broadcaster said. "The team were dealing with a live situation but with hindsight we should have pulled the stream during the performance." Glastonbury organizers condemned Bob Vylan's performance in a June 29 Instagram post. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said it was appalling that the comments had been made on stage, adding that he was also appalled by the violence committed by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank. "I'd also say to the Israeli Embassy, get your own house in order in terms of the conduct of your own citizens and the settlers in the West Bank," Streeting told Sky News. "I wish they'd take the violence of their own citizens toward Palestinians more seriously." Contributing: Reuters

Government accused of 'stark' contradiction over position on Gaza genocide allegations
Government accused of 'stark' contradiction over position on Gaza genocide allegations

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Government accused of 'stark' contradiction over position on Gaza genocide allegations

The government has won a long-running legal challenge about its decision to continue allowing the sale of spare parts for F-35 fighter jets to Israel, while suspending other arms licences over concerns about international humanitarian law in Gaza. But a key part of its case has highlighted mixed messaging about its position on the risk of genocide in Gaza - and intensified calls for ministers to publish their own assessment on the issue. PM braced for pivotal vote - politics latest Lawyers acting for the government told judges "the evidence available does not support a finding of genocide" and "the government assessment was that…there was no serious risk of genocide occurring". Therefore, they argued, continuing to supply the F-35 components did not put the UK at risk of breaching the Genocide Convention. This assessment has never been published or justified by ministers in parliament, despite numerous questions on the issue. Some MPs argue its very existence contrasts with the position repeatedly expressed by ministers in parliament - that the UK is unable to give a view on allegations of genocide in Gaza, because the question is one for the international courts. For example, just last week Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner told PMQs "it is a long-standing principle that genocide is determined by competent international courts and not by governments". 'The UK cannot sit on our hands' Green MP Ellie Chowns said: "The government insists only an international court can judge whether genocide is occurring in Gaza, yet have somehow also concluded there is 'no serious risk of genocide' in Gaza - and despite my urging, refuse to publish the risk assessments which lead to this decision. "Full transparency on these risk assessments should not be optional; it is essential for holding the government to account and stopping further atrocity. "While Labour tie themselves in knots contradicting each other, families are starving, hospitals lie in ruins, and children are dying. "The UK cannot sit on our hands waiting for an international court verdict when our legal duty under the Genocide Convention compels us to prevent genocide from occurring, not merely seek justice after the fact." 'Why are these assessments being made?' "This contradiction at the heart of the government's position is stark," said Zarah Sultana MP, an outspoken critic of Labour's approach to the conflict in Gaza, who now sits as an independent after losing the party whip last summer. "Ministers say it's not for them to determine genocide, that only international courts can do so. Yet internal 'genocide assessments' have clearly been made and used to justify continuing arms exports to Israel. "If they have no view, why are these assessments being made? And if they do, why refuse to share them with parliament? This Labour government, in opposition, demanded the Tories publish their assessments. Now in office, they've refused to do the same." Read more: Judges at the High Court ultimately ruled the case was over such a "sensitive and political issue" it should be a matter for the government, "which is democratically accountable to parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not the court". Dearbhla Minogue, a senior lawyer at the Global Legal Action Network, and a solicitor for Al-Haq, the Palestinian human rights group which brought the case, said: "This should not be interpreted as an endorsement of the government, but rather a restrained approach to the separation of powers. "The government's disgraceful assessment that there is no risk of genocide has therefore evaded scrutiny in the courts, and as far as we know it still stands." What is the government's position? Government lawyers argued the decision not to ban the export of F-35 parts was due to advice from Defence Secretary John Healey, who said a suspension would impact the whole F-35 programme and have a "profound impact on international peace and security". The UK supplies F-35 component parts as a member of an international defence programme which produces and maintains the fighter jets. As a customer of that programme, Israel can order from the pool of spare parts. Labour MP Richard Burgon said the ruling puts the government under pressure to clarify its position. "This court ruling is very clear: only the government and parliament can decide if F-35 fighter jet parts - that can end up in Israel - should be sold," he said. "So the government can no longer pass the buck: it can stop these exports, or it can be complicit in Israel's genocide in Gaza. "On many issues they say it's not for the government to decide, but it's one for the international courts. This washing of hands will no longer work." Israel has consistently rejected any allegations of genocide. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu branded a recent UN report on the issue biased and antisemitic. "Instead of focusing on the crimes against humanity and war crimes committed by the Hamas terrorist organisation… the United Nations once again chooses to attack the state of Israel with false accusations," he said in a statement. The UK government has not responded to requests for comment over its contrasting messaging to parliament and the courts over allegations of genocide. But in response to the judgement, a spokesperson said: "The court has upheld this government's thorough and lawful decision-making on this matter. "This shows that the UK operates one of the most robust export control regimes in the world. We will continue to keep our defence export licensing under careful and continual review. "On day one of this Government, the foreign secretary ordered a review into Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law (IHL). "The review concluded that there was a clear risk that UK exports for the IDF (Israel Defence Forces) in the Gaza conflict might be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of IHL. "In contrast to the last government, we took decisive action, stopping exports to the Israeli Defence Forces that might be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store