Opinion - America has a fentanyl and human trafficking crisis. We must secure our financial borders to fix it
Drug cartels and trafficking organizations don't just rely on smuggling routes; they depend on financial systems that allow them to launder massive amounts of illicit profits with little oversight. The Trump administration recently took a bold step by designating certain drug trafficking organizations as foreign terrorist organizations. This significant move signals a clear recognition: stopping traffickers means following the money.
For one, it raises the stakes for financial institutions to take their anti-money laundering responsibilities seriously — TD Bank got hit last year with a historic $3 billion in U.S. fines, in part for contributing to the fentanyl and synthetic drug crisis. Additionally, the new designation will give U.S. law enforcement a stronger political mandate to 'follow the money' to stop the cartels. Canada is now following suit.
Yet even as we raise the stakes abroad, the United States has held the door open to the world's dirty money. For years, our nation has been one of the easiest places on the globe to set up anonymous shell companies, making it a prime destination for drug traffickers looking to hide their profits. Ample evidence shows that fentanyl networks and trafficking cartels have relied on anonymous U.S. companies to perpetrate their lethal schemes. Even Secretary of State Marco Rubio noted in a recent interview that in some cases, traffickers and their money launderers set up 'shell companies, to hide their profits and be able to distribute the funds they have.'
Congress took action to address money laundering entities in 2021 by passing the bipartisan Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which requires certain companies to disclose their true owners to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). This law, passed under the first Trump administration, marked the most significant update to U.S. anti-money laundering law in two decades.
Most notably, if implemented correctly, federal, state and local law enforcement would have access to vital information on the beneficial owners of these formerly anonymous companies. Prior to this, law enforcement investigations into the financing of these trafficking and drug networks were derailed by layers of corporate secrecy.
But today, enforcement of this critical anti-trafficking tool is at risk, facing opposition from some business groups and lawmakers who want to weaken its implementation. Worse still, the U.S. Department of the Treasury recently announced it will notenforce key parts of the CTA. This is an alarming reversal that directly undercuts law enforcement's ability to fight trafficking and fentanyl distribution.
At a time when traffickers are growing more sophisticated, we cannot afford to let them exploit loopholes in our financial system. Effective efforts to stop fentanyl and traffickers require fully implementing the CTA and fully funding FinCEN's efforts to track the illicit financial flows fueling the fentanyl crisis. What's more, this law assists the administration in continuing its work building robust relationships with our neighbors to support law enforcement cooperation and information sharing to dismantle these transnational crime operations.
Our government recognizes the need to work with Canada and Mexico to crack down on the financial enablers of drug and human trafficking. Failing to enforce the beneficial ownership information requirements of the CTA, as announced by the Department of Treasury last week, is a significant step back in our fight to improve public safety.
Other nations are stepping up. Canada already requires disclosures similar to the Corporate Transparency Act, Mexico has anti-money laundering measures that generate crucial financial data ripe for analysis.
With proper enforcement, the United States can lead a regional effort to choke off the flow of criminal proceeds and dismantle these dangerous transnational networks. But if we abandon our own enforcement tools, we make America the soft target. We invite cartels and traffickers to hide their profits here, undermining the very border security and law enforcement efforts we claim to champion.
Stopping trafficking means going after the money. It means equipping our law enforcement agencies with every available tool — including the CTA. Tariffs alone won't stop trafficking. Increasing border security alone won't stop fentanyl. But making it harder for criminals to both profit and move their money? That's where it hurts. Follow the money. Secure America's financial borders and bring these criminals to justice.
Frank Russo is vice president of Modern Fortis Public Safety Strategies and the director of the CPAC's Center for Combating Human Trafficking. Nelson Bunn is the executive director of the National District Attorneys Association.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact check: Trump calls to prosecute Beyoncé based on a nonexistent $11 million payment
President Donald Trump over the weekend called for the prosecution of music superstar Beyoncé – based on something that did not actually happen. Trump claimed in a social media post that Beyoncé broke the law by supposedly getting paid $11 million for her endorsement of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris during an October 2024 event in Houston. But there is simply no basis for Trump's claim that Beyoncé received an $11 million payment related to the Harris campaign, let alone for the endorsement in particular. Federal campaign spending records show a $165,000 payment from the Harris campaign to Beyoncé's production company, which the campaign listed as a 'campaign event production' expense. A Harris campaign spokesperson told Deadline last year that they didn't pay celebrity endorsers, but were required by law to cover the costs connected to their appearances. Regardless of the merits of this particular $165,000 expenditure, it's far from an $11 million one. Nobody has ever produced any evidence for the claim of an eight-figure endorsement payment to Beyoncé since the claim that it was '$10 million' began spreading last year among Trump supporters on social media. Fact-check websites and PolitiFact looked into the '$10 million' claim during the campaign and did not find any basis for it. The White House did not immediately respond to a CNN request late Saturday for any evidence of Trump's $11 million figure. When Trump previously invoked the baseless figure, during an interview in February, he described his source in the vaguest of terms: 'Somebody just showed me something. They gave her $11 million.' A Harris spokesperson referred CNN on Saturday to a November social media post by Beyoncé's mother Tina Knowles, who called the claim of a $10 million payment a 'lie' and noted it was taken down by Instagram as 'False Information.' 'When In Fact: Beyonce did not receive a penny for speaking at a Presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harrris's (sic) Rally in Houston,' Knowles wrote. A spokesperson for Beyoncé told PolitiFact in November that the claim about a $10 million payment is 'beyond ridiculous.' What Trump wrote Sunday Trump revived the false claim in a social media post published after midnight early Sunday morning in Scotland, where he is visiting. He wrote that he is looking at 'the fact' that Democrats 'admit to paying, probably illegally, Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT.' Democratic officials actually reject the claim of an $11 million payment. The White House did not immediately respond to CNN's request for any evidence of a Democratic admission of such a payment. Trump went on to criticize other payments from the Harris campaign to organizations connected to prominent endorsers. He asserted without evidence that these payments were inaccurately described in spending records. And he wrongly asserted that it is 'TOTALLY ILLEGAL' to pay for political endorsements, though no federal law forbids endorsement payments. Trump concluded: 'Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Trump has repeatedly called for the prosecution of political opponents. His Saturday post about Harris and celebrity endorsements was an escalation from a post in May, when he said he would call for a 'major investigation' on the subject but did not explicitly mention prosecutions.

Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he would ‘like' to strike a trade deal with the EU
US President Donald Trump said on Sunday he would 'like' to strike a trade deal with the EU, adding there was a '50-50 chance'.Trump said Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China, US to extend tariff pause at Sweden talks by another 90 days, SCMP reports
(Reuters) -Beijing and Washington are expected to extend their tariff truce by another three months at trade talks in Stockholm beginning on Monday, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported on Sunday, citing people familiar with the matter. During the expected 90-day extension, the U.S. and China will agree not to introduce new tariffs or take other actions that could further escalate the trade war, the report said. While the earlier discussions in Geneva and London focused on "de-escalation", the latest meeting the Chinese delegation will also press Trump's trade team on fentanyl-related tariffs, the report further said, citing three sources familiar with the matter. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The third round of U.S.-China talks is set to be held in Stockholm on Monday to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of the countries' trade war. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data