
Dementia: Study links 3 vascular health risk factors to increased risk
A new study has found a link between certain midlife vascular risk factors — specifically high blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking — and risk for dementia.
Scientists report the attributable vascular risk factors were higher in both female and Black participants, as well as non-carriers of the APOE ε4 gene, which is linked with an increased risk of Alzheimer's.
The vascular system refers to all the blood vessels that run through the body. These vessels are in charge of moving oxygen throughout the body and removing waste products.
Now, a new study recently published in the journal JAMA Neurology has found a link between certain midlife vascular risk factors — specifically high blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking — and risk for dementia.
Scientists report the attributable vascular risk factors were higher in both self-identified female and Black participants, as well as non-carriers of the apolipoprotein ε4 (APOE ε4) gene .
For this study, researchers analyzed medical data from about 7,700 participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, which ran from 1987-2020 with a 33-year follow-up. Participant risk factors were measured at ages 45-54, 55-64, and 65-74 years old.
Researchers focused on three main vascular risk factors for this study: high blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking.
'There's been pretty consistent research for decades that indicates the importance of these three vascular risk factors in midlife (~ age 45-64 years) for elevating dementia risk, with less consensus on their associations in late-life (~ age ≥75 years),' Jason R. Smith, PhD, ScM, who was at the time of the study a researcher in the Department of Epidemiology at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Maryland and first author of this study, told Medical News Today .
'The prevalence of vascular risk factors also remains high in adults. So interventions for vascular factors beginning as early as midlife could potentially avert a big chunk of dementia risk,' he said.
Upon analysis, researchers found that between 22–44% of dementia cases reported by participants by age 80 were attributable to midlife and late-life vascular risk factors.
'That 22-44% of population-level dementia risk by 80 years was attributed to at least one vascular risk factor from midlife through early late-life (ages 45-74 years) signals a major prevention gap,' Smith explained. 'Clinical and public health interventions targeting vascular risk beginning as early as midlife could delay or prevent a sizable fraction of dementia risk by 80 years.'
'The burden of dementia remains high,' he continued. 'It has a heterogeneous presentation and pathology, so targeting risk factors that are modifiable, more proximal to dementia expression (including hypertension, diabetes, and smoking), and that could potentially impact more than one underlying process giving rise to dementia, is paramount to reduce population-level dementia risk.'
Additionally, scientists found that the vascular risk factor attributable risk was highest in participants who self-identified as female or Black, as well as those not carrying the APOE ε4 gene.
'Caution's warranted when interpreting these stratified analyses, given wide (confidence intervals),' Smith said. 'However, the analysis stratified by APOE carrier status suggests the absolute vascular contribution to dementia is larger among those at lower genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease.'
'And that the vascular contribution was larger among those racialized as Black is likely due to a higher burden of vascular risk factors in this population,' he continued. 'More inclusive and representative research is urgently needed to understand the prevention potential of vascular risk reduction in different populations.'
'While this study is not designed to provide evidence on individual-level dementia risk reduction, promoting optimal vascular health as early as midlife could be vital for reducing population-level dementia risk by 80 years,' Smith added. 'What's good for the heart is good for the brain, and the earlier prevention starts, the better.'
MNT spoke with Christopher Yi, MD, a board certified vascular surgeon at MemorialCare Orange Coast Medical Center in Fountain Valley, CA, about this study.
Yi commented that this study reinforces an increasingly clear message: vascular health is brain health.
'My first reaction was that the findings were both striking and practical — nearly half of dementia cases by age 80 could be linked to modifiable vascular risk factors like high blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking,' he continued. 'It's especially notable that late-life vascular health appeared even more strongly associated with dementia risk than midlife health, which challenges the idea that 'it's too late' to make a difference after midlife.'
Yi explained that vascular health affects dementia risk through several interconnected mechanisms.
'High blood pressure and vascular disease can damage the small vessels that supply the brain, leading to chronic ischemia (lack of oxygen) and brain tissue damage,' he detailed. 'Silent strokes and microinfarcts are common in people with uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes and can accumulate over time, impairing cognitive function without obvious warning signs.'
'Vascular risk factors promote inflammation and free radical damage, which contribute to neurodegeneration and Alzheimer's pathology. (And) chronic vascular dysfunction can make the blood-brain barrier leaky, allowing harmful substances to enter the brain and accelerate neuronal damage.'
— Christopher Yi, MD
For the next steps in this research, Yi said he would like to see more intervention trials, risk factor-specific analyses, mechanistic studies, and policy translation.
'Explore how these findings could support more aggressive screening and treatment of vascular risks in primary care, with cognitive outcomes in mind,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Kennedy to oust care task force, WSJ reports; HHS says no decision yet
WASHINGTON, July 25 (Reuters) - U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is planning to remove all the members of an advisory panel that determines what cancer screenings and other preventive health measures insurers must cover, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. A Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson said on Friday that Kennedy had not yet made a decision regarding the 16-member U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. "No final decision has been made on how the USPSTF can better support HHS' mandate to Make America Healthy Again," the HHS spokesperson said. The Journal said Kennedy planned to dismiss all 16 panel members in what would be the latest in a series of far-reaching actions by Kennedy, a long-time vaccine skeptic, to reshape U.S. regulation of vaccines, food and medicine. In June he fired all 17 members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a panel of vaccine experts, replacing them with seven handpicked members, including known vaccine skeptics. The USPSTF includes medical experts serving staggered four-year terms on a volunteer basis. Its role in choosing what services will be covered by insurers was established under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. The 40-year-old group, whose recommendations provide guidance to doctors, looks at everything from routine breast cancer screening to drugs to prevent HIV infection. The U.S. Supreme Court in June upheld the constitution of the task force and ruled in favor of its recommendation to cover preventive care. Though made up of an independent group of volunteer experts, members are selected by the health secretary without Senate confirmation and it relies on support from the department's Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. A group of 104 health organizations, opens new tab, including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics, in early July sent a letter to Congressional health committees, urging them "to protect the integrity" of the task force. The task force has been criticized by some conservatives, opens new tab as too left-leaning.


Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
NFL star Joshua Hines-Allen reveals his seven-year-old son has been battling cancer
Jacksonville Jaguars star Joshua Hines-Allen has revealed his seven-year-old son Wesley is nearly cancer free after battling leukemia for the past seven months. Hines-Allen, who did not travel to Indianapolis for the Jaguars' 2024 season finale in January due to personal reasons at the time, made the emotional announcement on social media along with his wife Kaitlyn. Kaitlyn recalled the initial concern they had when Wesley began bleeding from his tooth after a weekend at Disneyland. 'I was just hugging him 'cause he was crying and he started bleeding even more in the gums, then he started to catch a fever,' she explained. Joshua continued: 'It just didn't get better, and the bleeding was consistent every day.' The couple, who also have another son and daughter together, were then forced to take Wesley to hospital when his symptoms showed no signs of slowing down. The dreaded six-letter word that no parent ever wants to hear: Cancer. Seven months ago, our world stopped when our son, Wesley, was diagnosed with leukemia. As parents, we've held each other through tears we didn't know we had, watching our little boy fight the biggest battle… — Joshua Hines-Allen (@JoshHinesAllen) July 25, 2025 'I was just leaving practice,' Hines-Allen remembered. 'Kate called me [saying], "Hey, we're going to the hospital. I need you to go home and pack a bag for Wes." Not thinking anything of it, really. 'He wasn't feeling good at all still, so he's like cuddling up and we're waiting in the lobby to go back there. We finally get in the back, and then later that night [they] came back, pulled us out and they told us that he had leukemia. 'It just kind of like hit me, and nothing else mattered after that.' Doctors informed Joshua and Kaitlyn that Wesley's journey was going to be a long one, explaining how he will need to undergo regular testing for the next 21 years of his life aside from chemotherapy. Fortunately, Wesley has responded well to the treatment and is now nearing a full recovery, Kaitlyn revealed. He is set to undergo his final chemotherapy treatment in late August at Nemours Children's Health in Jacksonville. 'Wesley is doing great,' she said. 'He's swimming every day, he's running around, he's playing sports.' 'He's got back to being the big brother he is,' Joshua added. Along with the video and the encouraging update on Wesley's progress, Hines-Allen also announced that his foundation, Four One For All, is conducting a season-long campaign called Four One For Hope that aims to give back to four cancer-focused nonprofits throughout the 2025 campaign. 'We recently received the good news that Wesley is on his way to a full recovery,' he said in a separate statement, via ESPN. 'We are grateful to the dedicated team of doctors, nurses, and caretakers who contributed to our son's well-being and counseled us through this time. 'Our goal is to ensure that families going through something similar feel the same level of love and support as we did.' Hines-Allen is now gearing up for his seventh season with the Jaguars after being selected by the team with the seventh overall pick in the 2019 NFL Draft.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US court upholds California's implicit bias training mandate for doctors
July 25 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Friday rejected claims that California violated the free speech rights of doctors who teach continuing medical education courses by mandating that they include information on implicit bias. A unanimous three-judge panel, opens new tab of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that because the content of the courses, known as CMEs, is dictated by the state, it amounts to government speech shielded from constitutional scrutiny regardless of who delivers the message. The Medical Board of California requires physicians and surgeons to complete CMEs to maintain their licenses, and approves and accredits courses offered by doctors including Azadeh Khatibi, an ophthalmologist and the plaintiff in Friday's case. A 2021 state law requires that CMEs include information about implicit, or unconscious, bias and the potential for doctors to treat patients differently based on their race, sex or other factors. Khatibi and the nonprofit Do No Harm, which advocates against what it calls "radical, divisive and discriminatory ideologies" in the medical profession, say the law unlawfully forces instructors to endorse speech with which they may not agree in violation of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. But the 9th Circuit said that speech belongs to the government, as it has more than a century of closely regulating the medical profession and adopting detailed requirements for CMEs. "If physicians are cognizant that their profession is heavily regulated [and] that they attend CMEs primarily to secure credits to maintain their licenses ... then 'common sense' commands that licensees could attribute approved CMEs' content to California," Circuit Judge Jacqueline Nguyen wrote. The panel included Circuit Judges A. Wallace Tashima and Salvador Mendoza. All three judges are appointees of Democratic presidents. Caleb Trotter of Pacific Legal Foundation, who represents Khatibi and Do No Harm, said the libertarian group was disappointed with the ruling and is considering its options. "If continuing medical education courses in California are 'government speech' as the panel decided today, then there is little to stop governments around the country from compelling continuing education instructors in any trade or profession to profess all manner of controversial state-endorsed topics," Trotter said in an emailed statement. Many states in recent years have conditioned professional licenses for doctors, lawyers, teachers and others on completing diversity or anti-racism training, prompting backlash from some professionals and conservative groups. A Michigan dentist represented by Pacific Legal filed a lawsuit, opens new tab in April over a state licensing requirement that healthcare providers complete implicit bias training. Last year, the St. Louis-based 8th Circuit rejected claims, opens new tab that a Missouri school district violated employees' free-speech rights by requiring them to attend anti-racism training. Friday's decision affirms a 2024 ruling by U.S. District Judge Monica Ramirez Almadani in Santa Ana, California, that dismissed the lawsuit by Khatibi and Do No Harm. The case is Khatibi v. Hawkins, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-3108. For Khatibi and Do No Harm: Joshua Thompson and Caleb Trotter of Pacific Legal Foundation For the state: Kristin Liska of the California Attorney General's office Read more: US court leery of free-speech challenge to school's anti-racism training U.S. law students to receive anti-bias training after ABA passes new rule