Ban on Palestine Action clears Parliament but faces legal challenge
The House of Lords backed proscribing the group under the Terrorism Act 2000 without a vote.
A short time before, a so-called regret motion proposed by a Green Party peer criticising the measure was rejected by 144 votes to 16, majority 128.
The ministerial order, which has already been approved by MPs, will make it a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it.
However, it is unclear when the ban, which needs final sign-off by the Home Secretary, will come into force as the group is mounting a court challenge to try to temporarily block the move with a hearing scheduled on Friday, pending further proceedings.
The Government crackdown comes after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 causing £7 million worth of damage, in an action claimed by Palestine Action.
Four people have been charged by counter-terrorism police in connection with the incident and were remanded in custody following a court appearance.
Home Office minister Lord Hanson of Flint said: 'I will always defend the right of British people to engage in legitimate and peaceful protest and to stand up for the causes in which they believe.
'But essential as these rights are, they do not provide a blank cheque for this particular group to seriously damage property or subject members of the public to fear and violence.'
He added: 'We would not tolerate this activity from organisations if they were motivated by Islamist or extreme right-wing ideology, and therefore I cannot tolerate it from Palestine Action.
'By implementing this measure, we will remove Palestine Action's veil of legitimacy, tackle its financial support, degrade its efforts to recruit and radicalise people into committing terrorist activity in its name.'
But ministers have faced criticism over the decision to outlaw Palestine Action, with opponents branding the move as 'draconian overreach' and comparing the group to the Suffragettes.
The United Nations has also warned against the ban, with experts concerned at the 'unjustified labelling of a political protest movement as 'terrorist''.
In the Lords, Green Party peer Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb opposed the proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation.
Her regret motion argued the ban undermined civil liberties, constituted a misuse of anti-terror legislation, suppressed dissent against the UK's policy on Israel, and criminalised support for a protest group, causing 'a chilling effect on freedom of expression'.
The legislation approved by the Lords also bans two white supremacist groups, Maniacs Murder Cult and Russian Imperial Movement, including its paramilitary arm Russian Imperial Legion.
The Home Office describes the Maniacs Murder Cult as a neo-Nazi transnational and online organisation which has claimed a number of violent attacks around the world.
The Russian Imperial Movement is an ethno-nationalist group which aims to create a new Russian imperial state.
Its paramilitary unit fought alongside Russian forces in the invasion of Ukraine to advance its ideological cause.
It also runs a paramilitary training programme to support attendees to carry out terror attacks, the Home Office added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Palestine Action terror ban comes into force after late-night legal action fails
A ban against Palestine Action has come into force, designating it as a terror group after a late-night legal bid to delay it failed. It makes membership of, or support for, the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The move to ban the organisation was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused around £7 million worth of damage. In response to the ban, a group of around 20 people are set to gather and sit in front of the Gandhi statue in London's Parliament Square on Saturday afternoon, according to campaign group Defend Our Juries. They will hold signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' The newly proscribed group lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday to temporarily stop it being banned, less than two hours before the move came into force at midnight. Earlier that day Huda Ammori, the group's co-founder, unsuccessfully asked the High Court to temporarily block the Government from designating the group as a terrorist organisation, before a potential legal challenge against the decision to proscribe it under the Terrorism Act 2000. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday. Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident. They appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977. Lawyers for Ms Ammori took her case to the Court of Appeal on Friday evening, and in a decision given at around 10.30pm, refused to grant the temporary block. Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, made a bid to have the case certified as a 'point of general public importance' to allow a Supreme Court bid, but the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr said they would not get to the Supreme Court before midnight. The judge added that any application should be made before 4pm on Monday and refused a bid to pause the ban coming into effect pending any Supreme Court bid. In an 11-page written judgment, Baroness Carr, Lord Justice Lewis and Lord Justice Edis said: 'The role of the court is simply to interpret and apply the law. 'The merits of the underlying decision to proscribe a particular group is not a matter for the court…Similarly, it is not a matter for this court to express any views on whether or not the allegations or claims made by Palestine Action are right or wrong.' They also said: 'People may only be prosecuted and punished for acts they engaged in after the proscription came into force.' In his decision refusing the temporary block, High Court judge Mr Justice Chamberlain said: 'I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force.' Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, for Ms Ammori, told the Court of Appeal that the judge wrongly decided the balance between the interests of her client and the Home Office when deciding whether to make the temporary block. She said: 'The balance of convenience on the evidence before him, in our respectful submission, fell in favour of the claimant having regard to all of the evidence, including the chilling effect on free speech, the fact that people would be criminalised and criminalised as terrorists for engaging in protest that was not violent, for the simple fact that they were associated with Palestine Action.' She also told the Court of Appeal that Mr Justice Chamberlain 'failed properly to consider' that banning the group 'would cause irreparable harm'. Ms Ni Ghralaigh said: 'There was significant evidence before him to demonstrate the chilling effect of the order because it was insufficiently clear.' She continued that the ban would mean 'a vast number of individuals who wished to continue protesting would fall foul of the proscription regime due to its lack of clarity'. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the Court of Appeal that Mr Justice Chamberlain gave a 'detailed and careful judgment' and that the judge was 'alive' to the possible impacts of the ban, including the potential 'chilling effect' on free speech.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Reeves Tells Cabinet Next Tax Rise to Be Challenging, Times Says
Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves told cabinet ministers that tax increases in the Labour government's fall budget are likely to be even more challenging than a £40 billion ($55 billion) package she put in place last year, the Times reported. Reeves said the new increases are likely to be smaller but that she has limited options as taxes need to rise to cover the cost of abandoning welfare reforms, according to the report. Her comments went further than her public statements that have been less explicit about the prospect of higher taxes, the Times said.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Live Updates: President Signs Sweeping Policy Bill at White House Event
Demonstrators gathered in Los Angeles to protest the Trump administration, one of hundreds of protests around the country on Friday. As many Americans gathered for cookouts and patriotic parades to celebrate Independence Day on Friday, others assembled at hundreds of planned demonstrations against the Trump administration. Many of the protests were organized under the banner of 'Free America,' a nod to 1776's spirit of independence from tyranny and authoritarian rule, which protesters described as their aim. And while the atmosphere of the demonstrations was largely festive, with music, dancing and food vendors, protesters were resolute in their cause. They pointed to a wide range of issues that inspired them to come out, including immigration raids, education cuts, concerns about democracy and, more specifically, the passage of President Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill, which cuts taxes for the wealthy and slashes safety-net programs for the poor. He signed the measure on Friday afternoon. 'It's our nation's birthday, but I don't think we are the nation that was founded almost 250 years ago,' said Lynn Kardasz, a U.S. Navy veteran who attended a protest in Chicago. 'With the passage of Trump's big bill yesterday, our democracy has ceased to exist.' Mary Koch, 81, who was at a Houston demonstration, said she was appalled by the administration's approach to deportations. 'People are being picked up in the streets, and there is no due process,' she said. 'Millions of people are being bullied.' She carried a sign that said 'Due process,' with a heart. Immigration issues have felt personal for many residents in Los Angeles, where protests over raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents led to days of clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement last month. The raids also prompted cancellations of some July 4 events in the city, out of fear that immigrants could get arrested there. 'We all know someone who's been impacted,' said Cristina Frias, a college professor who rallied in front of a federal detention center in the city's downtown on Friday. 'We've lived it firsthand.' Ms. Frias and her friends carried fruit and flowers to represent street vendors who fear they can no longer be out on the streets. The website of Women's March, the group that organized many of Friday's protests, listed more than 300 events across the country, including in major cities like Miami and New York and in smaller communities like Quitman, Texas, and Rolla, Mo. 'Protesting gives people a first step to fostering community, especially for folks in rural areas,' the managing director of Women's March, Tamika Middleton, said in a statement. 'Right now, it is the most patriotic thing we can do.' In St. Louis, Melinda Lohrum, 43, organized her own protest for the first time after participating in others this spring and summer. She was initially motivated, she said, by scenes of ICE agents carrying out raids in masks and by 'the cruelty of everything.' Ms. Lohrum, who is a nurse, said she contemplated making some general protest signs earlier this week, but pivoted after what Mr. Trump has called the 'big beautiful' bill passed the House of Representatives on Thursday. One of her signs read, 'Blood on their hands: GOP prioritizes power over lives!' Some protesters were particularly concerned about cuts to Medicaid in the policy bill. Shell Kimble, an Episcopal priest in Washington at what she said was a 'politically divided' church, said she doesn't know one could call the measure a 'big beautiful bill' 'when you're talking about taking money away from people who so desperately need it. A lot of the people I minister to are on Medicaid, and those cuts are devastating.' Jason Hellenberg, 50, who organized the protest in Washington, said his 73-year-old mother loves Mr. Trump and is dependent on Medicaid. Although she currently doesn't have health issues, the bill's passage makes him worried about the future of her Medicaid benefits, he said. But because they don't talk politics, he doesn't know how his mother feels about the cuts. 'She's a MAGA supporter, I'm not. We kind of have a divided house,' Mr. Hellenberg said, adding, 'When I left today, she said, 'Have a good time.' But I'm not sure she really meant it.' The protests on Friday are the latest sign of grass-roots resistance to Mr. Trump's agenda. On June 14, large crowds gathered in all 50 states for 'No Kings' rallies, branded as a 'day of defiance' against what organizers characterized as authoritarian actions by the Trump administration. They took place on the same day that Mr. Trump presided over a military parade in Washington for the Army's 250th anniversary, and also celebrated his 79th birthday. Friday's demonstrations, too, took place on a significant date: Independence Day. This July 4 is the nation's 249th birthday and kicks off a countdown to next year's 250-year milestone, which Mr. Trump touted in Iowa on Thursday. Planned celebrations for 2026 include the Great American State Fair, athletic competitions and a display in Washington of 'the largest U.S. flag in history.' The domestic policy bill passed this week includes $200 million for 'America250' commemoration events. For protesters, expressing their discontent toward the current administration was a form of patriotism. In Tallahassee, Fla., a small group rallied in an outdoor pavilion at a local shopping center on Friday. Copies of the Declaration of Independence and the preamble of the U.S. Constitution were available, along with sunscreen, granola bars and water. About half of the protesters, who were mostly older adults, sat in chairs, while others stood around listening to the speakers and singing songs. 'Stand up. Fight back. Stop the madman now,' the group sang. Many of them were wearing red, white and blue. Reporting was contributed by Robert Chiarito in Chicago, Valerie Crowder in Tallahassee, Fla., and Maria Jimenez Moya in Houston.
