Generational investment fund bill fails in Wyoming House of Representatives
Senate File 197, 'Wyoming generational investment account-2,' was not debated on the House floor by a Friday deadline for bills on general file, but an amendment to another bill to create the fund was debated on second reading Monday afternoon.
SF 197 would have created a perpetual trust fund with a $100 million transfer from the Legislative Stabilization Reserve Account (the state's 'rainy-day fund' — if available and based on a sliding scale dependent on funding in the LSRA — to the proposed Wyoming Generational Investment Account.
Bill sponsor Sen. Ogden Driskill, R-Devils Tower, said the program would have been rolled out in two phases: First, it would have created the structure needed to create the fund, and then it would have rolled out a constitutional amendment so that investment earnings would be distributed 30 years after the initial contribution.
'You have to create the fund, and then go to the people and make it an inviolate trust,' Driskill said.
Driskill said that while he was 'very disappointed' the bill did not hit the House floor by Friday night, he believed the idea would come back in a future session.
'It will come back, and I really believe it will come to fruition,' Driskill said.
Calculations based on historical earnings indicate the fund would be worth around $30 billion in 30 years, according to Wyoming State Treasurer Curt Meier's office. But Rep. John Bear, R-Gillette, recommended the idea become an interim topic for study by the Joint Appropriations Committee.
Meier said he believes there is support in the House for a constitutional amendment to create an inviolate trust, but an understanding of the bill and the program it would create 'was not there.' After the session, he said, he plans to conduct outreach to lawmakers and Wyoming residents about a generational investment account.
'We are going to go into areas where we didn't have a lot of support,' Meier said. 'We want to tell people the benefits of this idea.'
Waiting a year or two to create the program doesn't mean that any long-term investment like that proposed in SF 197 cannot be realized, he continued.
'It could still pay off, but it would just be a year or two later,' Meier said. 'But if you have that steady stream of income, it opens up a whole bunch of opportunities that we don't have today.'
Driskill said that SF 197 did include an effective date of three years out, so that leaders could agree on the framework of the program, but nonetheless, the measure did not make it past the House.
'We did that to have a chance to say, did we create the right framework? The right vehicle? And if we didn't, let's fix it,' he said. 'In the meantime, that would give us time to get ready to run a constitutional amendment.'
Even without the creation of a new inviolate trust for the state of Wyoming this session, Driskill said he believes such a trust is crucial because when funding is short, those investment accounts are limited in use.
In discussions this session about a Wyoming generational investment account, lawmakers have brought up the state's Permanent Mineral Trust Fund multiple times. According to the Wyoming Taxpayers Association, the PMTF was created in 1975 by a constitutional amendment that passed on the November 1974 ballot.
The history of the fund dates back to 1968, when the balance in Wyoming's bank account had dwindled to only $80. Then-Gov. Stan Hathaway drafted a bill to institute a severance tax on minerals in the state. Legislators were reluctant to bring forward his proposal, however. The bill passed by a narrow margin, creating the first severance tax on minerals in Wyoming.
Today, 30% of the state's general fund comes from interest on the PMTF, which has equated to a lower tax burden on residents.
'If we could have (spent) the Mineral Trust Fund, it probably would have been drawn down several times. I really feel strongly (a generational investment account) needs to be an inviolate trust,' Driskill said.
House debates the idea anyway
Monday afternoon, the House did have a chance to discuss the idea of a generational investment fund, although in a roundabout way. Rep. Steve Harshman, R-Casper, brought a second-reading amendment to Senate File 70, 'Investment modernization-state nonpermanent funds,' to create what he said was something similar to the fund under SF 197, but what he called an 'income tax prevention account.'
Harshman also sponsored House Bill 107, 'Wyoming generational investment account,' a mirror bill to SF 197. That bill was not heard in committee of the whole in the House by a Feb. 10 deadline.
'Really, this is a simple way for us to get our existing money working harder,' Harshman said about his amendment Monday.
Rep. Bob Nicholas, R-Cheyenne, said that in his eight years chairing the Appropriations Committee, he often faced discussion about impending budget shortfalls due to falling revenue from the coal, oil and gas industries. With that experience in mind, he said he would support Harshman's amendment.
'Our fundamental responsibility is to prepare for the future, for our kids and for their kids,' Nicholas said.
But Bear said on the floor that the idea was vetted in the House Appropriations Committee, and that a second-reading amendment on a different bill was not the right way to resurrect the idea. SF 70, he said, restricts spending from the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resource Trust Fund, and the Wyoming Cultural Trust Fund.
'Now, what we are talking about is actually bringing a bill in for a whole different purpose, that died earlier in this particular session,' Bear said.
Rep. Ann Lucas, R-Cheyenne, said she would oppose the amendment, because in addition to saving, the state must cut its spending.
'I've coached people on how to save money, and how to spend wisely,' Lucas said. 'I didn't hear anybody here say, 'Maybe we should cut spending some places.' I feel that no savings plan works without a controlled, reasonable spending plan.'
Harshman's amendment failed on a 35-22 vote Monday afternoon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump wants to 'unleash' America's housing market — and is throwing his support behind MTG's big plan for US real estate
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. Typically, when you sell an asset for more than you paid, the profit is considered a capital gain — and subject to tax. With U.S. home prices having soared over the years, many homeowners looking to sell now find themselves in position to pay capital gains tax. But President Donald Trump is floating a plan to eliminate this tax specifically on home sales. At a White House Q&A on July 22, a reporter asked Trump for his view on scrapping the tax to help 'unleash' the housing market. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Shop Top Mortgage Rates Personalized rates in minutes A quicker path to financial freedom Your Path to Homeownership 'We're thinking about that,' Trump replied. 'But [we] would also unleash it just by lowering the interest rates. If the Fed would lower the rates, we wouldn't even have to do that. But we are thinking about no tax on capital gains on houses.' Currently, if you've owned your primary home for at least two years and sell it with a capital gain, the IRS allows you to exclude up to $250,000 ($500,000 for joint filers) of the taxable gain. But that exclusion was set back in 1997 — when home prices were substantially lower. Trump's comment followed U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's recent introduction of the 'No Tax on Home Sales Act,' a bill that would eliminate federal capital gains taxes on the sale of primary residences altogether. 'Thank you, President Trump, for supporting my No Tax on Home Sales Act!' Greene posted on X after his remarks. 'You worked for it. You should keep it. Let's get this bill passed!' 'A problem for people who want to buy a home' Trump also took aim at the Federal Reserve during his chat with the press, blaming high interest rates for locking would-be buyers out of the housing market — and placing the blame squarely on Fed Chair Jerome Powell. '[Powell] is too late all the time,' Trump said. 'He should have lowered interest rates many times. Europe lowered their rate 10 times. We lowered ours none. And it's causing a problem for people who want to buy a home.' The Fed has been holding its benchmark interest rate steady at 4.25-4.50%, while Trump has said that rates should be three percentage points lower to help the economy. Powell addressed the impact of interest rates on the housing market last September. He acknowledged that the housing market was "in part frozen," with many homeowners hesitant to sell because they are locked in at lower mortgage rates. Meanwhile, Greene has argued her bill could help 'boost' the nation's housing supply by removing the capital gains tax obstacle that might discourage homeowners from selling. The lack of supply remains a pressing issue in the U.S. housing market. A recent Zillow study estimates a shortfall of 4.7 million homes nationwide. Still, experts aren't convinced the bill — at least in its current form — will go far. 'I think this could generate some interest, but they're more likely to raise the exemption than they are to eliminate the tax entirely,' Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, told CNBC. Even that could make a difference. Research by the National Association of Realtors estimates that about 1-in-3 homeowners have accumulated more equity than the federal capital gains tax exclusion would allow. Presently, sales profits that exceed the exemption limits may be taxed at 0%, 15% or 20%, depending on taxable income. Read more: BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has an important message for the next wave of American retirees — Getting on the real estate ladder — starting with $100 Soaring home prices and elevated mortgage rates have made buying a home increasingly difficult. According to a typical household now needs to earn $118,530 annually to afford a median-priced home of $402,500 in the U.S. — more than 50% above the national median income of roughly $77,700. But while owning a home may feel out of reach for many, it's now easier than ever to start investing in real estate thanks to crowdfunding platforms like Arrived. Backed by world-class investors like Jeff Bezos, Arrived allows you to invest in shares of rental homes with as little as $100, all without the hassle of mowing lawns, fixing leaky faucets or handling difficult tenants. The process is simple: browse a curated selection of homes that have been vetted for their appreciation and income potential. Once you find a property you like, select the number of shares you'd like to purchase, and then sit back as you start receiving any positive rental income distributions from your investment. For investors seeking monthly dividends, the platform also offers the Arrived Private Credit Fund, which allows you to invest in short-term loans that finance real estate projects, such as renovations, property rehabs or even new home construction. The fund generates cash returns by collecting interest payments on the loans and distributing monthly payouts to investors. All of the loans are secured by residential housing as collateral, so even if the borrowers default, the underlying property can be sold to keep the fund healthy. Historically, the Arrived Private Credit Fund has paid 8.1% annualized dividends to investors. For those interested in tapping into home equity instead, Homeshares offers accredited investors access to the $35-trillion U.S. home equity market — a space that's historically been the exclusive playground of institutional investors. With a minimum investment of $25,000, investors can gain direct exposure to hundreds of owner-occupied homes in top U.S. cities through their U.S. Home Equity Fund — without the headaches of buying, owning or managing property. With risk-adjusted target returns ranging from 14% to 17%, this approach provides an effective, hands-off way to invest in owner-occupied residential properties across regional markets. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Coffee shop's evening alcohol plans approved
A coffee shop's plan to offer early evening alcoholic drinks at its city centre site has been approved. The Nest Coffee House in London Road sought permission for a premises licence from Southampton City Council. The application went before a licensing sub-committee after three representations were made by residents, who live near the site. Designated premises supervisor and director Nathan Alexander said the proposal was to offer an alternative after the working day following a request from customers. Councillors were told the coffee shop was planning to offer 'very low-level alcohol availability'. 'We are not looking at doing cocktails or any pumps,' Mr Alexander said. 'It was purely to have several cold bottle offerings to offer something a little bit different to a cup off coffee at 6pm in the evening on a Friday night. 'We would possibly run alongside low-level events like cheese and wine evenings, low-level acoustic music with no amplification, just local bands.' He told the licensing committee on Wednesday, July 30, Nest was not looking to be a bar or add to the night-time economy in the area. The premises licence included the supply of alcohol from 12pm until 10.30pm Monday to Saturday and until 9pm on Sunday. The venue will also be able to host live music from 6pm to 10pm on Monday to Friday, 5pm to 10pm on Saturday, and 5.30pm to 8.30pm on Sunday. However, Mr Alexander said the coffee shop's goal was to stay open until around 9pm or 9.30pm on Thursday, Friday and Saturday evenings. He said initially the premises might start with just Friday and Saturdays to 'see how it goes'. Summarising the proposal, Mr Alexander said: 'It was really just to compliment what we already do. 'We have got quite a nice vibe in the place and it is something customers have asked for. 'We have had a look at it and from a business point of view it works for us but we are primarily a coffee shop and a place of work for students and offices and meetings.' The meeting heard Mr Alexander had past experience running bars in Southampton and London. Sub-committee chair Cllr Gordon Cooper said the resident objections largely raised questions about wider tenure of the London Road area. Mr Alexander said he 'totally' understood the concerns, adding that he is an active part of a business collective which is trying to address some of these issues.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
CNN Data Chief Flags Exactly How GOP Is Playing 'Hardball' Ahead Of Midterms
CNN's chief data analyst Harry Enten on Thursday broke down how Texas Republicans' new congressional redistricting proposal could prove to be a 'huge difference' as they look to maintain control of the House of Representatives ahead of the midterms. 'They are playing hardball at this particular point. And right now it seems to me that Democrats are actually playing closer to Little League pee wee,' said Enten in a segment with CNN's John Berman. GOP lawmakers in the state shared their draft of a new congressional map Wednesday — a rare move to occur in the middle of a decade. The new map, per the Texas Tribune, targets Democratic districts in the chamber and could result in five seats being flipped in the GOP's favor in next year's elections. The proposed map in Texas — which could see changes before it makes its way to the desk of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) — falls in line with GOP efforts togain House seats in other states. Enten, when asked by Berman what Texas' five House seats would do for Republicans 'overall' in the chamber, stressed the importance of such a gain. He added that Democrats had four House seats to spare for the majority after the 2020 elections. Republicans then had four seats to spare for the majority following the 2022 midterms and, after the 2024 elections, Republicans had two seats to spare. 'Five seats can make all the difference in the world,' Enten said. Related... Trading Partners Scramble To Reach Deals With U.S. Ahead Of Trump's Looming Deadline For New Tariffs Trump Is Tearing Up Part Of The White House To Build A $200 Million Ballroom Trump Lobs All-Caps Insults At Jerome Powell For Refusing To Lower Interest Rates Once Again
