Excise policy case: HC seeks ED's response on Kejriwal's plea challenging summons
on Wednesday sought the
's response on a plea by former CM
challenging the summons issued to him in a money laundering case related to the alleged excise policy scam in the capital.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Justice Ravinder Dudeja asked ED to file the counter affidavit within six weeks.
During the hearing, ED raised a preliminary objection over the maintainability of the petition, but the high court asked the agency to raise everything, including the preliminary objection, in its reply and listed the matter for hearing on Sept 10.
Kejriwal challenged a special court order dated Sept 17, 2024, by which his revision petition against a March 7, 2024, order of a magisterial court summoning him was dismissed.
Besides, the ex-CM also challenged a sessions court order which upheld an Oct 24 order of a magistrate refusing to transfer his case to another court. Even in this case, the high court issued notice on the second petition and asked ED to file its response within six weeks. It listed the matter for the same date while ED said the special court order was challenged after a delay of almost 10 months.
Last year in June, Kejriwal was granted bail by a trial court in the money laundering case, but it was later stayed by the high court on the ED's plea.
However, a month later, Supreme Court granted interim bail to the AAP convener while referring to a larger bench three questions on the aspect of "need and necessity of arrest" under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
The ED's money laundering case stems from an FIR lodged by Central Bureau of Investigation after Delhi lieutenant governor VK Saxena recommended a probe into the alleged irregularities in the implementation of the 2021-22 Delhi excise policy. According to ED and CBI, irregularities were allegedly committed while modifying the excise policy, and undue favours were extended to the licence holders.
Delhi govt implemented the policy on Nov 17, 2021 and scrapped it by the end of Sept 2022 amid allegations of corruption.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
23 minutes ago
- Hans India
Bihar's SIR row: Supreme Court declines to stay publication of draft electoral rolls
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday declined to issue an interim stay on the publication of the draft electoral rolls by the Election Commission of India (ECI) following its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in poll-bound Bihar. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi observed that since the petitioners did not seek interim relief during the initial hearing, it could not be granted at this stage, and the matter would be interpreted once and for all. Due to paucity of time, the Justice Surya Kant-led Bench adjourned the hearing, stating that the schedule for the final hearing would be determined on July 29. In a short hearing, the apex court emphasised that the ECI should consider Aadhaar cards and Electoral Photo Identity Cards (EPIC) for voter verification. As senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing on ECI's behalf, raised reservations about the documents, adding that many fake ration cards have been issued, the court said: "As far as ration cards are concerned, we can say they can be forged easily, but Aadhaar and voter cards have some sanctity and have a presumption of genuineness. You proceed with these two documents (Aadhaar and EPIC). Wherever you find forgery, that's on case-to-case basis." Several petitions have been filed before the Supreme Court claiming that if the June 26 decision of the ECI directing SIR is not set aside, it can "arbitrarily" and "without due process" disenfranchise lakhs of voters, disrupt free and fair elections and democracy. The petitioners have questioned the timing and legality of the revision exercise, arguing that the poll body initiated an extensive revision process in a poll-bound state without sufficient safeguards or public clarity. In an earlier hearing, the apex court advised the ECI to consider accepting Aadhaar cards, ration cards, or previously issued voter ID cards as valid identification for electoral rolls verification. In its order passed on July 10, the Supreme Court outlined three core issues to be addressed in the hearing: The legal authority of the EC to conduct a special revision, the validity of its procedures, and the timing of the exercise, given its proximity to a crucial state election. As per the SIR schedule released by the poll body, every elector who has submitted the enumeration form — with or without supporting documents — will be included in the draft electoral roll set to be published on August 1. Electors who have not submitted their forms will still be entitled to seek inclusion in the final roll by filing a claim in the prescribed form along with the required declaration. "Therefore, any person excluded from the draft roll has another opportunity to be included by submitting the form with the necessary declaration and documents. This claims period will remain open for 31 days following the publication of the draft roll, i.e., until September 1, 2025," the Commission said in an affidavit filed before the Supreme Court. After the completion of the entire process, the final roll will be published on September 30, the reply document added. The ECI also submitted that even after the final roll is published, new electors may still be enrolled up to the last date for filing nominations for the upcoming Bihar Assembly elections.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Top 5 news of the day: Rajnath Singh dismisses 'US pressure' claims on Op Sindoor; Thailand-Cambodia agree for ceasefire; & more
Rajnath Singh; Thai-Cambodian leaders Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, opening the debate on Operation Sindoor in the Lok Sabha on Monday, firmly denied claims that India halted its military operations under external pressure, calling such suggestions 'absolutely baseless.' Operation Sindoor was launched by India on the intervening night of May 6–7 in retaliation for the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which was carried out by Pakistan-backed terrorists. The operation triggered intense border clashes between the Indian and Pakistani forces. On May 10, Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations reached out to his Indian counterpart to request a ceasefire—a proposal India accepted. Separately, Thailand and Cambodia—Asian neighbours much like India and Pakistan—ended their own five-day border conflict on Monday, bringing a close to a brief but intense flare-up in the region. Here are the top 5 news stories of the day: Rajnath Singh tells Lok Sabha how Indian strikes rattled Pakistan; dismisses 'pressure' charge Defence minister Rajnath Singh led the government's charge in the Parliament debate on Operation Sindoor. In his point-by-point rebuttal to Opposition charges following the operation, the defence minister reiterated that the mission was paused without any external pressure, dismissing any such claims as absolutely baseless. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo by Taboola by Taboola The operation was a retaliatory strike targeting terrorists and terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir (PoJK), after the April 22 massacre in Pahalgam's Baisaran meadow that left 22 civilians dead. Read here Thailand and Cambodia agree for truce Thailand and Cambodia have agreed to implement an immediate and unconditional ceasefire starting at midnight, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim announced following mediation talks in Malaysia. 'Both Cambodia and Thailand reached a common understanding as follows: One, an immediate and unconditional ceasefire with effect from 24 hours local time, midnight on 28th July 2025, tonight,' Anwar said, according to news agency AFP. Read here Bihar SIR: Supreme Court asks EC to reconsider Aadhaar and election ID The Supreme Court once again asked the Election Commission to consider the Aadhaar card and the electoral photo identity card as admissible documents to prove the identity of voters during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral polls, which is under way in Election Commission launched the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar on June 24. According to the ECI, there are 11 documents that a person needed for voter roll update. Read here Was Shashi Tharoor offered a chance to speak on Operation Sindoor in Parliament? What we know Senior Congress leader and MP Shashi Tharoor's silence is making more noise than words. The Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, who led a delegation under India's diplomatic outreach after Pahalgam terror attack , has declined party's offer to participate in the Parliament debate on Operation Sindoor, PTI reported quoting sources. Read here Woman, baby survive Ahmedabad plane crash inferno; her skin grafted to heal his wounds Eight-month-old Dhyaansh is all smiles today, his rosy cheeks glowing as he grins widely. After receiving skin grafts on his face, head and hands from his mother, Manisha, 30, the infant has recovered from what could have been fatal injuries. The son and wife of Dr Kapil Kachhadiya, a urology resident at Civil Hospital, were recently discharged from a city hospital after five weeks of treatment for severe burns they suffered in the aftermath of the AI 171 airplane crash on June 12. Read here
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Presidential reference hides binding rulings on Governors: Kerala tells SC
State of Kerala has urged the Supreme Court to reject Presidential reference on Governors' assent timelines, saying it suppresses key rulings and misuses Article 143 to reopen already settled issues Rimjhim Singh New Delhi The state of Kerala has filed an application in the Supreme Court, challenging the Presidential reference that seeks the court's opinion on the time limits for Governors and the President to assent to Bills passed by state legislatures, Bar and Bench reported. Advocate of the Kerala state has asked the Supreme Court to dismiss the reference without answering the questions raised, arguing that the matter has already been settled by previous rulings of the court. The state said, the reference hides key constitutional judgments, making it legally weak and misleading. Kerala's argument: Reference is not maintainable The Presidential reference seeks the Supreme Court's opinion on 14 key issues concerning the powers of Governors under Article 200 and the President under Article 201. Kerala has strongly opposed this, calling the entire basis of the reference 'flawed'. The state of Kerala objected especially to the suggestion that Article 200 does not specify any deadline for a Governor to act on a Bill. 'This is amazing,' the application states, '…and it is difficult to believe that the Council of Ministers, in advising the Hon'ble President, have not even cared to read the proviso to Article 200 which states that the Governor shall act 'as soon as possible after the presentation to him of the Bill for assent'.' Kerala said that the issues raised have already been clarified by the Supreme Court in three important cases: * State of Telangana vs Secretary to the Governor of Telangana * State of Punjab vs Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab * State of Tamil Nadu vs The Governor of Tamil Nadu (2025 INSC 481) According to the application, 11 out of the 14 questions raised in the reference were directly settled in the Tamil Nadu case, which was delivered just one month before the reference was made. Kerala argued that this judgment was not even mentioned in the reference — a serious omission, the news report said. 'Court cannot be misled or asked to overrule itself' Kerala state mentioned that the omission of these judgments is a way to mislead the top court into reviewing and possibly overruling its own decisions, something that cannot be done through a Presidential reference. 'The present reference suppresses the single important aspect,' Kerala said, '…that the first 11 queries are directly covered by a judgment of the Supreme Court… the existence of the judgment is suppressed in this reference.' The state also said that the Union government never challenged the Tamil Nadu ruling by filing a review or curative petition. Therefore, the verdict is final under Article 141 and cannot be questioned again through a different route. Reference misuses presidential power, Kerala alleges Calling the reference 'a serious misuse' of Article 143, Kerala stated that the top court cannot act as an appellate authority over its own settled judgments. It also said that the President cannot use Article 143 to indirectly reopen legal questions that have already been answered, the news report said. What the Supreme Court had held earlier In April 2025, a Supreme Court Bench ruled that the Governor's inaction under Article 200 was subject to judicial review. It said that while Article 200 does not mention a deadline, the Governor must act 'within a reasonable time' and not stall the democratic process. On the President's powers under Article 201, the court ruled that decisions must be made within three months. If there is any delay, the reasons must be given to the concerned state. Following this, President Droupadi Murmu sent a reference to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Constitution does not allow courts to set such deadlines or suggest 'deemed assent' in case of delays. Kerala, however, said that the Court's rulings are final and that the President's reference is both unnecessary and unconstitutional.
