US supreme court upholds Tennessee ban on certain transgender treatments for minors
US
supreme court on Wednesday upheld a Tennessee law prohibiting some medical treatments for transgender minors, rejecting arguments that it violated the Constitution and shielding similar laws in more than 20 other states.
The ruling, which came amid the
Trump
administration's fierce assaults on transgender rights, and follows a decision by the court five years ago to protect transgender people from workplace discrimination.
The vote was 6:3, with the court's three liberal members in dissent. Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, acknowledged the 'fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field'.
'The voices in these debates raise sincere concerns; the implications for all are profound,' he said.
READ MORE
He said these questions should be resolved by 'the people, their elected representatives and the democratic process'.
The Tennessee law was enacted in 2023, amid a sweeping national pushback to expanding rights for transgender people. Since then, controversies about military service, athletes, bathrooms and pronouns have played a role in president Donald Trump's second-term agenda.
The law prohibits medical providers from prescribing puberty-delaying medication, offering hormone therapy or performing surgery as treatment for the psychological distress caused by incongruence between experienced gender and a person's biological sex.
The doctor and three families who sued to challenge the Tennessee law said it discriminated based on sex and transgender status in violation of the Constitution's equal protection clause. They noted the law specified that those prohibited treatments were allowed when undertaken for reasons other than gender transition care.
In a measure of the shifting politics around transgender issues, the Biden administration intervened on their side. After Mr Trump took office, his administration issued an executive order directing agencies to take steps to curtail surgeries, hormone therapy and other gender transition care for youths under 19. And in February, his administration formally reversed the government's position in the case and urged the justices to uphold the law.
The briefs in the case before the supreme court surveyed the medical evidence, with the challengers stressing that major American medical associations support the prohibited treatments as crucial for alleviating the psychological distress of many transgender youths.
Tennessee's brief countered that scientific uncertainty meant legislatures rather than courts should decide what treatments are available to minors. —
The New York Times
.
2025 The New York Times Company
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
44 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Brazil's ex-president under house arrest ahead of trial
Brazil's Supreme Court has put former President Jair Bolsonaro under house arrest ahead of his trial for an alleged coup plot, underscoring the court's resolve despite escalating tariffs and sanctions from US President Donald Trump. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, the target of US Treasury sanctions last week, issued the arrest order against Mr Bolsonaro. His decision cited a failure to comply with restraining orders that he had imposed on Mr Bolsonaro for allegedly courting Mr Trump's interference in the case. Mr Bolsonaro is on trial before the Supreme Court on charges he conspired with allies to violently overturn his 2022 electoral loss to leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Mr Trump has referred to the case as a "witch hunt" and called it grounds for a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods due to take effect on Wednesday. The US State Department condemned the house arrest order, saying Mr Moraes was using Brazilian institutions to silence opposition and threaten democracy. It added the US would "hold accountable all those aiding and abetting sanctioned conduct". It did not provide details, but the president has said the US could still impose even higher tariffs on Brazilian imports. The order from Mr Moraes also banned Mr Bolsonaro from using a cell phone or receiving visits, except for his lawyers and people authorised by the court. A press representative for Mr Bolsonaro confirmed he was placed under house arrest yesterday evening at his Brasilia residence by police who seized his cell phone. Mr Bolsonaro's lawyers said in a statement they would appeal the decision, arguing the former president had not violated any court order. In an interview with Reuters last month, Mr Bolsonaro called Mr Moraes a "dictator" and said the restraining orders against him were acts of "cowardice". Some Bolsonaro allies have worried that Mr Trump's tactics may be backfiring in Brazil, compounding trouble for Mr Bolsonaro and rallying public support behind Mr Lula's government. However, Sunday demonstrations by Mr Bolsonaro's supporters – the largest in months - show that Mr Trump's tirades and sanctions against Mr Moraes have also fired up the far right former army captain's political base. Mr Bolsonaro appeared virtually at a protest in Rio de Janeiro via phone call to his son, Senator Flavio Bolsonaro, in what some saw as the latest test of his restraining orders. Judge Moraes said the former president had repeatedly made attempts to bypass the court's orders. "Justice is blind, but not foolish," the justice wrote in his decision. Senator Bolsonaro told CNN Brasil yesterday that the order from Mr Moraes was "a clear display of vengeance" for the US sanctions against the judge, adding: "I hope the Supreme Court can put the brakes on this person (Moraes) causing so much upheaval". The judge's orders, including the restraining orders under penalty of arrest, have been upheld by the wider court. Those orders and the larger case before the Supreme Court came after two years of investigations into Mr Bolsonaro's role in an election-denying movement that culminated in riots by his supporters that rocked Brasilia in January 2023. That unrest drew comparisons to the 6 January 2021 riots at the US Capitol after Mr Trump's 2020 electoral defeat. In contrast with the tangle of criminal cases which mostly stalled against Mr Trump, Brazilian courts moved swiftly against Mr Bolsonaro, threatening to end his political career and fracture his right-wing movement. An electoral court has already banned Mr Bolsonaro from running for public office until 2030. Another of Mr Bolsonaro's sons, Eduardo Bolsonaro, a Brazilian congressman, moved to the US around the same time the former president's criminal trial kicked off to drum up support for his father in Washington. The younger Bolsonaro said the move had influenced Mr Trump's decision to impose new tariffs on Brazil.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Trump and Putin: the dangerous nuclear backdrop
When Donald Trump ordered two US nuclear submarines to move closer to Russia over the weekend in response to online nuclear threats from Russia's former president, Dmitri Medvedev, a global, collective frisson of fear was understandable. The US President's move came as part of a verbal exchange with Moscow over a new 10-day deadline to Vladimir Putin to commit to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face 'secondary sanctions' against countries that buy Russian oil. And yet, the strategic significance of the deployment is unclear – Trump did not clarify whether the submarines were nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed, and, even if the latter, how their redeployment would enhance the ability they already have, wherever they are, to deliver their deadly payloads against Russia. This symbolic act is thus largely a rhetorical reminder to the Russian President of the US president's newfound, belated determination to pursue some form of peace in Ukraine and his expectation that Putin will fall into line. So far the Russian president has shown no intention whatsoever to do so. READ MORE The respective nuclear postures, however, remain an important and dangerous backdrop to the confrontation between the superpowers. Both Russian and US thresholds for the use of nuclear weapons, particularly their first-use, have long been deliberately ambiguous – a very Trump-like ambiguity. Unlike a no-first-use policy, which commits a country only to retaliate in response to a nuclear attack, ambiguity, it is argued, forces adversaries to consider the possibility that any aggression could provoke a devastating nuclear response, even in a non-nuclear conflict. A first-use option, it is said, deters conventional aggressors who may believe that their superior non-nuclear forces could succeed. Both the US's and Russia's nuclear doctrines, the latter revised as recently as last year, do not limit their options to responses to nuclear attack by others .The US doctrine allows considerable latitude. It says: 'The US would only consider the use of nuclear weapons in extreme circumstances to defend the vital interests of the US or its Allies and partners.' The Russians reserve the right to employ nuclear arms 'in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation involving the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is under threat.' Russia is also reported to have in place a automatic system to launch nuclear missiles if the country's leaders have been killed by a strike from another state. And both leave the ultimate decision to press the nuclear button not to parliaments, but to their two presidents , Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Trump ally Jeanine Pirro confirmed as top federal prosecutor for Washington DC
The US Senate has confirmed Jeanine Pirro – a former Fox News host and staunch Donald Trump ally who boosted lies that he lost the 2020 presidential race because of electoral fraudsters – as the top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital. Ms Pirro – a former New York state district attorney and county judge who joined Fox News in 2011 – was confirmed on Saturday in a 50-45 vote along party lines. In a statement issued by Ms Pirro after the vote, the Republican said she was 'blessed' to have been confirmed as the US attorney for Washington DC. 'Get ready for a real crime fighter,' said Ms Pirro's statement, which called the US attorney's office she had been confirmed to lead the largest in the country. Before her media career, Ms Pirro spent more than a decade as a Republican district attorney in Westchester county, New York, and also served as a county judge. She hosted her own Fox show Justice with Judge Jeanine. More recently, she became a co-host on the Fox show The Five. Ms Pirro used her time at Fox News in part to publicly support the baseless claims that Mr Trump lost his first presidency to Joe Biden in 2020 because of voter fraud. In 2021 she was among several Fox News hosts named in the defamation lawsuit against Fox News by Dominion Voting Systems, which accused the network of knowingly airing false claims about the company's voting machines after the previous year's election. Fox ultimately settled the lawsuit for $787.5 million and has acknowledged that the fraud claims were false. Ms Pirro has been serving as the interim US attorney since May, when Mr Trump nominated her to the post months into his second presidency. She was nominated after Mr Trump withdrew the nomination of conservative activist Ed Martin, his first choice for the role. A key Republican senator, North Carolina's Thom Tillis, had said he would not support Mr Martin's nomination. In announcing Ms Pirro's nomination in May, Mr Trump praised her record, and said she was a 'powerful crusader for victims of crime' and someone who 'excelled in all ways'. 'Jeanine is incredibly well qualified for this position,' the president said. The US attorney general, Pam Bondi, on Saturday published a statement exalting Ms Pirro as 'a warrior for law and order'. At the end of his first presidency, Mr Trump pardoned Ms Pirro's former husband, Albert Pirro Jr, after he had been convicted in 2000 on federal charges of fraud and tax evasion. Ms Pirro is one of a number of Trump loyalists with ties to Fox who have joined the president's administration. Other prominent names include her fellow ex-Fox News host Pete Hegseth, the embattled defence secretary, and the former Fox Business personality Sean Duffy, the embattled transportation secretary. In June US senator Adam Schiff said Ms Pirro's 'blind obedience to Donald Trump is nearly unrivalled among his ardent supporters'. 'For an important prosecutorial position like this one, the country has a right to demand a serious and principled public servant,' Mr Schiff said. 'Jeanine Pirro is not it.' Despite Ms Pirro's confirmation, the US Senate left Washington DC on Saturday night for its month-long August recess without a deal to advance dozens of Trump nominees despite days of contentious, bipartisan negotiations. An irate Mr Trump went on social media and told Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer to 'GO TO HELL!'
