LPL 2025 to be held in Colombo, Pallekele and Dambulla from November 27
This will be the fourth time in six years that the LPL is being staged in the November-December window instead of its usual July-August slot. While the last two seasons were held during the mid-year period, Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) opted for a later schedule this year, considering the 2026 T20 World Cup is set to begin in February, making the revised window more strategic.
"The idea to conduct the LPL during this time frame is aimed at aligning the tournament with the ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026," said Samantha Dodanwela, Tournament Director, LPL.
The LPL, Sri Lanka's flagship domestic T20 tournament with an international appeal, serves as a dynamic platform for the country's top first-class cricketers to compete alongside and against international stars. Since the inaugural edition in 2020, the Lanka Premier League has been held annually and has become a vital fixture in Sri Lanka's cricketing calendar.
Earlier this year, Sri Lanka Cricket terminated the contracts of Jaffna Kings - previously the longest-standing franchise since joining in the tournament's second edition - and Colombo Strikers, citing 'failure to uphold contractual obligations.'
As a result, none of the current LPL franchises have ownership histories dating back beyond 2024. New owners for the Jaffna and Colombo teams are yet to be announced.
Dodanwela also shared the board's intent to develop more batting-friendly pitches to help players adapt to conditions expected during the 2026 T20 World Cup, which will be co-hosted by Sri Lanka along with India.
"We were quite happy with the wickets during the last edition, particularly in Dambulla and Kandy. We saw lots of high scores and even some centuries during that portion of the tournament. It was only in Colombo where batting was a little harder," Dodanwela noted.
Supporting his comments, relaying work is currently underway on the pitches at the R. Premadasa Stadium. Several national players, including Charith Asalanka and Dhananjaya de Silva, have also recently highlighted the need for surfaces that offer more support to batters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
IND vs ENG: Limiting Jasprit Bumrah's playing time part of plan to protect him from further injury and help him extend career
Though the decision to not play Jasprit Bumrah in the fifth and final Test at The Oval with the series on the line raised eyebrows, The Indian Express understands that given the pacer's injury history, the team management is unanimous that he should be protected from further setbacks and giving adequate rest in between assignments would be the way forward. Sources in the Indian cricket board have affirmed that it is not a case of Bumrah 'picking and choosing' matches he wants to play, but rather a common decision arrived at to allow the star pacer to extend his playing career as long as possible. As mentioned by chairman of selectors Ajit Agarkar while announcing the squad for the England Test sojourn, Bumrah was available to play only three Tests on the tour. Even head coach Gautam Gambhir reiterated in the middle of the series that Bumrah won't be fielded in more than three games irrespective of how the series was placed. And after playing the fourth Test in Manchester – his third of the series – Bumrah was rested for the decider at The Oval and the BCCI even released him from the squad. With India not having any playing assignment till the Asia Cup next month, Bumrah has an extended break to recover after the long tour. Even with regards to his participation in the continental tournament, a call will be taken purely based on the inputs provided by BCCI's medical team, which continues to keep a close tab on the premier pacer's workload. The Indian Express understands that the priority of the team management is to have Bumrah available for important tournaments, in particular ICC events. While the 31-year-old did undergo a back surgery earlier this year, it is reliably understood that given this long standing issue, the medical team has advised Bumrah to tread cautiously as there is a strong chance of the injury resurfacing. Given the risk involved, the decision-makers are averse to the idea of pushing him to play more and would rather have him fit and firing in the matches he does play. India are scheduled to play only four more Tests till the end of this season, which also includes a T20 World Cup on home soil. With the tournament being the top priority for the defending champions, the team management prefers to protect Bumrah and keep him fresh for the marquee event as against making him play every fixture. Moreover, that the rest of the pace attack stepped up creditably in the two Tests that Bumrah didn't play in the England series has only encouraged the team management's plan to judiciously use the pacer whose last two overs in the T20 World Cup final helped India end a long drought in terms of ICC silverware. Despite his injury concerns, Bumrah has also reiterated to the BCCI and the team management that he wants to play all three formats. 'There is a threshold for everyone and with Bumrah, it is a unique situation. It's not just the case of the bowling coach or the support staff seeing a red flag and resting him for a match. The medical staff is also involved and when a player like Bumrah – who can win games on his own – is available, everything is being done to protect him,' sources in the know told this paper. After bowling his heart out during the last tour of Australia, Bumrah suffered a back injury before returning mid-way through the IPL. 'This is not a case of workload management. There is injury management also in place. He had already undergone a lengthy rehab process in the lead up to the 2023 World Cup. Ideally, everyone is working to not see a repeat because spending a long time in rehab in case of another injury won't be easy on him,' sources said. Though he has suffered a career-threatening back injury, playing Test cricket is still part of Bumrah's plans, as he revealed in an interaction with Sky Sports before the England series. 'Whenever you play for India, you never think 'I'm not going to do this, I'm not going to do that. I'm going to protect myself.' But going further, you have to be smart. Sometimes when the workload goes really high, there's less time between Test matches, (and) it takes a lot out of a fast bowler. So coming to this series, yes, I've prepared really well. But I have to be smart as well because I'm not becoming younger by the day. So I have to keep an eye on my body, take care of my body because at the end of the day, I would love to play for longer. I'm still not done in my mind. So I have to be a little smart about my workload. I still want to contribute in all three formats. So I have to be a little smart in how I operate on things like that.' Bumrah had said. As the pacer himself had revealed, it is due to this reason that he informed the BCCI not to consider him for any leadership role even before Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma quit Test cricket. 'Obviously, if I'm not careful, I don't know about the future. I don't want to be in a situation where, you know, abruptly I have to go away from this format. I come from a time where Test cricket was the pinnacle. And for me, this is the format that I grew up watching and I always judge myself through this format,' Bumrah had said.
NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
Tim David Fined For Showing Dissent During Fifth T20I Against West Indies
Australia batter Tim David has been fined 10 per cent of his match fee for showing dissent during the fifth T20I against the West Indies in St. Kitts on July 28. The ICC confirmed that David had breached Article 2.8 of its Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel, which relates to 'showing dissent at an Umpire's decision during an International Match.' The incident took place in the fifth over of Australia's innings, when a delivery from Alzarri Joseph down the leg side was not called a wide. In response, David expressed his displeasure by stretching his arms out in protest and then walking towards the umpire with his arms still extended — an act deemed inappropriate under the Code of Conduct. As this was David's first offence within a 24-month period, he was handed one demerit point in addition to the fine. He admitted the offence and accepted the sanction proposed by match referee Reon King of the ICC International Panel, making a formal hearing unnecessary. The charge was officially levelled by on-field umpires Zahid Bassarath and Leslie Reifer, along with third umpire Deighton Buttler and fourth umpire Gregory Brathwaite. According to ICC rules, Level 1 breaches carry a minimum penalty of an official reprimand and a maximum of 50 per cent of a player's match fee, along with one or two demerit points. If a player accumulates four or more demerit points within a 24-month period, they are converted into suspension points, leading to bans. Two suspension points translate into a ban from one Test or two ODIs or T20Is, depending on which format comes first. Demerit points remain on a player's record for two years before they are expunged. David's conduct was the only disciplinary incident reported during the match, and while the sanction was relatively minor, it serves as a reminder of the standards of behaviour expected at the international level.
News18
6 hours ago
- News18
Aussie Batter Fined 10% Match Fee For 'Showing Dissent At An Umpire's...'
Last Updated: Australia's Tim David was fined 10% of his match fee for dissent during the fifth T20I against West Indies. He breached ICC's Article 2.8 and received one demerit point. Australia batter Tim David has been fined 10 per cent of his match fee for showing dissent during the fifth T20I against the West Indies in St. Kitts on July 28. The ICC confirmed that David had breached Article 2.8 of its Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel, which pertains to 'showing dissent at an Umpire's decision during an International Match." What Did Tim David Do? The incident occurred in the fifth over of Australia's innings when a delivery from Alzarri Joseph down the leg side was not called a wide. David expressed his displeasure by stretching his arms out in protest and walking towards the umpire with his arms still extended — an act deemed inappropriate under the Code of Conduct. Since this was David's first offence within a 24-month period, he was handed one demerit point along with the fine. He admitted the offence and accepted the sanction proposed by match referee Reon King of the ICC International Panel, thus avoiding a formal hearing. The charge was officially levelled by on-field umpires Zahid Bassarath and Leslie Reifer, along with third umpire Deighton Buttler and fourth umpire Gregory Brathwaite. According to ICC rules, Level 1 breaches carry a minimum penalty of an official reprimand and a maximum of 50 per cent of a player's match fee, along with one or two demerit points. Accumulating four or more demerit points within a 24-month period converts them into suspension points, leading to bans. Two suspension points result in a ban from one Test or two ODIs or T20Is, depending on which format comes first. Demerit points remain on a player's record for two years before they are expunged. David's conduct was the only disciplinary incident reported during the match, and while the sanction was relatively minor, it serves as a reminder of the standards of behaviour expected at the international level. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
