
Justice Secretary ‘determined to keep prison staff safe' as Tasers trial starts
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood attended the base in Kidlington last Thursday, when officers demonstrated how they would use Tasers on violent inmates in scenarios where there is a significant threat to safety – such as hostage situations or riots.
The trial will run until enough data has been collected to determine if Tasers should be more widely used, according the Ministry of Justice – but Ms Mahmood said she hoped to have updates in the autumn.
'I inherited a situation with completely unacceptable levels of violence,' she told reporters at the Kidlington base last week.
'I'm not willing to tolerate that.
'I'm determined to do everything I can to keep prison staff safe.
'They have been asking for Tasers to be allowed to be used in our prison estate for years and years and years, and I'm very pleased to have been able to greenlight this trial.'
She said the roll-out of Tasers for local prison staff teams across the UK will be examined as part of the trial, adding: 'I think it's right that we start looking at the trial through the prism of our national capabilities.
'Of course I will consider what the trial shows, but from my perspective this is very much the beginning.'
It comes after rates of assaults on prison staff reached record levels last year, rising by 13% in the 12 months up to December 2024, according to Government data.
There were also 10,496 assaults on staff in the 12 months to September 2024 – a 23% increase from the previous 12 months and a new peak.
In April this year, Manchester Arena plotter Hashem Abedi targeted prison staff at HMP Frankland with boiling oil and homemade weapons in a planned ambush.
Four prison officers were injured at the jail in Brasside, County Durham, with three taken to hospital.
'The incident of Frankland has really forced the pace on further roll-out of these measures,' Ms Mahmood said.
Southport killer Axel Rudakubana also allegedly attacked a prison officer at HMP Belmarsh in May by pouring boiling water over them.
Union bosses called for officers to be given stab vests and protective equipment, with Ms Mahmood announcing in June officers would be told to wear body armour at close supervision centres, separation centres and segregation units in the highest categories of prisons in England and Wales.
Last week, officers based in Kidlington demonstrated their emergency response protocols through two scenarios: one in which inmates take a member of staff as hostage, and another in which three inmates assault a fourth prisoner in the yard.
In the hostage situation, officers showed how the use of loud pyrotechnics can help startle and distract violent inmates before officers are able to immobilise them by tackling them to the ground and putting them in handcuffs.
In the yard attack scenario, officers deployed Tasers and gave verbal warnings before firing.
The targets – fellow officers who played the role of violent inmates – wore thick protective suits so as to not feel the effects of the Taser.
The trial will use the Taser 7 model, which generates 50,000 volts when fired, with the voltage dropping to 1,500 volts on contact with the skin to incapacitate the target.
The T7 model is also a two-shot weapon, enabling officers to shoot a second time in the event they miss their target the first time.
The Tasers will be worn by officers on their tactical vest in a secure holster, making the weapon visible to inmates as a deterrent, officers told Ms Mahmood last week.
The device also collects data – such as how long it was armed for, how long it was discharged for, who discharged it, and any malfunction that arises – which will contribute to the trial, officers told the Justice Secretary.
'Tasers have been used for many years by the police, but a custodial setting is different to usage in other scenarios,' Ms Mahmood said.
'These are exactly the lessons that the trial will be looking to use, and it is one of the reasons why you can't just look at the usage of Tasers by the police and assume that the read across the prisons will be exactly the same.
'We will have to make sure that we guard against all of those potential incidents as much as is humanly possible … so that we can make sure we've got the strongest possible protocols in place and that, when they're discharged, they do what they're meant to do, which is prevent a threat to life and keep my staff safe.'
Officers already have access to batons and Pava spray, a synthetic form of pepper spray, in men's prisons in the public sector.
The Ministry of Justice announced in April Pava spray is due to be made available 'in limited circumstances' to a select number of specialist staff at the three public sector young offender institutions – including YOI Werrington, Wetherby and Feltham A.
The Taser trial is part of a £40 million package announced last month to boost security across the prison estate, including £10 million specifically for anti-drone measures such as new netting and reinforced windows, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said on Monday.
'Officers will be subject to robust accountability measures, each deployment of a taser will be reviewed,' a spokesperson for the MoJ added.
The Prison Officers' Association (POA) said it welcomed the move, but added the Government needed to address the roots of violence in jail.
'The POA will always support any initiative that will help protect our members,' a spokesperson for the trade union said.
'However, as welcome as this initiative is we need to address the reasons why prison officers need Tasers in the first place.
'Violence in our prisons is out of control and apathetic prison managers would rather put the prison regime before the safety of their staff.
'We urgently need action to address overcrowding, understaffing, drugs and the other root causes of prison violence.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JEFF PRESTRIDGE: How to stop millions of pensioners getting taxed on their state pensions
Many pensioners feel victimised by Labour – and understandably so. Deprived last year of their universal right to winter fuel payment, they continue to be hit by a toxic mix of rising household bills and higher taxes on their income and savings. Yet they refuse to lie down without an almighty fight. Buoyed by the Government's partial U-turn on winter fuel payment, they have now set their sights on getting Chancellor Rachel Reeves to lift the freeze on the personal allowance, which has been stuck at £12,570 since 2021 – and is currently set to remain at this level until at least 2028.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
A-List star's generous gesture of support to woman beaten up in Cincinnati street brawl
Hollywood actor Charlie Sheen has made a generous gesture of support to a woman who was severely beaten following a street brawl in Cincinnati. The victim, known only as Holly, was attacked in the downtown area of the southern Ohio city alongside an unidentified man. The shocking July 26 attack, which was captured on camera, left the single mother severely bruised and suffering from a 'very bad' brain trauma. Conservative political commentator Benny Johnson launched a crowdfunding campaign to help support Holly with the 'mounting medical and legal bills' she is now facing after the brutal attack. Sheen, whose parents are Ohio natives, made a $1,000 donation to the campaign, vowing the attack 'will NOT be tolerated by the "true" Ohioans' and that 'justice will reign supreme'. The actor, 59, encouraged Holly to 'heal well' and reminded her that 'we are all rooting for you'. Johnson thanked Sheen and the 'thousands' of others who have 'stood with Holly'. As of Tuesday, the campaign has raised more than $493,000. The FBI on Monday arrested a fifth suspect in the now-viral violent beatdown. Police are still searching for a sixth suspect. Sheen donated to Holly's GiveSendGo campaign anonymously, but fans were quick to identify the actor as the generous giver. Not only did his sign his message 'CS', but Sheen left little clues to his identity riddled throughout the post Sheen donated to Holly's GiveSendGo campaign anonymously, but fans were quick to identify the actor as the generous giver. Not only did his sign his message 'CS', but Sheen left little clues to his identity riddled throughout the post. 'Hi Holly. Both of my parents are from Ohio. I'm a lifelong Reds fan and I also played for the Indians in a film years ago,' he wrote, referencing his role in Major League. Sheen portrayed rookie Cleveland Indians pitcher Ricky 'Wild Thing' Vaughn in the beloved 1989 sports comedy film. 'My Ohio connections run deep and what happened to you will NOT be tolerated by the "true" Ohioans (like yourself), as justice will reign supreme,' the actor continued. 'Heal well young lady, and know that we are all rooting for you!' Johnson shared a screenshot of Sheen's heartfelt message with his 3.8million X followers and thanked the star, as well as the countless others who donated to Holly's campaign, for 'saving a life'. Sheen replied to Johnson's post, praising the commentator for his 'stunning and compassionate' donation plan. 'Benny! I was merely following your gracious lead!' Sheen tweeted. 'The speed at which you and Sen Moreno hatched the donation plan, was stunning and compassionate and as patriotic as it gets. You both reminded all of us of the America we remain proud to call - home. He added: 'Keep up the great work, and to Holly, "we" have your six. xox. CS' Conservative political commentator Benny Johnson publicly praised Sheen's generous donation online, prompting a thoughtful reply from the actor Holly is a single, working-class mother and is out of work due to her injuries, the crowdfunder states. She is suffering from a severe concussion as well as hemorrhaging, with the money raised going to help her medical and legal bills. Images emerged last week of her extensive injuries, revealing that both sides of her face were extremely bruised following the assault. Her bottom lip was also cut open slightly, with dark bruises seen around her neck and upper torso. Holly is also living in an undisclosed location due to threats on her life. She spoke out for the first time since the attack last week, sharing an emotional video message that was posted to Johnson's X account. 'I want to say thank you to everyone for all of the love and support,' Holly shared. 'It's definitely what's keeping me going. And you have just brought back faith in humanity. 'It's been very, very hard, and I'm still recovering. I still have a very bad brain trauma. God bless you all. Thank you.' Investigators in Georgia on Monday arrested a fifth suspect in connection to the assault, Fox News reports. Patrick Rosemond, 38, was taken into custody by the FBI and the Atlanta Metropolitan Major Offender's Task Force in Fulton County, Georgia - more than 450 miles south of Cincinnati. Rosemond has been charged with two counts of felonious assault and aggravated riot, as well as one count of fugitive from justice for a fingerprintable charge. He is being held in Fulton County Jail until he is extradited back to Ohio. Officials say Rosemond lives in Cincinnati. It is unclear why he fled to Georgia as he does not appear to have any registered addresses in the state. Rosemond's arrest comes just days after police arrested Jermaine Matthews, Montianez Merriweather, DeKyra Vernon and Dominique Kittle for their alleged roles in the brawl. Kittle, 37, was taken into police custody on Friday night and was charged with felonious assault and aggravated riot, his bond was set at $150,000. He appeared in court on Saturday where his lawyer told the judge that he suffers from paranoid schizophrenia, according to WLWT. Matthews, 39, Merriweather, 34, and Vernon, 24, were taken into custody earlier last week after the ordeal, which JD Vance waded in on. Matthew and Merriweather were initially charged with aggravated riot and assault over the brawl. Matthews, however, was hit with three more charges on Thursday - two felonious assault and one misdemeanor assault charge. It is alleged that Merriweather was the 'catalyst' for what detectives have described as a 'coordinated attack'. New footage has also emerged showing the moments leading up to the attack, with one of the men who police said was a victim using racial slurs. The video, obtained by The Enquirer, shows the unknown individual say: 'Get him! Get that little n*****.' Two black men appeared to try and talk to the man to calm him down before the brawl starts. Matthews' attorney Brandon Fox released the video. Merriweather's family have also claimed that he was called racial slurs and spat on in the lead up to the fight. Fox said: 'It was not a Black, racist mob attacking people. These were separate fights that were triggered by racial slurs that ultimately poured gasoline on the fire.' The melee prompted an outcry from Police Chief Theresa Theetge who admonished witnesses for failing to call 911. 'Nobody called the police,' she said Monday. 'Nobody got us there as quickly as we could get there. They waited until they saw it on social media. 'That is unacceptable to not call the police when you view this. Traffic was horrendous. People saw this, they were fighting in front of traffic.'


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Of all the harebrained schemes to smash migrant smugglers, Labour's new One In One Out plan is worst of all – here's why
HOME SECRETARY Yvette Cooper has a new plan to stop the migrants flooding into this country but is not going to tell you about it. It isn't about the numbers. They're calling the plan One-in, One-out but that isn't about the numbers, either. 4 4 More than 25,400 illegal migrants have crossed the Channel this year alone — 50 per cent more than last year — but that's not about the numbers, apparently. Ms Cooper isn't inclined to even reveal how many of them will be sent back to France under the new scheme, because to do so would only aid the people smugglers, or so she claims. Yesterday we had the rather ludicrous launch of a new policy that doesn't even do what it says on the tin. The Government's hope that this gimmick — for that is plainly what it is — will convince anyone the vile people-smuggling gangs will simply give up trafficking their lucrative quarries is wildly deluded. Taxpayer's expense Any examination of the new system makes it immediately obvious that there is no chance of it working. The Home Secretary said yesterday that, as of this week, migrants arriving illegally on to our shores will be detained then returned to France. Ms Cooper said detained 'within days' and returned 'within weeks'. But how, exactly? It was what she didn't say that was of far more interest. For example, where will they be detained? As far as we know, there are no workable detention centres anywhere near Dover. Small boat migrant found dead riddled with bullets on French coast after being gunned down 'by people smugglers' And Manston, the current holding area 20 miles away, is already over capacity. Ms Cooper has not volunteered any information as to where the arrivals will go. Neither has she suggested how long they will be held in detention, whether they will go through a court process or, indeed, whether they will be able to access legal services at the taxpayer's expense. As if all that wasn't bad enough, there is simply no explanation at all of how the migrants will be 'returned'. Will they all be packed into the back of a lorry? Will Border Force take them back to France on their boats? Or will it be down to the RNLI? One-in, One-out, it may be called, but not one clue is being given as to its likely success Perhaps the migrants will be put on the Eurostar or flown out of the country on one of those chartered jets. You might as well throw a dice or toss a coin. One-in, One-out, it may be called, but not one clue is being given as to its likely success. The Home Secretary has conceded there 'might' be legal challenges in some cases. So it's then back to the old right to a family life, under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The public, of course, are under no illusions. 4 4 My listeners and readers gave me their verdict about all this yesterday. 'If it's 50,000 in and 50,000 out, they get replaced by another 50,000, so it's still 50,000 more,' said one wise caller. Despite Ms Cooper's claim that this is not about the numbers, the increasingly frustrated and fed-up citizens of this country are very clear that it is. She has conceded that only about 50 migrants will be exchanged per week in the initial pilot stage of the programme — which is due to run for only 11 months. That represents just one in 17 of the current small-boat arrivals on to our shores. And so, obviously, the numbers do matter. Ms Cooper says that the replacement migrants will be fully documented and legitimised. In effect, they will qualify to come and live here because they can prove who they are and that they have family here. Does she really think that system won't be abused? Asylum seekers in France can now apply online to come to Britain. So, you can only imagine the numbers that will flock to the French coast in the hopes of a successful application. In one fell swoop, the Government has taken away the risk of dying in the Channel — instead encouraging the migrants to fill out a form. Harebrained schemes And who will assess the suitability of the applicants? Will a family of four from Libya get precedence over two teenage brothers from Eritrea? And if their application is successful, where will they live? A migrant hotel? Social housing? An army camp? Of all the harebrained schemes to smash the gangs, stop the boats, fix the system and secure our borders — yes, Sir Keir Starmer has promised to do all four — this is perhaps the worst of all. It brings yet more people into the country with no perceived skills or reason to be here. It adds fuel to an already tense situation, up and down the country. And it will almost certainly fail to do what it is meant to do. Aside from that, it'll cost more billions of pounds of our money. I'm not in. I'm out.