
US Treasury yield forecasts anchored despite rising debt load and inflation concerns
President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, which cleared its final hurdle in the U.S. Congress earlier this month, is expected to add $3.4 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion debt pile, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
Inflation risks from a renewed U.S.-led trade war, which includes Trump threatening a 30% tariff on imports from Mexico and the European Union starting August 1, has also pushed the U.S. "term premium" - the compensation investors demand for holding longer-term bonds - higher.
With net Treasury issuance expected to approach nearly half a trillion dollars this quarter a rising risk premium makes it considerably harder to finance those expenses at higher interest rates.
Nearly 77% of bond strategists, 23 of 30, responding to a July 10-15 Reuters survey said demand for U.S. Treasuries would lag supply slightly both this quarter and the next.
Those respondents generally held a higher yield view than the wider monthly panel of 71 bond yield forecasters. Most bond strategists in Reuters surveys over the past year have repeatedly overestimated declining yields.
"I think rates will over time structurally drift higher until either they're too restrictive in the real economy or the administration...has to rein in spending in order to right-size the budget," said Connor Fitzgerald, fixed income portfolio manager at Wellington Management.
"While the government will be fine financing all the supply they need it will, over time, come at a slightly higher risk premium or cost."
Sustained expectations the U.S. Federal Reserve will cut interest rates is one main reason strategists expect the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield , currently 4.42%, to roughly hold that level in coming months, falling a bit to 4.40% by end-September and 4.30% by year-end.
"We think we're going to be in a range-trade for the next few months, maybe a marginal drop by year-end - not a huge move. There's a limit to the sell-off in the long end, but then there's a limit to a rally and lower yields too," said Jason Williams, director of U.S. rates research at Citi.
"There are certainly risks the unemployment rate can go higher and though we haven't seen much tariff-led inflation yet there are definitely risks tariffs will cause a one-time price shift and that really complicates the Fed's reaction function."
U.S. consumer prices likely rose sharply in June, potentially signaling the start of a long-anticipated tariff-driven rise that could limit how much the Fed can cut rates.
That would further strain the already-tense relationship between Trump and Fed Chair Jerome Powell.
"A key risk is the impact inflation will have on consumer spending and the extent to which firms will pass that on. If firms are unable to absorb the cost pressures and pass them off to consumers...that would be a major factor in driving an economic slowdown," said Matthew Vegari, head of research at Clearwater Analytics.
The interest-rate-sensitive 2-year Treasury yield , currently 3.90%, will decline 27 basis points to 3.63% at year-end, survey medians showed.
If realized, that would steepen the yield curve, widening the spread with the 10-year yield to 67bps from around 50bps.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
12 minutes ago
- Reuters
Tariff 'doom loop' hangs over global equities
ORLANDO, Florida, July 15 (Reuters) - The astonishing rebound in stocks since early April largely reflects investors' bet that U.S. President Donald Trump won't follow through on his tariff threats. But the market's very resilience may encourage the president to push forward, which could be bad news for equities in both the U.S. and Europe. Investors appear to believe that the April 2 "reciprocal" tariffs were mostly a tactic to bring countries to the negotiating table, and Washington's levies will end up being much lower than advertised. Tariffs may end up much higher than they were before Trump's second term began, but the situation will still be better than the worst-case scenarios initially priced in after Trump's so-called "Liberation Day". Monday's equity moves were a case in point. Trump's threat on Saturday to impose 30% levies on imports from the European Union and Mexico - two of America's largest trading partners - was met with a collective market shrug. European and Mexican stocks dipped a bit, but Wall Street closed in the green and the Nasdaq hit a new high. This follows threats in recent days to place a 50% tariff rate on goods imported from Brazil and a 35% levy on goods from Canada not covered under the USMCA agreement. Brazilian stocks have slipped 5%, but Canadian stocks have hit new peaks. The question now is whether the line between complacency and the "TACO" trade - the bet that "Trump always chickens out" - is getting blurred. The scale of the recovery since April 7 is truly eye-popping. It took the S&P 500 less than three months to move from the April bear market lows to a new all-time high, as Charlie Bilello, chief market strategist at Creative Planning, recently noted on X. This was the second-fastest recovery in the last 75 years, only bested by the bear market recovery in 1982 that took less than two months. On a 12-month forward earnings basis, the S&P 500 index is now near its highest level in years and well above its long-term average. The tech sector, which has propelled the rally, has rarely been more expensive in the last quarter century either. None of that means further gains cannot materialize, and one could argue that the valuations are justified if AI truly delivers the promised world-changing productivity gains. Regardless, it is hard to argue that the rally since April is not rooted in the belief that tariffs will be significantly lower than the levels announced on Liberation Day. If many countries' levies do end up around 10% like Britain's and the aggregate rate settles around 15%, then equity pricing might very well be reasonable. But if that's not the case, growth forecasts will likely have to be revised a lot lower. "We stay overweight U.S. stocks, but don't rule out more sharp near-term market moves. Uncertainty on who will bear tariff costs means yet more dispersion in returns – and more opportunity to earn alpha, or above-benchmark returns," BlackRock Investment Institute analysts wrote on Monday. One concern is that a loop is potentially being created, whereby Wall Street's resilience and strength in the face of heightened trade uncertainty actually emboldens Trump to double down on tariffs. Most analysts still believe cooler heads will prevail, however. Trump's tolerance for equity and bond market stress, and therefore U.S. economic pain, appears "limited", according to Barclays. But if markets have gotten too complacent and Trump does increase tariffs on EU goods to 30%, potential retaliation would risk a repeat of something similar to the post-Liberation Day selloff, sending European equities down by double digits, Barclays warns. It may also be that when it comes to tariffs, investors are focusing so intently on China that not much else moves the dial. This may be short-sighted though. China accounted for 13.4% of U.S. goods imports last year, the lowest in 20 years. In contrast, the U.S. imported $605.7 billion of goods from the European Union, or 18.6% of all imports and the most from any single jurisdiction. As Trump sees it, Europe is "ripping off" America almost as much as China. Bilateral U.S.-China trade last year totaled $582 billion, compared with bilateral U.S.-EU trade flows of $975 billion, U.S. Census data shows. America's $235.9 billion goods deficit with the EU was smaller than its $295.5 billion gaps with China, but that's still comfortably America's second-biggest trade deficit. If Trump doesn't back down in his standoff with Europe, Wall Street might have to. (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters)


Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Ofcom chairman defends ‘Orwellian' measures after Trump attacks
Ofcom's chairman has hit back at claims of an 'Orwellian' online crackdown after Donald Trump's White House accused the agency of stifling free speech. Lord Grade, the former Channel 4 chief executive and ex-chairman of BBC and ITV, said new laws aimed at stamping out criminal material and protecting children from online harm did not conflict with freedom of expression, which was the 'beating heart' of Ofcom regulation. The watchdog's tougher policing of online material has attracted the ire of Mr Trump, who has long been a vocal supporter of free speech. During meetings earlier this year, officials in the US state department reportedly raised concerns with UK representatives that the new laws could amount to censorship. However, Lord Grade said the watchdog's decision to investigate, fine or even ban online services which did not comply with the new rules were not 'Orwellian'. 'We are tackling criminal material, such as terrorist content or child sexual abuse. And we are getting the tech companies to protect children both from the illegal, and from content that poses serious risks of harm to their physical or emotional health,' he said in a speech at a King's College on Tuesday, 'Now if anyone believes that either of those aims is misguided, I really cannot agree. Neither one, to my mind, is in conflict with free expression.' 'Domesday for broadcasting' He said Ofcom assessed 10,000 pieces of TV and radio content last year and only 33 breached its rules. Ofcom has adopted new powers as Britain's first internet regulator as part of sweeping laws aimed at tackling material. As part of the powers, new rules forcing tech firms to boost child safety measures will come into force next week. Reddit this week announced new age verification processes to stop under-18s from accessing inappropriate posts. The new rules, which could lead to heavy fines for US tech giants, have taken on extra significance as Britain sought to avoid Mr Trump's tariffs. Sir Keir Starmer's Government has denied they were up for negotiation as part of trade discussions. In his speech, Lord Grade took aim at tech bosses, who he said 'placed a premium on revenue growth' but 'failed to give enough attention to safety'. He added: 'No one, least of all the tech sector, should be surprised that a situation like this has brought about a societal, political, regulatory and global response. But it has. And now, change is happening.' Lord Grade also warned of a 'Domesday scenario' for British broadcasting as they face growing competition from streaming rivals such as Netflix and Disney, as well as TikTok and other social media apps. He said traditional TV channels would have to fight even harder to stay relevant by creating 'moments of essential, national viewing'. 'There are some things that regulation, no matter how modern, cannot do. It can't make people watch what they don't want to watch,' he said.


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Blackstone and US utility PPL to build gas power plants in JV partnership
July 15 (Reuters) - Pennsylvania electric and gas utility PPL (PPL.N), opens new tab and Blackstone Infrastructure have formed a joint venture to build natural gas generation stations to power data centers under long-term energy services agreements, the companies said on Tuesday. "We're excited to leverage the powerful expertise that PPL and Blackstone Infrastructure possess to bring much-needed new dispatchable generation online in Pennsylvania to match new data center load," said PPL President and CEO Vincent Sorgi in a statement. The announcement came during the Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit in Pittsburgh, where government, technology, and energy officials announced roughly $90 billion in investments in advancing data centers and other aspects of the artificial intelligence boom. U.S. President Donald Trump was expected to be in attendance. The joint venture, of which PPL owns 51% and Blackstone Infrastructure owns the remaining 49%, will seek to sign long-term energy service agreements with large data center companies, the companies said. No such agreements have been reached yet. "The joint venture is actively engaged with landowners, natural gas pipeline companies and turbine manufacturers, and has secured multiple land parcels to enable this new generation buildout," according to the statement.