logo
Why an Idaho Victim's Dad Is Apologizing to His Late Daughter — and Saying He Feels 'Used' by Prosecutors

Why an Idaho Victim's Dad Is Apologizing to His Late Daughter — and Saying He Feels 'Used' by Prosecutors

Yahoo03-07-2025
Idaho murder victim Kaylee Goncalves's father is livid over the prosecution's decision to offer Bryan Kohberger a plea deal sparing him the death penalty
Kohberger's murder trial was scheduled to take place in August, but in a surprise move, he pleaded guilty to four counts of first-degree murder on July 2
He is expected to be sentenced to four consecutive life terms in prisonSteve Goncalves apologized to his late daughter, Kaylee, for the prosecution's decision to offer now-convicted killer Bryan Kohberger a plea deal that spares him the death penalty.
'It's my mistake. I'm sorry Kaylee,' Goncalves said on Banfield on NewsNation on Wednesday, July 2.
'I'm truly sorry that I didn't get you a prosecutor who really believed what happened to you could only be fixed with life.'
Hours earlier, Kohberger, 30, had pleaded guilty to fatally stabbing University of Idaho students Goncalves and her best friend, Maddie Mogen, both 21, and Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, both 20, at their off-campus rental house in Nov. 2022.
Families of the victims gathered inside the courthouse on Wednesday to hear Kohberger plead guilty, coming face to face with the killer who viciously ended their loved ones' young lives.
Related: Best Friends of University of Idaho Murder Victims Speak Out: What We Saw (Exclusive)
Steve Goncalves and his family came to the courthouse, but did not go into the courtroom, NewsNation reported. 'It's a pointless exercise,' he said.
During the tense plea hearing, the judge asked Kohberger, 'Did you on Nov. 13, 2022, in Latah County, Idaho, kill and murder Kaylee Goncalves, a human being?'
Showing no emotion and answering in a matter of fact tone, Kohberger replied, 'Yes.'
The judge then asked him, 'Did you do that willfully, unlawfully, deliberately, with premeditation and malice aforethought?'
Again, Kohberger answered 'Yes' in an emotionless tone, and did so when he was asked about murdering the other three victims.
Related: Bryan Kohberger Pleads Guilty, Confessing to Murders of 4 University of Idaho Students to Avoid Possible Execution
Kohberger's murder trial was supposed to take place in August, but in a surprise move, he asked for, was granted and agreed to plead guilty to four counts of first-degree murder in the Nov. 2022 deaths of the four students, according to a letter sent to victims' families from prosecutors, cited by ABC News, the Idaho Statesman, and The New York Times.
Steve Goncavles and his family criticized the plea deal, writing on Facebook that the prosecution 'failed us."
They noted that they met with prosecutors on Friday, June 27, about "the possibility of a plea deal and it was a hard no from our family.'
Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up for for breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases.
On Tuesday, July 1, the family wrote that prosecutors "vaguely mentioned a possible plea on Friday, without seeking our input, and presented the plea on Sunday."
On Wednesday, July 2, Steve Goncalves told Banfield host Ashleigh Banfield he and his family feel 'used' by the prosecution.
He also said that he wished Kohberger's fate had been decided by a jury of his peers, who could have decided whether or not to give him the death penalty.
Related: 'Furious' Idaho Murders Victim's Father Wanted to Face Killer in Court. Plea Deal Was a 'Hard No' from Family
When Banfield asked him what he would like to say to Kohberger, he replied that he would tell him he is 'a complete loser.
'I'm ashamed that we couldn't have ended you,' he said. 'You beat me on that. My bad.'
Read the original article on People
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NFLPA fires arbitrator who ruled against union president JC Tretter over comments about players faking injuries: Report
NFLPA fires arbitrator who ruled against union president JC Tretter over comments about players faking injuries: Report

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NFLPA fires arbitrator who ruled against union president JC Tretter over comments about players faking injuries: Report

The NFLPA fired arbitrator Sidney Moreland on Wednesday, just months after he ruled against the union in a grievance concerning comments made by former NFLPA president JC Tretter, according to Sportico. The news comes the same week Moreland's ruling was obtained by journalists Mike Florio and Pablo Torre. Moreland's dismissal reportedly had nothing to do with the ruling being leaked, sources told Sportico. The NFL and NFLPA have the ability to fire arbitrators between July 10 and July 20 of each year, per an article in the collective-bargaining agreement, so the timing could be a coincidence. On Thursday, Florio and Torre revealed the NFL and NFLPA worked to try and bury a ruling made by Moreland concerning players faking injuries as a strategy to receive a better contract. In 2023, the NFL filed a grievance against Tretter, then the NFLPA president, over comments he made during an appearance on "The Ross Tucker Football Podcast." Tretter was asked about running back holdouts and the resistance from some teams about handing out significant deals to running backs. Tretter responded by implying it was a smart strategy for a player to fake an injury to sit out of practices while seeking a new contract. He seemed to recognize his error during the show, saying, "I don't think I'm allowed to ever recommend that, at least publicly, but I think each player needs to find a way to build up leverage to try to get a fair deal." The NFL believed Tretter's comments violated the collective-bargaining agreement, and filed a grievance against Tretter two months after that interview. Moreland ruled in favor of the NFL, saying Tretter's comments violated a section in the CBA, per Florio. Said the NFL, in a Tuesday statement to PFT: 'The Arbitrator upheld the Management Council's grievance in its entirety and found that Mr. Tretter's statements violated the CBA by improperly encouraging players to fake injury. As a result, he prohibited Mr. Tretter and the union from such conduct in the future. The NFL did not allege that any individual player ever feigned injury. We are grateful for the arbitrator's thorough review of the evidence and order enforcing the CBA.' Moreland specifically called out Article 2, Section 2 of the CBA and Article 3 in the CBA in his ruling. Article 2, Section 2 of the CBA contains a passage stating both sides will "faithfully" adhere to the rules laid out in the CBA. Article 3 deals with strikes and work stoppages. Moreland essentially ruled that Tretter's comments encouraged players to skirt CBA rules by engaging in mini work stoppages. It marks at least the second ruling the NFL and NFLPA tried to prevent from being reported. Florio and Torre revealed details of the first grievance in June, which found the league and commissioner Roger Goodell encouraged teams to reduce guaranteed contracts to veteran players. The league and players' union was also accused of trying to hide certain details of that ruling from players. It's unclear why both the NFL and NFLPA felt it was necessary to try and bury the ruling revealed by Florio and Torre on Thursday. The decision makes sense on the NFLPA side, as they ultimately lost. The NFL's decision to hide the ruling makes less sense, as they won the grievance. The decision adds another layer of confusion to the relationship between the NFL and NFLPA. That relationship has faced scrutiny recently, as an ESPN report revealed NFLPA executive director Lloyd Howell worked as a consultant with an NFL-ownership group during his time with the NFLPA, a possible conflict of interest. Thursday's reveal adds yet another layer of murkiness to the already confusing relationship between the NFL and NFLPA.

Popular podcaster criticizes JD Vance over past Epstein comments: 'What changed?'
Popular podcaster criticizes JD Vance over past Epstein comments: 'What changed?'

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Popular podcaster criticizes JD Vance over past Epstein comments: 'What changed?'

A popular podcast host and comedian who interviewed Donald Trump on the 2024 presidential campaign and attended his inauguration is criticizing Vice President JD Vance over the Jeffrey Epstein case. In a social media post July 16, Theo Von, whose podcast and social media channels have millions of subscribers, recirculated a clip of a former interview with Vance in which the then-candidate appeared to agree to release alleged files about the criminal investigation into Epstein. Von's comments join a growing chorus of online MAGA figures pushing back against the Trump administration after a July 7 announcement claiming the FBI and Department of Justice investigation found no evidence of a supposed client list, thought to contain names of individuals who were associated with Epstein's alleged sex trafficking. The financier and convicted sex offender died while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking in 2019. Maurene Comey fired: Daughter of ex-FBI director and prosecutor against Jeffrey Epstein Von reshared the 7-second video clip of his October 2024 interview with Vance in which the then-senator said "seriously, we need to release the Epstein list, that is an important thing," after another user, self-described as a progressive activist, posted it a day prior. The user's original post included the text: "A video is going viral showing JD Vance calling for the full Epstein list to be released − on Theo Von's podcast. Hey JD, what changed?" Von republished the post on his own page, adding: 'Yeah, what changed?' Von's podcast, "This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von," is the fourth most popular podcast on Spotify, as of mid-July, and is among the more popular conservative-leaning podcasting shows. It is often lumped in with Joe Rogan's within the so-called 'manosphere,' of media channels catering to predominantly male audiences. Von's show often features interviews with celebrities, political figures and influencers, including a nearly hour-long sit-down with Trump a few months before the November 2024 presidential election. The alleged Epstein "client list" and surrounding controversies have created division within the Republican party and among some of MAGA's most vocal online personalities. Trump has long suggested he would be open to releasing the so-called list of Epstein clients, and Vance had also been vocal in making similar statements during the 2024 campaign. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in March she had a "truckload" of Epstein files to review and potentially release, further stoking expectations and conspiracies, especially among Trump's base. Yet furor erupted on July 7 when Bondi's Justice Department announced there was no "client list" and no further disclosure was needed. More about the Epstein 'list': Jeffrey Epstein is sowing division among MAGA. What to know about the late sex offender While Trump has since directed Bondi to release "whatever she thinks is credible," he has attempted to distance himself from the uproar, claiming it to be a "Democratic hoax." Yet long-time Trump loyalists, including daughter-in-law Lara Trump and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, have called for more transparency. Democrats have also pushed for legislative action to release some of the documents. Rep. Lauren Boebert, a hardline MAGA supporter, weighed in on X on July 15, writing: "We deserve the truth about the Epstein files. I'm ready for a Special Counsel to handle this." Charlie Kirk, a key MAGA influencer who had spoke often about his doubts over the Epstein probe, abruptly reversed course on his vocal criticism this week, saying in his podcast: "I'm done talking about Epstein for the time being. I'm gonna trust my friends in the administration ." Contributing: Kinsey Crowley, USA TODAY; Reuters. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Theo Von questions JD Vance about Epstein files: 'What changed?'

Chiefs WR Rashee Rice reportedly sentenced to 5 years probation, 30 days in jail after multi-car crash in Dallas
Chiefs WR Rashee Rice reportedly sentenced to 5 years probation, 30 days in jail after multi-car crash in Dallas

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Chiefs WR Rashee Rice reportedly sentenced to 5 years probation, 30 days in jail after multi-car crash in Dallas

Kansas City Chiefs wide receiver Rashee Rice has been sentenced to five years probation and 30 days of jail time by a Dallas County judge, per ESPN's Adam Schefter. The sentence is related to Rice's role in a multi-car crash that last April. Shortly after the incident, Rice's attorney confirmed that Rice was driving the Lamborghini that was involved in a hit-and-run in Dallas. Per Schefter, the 30 days of jail time can be served at any point during Rice's five years on probation. Rice received deferred adjudication, per Schefter, meaning that his case will be dismissed if he successfully completes probation. After the crash, Rice was sued for $1 million by the two people who were injured in the crash. In that lawsuit, the judge ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on Wednesday, according to Dallas County court records. As a result of the ruling, Rice will pay out $1 million to the two plaintiffs and will pay their lawyer's fees. Rice had a shortened 2025 season due to injury, going on injured reserve in early October. He underwent season-ending LCL surgery the next week. The 25-year-old receiver. participated in the Chiefs' voluntary OTAs last month, and returned to Kansas City this week for mandatory minicamp.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store