'The worst is yet to come': Baba Vanga and world famous psychics predict apocalyptic end to 2025
Nostradamus
,
Athos Salomé
, and Nicolas Aujula—have all issued ominous predictions for 2025, warning of widespread turmoil. Baba Vanga foresaw powerful earthquakes driven by climate change and a European war signaling the beginning of "humanity's downfall." Nostradamus, in Les Prophéties, predicted a brutal conflict involving the UK, with both internal unrest and external threats, alongside the return of a deadly, COVID-like pandemic.
Athos Salomé and
Nicolas Aujula
echoed these concerns, pointing to potential global upheaval. These aligned forecasts have sparked worldwide anxiety and debate over what the remainder of the year may bring. Born in 1911 as Vangeliya Pandeva Gushterova, Baba Vanga became known as the 'Nostradamus of the Balkans' for her uncanny predictions, which reportedly included events like 9/11, the death of Princess Diana, and more recently, climate change-related earthquakes in 2025—similar to the devastating tremors that struck Myanmar and Thailand last month.
ALSO READ:
Real reason why Melania Trump came clean about Barron Trump and Harvard revealed
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Flats in Chattarpur South Delhi
A D Infra
Get Info
Undo
Apocalyptic end to 2025?
Alongside her predictions for shattering earthquakes due to the climate crises this year, which has already come true as Myanmar and Thailand faced devastating earthquakes last month, Baba Vanga has also forecast that Europe would be rocked by a devastating war, reports Daily Mail.
The prophet, who was born in 1911 as Vangeliya Pandeva Gushterova, had predicted the war as the start of 'humanity's downfall' that will 'devastate' the population.
Live Events
Meanwhile Nostradamus warned in his book Les Prophéties, a collection of 942 poetic quatrains allegedly predicting future events, that this year the UK is going to be drawn into a war.
In the book, which first appeared in 1555, he said: "When those from the lands of Europe, see England set up her throne behind. Her flanks, there will be cruel wars.
ALSO READ:
Market Basket CEO Arthur T Demoulas placed on administrative leave by board of directors. Here's why
"The kingdom will be marked by wars so cruel, foes from within and without will arise. A great pestilence from the past returns, no enemy more deadly under the skies."
Another psychic who was named after the French astrologer but is still alive today, Athos Salomé, 38, from Brazil, dubbed the 'Living Nostradamus', also predicted a coming war.
Psychics' chilling warning as global tensions escalate
Brazilian psychic Athos Salomé, 38—dubbed a modern-day Nostradamus for accurately predicting events such as Queen Elizabeth's death and the COVID-19 pandemic—has issued a chilling warning: World War III is near, and "the worst is yet to come." In December 2024, he predicted that a global conflict was imminent, pointing to rising geopolitical instability and the growing role of cyber warfare.
"This isn't just a war of men," Salomé cautioned, "but of machines. The question is—what comes next?"
Echoing his concerns, London-based hypnotherapist and psychic Nicolas Aujula, also 38, forecast that 2025 will be marked by a troubling lack of compassion and a surge in violence fueled by religion and nationalism. He believes WWIII could erupt by mid-year, with the UK no longer immune to its reach.
These warnings follow aggressive rhetoric from Russian officials. After a car bomb killed Lieutenant General Yaroslav Moskalik in Moscow—an attack the Kremlin blamed on Ukraine—Russian propagandists turned their fury toward Britain. They accused British intelligence of supplying explosives for the assassination, with state TV pundits calling for violent retaliation.
ALSO READ:
'Harvard getting their a** kicked, teaching 2+2 =4': Trump's bizarre dig as battle escalates
Military commentator Andrei Klintsevich claimed the explosives were provided "by the ton" by British security services. Prominent propagandist Vladimir Solovyov escalated the threat: 'British blood must be spilled,' he declared. 'If the factories and intelligence agency headquarters responsible for these terrorist acts are destroyed, no one should be surprised.'
The threats come amid heightened warnings from Dmitry Medvedev, a key ally of Vladimir Putin, who stated that Sweden and Finland—recent NATO members—are now potential targets for nuclear strikes. 'They've joined a bloc hostile to us,' Medvedev said, adding that Russia's military doctrine now includes them as valid targets, potentially even for preemptive nuclear action.
Sweden officially joined NATO in March, and Finland in April 2023, extending the alliance's border with Russia by over 1,300 km. Last week, the Kremlin also issued a stark warning to Britain: deploying a so-called "coalition of the willing" in Ukraine could trigger a nuclear confrontation.
Sergei Shoigu, secretary of Russia's Security Council and former defense minister, declared that any Western military presence on Ukrainian soil would be met with severe consequences.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Why 'Hamas-run hospital' but never ‘US-backed IDF'?': Zohran Mamdani calls out double standards on Israel-Gaza coverage; slams BBC
Zohran Mamdani (AP image) Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani criticized public broadcaster BBC for biased reporting on the ongoing Middle East conflict. He condemned the use of selective language in its coverage of the Israel-Gaza war, questioning why the outlet uses terms like 'Iran-backed Houthis' or 'Hamas-run hospital,' but avoids labels such as 'US-backed IDF' or referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as an 'indicted war criminal.' Mamdani questioned the broadcaster's choice of language, calling out its failure to apply similar labels to Israeli leaders and military forces as it does to other groups in the region. 'Why does the BBC always include context like 'Iran-backed Houthis' and 'Hamas-run hospital' but never 'US-backed IDF' or 'indicted-war-criminal Benjamin Netanyahu'?' Mamdani questioned in a post on X. Mamdani, a New York Assembly member and a vocal advocate for Palestinian rights, has long drawn attention for his positions on Israel and Palestine. A supporter of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, he has referred to Israel's military operations in Gaza as 'genocide' and has introduced proposals to cut ties with firms operating in Israeli settlements in the West Bank. In a past interview on Fox5's 'Good Day New York,' Mamdani courted controversy when he said he did not support Israel's existence as a Jewish state, arguing that no state should have a religious hierarchy. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like AirSense 11 – Smart tech for deep sleep ResMed Buy Now Undo by Taboola by Taboola 'Because I'm not comfortable supporting any state that has a hierarchy of citizenship on the basis of religion or anything else,' Mamdani said. "In the way we have in this country, equality should be enshrined in every country in the world.' Mamdani's remarks and political stance have not gone unnoticed. US President Donald Trump has frequently targeted him, most recently after Mamdani won the Democratic primary in New York City. In a post on Truth Social, Trump called Mamdani a '100% Communist Lunatic' and mocked him for looking "terrible." He further claimed that he would be bad for New York City. Speaking on a Fox News interview, Trump said Mamdani is a communist and he openly admits it. "He's a communist and I think it's very bad for New York. I don't know if he's going to get in but he's a pure communist and I think he admits it," he said. Mamdani's viral post criticizing the BBC has sparked online debate, with some social media users defending his stance and others accusing him of selective outrage. One netizen questioned, "Why does Zohran Mamdani never address the Russian genocide in Ukraine and war criminal Putin?" Another user agreeing with Mamdani wrote,"You are asking hard questions."
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Government convenes all-party meet ahead of Monsoon session
An all-party meeting convened by the government ahead of the Monsoon session of Parliament is underway here on Sunday where the opposition is likely to rake up various issues, including special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar as well as the Pahalgam terror attack . The government is likely to seek cooperation from opposition parties for the smooth conduct of the House. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Technology PGDM MCA Digital Marketing Product Management Others Data Science healthcare Public Policy others Artificial Intelligence Data Analytics Degree Healthcare CXO Management Leadership MBA Cybersecurity Design Thinking Finance Project Management Operations Management Data Science Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Weeks MIT xPRO CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India Starts on undefined Get Details Leaders of various political parties are attending the meeting where the government is being represented by Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju and his junior minister Arjun Ram Meghwal. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo Gaurav Gogoi and Jairam Ramesh of the Congress, Supriya Sule of NCP-Sharad Pawar, DMK's T R Baalu and RPI (A) leader and Union minister Ramdas Athawale were amongst those who are attending the meeting. INDIA bloc parties have resolved to raise during the Parliament's Monsoon session the issues of Pahalgam attack terrorists not being brought to justice, US President Donald Trump's repeated claims of brokering a 'ceasefire' during India-Pakistan hostilities and the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar that the opposition alleges "threatens people's voting rights".
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Obama, Russia, and a coup? DNI Tulsi Gabbard claims plot to derail Donald Trump's 2016 win
Tulsi Gabbard , the current US Director of National Intelligence , has ignited a political firestorm by accusing former President Barack Obama and senior members of his administration of orchestrating a "treasonous conspiracy" during the 2016 election aftermath. Speaking on Friday, Gabbard said her office had uncovered "overwhelming evidence" that high-ranking officials manipulated intelligence to justify the Trump–Russia investigation. These claims were laid out in newly declassified documents, which she says will be handed to the Department of Justice for criminal referral. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Cybersecurity Technology Artificial Intelligence Data Science CXO MCA Healthcare Degree others Design Thinking Product Management PGDM Management Others healthcare Digital Marketing Leadership Data Analytics Project Management Public Policy Finance Data Science Operations Management MBA Skills you'll gain: Duration: 10 Months MIT xPRO CERT-MIT xPRO PGC in Cybersecurity Starts on undefined Get Details 'No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again,' Gabbard said in an official statement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Most Expensive Cars In The World Undo A high-level meeting and a shift in narrative According to the documents released by Gabbard, the turning point came during a National Security Council meeting at the White House on 9 December 2016. Present at that meeting were former CIA Director John Brennan, DNI James Clapper, National Security Adviser Susan Rice, Secretary of State John Kerry, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. She contends that the meeting led to a new intelligence directive—ordered by Obama—to reassess Russia's role in the 2016 election. Following the meeting, Clapper's assistant reportedly instructed the CIA, FBI, NSA and DHS to prepare a revised Intelligence Community (IC) assessment "per the President's request". Live Events This assessment, released on 6 January 2017, suggested Russia interfered in the election to aid Donald Trump. But Gabbard says earlier internal findings did not support that conclusion. 'Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome,' reads a 7 December 2016 internal memo cited in the report. She claims the revised report ignored previous intelligence and relied instead on 'manufactured' sources, including the now-discredited Steele Dossier. 'Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people,' Gabbard said on social media. False leaks and media influence Gabbard further alleged that Obama-era officials leaked misleading claims to major news outlets to shape public opinion. She cited examples where statements were fed to publications such as The Washington Post, claiming Russia had attempted to interfere with or even influence the election outcome. 'Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election,' she said, quoting one such claim. Trump applauds, Democrats push back Donald Trump quickly responded to Gabbard's claims, voicing his support through a post on Truth Social. "Great job by young and talented Harrison Fields on FoxNews. The Panel was fantastic on prosecuting Obama and the 'thugs' who have just been unequivocally exposed on highest level Election Fraud. Congratulations to Tulsi Gabbard. Keep it coming!!!" Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers issued swift and sharp rebuttals. Senator Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said, 'The Senate Intelligence Committee conducted a bipartisan investigation reviewing hundreds of thousands of documents and interviewing witnesses over several years. The unanimous, bipartisan conclusion was that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. This is just another example of the DNI trying to cook the books, rewrite history, and erode trust in the intelligence agencies she's supposed to be leading.' Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut also weighed in, 'Baseless accusations of treason are unfortunately par for the course for this Director of National Intelligence, but that doesn't make them any less damaging and unacceptable. The IC leaders in 2016 understood that they took an oath to the Constitution, not President Trump. I wish Director Gabbard could say the same.' Layers of investigation and conflicting reports Gabbard's claims arrive years after a slew of investigations into the Trump–Russia saga. The Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Republicans during Trump's presidency, conducted a three-year investigation concluding that Russia did mount an aggressive effort to sway the 2016 election. It found numerous contacts between Trump campaign aides and Russian officials but stopped short of confirming coordination. Former CIA Director John Ratcliffe also ordered a separate review. While that review criticised how the 2016 IC assessment was put together, it did not overturn its conclusions. Additionally, the Department of Justice's internal watchdog and Special Counsel John Durham investigated the origins of the FBI's Russia probe. Durham's inquiry led to three indictments, including one FBI lawyer who admitted to falsifying details in a surveillance warrant. But overall, the probe found no systemic wrongdoing. A deepening divide Gabbard insists this issue cuts across party lines. 'The issue I am raising is not a partisan issue. It is one that concerns every American,' she said. 'The American people's faith and trust in our democratic republic and therefore the future of our nation depends on it.' The Justice Department has not yet confirmed whether it will pursue the referrals. Clapper and Brennan did not respond to comment requests. James Comey declined to comment. With both political camps entrenched, the release of these documents may reopen old wounds—but whether it leads to prosecutions remains uncertain.
