logo
Cosatu critiques Finance Minister's Budget as insufficient for economic growth

Cosatu critiques Finance Minister's Budget as insufficient for economic growth

The Star21-05-2025

Ashley Lechman | Published 7 hours ago
Trade union, The Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) said on Wednesday that it does not think Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's third Budget attempt was enough to stimulate growth for the country's economy.
"We welcome government's decision to withdraw the proposed VAT hike as it would have been an unnecessary burden to workers struggling to cope with the rising costs of living. I t is a positive moment in our democratic evolution, when government led by the African National Congress, shows the political maturity and humility by responding positively to the concerns of Cosatu and society," Cosatu stated.
The union added that it cannot support tax hikes upon the working class and the poor who are already highly indebted.
"Whilst appreciating the scrapping of the VAT hike, we remain deeply distressed that for two years in a row, Personal Income Tax brackets have not been adjusted for inflation. This will see workers at the margins of the next tax bracket in danger of paying higher taxes when receiving their annual increases. This trend must be reversed. Whilst regretting the decision not to extend VAT exemptions for additional food items or provide further fuel price relief, we urge government to pursue additional measures to cushion indigent households from poverty, in particular expanding free electricity and water," Cosatu said.
"The Federation commends the R4 billion boost to the South African Revenue Service's tax and customs compliance efforts. SARS has shown that it has the capacity to deliver. The R7.5 billion allocated to it over the Medium-Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) is an important step towards enabling it to ramp up collection of the R800 billion in owed taxes and improving tax compliance by at least R60 billion annually. It is critical that SARS be given every possible support to achieve these tax compliance targets. The tax regime must be reviewed to provide relief for low-income earners and ensure wealthy individuals and companies pay their fair share," Cosatu added.
Cosatu said that further discussions must take place on how the Reserve Bank's currency reserves can support the fiscus.
"We welcome government's acknowledgment that bleeding the public services working-class communities and businesses depend upon is reckless and harmful to the economy. The 5.4% increase in expenditure over the MTEF and allocations to frontline services, in particular including the rolling out of Early Childhood Education to 700 000 learners and tackling the school infrastructure backlog, refurbishing 660 health facilities, investing in Home Affairs' capacity, Defence and Correctional Services will be a step forward to repair damage inflicted by previous austerity budget cuts. However more must be done," Cosatu said.
The minister committed to hiring more teachers (1000 plus allocations to save 5500 existing posts), Home Affairs, police (4000), prosecutors (250) and border management officers, amongst other critical frontline personnel will boost public services.
"But we remain deeply dismayed by the reduced low allocations for doctors (800) and nurses. The implementation of the public service wage agreement will help public servants heal financial wounds. We are concerned about the impact the loss of valuable skills and experience by public servants who opt for early retirement, may have upon the state's ability to provide public services. Government must move with speed to identify any ghost posts in the state, as well as boost effort to tackle corruption and wasteful expenditure," Cosatu said.
The union said that it applauds the outstanding work done by Eskom and municipal workers to overcome load shedding.
"We are pleased that the debt relief package has provided Eskom breathing space to ramp up maintenance. It is critical that Eskom be given more support to tackle corruption, wasteful expenditure, cable theft and bring on board new generation capacity. The allocation of R219bn for energy infrastructure will be an invaluable boost as will the electrification of an additional 300 000 homes. These measures must translate into affordable electricity if the economy, in particular mining and industry are to survive and grow," Cosatu said in a statement.
"The turnaround of South African Airways is testimony that state-owned enterprises can be turned around to once again become enablers of economic growth. Whilst government is naturally reluctant to provide further debt relief to SOEs, Transnet should be assisted to settle its debt to free up capital for the modernisation of its port and railway network as these will unlock the mining, manufacturing and agricultural sectors, creating thousands of badly needed jobs and boosting state revenue. We are concerned by the reduction to R12.7 billion for Metro Rail's signal upgrades but hope its total R66 billion allocation will secure its efforts to return to full capacity, thus enabling 10 million workers and commuters travel quickly and save money on transport," the union added.
"Treasury needs to honour its court signed business rescue agreement to provide the Post Office with the long delayed R1.8 billion injection. This should not be delayed over the MTEF. We urge government to table the Road Accident Fund (RAF) and Benefits Scheme Bills at Parliament as part of a package of interventions to set the RAF on a sustainable path and ensure its funds are directed to the poor not the wealthy, let alone insatiable ambulance chasing lawyers," Cosatu added.
Cosatu said, "We welcome the various progressive provisions in the Budget, which Cosatu campaigned for, including allocating 61% for social wage expenditure. We are, however, disappointed by the failure to show any relief for the 8 million SRD Grants and government's continued shyness to drastically ramp up sufficient resources to support SMMEs, industrialisation and export sectors, as well as public employment programmes."
" The Budget does not foresee growth rising beyond 2% over the next decade whilst we desperately need at least 3% growth if we are to turn the corner on unemployment. We dare not normalise a 43.1% unemployment rate. This is a ticking time bomb that will one day explode and the price of picking up the pieces will be far greater than we can afford," Cosatu added.
The union said it is calling upon Parliament and Government in the run up to the MTBPS and the 2026 Budget, to initiate a national dialogue on what are our expenditure priorities and what we can live without, and what are the acceptable and unacceptable revenue streams to fund these.
"We cannot afford to continue to stumble along a meek path of business as usual and expect better results. A bold and decisive Marshall Plan is needed if we are to capacitate the state, stimulate growth and slash unemployment. We do not have endless time to make the bold changes our many socio-economic crises demand. COSATU will be seeking further engagements with government on these burning matters," the union further stated.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pension Plain: the hidden costs of withdrawing from your Savings Pot
Pension Plain: the hidden costs of withdrawing from your Savings Pot

IOL News

time16 hours ago

  • IOL News

Pension Plain: the hidden costs of withdrawing from your Savings Pot

Explore the significant tax implications of withdrawing from your Savings Pot and understand how these decisions can impact your retirement savings. Image: File picture. During a recent speech, Edward Kieswetter, the Commissioner of the South African Revenue Service (Sars), stated that the total amount of tax collected from retirement fund members who made Savings Pot withdrawals amounted to around R15 billion. Put differently, Sars on average received about R25 of each R100 withdrawn, and members only received R75 or less of their own money. Our collective retirement savings pool has been robbed of R57 billion that will never grow tax-free to provide a future tax-free lump sum benefit or a higher monthly pension amount after retirement. In the whole Two Pots debate, the negative effect that income tax has on early withdrawals from our Savings Pots does not seem to be high on the agenda. As a result, fund members make ill-informed decisions by not taking the tax effect of their withdrawals into account and then complaining about how they were robbed when they received much less than they anticipated. Firstly, any withdrawals from your Savings Pot will immediately reverse part of the tax deduction that you received when you contributed to your fund. If you contributed R3,000 to your fund, of which R1,000 went into your Savings Pot, you received a tax deduction on the full R3,000 contribution to the fund. If you now withdraw R1,000 from your fund, the R1,000 will be taxable at your marginal income tax rate. If your withdrawal is in a different tax year than the year you contributed, you will not be able to replace that contribution and obtain the tax deduction in the same contribution year. If you therefore contribute 27.5% of your income, for example, R90 000, to a fund and get the full tax deduction and you then withdraw the R30,000 that you have in the Savings Pot, you are not allowed to then contribute an additional tax-deductible contribution of R30 000 in addition to the 27.5% to your fund as the Savings Pot withdrawals are not deducted from your contributions made for tax purposes. Secondly, you will reduce the tax-free amount that you can take as a lump sum payment from the Savings Pot of your fund at retirement. Currently, you are allowed to take R550,000 as a tax-free lump sum amount at retirement. If you started to contribute to a fund after September 1, 2024, and you keep on making withdrawals from your Savings Pot, chances are that you will end up having significantly less than R550,000 in your Savings Pot at retirement. Although the tax issue is concerning enough, the fact that you might end up with significantly less money to retire should be your major concern. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ If you started your fund membership after September 1, 2024 and you contribute R10 000 per month (R3 333 going into your Savings Pot and R6 667 going into your Retirement Pot) to your retirement fund for a period of 30 years and you attain an investment return of 10% per annum, you will have about R7 million in your Savings Pot and about R14 million in our Retirement Pot. If you, however, withdraw all the money in your Savings Pot on an annual basis, you will end up having only R44 000 in your Savings Pot that you can take as a tax-free lump sum at retirement. This is significantly less than the R550 000 that you can take as a tax-free lump sum amount at retirement. As fund members, we have a responsibility to take control of our financial education regarding our retirement savings. Without discipline and short-term sacrifice, we will not be able to attain the long-term benefits of saving enough money for a retirement that is free from financial-related stress, even if we try to blame Sars for our ill-informed decisions. * Ladouce is a pension funds lawyer and the author of the book 'Pensions for Palookas'. PERSONAL FINANCE Explore the significant tax implications of withdrawing from your Savings Pot and understand how these decisions can impact your retirement savings. Image: File picture.

South Africa's millionaires pack their bags for UAE
South Africa's millionaires pack their bags for UAE

The South African

time20 hours ago

  • The South African

South Africa's millionaires pack their bags for UAE

South Africa continues to experience a significant outflow of wealth, as the country saw 250 high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) – those with assets exceeding $1 million (R17.88 million) – emigrate in 2024, according to the latest Henley & Partners Wealth Migration Report. The departure of these individuals has resulted in an estimated R28 billion in wealth leaving the country. This forms part of a broader trend, with South Africa's millionaire population shrinking by 12% over the past decade. In 2014, there were approximately 46 800 dollar-millionaires in the country. That figure dropped to 37 400 in 2024, marking a net loss of over 9 000 HNWIs. Globally, 134 000 millionaires migrated in 2024, with that number expected to rise to 142 000 in 2025. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) led the list of top destinations, gaining 9 800 millionaires and roughly R63 billion in new wealth. In contrast, the United Kingdom experienced the greatest outflow, losing 16 500 millionaires, with R92 billion in wealth departing the country. Despite the trend of dollar-millionaires exiting South Africa, the country has seen growth in rand-based millionaires. Data from the South African Revenue Service (SARS) shows that 569 351 individuals earned over R1 million annually in 2024 – a 16% increase from the previous year. These individuals now make up 3.94% of the 14.45 million registered taxpayers, up from 3.45%. Henley & Partners note that economic uncertainty, political instability, and crime remain key push factors behind South Africa's ongoing wealth migration. However, the growth in the number of local tax-paying millionaires suggests that while global investors may be leaving, South Africans continue to build wealth locally – albeit in rands, not dollars. As pressure mounts to retain skilled professionals and investors, economists suggest that policy certainty, improved security, and economic reform will be essential to reverse the exodus and rebuild long-term investor confidence. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Budget cuts expose SA's public service crisis
Budget cuts expose SA's public service crisis

IOL News

time2 days ago

  • IOL News

Budget cuts expose SA's public service crisis

While the government touts nominal increases in budget allocations, the harsh truth reveals a significant erosion of real-term funding. Image: Rawpixel/Freepik AS South Africa grapples with deepening inequalities and a faltering public service, the recently adopted Budget Vote Reports for 2025 expose a troubling reality: while the government touts nominal increases in budget allocations, the harsh truth reveals a significant erosion of real-term funding. The Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA), Public Service Commission (PSC), and National School of Governance (NSG) all face budget cuts that threaten to undermine service delivery and exacerbate existing disparities. In a virtual meeting this week, the Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration, chaired by the DA's Jan Naudé De Villiers, confronted these critical issues head-on. The reports presented revealed a complex interplay between budget allocations and the pressing needs of public service delivery. Julius Ngoepe, the committee content advisor, noted that the overall budget allocation for the DPSA for 2025/26 stood at R564 million, reflecting a nominal increase of 4.67% from R539m in 2024/25. He pointed out: 'This amount represents a decrease of 0.03% in real terms,' highlighting the painful reality of inflation outpacing budgetary growth. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The DPSA's budget over the Medium-Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) period is projected at R1.8 billion, with a staggering 54.4%, or R966m, earmarked for the compensation of employees (COE). This allocation raised critical questions about the sustainability of service delivery, particularly as spending on transfers and subsidies accounts for only 10.2%, or R178m, with R158m designated for the Centre for Public Service Innovation (CPSI). During the meeting, members voiced their concerns regarding the budget's failure to address systemic inequalities within the public service. The EFF's Sixolisa Gcilishe, lamented the budget's failure to address systemic inequalities: 'The budget failed to address systematic inequalities in the public service as reflected in the wage disparities between top and lower management.' She further highlighted the inadequacy of the R300m allocated for administration in Programme 1, saying: 'Frontline workers remain underpaid,' and questioned the effectiveness of the budget cuts on service delivery. The chairperson acknowledged the gravity of these concerns, saying: 'This was an internal meeting to consider and adopt the DPSA, PSC, and NSG Budget Vote Reports.' He emphasised the importance of documenting these discussions, urging members to reflect their views in the report. Gcilishe insisted that 'the comments should be reflected in the report because the government would not be aware if they were only made in speeches and not documented'. The meeting also saw a significant push for changes in the funding model for the Thusong service centres. The DA's Leah Potgieter proposed: 'The funding should be split among the various departments that were making use of the centres,' leading to an amendment in the recommendation. National and provincial departments providing services in the Thusong service centres should co-fund the centres to ensure their long-term sustainability.' As the discussion progressed, the committee grappled with the implications of budget cuts on service delivery. The committee secretary, Masixole Zibeko, advised that some comments should be added to the report while others should be reserved for the Budget Debate. He cautioned members against introducing new recommendations at this stage, saying: 'Members had opportunities on two previous occasions to do so.' The sentiment of dissatisfaction with budget cuts was echoed by Ngoepe, who said: 'Every sector had expressed dissatisfaction with budget cuts.' This sentiment was further reinforced by the MK Party's Japhta Malinga, who warned that adding new issues at this stage was 'not doing justice to the process'. The chairperson agreed, saying: 'The DPSA had a role to play, but solving youth unemployment was not the sole responsibility of the Department.' The NSG's budget allocation for 2025/26 was also scrutinised, with Ngoepe presenting a budget of R228m, a nominal increase of 4.5% from R218m in 2024/25. Potgieter raised concerns about the allocation of more than 51% of the budget for administration rather than training programmes, saying the bloated administration and minimal training should be highlighted in the report. The chairperson acknowledged this as a valid concern, noting: 'This is a general concern in almost every department across government.' In the PSC report, the overall budget allocation for 2025/26 is R302m, which represents an increase of 4.68% in nominal terms but a decrease of 0.02% in real terms. Langa emphasised the need for security measures for PSC commissioners, saying the critical role of the PSC commissioners and the need for protection against threats at all times should be reflected in the report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store