DFI Retail Group posts 38.9% rise in H1 underlying profit
This comes even as half-year revenue inched down to US$4.39 billion from US$4.4 billion in the previous corresponding period.
DFI on Tuesday (Jul 22) attributed the profit growth to lower financing costs and an improved showing in its associates, as well as its healthy and beauty, and food segments.
After accounting for the divestment of Chinese supermarket operator Yonghui Superstores, which was completed in February, underlying profit of the group's associates was US$30 million, up from US$3 million in the year-ago period.
The increase was also due to higher contributions from both Maxim's and Robinsons Retail. The group's share of Maxim's and Robinson Retail's underlying profits grew to US$14 million and US$18 million, respectively.
Sales in DFI's health and beauty segment grew 4 per cent on the year to US$1.3 billion and profit grew 8 per cent to US$109 million on a like-for-like basis.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The bottom line of the group's food division grew 14 per cent on the year to US$24 million on a like-for-like basis. This was despite a marginal drop in its revenue to US$1.5 billion, excluding the impact of the divestment of the Hero Supermarket business in Indonesia last year.
Underlying earnings per share stood at US$0.0779 for the period, up from US$0.0562 a year ago.
'Our ongoing portfolio evolution enables us to prioritise capital on high-margin businesses and growth initiatives, while providing strategic flexibility for inorganic opportunities,' said the group.
In the first quarter, the group completed the divestment of its minority stakes in Yonghui Superstores and Robinsons Retail, generating total gross proceeds of about US$900 million.
The group is also selling its Singapore food business to Malaysian retail and investment conglomerate Macrovalue for about US$93 million.
As a result, the group has declared a special dividend of US$0.443 per share. This is on top of an interim dividend of US$0.035 per share, unchanged from the previous year. Both will be paid on Oct 15.
However, after including non-trading items, the group would have made a loss of US$37.6 million in H1 FY2025, as opposed to a profit of US$95.1 million in the year-ago period.
Loss per share would then be US$0.0279 in the recorded period, reversing from an earnings per share of US$0.0707.
DFI noted that it expects underlying profit to be between US$250 million and US$270 million in 2025.
'Despite a more cautious revenue outlook, the group expects to deliver stronger profitability through enhanced operational efficiency and disciplined cost management,' said DFI.
It also expects 0.5 to 1 per cent growth in revenue for the full year, reflecting broader economic uncertainty and a sharper-than-expected decline in cigarette sales.
Shares of DFI ended Tuesday 1 per cent or US$0.03 higher at US$3.16.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
3 minutes ago
- Straits Times
‘Hashing things out': Japan, Vietnam, EU contest terms of US tariff deal behind the scenes
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The devil lies in the nitty-gritty, and leaders from Asia and Europe have openly contradicted the US on the terms of agreement. – US President Donald Trump has chalked up a spate of headline-grabbing trade deals as the clock ticks down to his Aug 1 'reciprocal' tariffs deadline. But cracks are emerging over their precise terms amid confusion over their timing, implementation, and investment conditions. Critics have reportedly described the agreements as 'flimsy napkin deals'. The devil lies in the nitty-gritty , and leaders from Asia and Europe have openly contradicted the US on the terms of agreement. For Vietnam , The Straits Times understands that the proposed rates that were announced were not even what Hanoi had agreed on . Mr Trump touted a deal with Hanoi on July 2, proposing a 20 per cent 'reciprocal' tariff and a 40 per cent rate for transshipments. Unlike Japan and the EU, Vietnam believes it would be counterproductive to oppose Mr Trump publicly and directly, and both teams of negotiators are now hashing things out quietly. 'The strategy here is to work on the definition of goods that are deemed to be transshipped, not to change the headline number of 40 per cent itself,' a source with knowledge of Vietnam's ongoing trade talks with the Trump administration told ST. 'Ultimately, we hope to be able to persuade the White House that it is a fact that the Chinese are manufacturing products that form the bulk of the goods that we make. It is not fraud, but simply how the supply chains work,' the person added. For Japan, a deal was struck on July 22 for the US to lower the 'reciprocal' tariff rate from 25 per cent to 15 per cent, and car levies from 27.5 per cent to 15 per cent. As part of the deal, Mr Trump said Japan pledged US$550 billion (S$708 billion) in investments as a 'signing bonus', with the US to rake in 90 per cent of the profits. With the European Union, the US agreed on July 27 to halve tariff rates to 15 per cent, with the bloc committing an additional US$600 billion in investments in the US. For both agreements, there is no clear start date on their implementation. Politicians, economists and analysts are struggling to unmuddy the waters of what exactly had been agreed on. In the EU, where French and German leaders are among those to have soured on the deal, Bloomberg cited officials as saying that the announced agreement was but the first step in a long-drawn process for trade negotiators to iron out a legally binding text. For Japan, chief trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa even said that Tokyo would forgo a formal legally binding document lest this holds up the deal's implementation. But the absence of any signed document and a different understanding with the US over what had been agreed on precisely is turning up the heat on embattled Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. Mr Ishiba is fighting for his political survival after his ruling coalition was routed in consecutive polls, losing its majority in both the Lower and Upper House of the Diet. On July 28, he again reiterated that he would not resign as a political vacuum would only jeopardise an agreement that 'serves both countries' national interests, while protecting what we should protect'. One day later, he announced a task force to oversee the proper implementation of the deal. Among its members was Economy Minister Yoji Muto, who said at a regular news conference: 'With the deadline in mind, we urge the US to take necessary measures such as by issuing a presidential order to reduce the tariffs, as soon as possible.' There is, however, a fair share of critics, even within the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, over the lack of clarity and how the agreement was struck. Former economic security minister Sanae Takaichi, who is gunning to replace Mr Ishiba in the top job, wrote on X: 'In the absence of any written agreement, we don't know exactly what has been guaranteed.' She went on to highlight the discrepancies in both countries' statements . For example, while Mr Trump boasted that Japan agreed to 'buy billions of dollars worth of military and other equipment', such a commitment was nowhere in a Japanese fact sheet on July 25 of what was agreed on. But the biggest minefield stemmed from the supposed US$550 billion in investments, to be made across nine strategic sectors such as chips, pharmaceuticals, steel and shipbuilding. 'What Japan did is they brought down their tariffs. They gave us US$550 billion upfront, 100 per cent. We get 90 per cent, they get 10 per cent,' Mr Trump had said. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick described Japan as 'the banker', with a White House fact sheet saying that Japan would invest as 'directed by the United States to rebuild and expand core American industries'. The Japanese document instead said Japan pledged 'up to' US$550 billion – and not the precise figure. The US would be assured 90 per cent of profits and Japan, 10 per cent, 'proportionate to their respective financing contributions and risk burdens'. And rather than Japan taking orders from the US, Mr Akazawa stressed that the government-linked Japan Bank for International Cooperation would strictly review the projects that it would finance. He added that between 1 and 2 per cent would be actual investment, with the remainder funded by loans or loan guarantees. Further, while US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has threatened that Japan's 'reciprocal' tariff rate would boomerang back to 25 per cent if its deal was not followed faithfully, Mr Akazawa denied that any punitive measures were ever discussed. 'The uncertainty is only growing,' Ms Takaichi said. A source privy to the trade talks told ST that Japan was girding for even more turbulence ahead, given that 'there are voices within the US administration that it had been too lenient on Japan'. Geoeconomics expert Saori Katada of the University of Southern California told ST: 'Although the vibes after the Japan-US deal last week seem to be that it was a 'massive' agreement and an absolute success, I fully doubt so.' She observed that the US would have been in a hurry to land a good deal with Japan, a sizeable economy and an Indo-Pacific security ally whose political climate is increasingly volatile. As Mr Trump turned up the heat on Japan over alleged market barriers in cars and rice , the US could score headlines by playing up Japan's compromises. Japan agreed to allow US cars to be imported without the need for additional safety tests, and review subsidies to promote electric vehicles. It also promised to buy more US rice within the tariff-free import quota of 770,000 tonnes. The deal gave Mr Ishiba a policy victory, as he had long described the tariffs as a 'national crisis'. While the 15 per cent rate was still markedly higher than before Mr Trump announced sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs, the glass-half-full view of the July 22 deal was how low it was compared with other countries, with Mr Trump unlikely to exempt any country or region from these 'reciprocal' tariffs. 'It sounds like a public relations ploy on both sides, especially in the US,' Dr Katada said, adding: 'I think the global uncertainty will not end with the current series of 'trade deals', especially when Trump sees that others can be pushed around.' Meanwhile, criticism continues to swirl over the purported US$550 billion investment pledge, which main opposition leader Yoshihiko Noda warned would be a 'minefield'. Nomura Research Institute executive economist Takahide Kiuchi, a former Bank of Japan policy board member, said the statements from the US make the deal feel 'as though Japan's sovereignty is being infringed upon'. Dr Stefan Angrick, head of Japan and frontier markets at Moody's Analytics, added: 'The deal is unlikely to be the final chapter in a saga that has bruised Japan's economy.'
Straits Times
3 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Seatrium to pay $168m to Brazilian authorities, $73m to Singapore authorities to settle corruption case
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox With this announcement, Seatrium said that Singapore authorities have concluded their joint investigations into potential offences. SINGAPORE - Offshore and marine specialist Seatrium said it has signed a leniency agreement with the authorities in Brazil in relation to a long-running corruption probe, known as Operation Car Wash. It made the announcement on July 30, a day before the company is due to release its earnings for the first half of the 2025 financial year. Under the terms of the leniency agreements with Brazil's public prosecutor's office and other authorities, Seatrium will pay a final settlement of around $168.4 million. It was also required to pay a penalty of US$110 million (S$141.7 million) to Singapore authorities, under a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) entered with the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) in Singapore. However, the AGC has agreed for up to a maximum of US$53 million of the payment to the Brazilian authorities to be credited against the financial penalty here. As such, the amount payable by Seatrium under the DPA will be US$57 million (S$73.3 million). The DPA, signed on July 30 with Singapore authorities, is subject to approval by the Singapore High Court. With this announcement, Seatrium said that the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the Singapore police's Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) have concluded their joint investigations into potential offences. 'No action will be taken against the company and/or its officers,' Seatrium said. Seatrium shares fell 1.3 per cent, or three cents, to $2.35 as at the midday trading break on July 30, after the announcement. This is after the company lifted a trading halt around 11.20am that it had called for before the market opened earlier. Seatrium, which was then Sembcorp Marine, became implicated in Operation Car Wash, a major corruption scandal in Brazil, which involved allegations of paying bribes to secure contracts. The company said in its July 30 statement that it has made provisions in its financial statements for the in-principle settlement payment and financial penalty. 'Following the finalised agreements with the Brazilian and Singapore authorities, the company has reversed a provision of $14 million in its financial statements for the financial period ended June 30 to take into account the finalised settlement payment and financial penalty, current exchange rates and other expenses,' it said. 'There is therefore no material impact on the net earnings and net tangible asset per share of the group for the financial year ending Dec 31.' Seatrium added that it is 'keen to move forward' and to ride on the energy market tailwinds to create transformative offshore energy solutions globally and ultimately deliver long-term sustainable growth. 'The company wishes to emphasise that it remains committed to the highest standards of corporate governance and business integrity, including zero-tolerance for fraud, bribery and corruption,' it said. It added that it has put robust policies and procedures in place to instill the highest standards of discipline, ethics, and compliance across its global operations.
Business Times
3 minutes ago
- Business Times
HSBC first-half profit falls 26%, misses estimates
[HONG KONG] HSBC Holdings reported a 26 per cent slide in first-half pretax profit on Wednesday, missing analyst estimates, as a US$2.1 billion impairment from its investment in Bank of Communications weighed. Europe's largest bank posted a pretax profit of US$15.8 billion for the first six months of this year, versus US$21.6 billion a year earlier. The result compared with the US$16.5 billion average of broker estimates compiled by HSBC. REUTERS
