logo
Let us tax visitors on overnight stays in England, mayors say

Let us tax visitors on overnight stays in England, mayors say

Yahoo05-06-2025
A coalition of mayors has called for powers to be given to local authorities to create visitor levies across England, in an attempt to boost tourist infrastructure and regional growth.
The group of mayors from around the country, led by Liverpool City Region Mayor Steve Rotheram, is calling on the government to grant devolved powers to allow regions to create a visitor levy, which could see a small charge added to overnight stays.
Mr Rotheram said the overnight charges are 'the kind most of us wouldn't think twice about when travelling abroad' and 'would give us the power to reinvest directly into the things that make our area so special'.
Other mayors have echoed his sentiment. Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, said: 'A modest overnight accommodation levy, similar to other international cities, would boost our economy, deliver growth and help cement London's reputation as a global tourism and business destination.'
A similar law is already in place in Scotland, passed in 2024, which allows councils to tax overnight accommodation if they wish to do so. Edinburgh has already made headway with this power, voting in January to add a five per cent surcharge on visitors' overnight stays by 2026.
A bill has also been proposed by Welsh lawmakers to introduce a small visitor levy that could see visitors to the country paying up to £1.25 per night by 2027.
The mayors say England is 'at risk of falling behind' as Scotland and Wales move ahead with their own tourism levies, so are calling for rapid action from the central government.
The mayors have argued that the powers to create a visitor levy would unlock 'vital' funding for tourism and cultural infrastructure and drive regional growth, as well as reduce dependence on funding from the central government.
English legislation does not allow cities to create a visitor levy; however, using legal workarounds has meant Liverpool and Manchester have introduced a form of tourism levy.
The city councils both introduced a tourism-based Business Improvement District (BID), using existing legal power to establish a form of tourist tax that allows hoteliers to charge £1 (in Manchester) or £2 (in Liverpool) per night as part of a 'city visitor charge'.
The mayors said that the BID visitor levy in Liverpool has received strong backing, while in Manchester, a recent survey revealed 70 per cent of tourists are willing to pay a small charge if it is used to visibly enhance tourism services.
However, the local authorities are hoping to see devolved powers to create visitor levies written into law.
The campaign is backed by the mayors of the Liverpool City Region, Greater Manchester, London, the North East, the West Midlands and West Yorkshire.
'These regions collectively attract hundreds of millions of visitors annually and contribute billions to the UK economy,' the group said. 'Yet none currently benefit from a dedicated funding stream to reinvest in tourism resilience and growth.'
The Liverpool City Region predicts that a visitor levy could raise nearly £11 million per year for the area from the over 60 million visitors it receives annually.
Greater Manchester says that a £1 to £5 overnight tax could raise between £8 million and £40 million per year, which could help fund key infrastructures such as the regeneration of Old Trafford or airport development.
Over in the capital, the group said tourism accounts for one in seven jobs and nearly 12 per cent of London's economy, whereas visitor economies stand at £6.1 billion in the North East and £16.3 billion in Birmingham.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court upholds restrictions on Los Angeles immigration arrests

time7 hours ago

Appeals court upholds restrictions on Los Angeles immigration arrests

An appeals court upheld a lower court's order to temporarily block federal immigration agents from conducting immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause. In the ruling on Friday night, the ninth circuit court of appeals agreed with a federal judge that immigration agents cannot use race, ethnicity or other factors, including speaking Spanish or speaking English with an accent, as the basis for reasonable suspicion to stop people. 'We agree with the district court that, in the context of the Central District of California, the four enumerated factors at issue -- apparent race, ethnicity, speaking Spanish or speaking English with an accent, particular location and type of work, even when considered together -- describe only a broad profile and do not demonstrate reasonable suspicion for any particular stop,' the three judge panel said. The appeals court found that the Trump administration did not dispute in filings that definitive stops in Los Angeles have occurred based on the factors and did not dispute the district court's conclusion that the reliance on them 'does not satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonable suspicion.' The judges concluded that plaintiffs 'are likely to succeed' in showing that the Trump administration stopped and detained people based on their race, place of work and language. Last month, immigrant advocacy groups filed a lawsuit accusing the Trump administration of unconstitutional sweeps in Los Angeles. A hearing in the case is scheduled for September.

uTalk Language Learning: Lifetime Subscription (150+ Languages)
uTalk Language Learning: Lifetime Subscription (150+ Languages)

USA Today

time7 hours ago

  • USA Today

uTalk Language Learning: Lifetime Subscription (150+ Languages)

DescriptionInstructorImportant DetailsReviewsRelated Products uTalk can help you start speaking like a native within minutes. Using the uTalk learning App you can listen to real native speakers to help you navigate through your next vacation or business trip. We all learned a language as children so you'd think we'd know how to learn one as adults? But somewhere along the line - maybe because of all the other info we've been cramming into our brains since then - we've forgotten the trick of it. One thing for sure though is that our childhood ability to learn a language wasn't dependent on reciting verbs and conjugations. And it wasn't dependent on using voice recognition technology when our own ears did the job. So learning a language with uTalk is child's play for all the right reasons. With more than 2,500 words and phrases to learn in each of our 150+ languages, the app gives you a running start on your journey to language fluency. Simple and easy to use, you have fun as you develop your language skills naturally - just like you did with your first language. Every single word you hear on the app is spoken by authentic native speakers so you're constantly immersed in your new language. And, because uTalk mirrors the way we all learn best as children, it lets you learn what you want, when you want, so you can progress at your own pace. Sometimes, even in this age of screens and technology, we could all do with learning the way Mother Nature intended. uTalk's language programs let you understand how native speakers actually talk and feature independently verified translations so you'll be able to navigate through your next vacation or business trip and speak like a real local. You can learn any of our languages from your own language too, so whether you are a Spanish speaker who wants to learn Arabic, an English Speaker who wants to learn Spanish, or a French speaker who wants to learn Urdu, we've got you covered. The uTalk learning method is tried and trusted by more than 30 Million users. Access to all 150 + languages for life (see Important Details for full list) to learn from any device, any time you want Discover real, practical vocabulary that you can use in real-world situations Measure your achievements as you go along Verify your learning by playing speaking games Over 60 different topics to help you learn Learn from native voice artists who really know what they're talking about Access your account from any device so you can pick up where you left off anywhere Awards & Reviews The Queen's Award for Innovation and Export The Chartered Institute of Language Threlford Cup Winner 2019 4.3/5 stars on IOS App Store: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Important Details Get a lifetime access to all and any of uTalk's 140 languages, including: Afrikaans Albanian Amharic Arabic (Egyptian) Arabic (Gulf) Arabic (Lebanese) Arabic (Modern Standard) Arabic (Moroccan) Armenian Assamese Azerbaijani Basque Belarusian Bengali Bosnian Breton Bulgarian Burmese Cantonese Catalan Cebuano Chibemba Chichewa Chinese (Hakka) Chinese (Mandarin) Cornish Croatian Czech Danish Dari Dutch Dzongkha English (American) English (Australian) English (British) English (Canadian) English (Cockney) English (Indian) English (Scottish) Esperanto Estonian Fijian Filipino (Tagalog) Finnish Flemish French French (Canadian) Galician Georgian German German (Swiss) Greek Greek (Ancient) Greenlandic Gujarati Haitian Creole Hausa Hawaiian Hebrew And more. Check full list here Length of access: lifetime To view complete terms and conditions, click here Have questions on how digital purchases work? Learn more here Learn more about our Lifetime deals here ! Unredeemed licenses can be returned for store credit within 30 days of purchase. Once your license is redeemed, all sales are final. This item is excluded from coupons. All reviews are from verified purchasers collected after purchase. The web interface feels clunky and you must download an app to really use it. The lessons leave a bit to be desired As an educator, uTalk misses out on a lot of the effective teaching techniques such as spaced repetition and feels like a flashcard app. However, I am giving it credit for having excellent coverage of languages as there are more than 100 options compared to the 14 or so offered by most other language apps. Estoy muy complacido con esta aplicación móvil y, además, tengo acceso a través de la web. Es vitalicia. Excellent value, and best language selection . This is one of the few apps I found which offers tagalog as an option. haven't had time to get too far into it yet, but enjoying the basics so far. can't give it a five star rating until i see how well i'm able to learn these languages. All the major world languages are covered. There is the same basic sequence of language learning for all the languages. The situations are mostly identical. Your cart is empty. Continue Shopping! Made in Venice, CA & powered by

Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps
Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps

CNBC

time7 hours ago

  • CNBC

Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps

A federal appeals court ruled Friday night to uphold a lower court's temporary order blocking the Trump administration from conducting indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in Southern California. A three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing Monday afternoon at which the federal government asked the court to overturn a temporary restraining order issued July 12 by Judge Maame E. Frimpong, arguing it hindered their enforcement of immigration law. Immigrant advocacy groups filed suit last month accusing President Donald Trump's administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people in Southern California during the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. The lawsuit included three detained immigrants and two U.S. citizens as plaintiffs. In her order, Frimpong said there was a "mountain of evidence" that federal immigration enforcement tactics were violating the Constitution. She wrote the government cannot use factors such as apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, presence at a location such as a tow yard or car wash, or someone's occupation as the only basis for reasonable suspicion to detain someone. The appeals court panel agreed and questioned the government's need to oppose an order preventing them from violating the constitution. "If, as Defendants suggest, they are not conducting stops that lack reasonable suspicion, they can hardly claim to be irreparably harmed by an injunction aimed at preventing a subset of stops not supported by reasonable suspicion," the judges wrote. A hearing for a preliminary injunction, which would be a more substantial court order as the lawsuit proceeds, is scheduled for September. The Los Angeles region has been a battleground with the Trump administration over its aggressive immigration strategy that spurred protests and the deployment of the National Guard and Marines for several weeks. Federal agents have rounded up immigrants without legal status to be in the U.S. from Home Depots, car washes, bus stops, and farms, many of whom have lived in the country for decades. Among the plaintiffs is Los Angeles resident Brian Gavidia, who was shown in a video taken by a friend on June 13 being seized by federal agents as he yells, "I was born here in the states, East LA bro!" They want to "send us back to a world where a U.S. citizen ... can be grabbed, slammed against a fence and have his phone and ID taken from him just because he was working at a tow yard in a Latino neighborhood," American Civil Liberties Union attorney Mohammad Tajsar told the court Monday. The federal government argued that it hadn't been given enough time to collect and present evidence in the lawsuit, given that it was filed shortly before the July 4 holiday and a hearing was held the following week. "It's a very serious thing to say that multiple federal government agencies have a policy of violating the Constitution," attorney Jacob Roth said. He also argued that the lower court's order was too broad, and that immigrant advocates did not present enough evidence to prove that the government had an official policy of stopping people without reasonable suspicion. He referred to the four factors of race, language, presence at a location, and occupation that were listed in the temporary restraining order, saying the court should not be able to ban the government from using them at all. He also argued that the order was unclear on what exactly is permissible under law. "Legally, I think it's appropriate to use the factors for reasonable suspicion," Roth said The judges sharply questioned the government over their arguments. "No one has suggested that you cannot consider these factors at all," Judge Jennifer Sung said. However, those factors alone only form a "broad profile" and don't satisfy the reasonable suspicion standard to stop someone, she said. Sung, a Biden appointee, said that in an area like Los Angeles, where Latinos make up as much as half the population, those factors "cannot possibly weed out those who have undocumented status and those who have documented legal status." She also asked: "What is the harm to being told not to do something that you claim you're already not doing?" Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the Friday night decision a "victory for the rule of law" and said the city will protect residents from the "racial profiling and other illegal tactics" used by federal agents.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store