Labour MPs fume as Keir Starmer appoints former Sun editor to top job
He was editor of The Scottish Sun for four years from 2006 before moving to London and working as editor of The Sun from 2013 to 2015. Dinsmore comes into the Government from a role as chief operating officer of News UK, the British arm of the Murdoch publishing empire.
The Sun is deeply unpopular in Liverpool for slandering people from the city who lost their lives in the Hillsborough disaster in 1989 and the paper is referred to throughout the letter as The S*n.
Under Dinsmore's watch, The Sun took a photograph of the 15-year-old victim of a paedophile from her Facebook page and published it after pixelating her face.
He was fined for a breach of the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act after a judge ruled that it remained identifiable to people who were familiar with her social media profile.
In 2014, he was named 'sexist of the year' by the End Violence Against Women group which campaigned against The Sun's infamous Page Three. He was mockingly praised for his 'valiant persistence in peddling pornography under the guise of 'news''.
These concerns were raised by the three Labour MPs who also told Starmer that his appointment would upset their constituents due to the Hillsborough connection.
The letter raised 'grave concerns' about Dinsmore's appointment 'at the same time promising Hillsborough families and survivors that the Hillsborough Law will be introduced'.
READ MORE: Donald Trump responds to John Swinney's indyref2 plan
It added: 'One of the key asks of the Hillsborough Law we are campaigning for is to ensure that senior Government officials and civil servants would be legally compelled to tell the truth at inquests or inquiries following a tragedy at the hands of the state.
'Prime Minister, what sort of message do you believe your appointment of Dinsmore into a senior Government role sends to Hillsborough families and survivors, who have lived through so much pain and suffering at the hands of the publication he has previously edited?'
(Image: Francesco Guidicini/The Sunday Times)
The letter also noted that The Sun has faced repeated accusations of 'disinformation, Islamophobia, misogyny and more'.
Dinsmore's new role will be permanent secretary for communications, a new position created to improve the Government's messaging to the public. It is a civil service rather than political role.
News UK and the UK Government were approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Man City verdict on 100+ charges could be months away with further delays in sight
Club executives and senior football figures believe that the Manchester City case could still go until at least October before the initial outcome, as the controversy threatens to complicate another Premier League season. Some club leaders have even speculated that it might arrive in the campaign's second international break, from 4-18 October, given previous patterns regarding similar cases. An outcome was expected last season, given that the hearing concluded in early December. It has nevertheless rumbled on into the summer, and means another season faces the weight of potential upheaval and drastic change through possible points deductions. Manchester City stridently insist upon their innocence. Actual details of the process have been kept under lock and key, with only those directly involved knowing exactly how it is going, due to the sensitivity of the case. The charges involve accusations of City breaching football's financial regulations, and Freedom of Information requests revealed that the British embassy in Abu Dhabi discussed the case. Bloomberg even reported that UAE officials raised the charges in a meeting with UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy in 2024, but Lammy said it was a matter for the Premier League. Insiders with knowledge of certain aspects of the investigation are nevertheless predicting a September-October outcome, with some believing it will come in one of the international breaks. The initial outcome of City's Associated Party Transaction case ended up arriving on 7 October 2024, which was at the start of that period's Fifa window. Such stances have nevertheless been subject to change, given there was previously a widespread view that the initial decisions would be published around Easter, and the end of April. The controversy - which has now been ongoing since the initial Der Spiegel "Football Leaks" in November 2018 and resulted in the Premier League announcing 100+ charges in February 2023 - is commonly seen as an "existential moment" for the league and the wider game regardless of outcome. Premier League insiders say it has also had another effect, which is in delaying proper governance. Clubs are now unwilling to push through or even suggest any major changes in the running of the competition, due to the belief that the outcome of the case could change absolutely everything. There is also a split between clubs regarding what should happen if the most severe charges are proven and City are punished. While a minority would push for outright expulsion in such an event, that is seen as unlikely since it would require a special shareholder vote and a majority of 15 clubs. Other clubs are more in favour of a potential punishment allowing everyone to get on with it, as they feel the controversy is now causing undue damage to the Premier League. That very view is nevertheless seen by other executives as a concerted "tactic" by City, since the stakeholders are more likely to become fatigued by the process the longer it goes on. Another split revolves around the idea of "a stay" in the event of a potential City punishment, and whether the club face sanctions straight away or after an appeal. One senior club executive told The Independent that there is unlikely to be any tangible change to anything for even a year after the initial outcome, due to the various stages of the process as well as possible appeals. As it is, City themselves are understood to be "confident" they will be cleared.
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Australia bans YouTube accounts for children under 16 in reversal of previous stance
The Australian government announced YouTube will be among the social media platforms that must ensure account holders are at least 16-years-old from December, reversing a position taken months ago on the popular video-sharing service. YouTube was listed as an exemption in November last year when the Parliament passed world-first laws that will ban Australian children younger than 16 from platforms including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and X. Communications Minister Anika Wells released rules Wednesday that decide which online services are defined as 'age-restricted social media platforms' and which avoid the age limit. The age restrictions take effect Dec. 10 and platforms will face fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($33 million) for 'failing to take responsible steps' to exclude underage account holders, a government statement said. The steps are not defined. Wells defended applying the restrictions to YouTube and said the government would not be intimidated by threats of legal action from the platform's U.S. owner, Alphabet Inc. 'The evidence cannot be ignored that four out of 10 Australian kids report that their most recent harm was on YouTube,' Wells told reporters, referring to government research. 'We will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids.' Children will be able to access YouTube but will not be allowed to have their own YouTube accounts. YouTube said the government's decision 'reverses a clear, public commitment to exclude YouTube from this ban.' 'We share the government's goal of addressing and reducing online harms. Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media,' a YouTube statement said, noting it will consider next steps and engage with the government. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would campaign at a United Nations forum in New York in September for international support for banning children from social media. 'I know from the discussions I've had with other leaders that they are looking at this and they are considering what impact social media is having on young people in their respective nations,' Albanese said. 'It is a common experience. This is not an Australian experience." Last year, the government commissioned an evaluation of age assurance technologies that was to report last month on how young children could be excluded from social media. The government had yet to receive that evaluation's final recommendations, Wells said. But she added the platform users won't have to upload documents such as passports and driver's licenses to prove their age. 'Platforms have to provide an alternative to providing your own personal identification documents to satisfy themselves of age,' Wells said. 'These platforms know with deadly accuracy who we are, what we do and when we do it. And they know that you've had a Facebook account since 2009, so they know that you are over 16." Exempt services include online gaming, messaging, education and health apps. They are excluded because they are considered less harmful to children. The minimum age is intended to address harmful impacts on children including addictive behaviors caused by persuasive or manipulative platform design features, social isolation, sleep interference, poor mental and physical health, low life-satisfaction and exposure to inappropriate and harmful content, government documents say.
New Statesman
26 minutes ago
- New Statesman
One year on, tensions still circle Britain's asylum-seeker hotels
In the Park Hotel car park, a little boy bounced around in the drizzle as his mother watched on from the foyer door. This was his makeshift playground: kids' bikes on a rack, a basketball net furring with moss. Families including 34 adults and 46 children live at this hotel – in the centre of Diss, a small market town in Norfolk – contracted by the Home Office in 2023 to house asylum seekers. They have come from Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Somalia and Eritrea. When I visited, they were in limbo in more ways than one: not just waiting for refugee status or a permanent home, but to find out if they would be replaced by a group of asylum-seeking single men. Imposed by the Home Office with little notice, this plan sparked a protest on 21 July. Around 150 people turned up to oppose the hotel's use, chanting, 'We want our country back.' It turned aggressive, when some crossed the road to confront counter-protesters. Local politicians accused out-of-town activists of stirring up trouble. Two men were charged with public order offences. A Norfolk reporter said the crowd had 'turned on' him and warned me to be careful as I wandered up the quaint high street of wool shops and stalls of fresh fish and hog roast. 'We used to have lovely Christmas dinners there,' recalled Martyn Thorndyke, 34, who works nights at a factory and often went for a pint at the hotel. 'But I guess they don't celebrate that there now, do they?' A 36-year-old woman suggested sheltering asylum seekers in tents. 'If it was me and I had to flee, I'd absolutely flee. But there's no housing for them here.' A fisherman, testing out some equipment in the lake, had another idea: 'They should have great white sharks patrolling Dover.' As the rain hung eyelash-thin and seagulls eddied above, the town tensed up. Police parked around the corner from the hotel. Further protests had been scheduled. The hotel owners were in a stand-off with government, threatening to close if they had to take solely men. 'We don't know what will happen, it's up to the Home Office,' said an employee. Another told me the hotel residents – who have cooked for people in Diss, taken English lessons at the library and sent their children to local schools – were distressed. Locals spoke, some unprompted, about the 'young, fit men' due to arrive. Emma Lummis, 47, a school worker, had banned her 13-year-old daughter from going out in the town centre, or wearing a short skirt. 'You just don't know who these people are. We're not racist. It's not about whether you're white or not; it's about whether you're a wrong 'un.' A 55-year-old woman who had collected donations and organised craft events for the families told me they had 'integrated' and 'Diss is a very welcoming town' – just not the place for young men. 'Just like the 'professionally unemployed' British guys drinking in the park, they would have nothing to do here but hang around.' When the riots hit last summer, she said police warned her to keep her activities at a 'low profile'. There are 210 hotels housing 32,345 asylum seekers across the UK – a drop since the height of 400 housing 56,042 in 2023. This July, protests spread through Diss, Norwich, Portsmouth, Bournemouth, Leeds, London's Canary Wharf and Epping in Essex. Far-right figures have attended and coordinated protests via social media. Stand Up to Racism counter-protesters rally in response. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe The asylum hotel policy could be a parable for all that is wrong with the British state. The Conservatives under-resourced asylum claim processing. Channel crossings rose despite government promising the reverse. Ministers commandeered much-loved venues at short notice, cancelling wedding receptions and birthday parties. And this was all contracted out to private providers such as Serco, costing the taxpayer £15bn. It is a tired tale of cuts, broken pledges, neighbourhood neglect and poor-value outsourcing. But a subplot fraught with rumour and racism is darkening the story. Reporting around England in recent years, again and again I have encountered the same fears: that these newcomers might assault women and girls. Riots in Southport and Ballymena over the past two years had the same trigger: charges of attacks on young girls. The Best Western Brook Hotel in Bowthorpe, Norwich – a site of recent protests – was home to a man now imprisoned for raping a woman, and another for asking a 14-year-old boy to send naked pictures. At Epping's Bell Hotel, there have been both violent clashes and peaceful protests after one resident, now in custody, was charged with sexual assault for allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl (which he denies). Such cases have led to the demonisation of young male asylum seekers as potential criminals and sex offenders. The memory of working-class white girls groomed by British-Pakistani gangs pulses through these suspicions. Victims then were ignored by authorities, partly down to political correctness – a fact that emboldens some people to voice Islamophobic generalisations about the attitudes of certain men towards women. Police National Computer data suggesting Afghans and Eritreans are more than 20 times more likely to be convicted of sexual offences than British citizens are widely shared. Officials warn, however, that this data neither accounts for gender nor for how much younger these ethnic groups are than the British average (young men generally are more likely to commit crime), that it is 'not reliable for nationality' as it omits dual nationals and that it doesn't reflect the number of repeat offenders. After violence outside the Bell Hotel, where officers were injured and 17 protesters arrested, Keir Starmer warned of a second summer of riots. Unrest last year followed the murder of three girls in Southport. The perpetrator, born in Britain to Rwandan parents, was falsely said to be a Muslim asylum seeker who had arrived on a small boat – disinformation that led to rioters attacking a mosque and setting an asylum hotel on fire. Anger is not just confected online in bad faith. At one Epping protest, I was struck by the dissonance between mums waving suffragette flags and grandmas Sharpie-ing 'Protect Our Kids' on to M&S bags for life, and the presence of ex-British National Party councillors and a member of Homeland, a far-right splinter group of the neo-Nazi Patriotic Alternative. Wearing a T-shirt with the slogan 'Save Our Children', the vice-chairman of Reform UK's Epping Forest branch, Orla Minihane, described this wave of protest to me as a '#MeToo moment'. 'Women won't go out for runs, they're getting their husbands to pick them up from the station, they're scared to walk their dogs,' she said. 'I'm sure most of the men in there are good, decent people – but we don't know.' She waved a suffragette flag among the rippling St George's Crosses. 'When we walk past a woman with a child, she pulls the child behind her as if we are going to take them – it is so painful to see,' said Khadar, 20, a Somali asylum seeker living at the Bell Hotel who crossed the Channel three months ago. 'We are not here to hurt you. It was very good here before the incident. Now we feel uncomfortable and there is a lot of tension; people treat us like we're criminals and say insulting words.' Another young Somali man at the Bell Hotel, who preferred not to be named, had been chased by a group of men while shopping. Even as warm sunshine soaked the tree tops of Epping Forest opposite, he pulled a thick black jacket around him and glanced around as we spoke. 'I was very scared.' 'Sexual violence and crime impacts all communities and involves perpetrators of all races,' said Georgie Laming, of the anti-fascist campaign group Hope not Hate. 'It's clear from Epping how an arrest, an allegation or a rumour can quickly take hold, be whipped up and racialised by the far right.' Rumours were ripping through the protests outside the Bell Hotel. I was told repeatedly that Essex Police had bussed anti-racism activists towards the demonstration – a story the force denies but which is all over social media and has been repeated by Nigel Farage. Numerous protesters also told me hotel residents were shoplifting from Tesco, but the police had no reports of this, and the local Tesco had no knowledge of it either. Since 2020, the year asylum seekers moved into the Bell, instances of rape, reports of antisocial behaviour and the number of robberies have dropped in the area. There is also misapprehension that the hotels are five-star experiences for their new guests. 'They're fed and watered, have hot showers, for free,' said an Epping local of 45 years. 'But for us living here, the town has gone downhill.' In Diss, the school worker I met said: 'We're working our arses off and they're given a lovely hotel, clean sheets every morning, it's plush.' In reality, those with knowledge of the Park Hotel talked of breakfast running out, children going hungry and women asking for donations of buckets and mops because of uncleanliness. At another hotel, I've seen a four-year-old scarred from bed-bug bites and families falling sick from undercooked chicken. I've also heard of young people forced to share rooms with adult strangers. The children's commissioner for England, Rachel de Souza, found a 'troubling' lack of safeguarding at these hotels. Such details don't resonate, though, when the world outside the hotels is one of low wages, housing shortages and a crumbling public realm. 'You've got to look after your own first,' said the factory operative. 'We need stuff given to English people, they haven't got houses themselves,' said the school worker. 'This town is empty, it's dead; people haven't got money to shop anymore. I worry about my future grandchildren: life is shit now, what will life be for them?' Deprivation and social dislocation, not levels of immigration, were the most common factors in riot-hit areas last summer, according to a report shared exclusively with the New Statesman that has been read in No 10. 'This Place Matters', by Citizens UK, UCL Policy Lab, and More in Common, finds no consistent correlation between high immigration to an area and low social cohesion. Rather, integration is what counts. The constituencies that experienced unrest all have populations where more people feel 'disconnected' than 'connected'. While financial insecurity is one of the strongest predictors of disconnection, the report identifies other alienating trends: neglected high streets and town centres, the decline of in-person socialising, and a loss of 'associational life' – fewer communal spaces where people interact, remote working and even self-checkouts. In a town of shuttered shops and fly-tipping – where children's centres and social housing and the municipal fireworks display are just a memory – it is little wonder you look up less from your phone. And when that screen is full of lurid innuendo, shared by politicians and activists who have no beguiling slogans for public service reform or community renewal, it only takes a spark to light the tinder. 'In Somalia, I couldn't work because I was in a rural area ruled by militia. I wanted to come to England for a better life, to contribute, not to depend on government, and it took ten hours on the boat – so long and painful with people suffocating,' said Khadar of the Bell Hotel. 'I thought England was a good place, more welcoming than Europe, and would help a lot. Now it feels like a hostile land.' [See more: Can Starmer and Trump come to an agreement on Gaza?] Related
