Starmer to raise Gaza ceasefire and UK steel tariffs in Trump meeting
The two leaders have built a rapport on the world stage despite their differing political backgrounds, with Mr Trump praising Sir Keir for doing a 'very good job' in office ahead of their talks on Monday.
But humanitarian conditions in Gaza and uncertainty over US import taxes on key British goods in America threaten to complicate their bilateral meeting.
The US president has been playing golf at his Turnberry resort in Scotland (PA)
Peace talks in the Middle East came to a standstill last week after Washington and Israel recalled negotiating teams from Qatar, with White House special envoy Steve Witkoff blaming Hamas for a 'lack of desire' to reach an agreement.
Since then, Israel has promised military pauses in three populated areas of Gaza to allow designated UN convoys of aid to reach desperate Palestinians.
But the UK, which is joining efforts to airdrop aid into the enclave and evacuate children in need of medical assistance, has said that access to supplies must be 'urgently' widened.
In his talks with Mr Trump, Sir Keir will 'welcome the President's administration working with partners in Qatar and Egypt to bring about a ceasefire in Gaza', Number 10 said.
'He will discuss further with him what more can be done to secure the ceasefire urgently, bring an end to the unspeakable suffering and starvation in Gaza and free the hostages who have been held so cruelly for so long.'
The leaders will also talk 'one-on-one about advancing implementation of the landmark Economic Prosperity Deal so that Brits and Americans can benefit from boosted trade links between their two countries', it said.
The agreement signed at the G7 summit last month slashed trade barriers on goods from both countries.
But tariffs for the steel industry, which is of key economic importance to the UK, were left to stand at 25% rather than falling to zero as originally agreed.
Concerns had previously been raised that the sector could face a levy of up to 50% – the US's global rate – unless a further agreement was made by July 9, when Mr Trump said he would start implementing import taxes on America's trading partners.
But that deadline has been and gone without any concrete update on the status of UK steel.
Downing Street said that both sides are working 'at pace' to 'go further to deliver benefits to working people on both sides of the Atlantic' and to give UK industry 'the security it needs'.
The two leaders are also expected to discuss the war in Ukraine, which Number 10 said would include 'applying pressure' on Vladimir Putin to end the invasion, before travelling on together for a private engagement in Aberdeen.
It comes after Mr Trump announced he had agreed 'the biggest deal ever made' between the US and the European Union after meeting Ursula von der Leyen for high-stakes talks at Turnberry on Sunday.
After a day playing golf, the US leader met the President of the EU Commission to hammer out the broad terms of an agreement that will subject the bloc to 15% tariffs on most of its goods entering America.
This is lower than a 30% levy previously threatened by the US president.
The agreement will include 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals, as well as EU purchases of US energy worth 750 billion dollars (£558 billion) over three years.
Speaking to journalists on Sunday about his meeting with Sir Keir, Mr Trump said: 'We're meeting about a lot of things. We have our trade deal and it's been a great deal.
'It's good for us. It's good for them and good for us. I think the UK is very happy, they've been trying for 12 years to get it and they got it, and it's a great trade deal for both, works out very well.
'We'll be discussing that. I think we're going to be discussing a lot about Israel.
'They're very much involved in terms of wanting something to happen.
'He's doing a very good job, by the way.'
Mr Trump's private trip to the UK comes ahead of a planned state visit in September.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
2 minutes ago
- Spectator
The state will do anything but fix the migrant crisis
Migrant hotel protests are erupting across the country, as 'tinderbox' Britain catches fire. What began with a series of protests in Epping, Essex, over the alleged sexual assault of a teenage girl by a recently arrived Ethiopian migrant, has now spread, as Brits air long-standing grievances about asylum seekers they have been forced to host in their own communities. A powerful tendency now exists in the British state towards displacement activity Demonstrations have so far been reported in Bournemouth, Southampton and Portsmouth, Norwich, Leeds and Wolverhampton, Sutton-in-Ashfield in Nottinghamshire, Altrincham and even at Canary Wharf in London. With years of unaddressed anger rapidly making themselves felt, the police, pulled in all directions, are struggling to keep up. 'Local commanders are once again being forced to choose between keeping the peace at home or plugging national gaps', admits the head of the Police Federation. Still, it seems there is one thing the government is more than happy to devote resources to: trawling the internet for anti-migrant sentiment. The Telegraph reports that an elite team of police officers convened by the Home Office is set to monitor social media to flag up early signs of unrest. Working out of the National Police Coordination Centre (NPoCC) in Westminster the new National Internet Intelligence Investigations team will 'maximise social media intelligence' gathering in order to 'help local forces manage public safety threats and risks'. If this new division was just about intelligence-gathering that would be one thing. It's true that social media is in invaluable resource for following events on the ground at such gatherings, while local Facebook groups are often where grassroots protests are organised. Yet we know that when it comes to the British state and social media, censorship and punishment for online speech is never far behind. Ever since Sir Keir Starmer repeatedly linked the Southport unrest last year with social media, the idea has firmly taken root in Whitehall that the best way to stop unrest is to aggressively police the internet. Ofcom, the broadcast regulator, already takes this view, and the link has even been drawn in Department for Education guidance on how to talk to schoolchildren about the Southport disorder. In a recent report, the police inspectorate said that that forces must be 'better prepared and resourced to monitor, analyse, use and respond to online content', which it argues was a risk to public safety. This general zeal for social-media policing is why Big Brother Watch believes the new unit is very likely to infringe on free speech. The investigations team is 'Orwellian' and 'disturbing', says interim director Rebecca Vincent, creating the possibility that it 'will attempt to interfere with online content' as other government bodies are known to have done during Covid. As if there weren't enough threats to free speech already. This week age verification provisions in the latest stage of the Online Safety Act (OSA) kicked in, meaning that some footage of protests is now inaccessible on social media for many users. Not even parliamentary privilege is safe from the censorship regime. Katie Lam's searing April speech on the rape gangs, in which she quoted court transcripts and survivors, could not be watched on X without age verification. We are beginning to look like North Korea with rainbow flags: for the public's 'safety', footage exposing grievous failures of the British state now cannot be viewed in the UK. Little wonder, given the OSA explicitly earmarks content relating to 'child sexual abuse' and 'illegal immigration and people smuggling' as the 'kinds of illegal content and activity that platforms need to protect users from'. The Conservatives, who bequeathed us this blank cheque for digital authoritarianism, certainly need to take a long, hard look at themselves. The claims that the OSA is merely about restricting access to pornography has been exposed as a mere fig leaf. And still things could still get worse. As the Free Speech Union has noted, shortly after last year's riots, the Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a pro-censorship lobby group with ties to Morgan McSweeney, 'hosted a closed-door meeting under the Chatham House rule to discuss the role of social media in civil unrest'. In attendance were officials from the Home Office, the Department of Science, Information and Technology, Ofcom and other organisations. The CCDH proposals that emerged included amending the OSA to 'grant Ofcom additional 'emergency response' powers to fight 'misinformation' that poses a 'threat' to 'national security' and 'the health or safety of the public''. This would give Secretary of State Peter Kyle the ability to directly flag unapproved content to be taken down at a time of 'crisis'. Should the unrest continue this could well be coming down the track. What all this illustrates is just how ill-equipped the people in charge are to deal with Britain's problems, as The Spectator's Madeline Grant noted earlier this week. A powerful tendency now exists in the British state towards displacement activity. Spin doctors 'manage' the news. Police surveil social media. The government shuffles asylum seekers from hotel to hotel, or to HMOs, or even to privately rented accommodation (which it uses your own taxes to outbid you for). For his part, the prime minister has been tweeting about the women's football. As the unrest grows, leading politicians continue doggedly insist that Britain remains a 'a successful multi-ethnic, multi-faith country'. In reality, there are answers to the asylum hotels crisis, it's just that the government simply lacks the will to act. Large numbers of illegal migrants need to be deported, while those that are here should be placed in a secure holding facility somewhere remote. What is surely obvious by now where they should not be: in hotels, in an Essex market town 500 yards from a school; on the Bournemouth beachfront; in the London's financial district; in a Leeds suburb right next to a shopping centre. As it is, however, it seems the regime will try anything and everything before addressing people's real concerns.
Scotsman
2 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Apathy and awe from a roadside cafe at Trump's Turnberry during US president visit
The apathy and awe from a roadside cafe during Trump's visit | Katharine Hay The media and security presence dominated a village with little to no sign of support or protest against the Donald Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Tucked in the corner of a cafe just outside Turnberry on the weekend of Donald Trump's visit, a waitress was trying to high-five a customer's dog before giving it a treat. At the next table, a family was tucking into an all day breakfast, washing it down with cans of Irn Bru. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Balkenna Tea Room is an ordinary roadside eatery, with some added character from a wall covered in an array of porcelain teapots of different designs. Balkenna Tearoom became a hub for journalists and Trump entourage over the US president's visit | Katharine Hay The cafe gave a very 'business as usual' vibe despite the furore a mile up the road with unprecedented security level for Mr Trump's visit | Katharine Hay But that changed over the weekend when the spot, popular with locals and motorists travelling up and down the A77, became a pitstop for members of the world's media and Mr Trump's entourage during the US president's private visit to Scotland. The trip has, so far, involved a few rounds of golf at Turnberry's Ailsa course, where Mr Trump was spotted wearing a white USA cap surrounded by family, including his son Donald Trump Jr, waving to journalists and a handful of supporters on Sunday morning. This was followed by an afternoon meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at the hotel to discuss trade deals. Getty Images The president is expected to meet prime minister Sir Keir Starmer at the hotel on Monday before meeting First Minister John Swinney in Aberdeen, where he is set to open a second 18-hole golf course at his Menie estate. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Trump's politics and play in the country that was home to his late mother, Mary Anne Trump, from the Isle of Lewis, has drawn an unprecedented level of security to the small south Ayrshire village. With several sniper points, helicopters and drones overhead and bus-loads of police driving in and out of the site as officers swap shifts guarding the site 24/7, the operation is said to be the largest security operation in Scotland since the death of the Queen. Yet the furore at the Turnberry resort under lockdown with a 10ft fence and multiple checkpoints was a far cry from the apathy felt among locals a mile down the road. Apart from the revolving door of reporters and suspected security officers with radios coming in for a bite to eat throughout the day, staff at the roadside cafe said it was just another normal weekend shift. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When asked if the last 48 hours was any different with Turnberry resembling a military training ground rather than a golf course, one of the waitresses shrugged, saying: 'We're always busy. It's just always a busy spot here with or without Trump.' Conversations mostly revolved around complaints on road blockages 'going on for days' and increased police presence in the area. The busy cafe, however, did attract the occasional fan of the US president, usually popping in for break from waiting around in the village in the hope of catching a glimpse of the Donald. The giveaway was usually someone wearing a 'Make England Great Again' cap modelled on the MAGA design or something printed with stars and stripes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Kenny Weir said Donald Trump has helped bring money into the area | Katharine Hay Sitting at a table looking out the window at the distant Ailsa Craig, an island off Ayrshire's coast where curling stones used in Olympic competitions come from, businessman and Ayrshire local Kenny Weir spoke about his support for the US president. 'I support Trump and I think John Swinney having been a finance minister should welcome Donald Trump with open arms,' he said. 'I know Trump has his faults but, at the end of the day, he spends a lot of money in Scotland.' Mr Weir, who claimed to have met Mr Trump while on a visit to America and who has built hotels all over the world, said he had eyes on buying Turnberry, but couldn't afford the renovation costs at the time it was up for sale about a decade ago. 'Trump spent hundreds of millions on that place,' he said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'He has done a lot employing people in the area with the work he's done here. 'And now we have what has to be the best golf course worldwide.' While flicking through pictures of himself with Trump memorabilia on his phone, he said: 'I think about 60 per cent of Scotland are in favour of him, but most are just too scared to show their support. I always say I have the best house in Ayrshire because it's just up the road from Turnberry.' Mr Weir then started to pull a flag with a picture of Mr Trump's face against stars and stripes from his bag before adding: 'I had better not in here actually.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Despite the heavy media and security presence, the village pavements lay mostly bare when it came to either supporters or protesters over the weekend. There were no signs of pro or anti Trump messages in home windows. Nick, from 'the people's peace core' standing at one of the blocked off roads leading to Turnberry Hotel | Katharine Hay One lone member of a group called 'The People's Peace Core' stood at a checkpoint on a road leading to the Turnberry Hotel in the hope of handing a certificate to the president saying 'to acknowledge your integrity and honourable dealings in promoting the cause of peace, harmony and love around the world.' A handful of demonstrators showed their support for the president on arrival and during a round of golf on Sunday, but, apart from a small protest on Friday, were no signs of the anti-Trump brigade all weekend.
Scotsman
2 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why Keir Starmer's government needs to urgently recognise Palestine
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It seems that with every day the situation we see depicted in news footage from Gaza becomes more hopeless. More horrific. Every report to the UK Parliament becomes more difficult to listen to, more frustrating as we know that whatever calls we make to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are unlikely to be heeded. What we're seeing is difficult to believe because we want to hold onto the hope that it isn't possible. We hear journalists describing the crisis are facing the same deprivations. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Increasingly there is agreement across Parliament that it is time we recognised Palestine as a state. We cannot wait for a peace process, one which has consistently failed to deliver its only aim, to come to an agreed path to statehood for the Palestinians. For too many people, it's already too late. Palestinian and Israeli alike. A boy, clearly in distress, queues for food in a charity kitchen in Gaza City earlier this month (Picture: Bashar Taleb) | AFP via Getty Images Students trapped in Gaza This week I received a letter of thanks from a Palestinian academic. A writer and scholar, she wanted me to know how grateful she was that I had written asking the UK Government to ensure safe passage of students and researchers to the University of Edinburgh. She has an unconditional offer to study for a PhD in English literature there, but the closure of the UK visa office in Gaza is denying her and others the opportunity to escape, leaving her stranded amidst the devastation of war. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The week before, I sat in Parliament with an Israeli mother who pleaded for MPs' support to press for the release of her son's body. He was one of the 251 hostages taken on October 7. The world they both knew, and we recognised, changed forever that day. A world shocked by the brutality of the Hamas attack and murder of almost 1,200 people, the largest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust, stood in solidarity and mourning with Israel. Since then, the Hamas-controlled Health Ministry claims almost 58,000 people have died and 90 per cent of homes have been destroyed. Israel's right to defend itself against Hamas after October 7 was in no doubt. But the scale of the destruction and acute humanitarian crisis in Gaza which ensued has brought widespread condemnation. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'A concentration camp' Many of us who have long regarded ourselves as friends of Israel are distraught at Netanyahu's failure to heed international opinion. One of his predecessors, Ehud Olmert, has criticised the government's plans for a so-called 'humanitarian city' for the Palestinians in Gaza saying: 'It is a concentration camp. I'm sorry.' It has to stop. Myself and my fellow Liberal Democrat MPs have already written to the government calling for recognition of Palestine. And pressure has been mounting this weekend on Keir Starmer to follow French President Emmanuel Macron's lead and announce immediate recognition as others have done. We know that has not been the preferred timescale of this government. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said recently: '…I wish I could say that if we were to recognise tomorrow, it would bring this war to an end, but I am afraid I am not sure that is the case. What is required now is painstaking diplomacy to get to a ceasefire…' For those whose lives have been destroyed, or whose loved ones have been lost, that may not be enough.
