logo
How is China leading the green energy sector?

How is China leading the green energy sector?

The Hindu13 hours ago
China installed more wind turbines and solar panels in 2024 than every other nation combined. This statistic alone underlines how China has sped ahead in the global green energy race, cornering the entirety of the renewable supply chain due to firm control over the extraction of key raw materials such as polysilicon and lithium. China also asserts dominance over the manufacturing of solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries.
China's renewable energy revolution is the result of decades of strategic state planning and massive investments in innovation. Starting with modest pilot projects in the early 2000s, Beijing is now leading in solar panel and battery production. In 2024 alone, China allocated a remarkable $940 billion into the renewable energy sector, according to U.K.-based research organisation Carbon Brief, from an initial investment of $10.7 billion in 2006. In comparison, India's renewable energy sector received a combined total investment of $3.4 billion in 2024-25 as per the Council on Energy, Environment, and Water, highlighting the stark gap.
Turning crisis into opportunity
Apart from climate goals, what mainly inspired China's green revolution was a mounting crisis of extremely high levels of air pollution, coupled with concerns about energy insecurity. By the early 2000s, the country's reliance on coal had made its cities nearly unliveable, resulting in air pollution so bad in Beijing and Shanghai that it was visible from space and had garnered global attention. Importantly, growing public awareness about the adverse affects of air pollution played a key role in pressuring the government to act.
Moreover, surging electricity demand left parts of the nation teetering on the edge of blackouts. Also, increasing dependence on foreign oil triggered concerns over energy security. China's oil imports are largely dependent on West Asia and sensitive shipping lanes through the Strait of Hormuz and the South China Sea.
Therefore, what began as a survival strategy quickly evolved into a platform for national ambition. In less than two decades, China transitioned from an environmental underdog to a clean-energy driven superpower. The turning point came with the 11th Five-Year Plan (2006–2010), which elevated renewable energy to a national strategic priority. The passage of the Renewable Energy Law in 2005 created legal backing for this vision, offering grid access guarantees and price incentives for wind and solar producers, particularly private enterprises that received generous government subsidies. The state poured billions into infrastructure and R&D, while provinces like Gansu, Inner Mongolia, and Jiangsu were identified as early testing grounds for wind and solar farms, in keeping with the Chinese economic practice of starting with pilot projects before scaling up.
The role of SOEs
State-owned Enterprises (SOEs) and banks had a key role to play in executing plans that were led by China's National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and the National Energy Administration (NEA). Public sector banks provided heavy loans, while industrial giants like State Grid, Huaneng, and Genertec brought wind farms and solar parks online at record speed. As SOEs, these firms didn't face the financial limitations of the private sector.
The speed was enabled by a blend of state coordination and market dynamism. While the policy push ensured demand at home, the sheer manufacturing scale drove down prices abroad. From the start, Beijing had a global vision for its ambitions, using programmes such as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to push green trade, whether through the export of solar panels, construction of hydropower stations in Africa or building wind farms in Latin America.
'The undertaking of major national projects, quickly integrating funds, technology, and policy resources, and achieving scale effects that private enterprises cannot achieve, that is what led to this growth achieved by SOEs,' explains Li Menghui, representative of Genertec. SOEs translated national climate policy into large-scale action, deploying wind farms, solar parks, and high-voltage transmission lines in remote regions. Due to the substantial support provided by the central government in the form of mandates, low-interest credit, and political backing, these companies could move more quickly and take significantly greater risks to innovate than their private counterparts globally.
SOEs were also deployed to focus on niche industries, allowing them to use their vast investments in the development and enhancement of a particular technology. Specialised SOEs were not only involved in building domestic energy infrastructure but also served as ambassadors of China's green agenda abroad. SOEsaccount for 55% of global renewable energy investment, as per Bloomberg Finance. China's SOEs turned clean energy into a tool of statecraft, aligning economic development with global dominance in renewable energy. Without them, China's rapid leap from fossil-fuel giant to renewable superpower with global influence would not have been possible.
Lessons learnt
China's green energy push wasn't without bumps along the way. For instance, in the mid-2010s, wind and solar installations outpaced the ability of the national grid to absorb their output. This led to the curtailment of energy, especially in northern provinces such as Inner Mongolia, Jilin, and Gansu where wind power curtailment was as high as 20% in 2014. These bottlenecks revealed a critical gap in transmission infrastructure. Although the creation of renewable energy projects was rapid, other aspects of national infrastructure could not keep up with the growth. Beijing responded through heavy investments in ultra-high voltage transmission lines and more focus on better integrating renewables into the national grid. Over a decade, State Grid doubled its investment from $33.31 billion in 2010 to $88.7 billion this year, according to Reuters.
Another problem was haphazard subsidy policies to SOEs that encouraged wasteful expansion, without adequate oversight. The vast expansion of projects encouraged a build-at-all-costs mentality, leading to redundant projects and inefficiencies across the sector. To correct those issues, Beijing tightened oversight mechanisms and emphasised planning that favoured efficiency and grid-readiness over capacity. One lesson for Beijing was that in the race for renewable development, speed could not trump structure and organisation.
Global influence
With a sprawling global network spanning 61 countries and a web of joint ventures, with local state-owned enterprises, from Angola to Hungary to Bangladesh, China's geopolitical presence in the sector has become deeply entrenched. The current focus is on ensuring dominance in the next wave of clean energy technologies. With support guaranteed by the state to firms such as Longi, Goldwing, and CATL, production costs have been slashed due to market dominance, leading to vertical integration and economies of scale. The next wave of advancement in renewable technology will arrive in the form of AI-powered smart grids, green hydrogen, and next-generation nuclear technologies like thorium reactors, all of which Beijing has set its eyes on with the same formula of aggressive state investment, breakneck deployment, and focus on the export of technology and influence.
The world now faces a bifurcated energy landscape, as the U.S. and its allies scramble to pump billions into reshoring clean energy industries through mechanisms like the Inflation Reduction Act. The key difference between Chinese SOEs and Western private enterprises is the ability of the Chinese state to mobilise large-scale manufacturing capabilities and properly utilise their vast scale. This enables low-cost, high-speed deployment of renewable tech, while the West grapples with higher costs, slower implementation, and far more complex political considerations on the adoption of green energy within each of their countries. The contest of the future, ultimately, will not be about panels or turbines or climate targets but who sets the rules of the global energy game. Will the future of climate tech follow Beijing's centralised, scale-driven blueprint, or will any other player be able to innovate fast enough and demonstrate a credible counter-model to offer to the world?
Kabir Jeet Singh is a student and writer based in Beijing, with a deep interest in global economics, energy policy, and China's ascent.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NITI Aayog proposes easing investment curbs on Chinese firms, suggests allowing 24% stake without nod: Report
NITI Aayog proposes easing investment curbs on Chinese firms, suggests allowing 24% stake without nod: Report

Mint

time25 minutes ago

  • Mint

NITI Aayog proposes easing investment curbs on Chinese firms, suggests allowing 24% stake without nod: Report

India's leading policy think tank, NITI Aayog, has suggested relaxing regulations that mandate additional scrutiny for investments by Chinese firms, asserting that these rules have caused delays for some significant deals, news agency Reuters reported, citing government sources. All investments by Chinese companies in India currently require necessary security approvals from both the Home Ministry and the Foreign Ministry. However, NITI Aayog has proposed that Chinese companies may acquire a stake of up to 24% in an Indian company without the need for approval, the news agency said, citing sources who did not wish to be named. The proposal is part of an initiative to increase foreign direct investment in India and is currently under review by the trade ministry's industries department, the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as well as by Prime Minister Narendra Modi office, the report said. NITI Aayog has also suggested to revamp the board that decides on foreign direct investment proposals, it added. Livemint could not independently verify the report. Notably, the NITI Aayog plays an advisory role and not all proposals suggested by the body are implemented by the government. government. However, the proposal comes at a time when India and China are reportedly trying to improve bilateral relations following the border issues in 2020. The final decision over easing the trade rules will be taken by the political leaders, the report said, citing two sources. The current regulations were introduced following border conflicts in 2020. They apply to land-bordering countries, most impacting Chinese companies. Meanwhile, firms from other countries are generally free to invest in various sectors like manufacturing and pharmaceuticals, although certain sensitive areas such as defence, banking, and media remain restricted. Due to these rules, deals such as China's BYD plan to invest $1 billion in an electric car joint venture in 2023 have been shelved, the report stated. Although global foreign investment has slowed since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the restrictions on Chinese investment in India are seen as a key reason for a significant decline in the country's FDI. Net foreign direct investment in India dropped to a record low of just $353 million in the last financial year, compared to the $43.9 billion recorded in the year ending March 2021. Foreign Minister S Jaishankar made his first visit to China in five years this week. During his trip, he emphasised to his counterpart the importance of resolving border tensions and urged both nations to avoid restrictive trade measures, such as China's limits on rare earth magnet supplies.

EU announces sanctions on Rosneft-backed Nayara Energy, lowers price cap on Russian crude
EU announces sanctions on Rosneft-backed Nayara Energy, lowers price cap on Russian crude

Indian Express

time25 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

EU announces sanctions on Rosneft-backed Nayara Energy, lowers price cap on Russian crude

The European Union (EU) is sanctioning Indian crude oil refiner Nayara Energy as part of its latest tranche of actions against Russia over the country's war in Ukraine. The EU has also decided to lower the price cap on seaborne Russian crude from the prevailing level of $60 per barrel. Russian oil giant Rosneft owns 49.13% per cent in the company, which was rechristened to Nayara Energy from Essar Oil after the Essar group sold the refinery a few years back. Nayara Energy has a 20-million-tonnes-per-annum refinery in Gujarat's Vadinar, and operates a network of around 6,800 fuel retail outlets. It also sells part of its fuel production to public sector oil marketing companies. The action would mean that Nayara Energy would not be able to export petroleum fuels and products to Europe, and potentially hit any of its dealings with European companies. It could also hit Rosneft's plan to exit Nayara as the EU sanctions could spook prospective investors. To be sure, Nayara Energy is not a big fuel exporter to Europe, and is estimated to have accounted for around 4 per cent of India's total fuel exports to Europe so far in 2025, according to industry data. Reliance Industries (RIL) is the biggest fuel exporter in the country, and accounted for around 90 per cent of fuel exports from India to Europe so far this year. The lower price cap on Russian crude, which has not been specified yet, could be beneficial for India if the new cap is strictly enforced. This is because India is a major importer of Russian crude and if the price of Russian barrels reduces due to a lower price cap, it could potentially lower the cost of imports for India. Currently, Russian crude accounts for around 40 per cent of India's total oil import volumes. Industry insiders said that the likely impact of the EU actions is not clear yet, and clarity is likely only when details of the sanctions and the new price cap emerge. Importantly, it has to be seen whether the United States will join the EU in these measures, as US action could have far greater consequences in terms of enforcement of the sanctions. 'We are standing firm. The EU just approved one of its strongest sanctions package against Russia to date. We're cutting the Kremlin's war budget further, going after 105 more shadow fleet ships, their enablers, and limiting Russian banks' access to funding. Nord Stream pipelines will be banned. A lower oil price cap. We are putting more pressure on Russia's military industry, Chinese banks that enables sanctions evasion, and blocking tech exports used in drones. For the first time, we're designating a flag registry and the biggest Rosneft refinery in India. Our sanctions also hit those indoctrinating Ukrainian children. We will keep raising the costs, so stopping the aggression becomes the only path forward for Moscow,' Kaja Kallas, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission, posted on social media platform X. In her social media posts, Kallas did not provide additional details of the EU's latest sanctions package against Russia. The EU and the US are increasing pressure on Moscow to reach a peace deal with Kyiv and end the Russia-Ukraine war that began in February 2022. Energy exports are the biggest revenue generators for Moscow and Western powers have been targeting this revenue stream to force the Kremlin's hand into ending the Ukraine war. The US, EU, and a few other powers had imposed a price cap of $60 per barrel on Russian crude, as per which Western shippers and insurers cannot participate in Russian oil trade if the price of Moscow's crude is above that level. Payment for oil cargoes in breach of the price cap cannot be in US dollars or Euros. According to industry sources, significant volumes of Russian crude imported by India are transported by the so-called shadow fleet—vessels effectively controlled by Russia—that doesn't rely on Western shipping and insurance, which means that such shipments need not adhere to the price cap. The price cap is adhered to for cargoes that depend on Western shipping and insurance. To be sure, Indian refiners buy Russian crude on a delivered basis, which means that transportation and insurance are arranged by the seller. Sukalp Sharma is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and writes on a host of subjects and sectors, notably energy and aviation. He has over 13 years of experience in journalism with a body of work spanning areas like politics, development, equity markets, corporates, trade, and economic policy. He considers himself an above-average photographer, which goes well with his love for travel. ... Read More

‘Must guard against all…': Microsoft's alleged use of Chinese engineers to maintain military cloud computing systems questioned by US senator
‘Must guard against all…': Microsoft's alleged use of Chinese engineers to maintain military cloud computing systems questioned by US senator

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

‘Must guard against all…': Microsoft's alleged use of Chinese engineers to maintain military cloud computing systems questioned by US senator

A US senator has reportedly questioned Microsoft's alleged use of Chinese engineers to maintain military cloud computing systems. This inquiry follows a ProPublica report from earlier this week that accused Microsoft of employing Chinese engineers to work on US military computing systems. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In a letter sent to Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR), who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, has requested additional information from the Pentagon about the tech giant's reported use of Chinese engineers for US military systems as it raises concerns about potential national security risks , a report by the news agency Reuters claims. The report claimed that these engineers operated under the supervision of US "digital escorts' who were hired through subcontractors. These subcontractors possessed security clearances but often lacked the technical skills to assess whether the Chinese engineers' work posed a cybersecurity threat , the report added. What US senator said about Microsoft allegedly employing Chinese engineers for US military systems In the letter sent to Hegseth (seen by Reuters), Cotton wrote: 'The US government recognises that China's cyber capabilities pose one of the most aggressive and dangerous threats to the United States, as evidenced by infiltration of our critical infrastructure, telecommunications networks, and supply chains. The US military must guard against all potential threats within its supply chain, including those from subcontractors." Senetor Cotton also requested the US military to provide a list of all contractors employing Chinese personnel, along with details on the training of US 'digital escorts' who are tasked with identifying suspicious activity, the Reuters report added. Microsoft has reportedly used a "digital escort" system that lets Chinese engineers indirectly access highly sensitive US military data for nearly a decade now. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Despite Pentagon rules barring foreign access, these engineers guide low-paid American escorts, often with minimal coding skills, to input commands into Defense Department cloud systems that has now raised national security concerns, the original report claims. Meanwhile, Microsoft, a key contractor for the US government and previously targeted by both Chinese and Russian hackers, has said that it had informed the government about its practices during the authorisation process.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store