logo
England women and a new focus after ‘fitness' furore

England women and a new focus after ‘fitness' furore

New York Times6 hours ago

Charlotte Edwards knows she must change perceptions as well as results when a new era for England women's cricket begins in earnest at Trent Bridge, with scrutiny on them like never before.
There is nothing that forces a shake-up and introspection more than an Ashes whitewash, and England turned to one of the biggest figures in women's cricket history after a woeful winter.
Advertisement
England men know all about the repercussions that come with losing a Test series 5-0 in Australia, but the points structure in the women's game (white-ball wins are worth two points and a Test victory earns you four points) makes it appear even worse when contemplating the 16-0 embarrassment handed out by the old enemy.
Not only that, but Edwards, who succeeded Jon Lewis as coach after the inevitable review that followed, has had to deal with questions about England's fitness levels at a time when the ECB (England and Wales Cricket Board) are desperate to shout about the professionalism of the women's game.
A six-match series against a weak West Indies provided a gentle introduction for an England team now led by new captain Nat Sciver-Brunt, but life will become tougher as the first of eight internationals against a strong India side begins on Saturday.
That will be followed by a 50-over World Cup in India and Sri Lanka, and then a Twenty20 world tournament in England next summer that the governing body hopes will become something of a 'Lionesses' moment in terms of interest and projection — mirroring the England's women's football team's victory on home soil at Euro 2022.
But it is the spectre of Australia that will continue to loom large over England until they prove their significant investment in women's cricket — a new professional structure at county level and equal starting salaries with men was a big step forward this year — sees them match and even overtake the dominant force in the game.
England last won the Ashes 11 years ago and have not defeated Australia in a world tournament knockout match since 2009. In 11 World Cups across formats since, Australia have been victorious eight times while England have won just one, the 2017 50-over home tournament.
'We're a lot closer to Australia than people are giving us credit for, which probably sounds stupid after a 16-0 drubbing, but I truly believe the teams are closer than that,' former England captain Edwards tells The Athletic.
Advertisement
'I know the Aussies believe we're closer than that, too, because I've coached a lot out there and they've got a lot of respect.
'When I first came in, the objective was to get our players playing more county cricket and putting an emphasis on performance in that, and it was really important for us to win both series against West Indies.
'The other thing I had to deal with was the perception of us as a group, which, after the winter, wasn't in the greatest of places. It was just looking at our professionalism and making players really understand their roles as England cricketers.
'I've been super impressed with how the players have responded. Now we're ready to take on the next challenge, which is India.'
That perception is a key point. One of the biggest controversies in England's development initially began when one of their former players and now a leading commentator, Alex Hartley, criticised the players' fitness after their shock defeat to the West Indies in Dubai in October and their early exit from the T20 World Cup.
'About 80 per cent of the England team are fit and athletic enough, but there are girls in that side who are letting the team down on fitness,' Hartley told the BBC.
The row escalated when Sophie Ecclestone, one of England's leading players and former No 1-ranked bowler in the world, took the criticism personally and refused to do a pitch-side interview with her former team-mate at both England and Lancashire after the first T20 international of the Ashes, by which point England were 6-0 down.
Hartley made that snub public when she later said on the BBC: 'I've been hung out to dry. The reason I said England aren't as fit as Australia is because I want them to compete. I want them to be better and to win. But I've been given the cold shoulder. Not by everyone, but a few individual coaches and players. They won't even look at me.'
Advertisement
Hartley, as a recently retired player and former team-mate of many of the players, should be commended for doing her job as a broadcaster and saying it as it is.
But perhaps the problem came with her use of the word 'fitness'. Only in April, one of the highest profile male cricketers of the modern age in Andrew Flintoff said in a Disney Plus documentary that fat shaming 25 years ago had driven him to bulimia.
Tammy Beaumont is one of the most experienced members of the England side and still a key figure in the new era as an opening batter in all three formats. 'It's a difficult one,' Beaumont, 34, tells The Athletic. 'If the word athleticism had been used, it would have been more accurate. I have spoken to Alex Hartley about it. We go way back and used to live with each other — and I think she now thinks athleticism is the word she should have used. That would be a fair comment.
'The Australians were more athletic than us in the field. Fitness-wise, we don't disclose our scores, but some people would be surprised to see we're not as unfit as has been said. But, yes, we have to move better in the field, we have to take the catches under pressure, and we understand that.
'More eyes are on women's cricket now. We want to be treated as equally as possible to our male counterparts, and they would have received criticism for similar things.
'We have to own up to the fact we as players weren't good enough on the pitch and we handled things off it in a way we regret. That's something we really want to prove to all the supporters. We care so much about English cricket and each other.'
Edwards concurs. 'It was really hard as an ex-player and someone who cares enormously about the women's game and the England team to witness that.
'It was a great reminder of where the game has reached. Gone are the days when there were two or three people in the ground watching and not too many bothered about it.
Advertisement
'That it got that level of media attention is where we want the game to be. It was a real shock to the players because they probably weren't prepared for that level of scrutiny.
'What we can't move away from is that Australia are a more athletic and probably fitter team than us, but from my experiences, the level of fitness I've witnessed since I've come in has been of a really high standard.
'The players are under no illusions now as to what is expected of them as England cricketers. I've seen a real shift in that area. After the winter, everyone was aware that the focus was on fitness rather than cricket, and I want the focus to be on cricket. It's whether we're winning games and batting or bowling well, rather than that. That can't be a talking point moving forward.'
Ecclestone missed the West Indies matches with a knee injury and then took a temporary break to protect her well-being and manage another minor injury. But she is due to make her return in Nottingham on Saturday.
'It has been a tough few months for Soph,' says Edwards. 'We know we're a better team with her in it, but it needed to be right for everyone before she came back.
'I'm looking forward to having her back doing what she loves doing and is good at. She has the full support of all the players and staff.'
When Edwards started playing for England in 1996, aged just 16, women cricketers were forced to wear skirts and paid for the privilege of representing their country.
By the time she was controversially replaced as England captain in 2016 by coach Mark Robinson, she had made 309 appearances in all formats and had seen the women's game become professional and grow beyond all recognition.
She has become just as adept as a coach, initially with Hampshire and Southern Vipers before gaining success in Australia and India with Sydney Sixers and Mumbai Indians. It was inevitable she would coach England and she will bring discipline and empathy.
Advertisement
'I love coaching and this job came at the right time,' says Edwards. 'I'm pretty hard but fair as a coach. I expect high standards of everyone, but I'm a lot of fun as well.
'I care enormously about the people I work with and I work bloody hard. You have to take people on that journey with you and building relationships is a big part of that. Hopefully, I've done that quite well over the last few years.'
Beaumont is relishing working again with her former England opening batting partner. 'She's an England legend and that comes with the respect it demands,' she says. 'She commands respect for everything she did as a player, but now her coaching does, too. She's a winner and not afraid to say now it's all about winning. That's really something that we're all on board with.'
Schedule: June 28: first T20 international (Trent Bridge, Nottingham); July 1: 2nd T20i (Bristol); July 4: 3rd T20i (The Oval, London); July 9: fourth T20i (Old Trafford, Manchester); July 12: 5th T20i (Edgbaston). July 16: first one-day international (Southampton); July 19: 2nd ODI (Lord's, London); July 22: 3rd ODI (Chester-le-Street, Durham).
Squads (T20 internationals)
England: Nat Sciver-Brunt (captain), Em Arlott, Tammy Beaumont, Lauren Bell, Alice Capsey, Charlie Dean, Sophia Dunkley, Sophie Ecclestone, Lauren Filer, Amy Jones (wicketkeeper), Paige Scholfield, Linsey Smith, Danni Wyatt-Hodge, Issy Wong.
India: Harmanpreet Kaur (captain), Smriti Mandhana, Shafali Verma, Jemimah Rodrigues, Richa Ghosh (wicketkeeper), Yastika Bhatia (wicketkeeper), Harleen Deol, Deepti Sharma, Sneh Rana, Sree Charani, Shuchi Upadhyay, Amanjot Kaur, Arundhati Reddy, Kranti Gaud, Sayali Satghare.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Liverpool agree fifth summer signing as transfer spree continues
Liverpool agree fifth summer signing as transfer spree continues

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Liverpool agree fifth summer signing as transfer spree continues

Liverpool continue to be the busiest Premier League club in the transfer window after agreeing a deal for their fifth signing of the summer. The Merseyside outfit wasted little time in getting down to business after winning the title at a canter in 2024/25, suggesting they are not ready to rest on their laurels. Advertisement Jeremie Frimpong was the first to arrive at Anfield in a £29 million deal with Bayer Leverkusen, replacing right-back Trent Alexander-Arnold who joined Real Madrid on a free transfer. That preceded the blockbuster signing of Florian Wirtz from the same German club in a deal worth up to £116m, providing a major boost to Arne Slot's squad. Goalkeeper Armin Pecsi arrived from Puskas Akademia in a £3 million deal in early June after Caoimhín Kelleher moved to Brentford, while Milos Kerkez completed his £40m move from Bournemouth this week. Liverpool agree fifth summer signing as transfer spree continues The latest player to join the Reds' ranks is former Newcastle United shot stopper Freddie Woodman. Liverpool announced on Saturday that the goalkeeper had agreed to sign a contract with the club following the expiration of his deal at Preston North End later this month. Advertisement The 28-year-old will provide cover for Alisson Becker and Giorgi Mamardashvili, who arrives this summer after Liverpool agreed a £29m deal with Valencia last year. Importantly, Woodman is a homegrown player, meaning he won't take up one of Liverpool's 17 non-homegrown slots on the UEFA squad list. Liverpool have now spent £172m, which could rise to £188m, this summer, but they are still not done in the transfer window. They have also been linked with possible moves for Crystal Palace defender Marc Guehi and Newcastle United striker Alexander Isak. Read – RB Leipzig join chase for Liverpool midfielder See Also – Five Bundesliga players Premier League clubs should be interested in this summer Follow The Football Faithful on Social Media: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | TikTok

Wimbledon storylines: Sabalenka and Gauff, Sinner and Alcaraz and no more line judges
Wimbledon storylines: Sabalenka and Gauff, Sinner and Alcaraz and no more line judges

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Wimbledon storylines: Sabalenka and Gauff, Sinner and Alcaraz and no more line judges

If you would like to follow The Athletic's Wimbledon coverage, click here and follow our tennis page. Is Aryna Sabalenka and Coco Gauff's olive branch a sign of things on court? Is Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner's dominance of men's tennis about to go up another level? Is the disappearance of line judges going to cause more problems than solutions? And will the biggest battle at Wimbledon this fortnight be not on the court, but in it? Wimbledon 2025 promises to be a cracker. Here, The Athletic's tennis writers, Matt Futterman and Charlie Eccleshare, chart some of the key storylines to follow over the next fortnight. Sabalenka is having an outrageous season. She is constantly making finals. She has won tournaments in Brisbane, Miami and Madrid. She is more than 2,000 points ahead of world No. 2 Gauff in the WTA rankings race that counts points won this season. But it also hurts her that she doesn't have the three titles she wanted to win more than all the others: the Australian Open, the French Open and Indian Wells. (And Stuttgart. The one that comes with the Porsche. She really wanted to win the Porsche. And the lost the final there. Again.) Advertisement Sabalenka isn't great at losing, just like most champions. She finds it so crushing to lose these matches that while it's happening, while the world is watching, she's visibly miserable. She's yelling at herself. She's yelling at her box. Every champion who loses feels this way, and only some let it out. It makes Sabalenka one of the most compelling players on the tour, because fans — and her rivals' fans — live every moment with her like it's their career on the line. After losing to Gauff at Roland Garros, Sabalenka spoke, first on court and then in her news conference, about how horribly she played. She barely gave any credit to Gauff until after the event. Then she apologized for what she called her 'unprofessional' comments, then they came to Wimbledon and made a TikTok or two. Gauff said they were good, so the rest of the world should be too. Then Wimbledon posted that on their own social media, which came off more strangely. Should a tournament be casting its top seeds as best friends? Does the tennis world not want more rivalries? The grass suits Sabalenka. She's the favorite, hands down. She has the power for it, the serve and the movement, as well as her ever-evolving variety and touch and feel. She's only won Grand Slams on hard courts, and Wimbledon is the Grand Slam that completes a career, so the pressure is there, but she might be far enough ahead of her rivals not too matter. Gauff's forehand grip makes it very difficult for her to win on such a low-bouncing surface. Madison Keys, who beat Sabalenka in Australia, could trouble her. Markéta Vondroušová, a potential third-round opponent, beat Sabalenka in Berlin and has won Wimbledon before. The 2022, champion Elena Rybakina cannot be discounted. Iga Świątek, who uses a similar forehand grip to Gauff, has been making the Bad Homburg grass in Germany her living room this week. Advertisement And if Sabalenka does make the final, it's more likely than not that said final will be stressful, that she will not play a perfect match, because no one ever does. Can she win? And if she can't, can she redirect her energy away from the way it manifested in Melbourne, Indian Wells and Paris? Sabalenka is a big Novak Djokovic fan. Djokovic is an incredible winner — obviously, 24 Grand Slams. He's also an incredibly gracious loser, in public. That's taken as the thing to be in tennis — even if some needle is good for business and for the sport. Matt Futterman Remember what it was like to be a tennis fan this time of year between 2006 and 2008, when Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer played in the final of the French Open and Wimbledon for three consecutive years. Federer won the U.S. Open in each of those years, and the Australian Open in 2006 and 2007. It was an incredible rivalry and a testament to their dominance of the sport. It was great. Wasn't it? Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner have now won every Grand Slam since the start of 2024. It's great. Or is it? And if it isn't, can anyone who's going to be contending in three years (that means anyone not named Djokovic) do anything about it? This is the question that Holger Rune, Lorenzo Musetti, Jack Draper, Ben Shelton and some players even younger than them are going to have to start answering. Tennis, meanwhile, might have to get better acquainted with the difference between a player's ceiling and their current peak. Draper has won a Masters 1,000 title, the rung below a Grand Slam. So has Rune. So has Jakub Menšík. Musetti has been in a final at that level. Shelton reserves his best tennis for the majors. But it's João Fonseca who gets the most adulation, who looks the player best positioned to challenge the Alcaraz-Sinner duopoly despite never being ranked inside the top 50. Why? He's 18, sure, but Menšík is barely 19 and inside the top 20. Draper is No. 4 in the world. How can this Brazilian guy be the one compared to them? Now we get to ceilings. Alcaraz and Sinner finished inside the top 40 in their first full seasons on the main ATP Tour. Fonseca is on his way to something like that. He has a cannon forehand. He can direct his backhand down the line almost better than he hits it crosscourt. He can take rackets out of top-10 players' hands. Just not consistently yet, and he hasn't worked out how to grind reliably when his first plan doesn't work. Menšík and Learner Tien, who Fonseca beat to win the ATP Next Gen Finals last year, are more ready for deeper runs than Fonseca is for now. For the long term? The Brazilian is ready for the biggest things in the sport. Advertisement So is someone coming into disrupt this duopoly anytime soon? Or will Djokovic have to look at the younger generation and realize that, at least for now, he has to do it himself? To use a favorite phrase of Sinner and Alcaraz, 'Lets' see…' Matt Futterman When the supposedly impregnable electronic line calling (ELC) malfunctioned at the Eastbourne Open this week, the whoops of delight from the traditionalists might have been heard over the high winds on the UK's south coast. See, we told you. At the first sniff of technical trouble at Wimbledon, except something even more unabashed. For the first time in the event's 148-year history, it has dispensed with human line judges in favor of ELC, which is used at all ATP Tour-level and combined events and two of the other Grand Slams but is not immune to glitches. At Eastbourne last Monday, a misleading image disagreed with the system's call during a first set tiebreak between Fonseca and Zizou Bergs. Players are overwhelmingly in favour of ELC, because of how it removes doubt and takes away their need to self-officiate. Until this year, players had to challenge a call they disputed in a timely fashion, meaning that they had to think about their next shot, whether or not to challenge and what their opponent would do on their next shot all at once. If the technology does fail at Wimbledon, then each court will have a couple of match officials to step in, but assuming all goes to plan, players and fans will have to get used to a relatively bare court, with the elegantly dressed line judges who have been such a feature of Wimbledon throughout its long history absent. Will that absence be meaningful at this year's event, or will everyone get used to it very quickly and move on? Only time — and perhaps some dubious calls — will tell. Charlie Eccleshare Bubbling away in the background at this year's Wimbledon is the All England Lawn Tennis Club's (AELTC) ongoing legal battle over 39 new grass courts. It wants to construct them, including an 8,000-seat stadium, on the old Wimbledon Park golf course. Doing so would almost triple the size of Wimbledon's grounds and allow the AELTC to host qualifying on site, as the other three majors do. Advertisement The Greater London Authority (GLA) granted planning permission at a hearing in September 2024, but after appeals led by the Save Wimbledon Park (SWP) group, a judicial review will take place Tuesday July 8 and Wednesday July 9 of 2025, right in the heart of the tournament's second week. During the hearing, the AELTC and SWP will outline their arguments, with a decision expected a few weeks later. The case is proving to be a major headache for the AELTC, which is desperate to press on with its expansion plans. Not being able to host qualifying on site (and not being able to pull in the revenue that would come with that) sees it, it says, lose ground on the other three majors. At the pre-tournament briefing a couple of weeks ago, Wimbledon chair Debbie Jevans said that the need for the transformation 'becomes ever more apparent as we see our fellow Grand Slams staging fully integrated three-week events by welcoming many more spectators and staging charity and community events during the qualifying week and, crucially, providing the players with a stage benefiting their sporting excellence'. It feels like no Grand Slam is complete these days without high-level discussions going on in the background, and this year's Wimbledon will be no different. Charlie Eccleshare For only the second time since 2004, there will be no Andy Murray in either the singles or doubles draws. Last year's opening week — and most of its matches — was dominated by questions of whether he would be healthy enough to compete. Murray withdrew from the singles at the last minute on the first Tuesday, then he staggered through his men's doubles match with his brother Jamie two days later. On middle Saturday came Emma Raducanu's decision to jilt Murray at the altar of the mixed doubles event, with the Brit needing to rest her wrist for singles competition. It's probably a relief for all involved that there is no major Murray storyline this time around. Last year was a painful end in many respects, and the rest of the event got sucked into a vortex by its gravity. The statue of him, which will arrive on the grounds in time for 2027, will have to do stand in his stead: he is not planning to attend at this time. It will fall to one of the other Brits, like Raducanu and Draper, to step up in his absence. Charlie Eccleshare Tell us which storylines you are looking out for in the comments.

COLUMN: Cricket has changed dramatically, especially with the bat
COLUMN: Cricket has changed dramatically, especially with the bat

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

COLUMN: Cricket has changed dramatically, especially with the bat

I think it's fair to say that cricket has changed dramatically in recent times, especially so with the bat, as so many of our top order batsmen at both county level and international level, play so many more extraordinary shots, that adds that extra ingredient to the game writes Merv Colenutt. Everyone will have their own ideas of how the game has changed and since the introduction of the ramp shot, reverse sweep and increasingly the lofted shot over fine leg, the more technical side of the game has become an added an exciting feature. Advertisement The introduction of helmets, also allow the batsmen to face short pitch bowling with far more confidence and in more recent times, the falling paddle shot, which we will no doubt see more of in the future from the likes of Rishabh Pant and Harry Brook, makes for another legacy, not only in the white ball game, but in test matches as well and to be fair it's another reason why test matches will go on drawing big crowds in the future. Another change could very well come in the coaching of bowlers, in fact it has already happened. In the good old days, you were generally encouraged to run in smoothly as a quick bowler, increasing your pace as you got closer to the wicket and release the ball at pace with a smooth follow through, just like Josh Davey does for Somerset now. You would hope by shining the seam, the ball would move off the pitch or in the air deceiving the batsman into playing down the wrong line, but again the coaching manual appears to have changed, with a quick bowler being encouraged to bowl from a slightly different angle with a more side on approach and deliver, with the batsman not always being able to pick out the ball to play or leave. Advertisement It's a marginal observation, but i feel sure that in some ways has brought the more baseball technique into our game, with increased timing and hand speed. I still firmly believe at almost the halfway stage of the season that Somerset are well placed to challenge for the double once again, there is no doubting they have the ability to remain on course in both the white ball game and the red ball game. What i find impressive as always is the ground fielding, brilliant, surely there is not a safer pair of hands anywhere better than Craig Overton, Riley Meredith might have only played five one-day internationals for Australia, but more are bound to come in the not too distant future, he has been magnificent. Tom Banton opening the batting has asked a few questions whether he should retain that spot, i believe he should, others question whether he should bat lower down the order and bring in Tom Lammonby, that has been questioned by some of the supporters and even Tom Abell has been short of runs, but the one sure factor is that Somerset have unquestionably got a massive array of talent at their disposal and they remain the team to beat in the 2025 season. The big test in the county championship, however will start on Sunday as the league leaders Nottinghamshire are the visitors to the County Ground.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store