logo
Louis Theroux: The Settlers showcases grim reality of West Bank

Louis Theroux: The Settlers showcases grim reality of West Bank

The National28-04-2025
The documentarian's latest film, Louis Theroux: The Settlers, is among some of his best works.
In the somewhat sequel to his 2011 documentary The Ultra Zionists about Israeli religious nationalists building illegal settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, Theroux finds himself in the territory 14 years later, with the colonisation process far more advanced and even more deadly.
Following the Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023, while the world's gaze is fixed on the atrocities being carried out in Gaza, nationalists are violently encroaching more into Palestinian land along the West Bank.
READ MORE: Louis Theroux opens up on The Settlers documentary
Backed by Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his alliance with the country's religious far-right, settlers are emboldened in their actions as they are protected by the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF).
The situation in the West Bank is dire, and Theroux does his best to showcase the fact.
Theroux and his crew repeatedly find themselves subjected to many of the confrontations and intimidation by Israeli settlers and the IDF, which Palestinians endure every day.
In one scene, settlers drive up and point guns with laser sights through the windows of a Palestinian's home at him. In another, he asks checkpoint guards to lower their weapons while he talks with them.
In one particularly intense encounter, Theroux tells a pair of balaclava-wearing Israeli soldiers, 'don't touch me,' as we see a side of the documentarian we've rarely witnessed before.
(Image: Louis Theroux: The Settlers)
'What are you doing in Israel?' one soldier barked at him. 'We are not in Israel are we, we're in the West Bank,' Theroux replies.
He manages to catch the repulsion of the Israeli soldiers from any media scrutiny well in his encounters; at times, you could almost sense the feeling of shame in their actions as they refuse to answer simple questions and conceal their identities.
The film reveals the deep contempt Israeli settlers have for the Palestinian people.
He meets Ari Abramowitz, a Texan settler in the West Bank who refuses to even use the word 'Palestinian', then a rabbi who calls Palestinians 'savages' and 'camel riders'.
Theroux is constantly told by settlers that they don't recognise the Palestinian state, nor do they see its people as people, and that they see the land as their own through religious rights.
As the film progresses, the sense of futility piles up. Theroux is presented with the same arguments repeatedly in an almost ritualistic mantra.
Then he meets the 79-year-old woman known as the 'godmother' of the settler movement, Daniella Weiss.
She has been a key member of the Israeli settler movement for 50 years and is even seen as a sort of celebrity amongst her kin.
Weiss and Theroux verbally battle it out throughout the film as the British filmmaker tries to pry her extremist views from behind her friendly smile.
Their cat and mouse encounters reach a boiling point by the end of the film when Theroux corners Weiss and presses her on settler violence against Palestinians, which she denies.
He says he has witnessed it, notably in a graphic video of a Palestinian being shot in the documentary, which Weiss claims the Israeli was acting in retaliation.
(Image: Louis Theroux: The Settlers)
She then physically shoves Theroux, an action so out of the blue that the camera crew is barely able to catch it.
Weiss taunts him, 'I wish you'd pushed me back'. She was trying to make the point about the framing of the narrative and that settlers are being portrayed as the aggressors.
Although it is evident she was using the opportunity to lash out physically, clearly frustrated she had been pinned into a verbal corner by Theroux, one she couldn't squirm her way out of.
Theroux reacts brilliantly; he doesn't push her back, and he doesn't hold his tongue like he would have in previous documentaries, where he would use the silence for people to draw their own conclusions. He just calls her a sociopath.
She smiles and leaves, seemingly self-aware that the mask didn't just slip; it hit the ground.
Were there certain aspects that I wish Theroux had explored more of? Yes.
The Israeli activists who protest against the settlements were most notably lacking airtime, and it would have been good to see more of the Palestinians' homes, which are impacted, but I can appreciate that an hour can be a tight squeeze to tell a complex story.
One of the biggest surprises seems to be the creative freedom that the BBC has given Theroux.
In February, the broadcaster was criticised after it pulled the documentary Gaza: How To Survive A War Zone, was pulled.
READ MORE: UK to host Palestinian Authority leader for first time in four years
You do wonder how long Theroux's The Settlers will stay up on iPlayer, as it shows a sobering reality of what is happening in the West Bank.
Theroux seems to be back at his best, and it couldn't come sooner as the settler ideology is gaining political traction across the world, with what is going on in the West Bank setting an alarming precedent.
The Settlers aired on BBC Two and is on iPlayer now.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who will be left to tell the story, if Gaza's last journalists die?
Who will be left to tell the story, if Gaza's last journalists die?

Evening Standard

time30 minutes ago

  • Evening Standard

Who will be left to tell the story, if Gaza's last journalists die?

Israel clearly understands that. Why else would it seek to silence the press? Alongside its calculated targeting of journalists in Gaza, Israel has increased its repression of journalists in the West Bank, introduced new laws to throttle journalism it does not like, pressured Israeli media critical of the war, and – perhaps most tellingly - banned foreign journalists from independently entering Gaza. The international press has been clamouring to get in, to relieve the burden on Palestinian reporters and see for itself the crumbled state that Gaza is in. But Israel knows too well the value of narrative control.

The BBC are the last news agency Israel should let into Gaza
The BBC are the last news agency Israel should let into Gaza

Telegraph

time31 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The BBC are the last news agency Israel should let into Gaza

There aren't many organisations Israel is less inclined to heed than the BBC, and most of them come with their own armed wing. So the Corporation's joint statement with news wires AFP, AP and Reuters, professing itself 'desperately concerned for our journalists in Gaza, who are increasingly unable to feed themselves and their families' is unlikely to move Benjamin Netanyahu or his government. Nor is the BBC's call for foreign journalists to be allowed back into Gaza, which is not only not in Israel's military interests but would put journalists in mortal danger. Israel is being pummelled daily by the BBC. It's not about to be responsible for one of Auntie's reporters being abducted by Hamas or killed in crossfire. Even if the BBC had any credibility remaining inside Israel, its statement would be misguided, but the Corporation seems not to realise just how degraded its reputation is among Israelis across the political spectrum. In the past six months alone, the BBC has aired a documentary on the Gaza war narrated by the son of a Hamas deputy minister, livestreamed Bob Vylan chanting 'death, death to the IDF' at Glastonbury, and its news chief executive has opined that 'we need to continually remind people of the difference' between the Hamas government and its armed wing, a distinction which does not exist in UK law. This is what will be to the forefront of the Israeli government's mind when receiving this statement. Jeremy Corbyn's new political party has a better chance of getting a hearing. The BBC's intervention is especially unfortunate given that it risks amplifying Hamas's messaging against those trying to alleviate the horrific suffering in Gaza. There is a concerted effort to make sure the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation fails and for one reason only: the GHF's mission is to distribute aid to the residents of Gaza. That's it. Nothing more nefarious than feeding people. But feeding people is a threat to the Hamas-NGO complex that has hitherto held a chokehold on humanitarian aid distribution inside Gaza. Whatever the aid, whatever its source, when Hamas is in charge it siphons off the best for its own and uses the remainder to coerce ordinary Gazans into joining its ranks or toeing the line – or see their families go hungry. This strategy is not unknown to the NGOs that work on the ground in Gaza and have become too willing to turn a blind eye. The GHF is disrupting this cartel. By directing its efforts to dispensing food parcels to the needy, and declining to become part of Hamas's propaganda echo chamber, the GHF is a trial run for a different future for Gaza. A Gaza in which humanitarian aid is not controlled by Hamas is a Gaza in which Hamas will struggle to retain control. That Gaza is one in which the gruelling work of state-building can finally begin, if the Palestinians choose a new leadership more concerned with developing the economy than using the strip as an eternal launching pad for a self-defeating war on the Jews. Ergo the deliberate provocations at food distribution sites, ergo Hamas's determination to bait the IDF into opening fire, ergo the death toll propaganda war. By cosigning this statement, the BBC is contributing to the propaganda war. The Corporation can either be a reporter of the conflict or a participant in it, but it can't be both. In less than two years since October 7 the BBC has accelerated a case for its privatisation that its detractors spent decades trying (and failing) to force into the political mainstream. Hamas controls Gaza today because, in 2007, it seized the territory during a brief civil war against rival Fatah. The two organisations proved incapable of cooperating in the wake of the 2006 Palestinian elections, which Hamas won and ended decades of Fatah dominance. Palestinian voters chose Hamas at the ballot box but almost two decades later there have been no further elections. The Israelis kidnapped on October 7 aren't the only hostages being held by Hamas. The international community should, for reasons both humanitarian and self-interested, be willing on Israel in its efforts to smash Hamas and give Gazans an opportunity to break free of their grip, reject bigoted and futile anti-Zionism, and choose a better future for themselves. As long as the international news media, including and especially the BBC, continue serving as useful idiots for Hamas, this cannot happen. And as long as Western populations are bombarded with unverified Hamas claims about starvation and fatalities, Western leaders will continue to heap pressure on Israel to relent and allow Hamas to keep its hold over Gaza. The result will be more terrorism, more wars, and more dead Palestinians. Gaza will continue to hold itself hostage from its own future. The Corporation's statement will have no impact in Israel. The Israelis have stopped listening to the BBC. Unless it changes, they won't be the only ones.

Iran ‘ready for nuclear talks with US but only if Washington rebuilds trust'
Iran ‘ready for nuclear talks with US but only if Washington rebuilds trust'

Glasgow Times

time44 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Iran ‘ready for nuclear talks with US but only if Washington rebuilds trust'

Iran is set to meet on Friday in Istanbul with the UK, France and Germany, known as the E3 nations, and the European Union's deputy foreign policy commissioner. They will be the first talks since Iran's 12-day war with Israel in June, which involved US B-52 bombers striking nuclear-related facilities in Iran. Mr Gharibabadi said in a social media post on Thursday that to enter negotiations, Iran sought 'several key principles' to be upheld. He said these included 'rebuilding Iran's trust — as Iran has absolutely no trust in the United States — avoiding the use of talks as a platform for hidden agendas such as military action, though Iran remains fully prepared for any scenario; respecting and recognising Iran's rights under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, including enrichment in line with its legitimate needs; and the lifting of sanctions'. A woman walks past a building damaged in an Israeli airstrike at a residential compound in Tehran (AP Photo) Friday's talks will be held at the deputy ministerial level, with Iran sending deputy foreign minister Majid Takht-e Ravanchi. A similar meeting was held in Istanbul in May. European leaders have threatened to trigger a 'snapback' mechanism included in a 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, which would reimpose sanctions that were lifted in exchange for Iran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear programme. The UK, France and Germany were signatories to the 2015 deal. The US withdrew in 2018 during the first term of President Donald Trump, who insisted the agreement was not tough enough. Iranian officials have warned that a move to reimpose sanctions would have consequences. Mr Gharibabadi said earlier this week that it could force Tehran to withdraw from key non-proliferation agreements. In a letter to UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused the E3 of hypocrisy, saying they failed to uphold their obligations under the 2015 deal while supporting Israel's recent strikes on Iran. In the recent conflict, US B-52 bombers struck Iranian nuclear facilities in support of Israel's air campaign. Iran responded with missile attacks, including a strike on a US base in Qatar, which President Masoud Pezeshkian insisted was not directed at the Qatari state. In an interview with Al Jazeera that aired on Wednesday, Mr Pezeshkian said Iran is prepared for another war and accused Israel of attempting to assassinate him during a June 15 meeting of Iran's national security council in Tehran. Mr Pezeshkian reiterated that Iran's nuclear programme will continue within the framework of international law and insisted the country has no intention of pursuing nuclear weapons. 'Our nuclear capabilities are in the minds of our scientists,' he said, emphasising Iran's position that future negotiations must be rooted in mutual respect, not threats. According to the official judicial news agency Mizan, at least 13 Iranian nuclear scientists were killed during the 12-day war between Iran and Israel. A spokesman for Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation said on Thursday the country's nuclear industry would recover from the recent attacks by Israel and the US. 'Our nuclear industry is deeply rooted. What has roots cannot be harmed by attack or pressure — it will grow back and thrive again,' state TV quoted Behrouz Kamalvandi as saying. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported in May that Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% had grown to over 400 kilogrammes (882 pounds). That material, just below weapons-grade level, remains a central concern for the West. Despite the growing stockpile, Iran has said it remains open to diplomacy, though it recently suspended co-operation with the IAEA following legislation signed by Mr Pezeshkian. While European officials say they want to avoid further conflict and are open to a negotiated solution, they have warned that time is running out.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store