WNBA players and league officials meet for CBA discussions during All-Star weekend
'I don't know that I'm going to say progress, but we had spirited conversation,' said Terri Carmichael Jackson, the executive director of the Women's National Basketball Players Association.
If a deal isn't done by the end of October, some players, including Napheesa Collier and Reese, have mentioned the potential of a walkout, which could present some immediate problems. The league has two new teams in Portland and Toronto starting next season and the expansion draft has typically been in December. Free agency usually starts in January.
The league has never lost a game to a work stoppage since it started in 1997. Jackson said the sides would eventually get to a new deal, though wouldn't say if they got any closer to it Thursday.
Advertisement
'I think we're on track to get back to meeting, and to engaging in conversations that will lead us to a CBA,' she said.
Jackson said Thursday was the most players the union ever had in the room, and was particularly impressed by the number of young stars such as Clark, who have helped spark unprecedented growth across nearly every business metric from attendance and viewership.
Advertisement
There's also the new $2.2 billion media rights deal that will start next season, and the league plans to expand to 18 teams by 2030, with each of the three new teams paying a $250 million expansion fee.
Players sent the league an initial proposal in February that the league finally responded to last month. Jackson believes the sides can overcome that slow start.
'I think we have plenty of time,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
The investor behind Opendoor's 190% run nearly shut down his fund
On June 6, online real estate service Opendoor was so desperate to get its beaten-down stock price back over $1 and stay listed on the Nasdaq that management proposed a reverse split, potentially lifting the price of each share by as much as 50 times. The stock inched its way up over the next five weeks. Then Eric Jackson started cheerleading. Jackson, a hedge fund manager who was bullish on Opendoor years earlier when the company appeared to be thriving and was worth roughly $20 billion, wrote on X on Monday that his firm, EMJ Capital, was back in the stock. "@EMJCapital has taken a position in $OPEN — and we believe it could be a 100-bagger over the next few years," Jackson wrote. He added later in the thread that the stock could get to $82. It's a long, long way from that mark. Opendoor shares soared 189% this week, by far their best weekly performance since the company's public market debut in late 2020. The stock closed on Friday at $2.25. The stock's highest-volume trading days on record were Wednesday, Thursday and Friday of this week. Jackson said in an interview on Thursday that the bulk of his firm's Opendoor purchases came when the stock was in the 70s and 80s, meaning cents, and he's bought options as well for his portfolio. Nothing has fundamentally improved for the company since Jackson's purchases. Opendoor remains a cash-burning, low-margin business with meager near-term growth prospects. What has changed dramatically is Jackson's online influence and the size of his following. The more he posts, the higher the stock goes. "There's a real hunger for buying the next big thing," Jackson told CNBC, adding that investors like to find the "downtrodden." It's something Jackson's firm, based in Toronto, has in common with Opendoor. When Opendoor went public through a special purpose acquisition company in 2020, it was riding a SPAC wave and broader gains driven by low interest rates and Covid-era market euphoria. Investors pumped money into the riskiest assets, lifting money-losing tech upstarts to astronomical valuations. Opendoor's business involved using technology to buy and sell homes, pocketing the gains. Zillow tried and failed to compete. Opendoor shares peaked at over $39 in Feb. 2021 for a market cap just above $22.5 billion. But by the end of that year, the shares were trading below $15, before collapsing 92% in 2022 to end the year at $1.16. Rising interest rates hammered the whole tech sector, hitting Opendoor particularly hard as increased borrowing costs reduced demand for homes. Jackson, similarly, had a miserable 2022, coinciding with the worst year for the Nasdaq since 2008. Jackson said his key client withdrew its money at the end of the year, and "I've been small ever since." While his assets under management remain minimal, Jackson's reputation for getting in early to a rebound story was burnished by the performance of Carvana. The automotive e-commerce platform lost 98% of its value in 2022 as investors weighed the likelihood of bankruptcy. In the middle of that year, with Carvana still far from bottoming out, Jackson expressed his bullishness. He told CNBC that April that he liked the stock, and then promoted its recovery on a podcast in June. He also said he liked Opendoor at the time. Investors willing to stomach further losses in 2022 were rewarded with a 1,000% gain in 2023, and a lot more upside from there. The stock closed on Friday at $347.52, up from a low of $3.72 in Dec. 2022, and almost triple its price at the time of Jackson's appearance on CNBC in April of that year. After Carvana's 2022 slide, "then obviously began an epic comeback," Jackson said. Opendoor, meanwhile, "continued to roll down the mountain," he said. Jackson said that the fallout of 2022 led him to pursue a different method of stockpicking. He started hiring a small team of developers, which is now four people, to build out artificial intelligence models. The firm has experimented with several models —some have worked and some haven't — but he said the focus now is using what he's learned from Carvana to find "100x" opportunities. In addition to Opendoor, Jackson has been promoting IREN, a provider of power for bitcoin mining and AI workloads, and Cipher Mining, which is in a similar space. He's seen his following on Elon Musk's social media site X, which he said was stuck for years between 32,000 and 34,000, swell to almost 50,000. And after a lengthy lull, investors are reaching out to him to try and put money into his fund, he said. Jackson has a lot riding on Opendoor, a company that saw revenue and number of homes sold slip in the first quarter from a year earlier, and racked up almost $370 million in losses over the past four quarters. In early June, Opendoor announced plans for a reverse split — ranging from 1 for 10 to 1 for 50 — to "give us optionality in preserving our listing on Nasdaq." With the stock now well over $1, such a move appears less necessary, as shareholders prepare to vote on the proposal on July 28. "I think it's a terrible idea," said Jackson. "Those things usually further cement a company's move into oblivion rather than hail some big revival." Opendoor didn't respond to a request for comment. Analysts are projecting a more than 5% drop in revenue this year, followed by 20% growth in 2026 and 12% expansion in 2017, according to LSEG. Losses are expected to narrow over that stretch. Jackson said his analysis factors in projections of $11.5 billion in revenue for 2029, which would be well over double the company's expected sales for this year. He looked at the multiples of companies like Zillow and Carvana, which he said trade for 4 to 7 times forward revenue. Opendoor's forward price-to-sales ratio is currently well below 1. With Zillow and Redfin having exited the instant-buying home market, Opendoor faces little competition in allowing homeowners to sell their property online for cash, rather than going through an extended bidding, sales and closing process. Jackson is banking on revenue growth and increased market share to lead to a profitable business that will push investors to value the company with a multiple somewhere between Zillow and Carvana. At $82, Opendoor would be worth about $60 billion, which is roughly 5 times projected 2029 revenue. Jackson said his model assumes that "like Carvana, Opendoor can prove that it can permanently turn the tide and get to sustained profitability" so that the "market multiple would get reassessed." In the meantime, he'll keep posting on X. On Friday, Jackson wrote a thread consisting of 11 posts, recounting the challenge of having "99.5% of my AUM" disappear overnight after his primary investor pulled out in 2022. "Translation: he fired me for losing him too much money," Jackson wrote. He said he almost shut down the fund, and was even encouraged to do so by his wife and accountant. Now, Jackson is using his recent momentum on social media to try and attract investor money, while still reminding prospects that he could lose it. "All I have is my reputation," he wrote, "and, unless I keep picking good stocks, it will be gone."
Indianapolis Star
5 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
WNBA All-Star weekend preview: A Caitlin Clark update, CBA negotiations, more
Chloe Peterson and Brian Haenchen preview WNBA All-Star weekend in Indianapolis, provide an update on Caitlin Clark injury and the CBA negotiations. Chloe Peterson and Brian Haenchen
USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
Former NFLPA head Lloyd Howell was sunk by his own secrets
That the NFL Players' Association ended up here — with their leader, Lloyd Howell, resigning amid multiple scandals Thursday — shouldn't be a surprise. When you marry secrecy, you get secrets. And, well, Howell's NFLPA had some secrets. Like the fact an independent arbiter ruled in favor of the NFLPA's grievance case there was a PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE COMMISSIONER ROGER GOODELL AND THE FORMER LEAD LEAGUE ATTORNEY ENCOURAGED TEAMS TO COLLUDE against giving players guaranteed dollars. The key part is capitalized for a reason. Howell and the union didn't want anybody to know about it. Essential reporting from Pablo Torre and Pro Football Talk's Mike Florio unearthed the initial ruling. ESPN's Kalyn Kahler and Don Van Natta Jr. added layers by exposing a secrecy agreement between the NFL and NFLPA to keep the arbitration ruling buried. What should have been a slam dunk for Howell and his union inexplicably became a 'nothingburger.' If only his tenure could be described that way. 'Disaster' is a better fit. 'Unhealthy' is more apropos. For the players, who rely on this union even though the vast majority of them don't really care about the details of the membership. For the fans, the vast majority of whom support the players' rights to receive their fair share in the fight against 32 separate, billion-dollar enterprises — and don't want to hear about collective bargaining agreement (CBA) drama. You think this stuff doesn't have consequences? Look at the second-round draft picks from the 2025 class fighting for guaranteed money. Every day is a scrap for the next cent in the NFL. The NFLPA's job is to give each player a chance in that battle. Howell was elected following a process that was shrouded in secrecy. None of the candidates were made public. Player membership received one day's notice of the election, according to reports, and only 11 individuals voted. And the outcome was Howell, a former executive at consulting firm Booz Allen. Former union president JC Tretter, now the chief strategist for the NFLPA, said the process was copacetic and within the union's constitutional guidelines. This is a group that represents nearly 1,700 active players and many more former ones. Maybe Howell was the most qualified candidate and presented the best vision for the NFLPA's future — not that the public (or many of the players) would have any idea. But it set the tone for the next two years. Once the dam broke for Howell, there was no plugging it. After Torre's initial revelation, the confidentiality agreement between the league and union came to light. Then Torre reported another grievance case that went to arbitration — this time with a judge ruling against the union that Tretter's comments on a podcast in 2023 violated the CBA for loosely suggesting players could use injuries as leverage. The NFL won that arbitration ruling, but nobody knew because of a different confidentiality agreement. One of the most egregious points of Howell's time leading the union is that he was a paid, part-time consultant for The Carlyle Group — one of the private-equity firms approved by the league to invest in NFL franchises. Conflict of interest and grift are en vogue in America in 2025. That doesn't make any of this OK. The union head must be unequivocally committed to being on the side of the players. This is a role that requires servant leadership. Focusing on adding zeros to checking accounts and diversifying investment portfolios don't mesh with that. Those are the controversies relevant to Howell's dealings at the NFLPA. And the union stood by Howell, even releasing a statement of support from the executive committee four days before his resignation. It was his choice to resign, according to a source with knowledge of the situation. The person did not want to be identified because of the sensitivity of the situation. The final nail in the coffin appeared to be the ESPN report that he was involved in a sexual discrimination and retaliation lawsuit at his former job in 2011. Per ESPN, some players who voted for Howell were unaware of the suit. One month after his election, Howell's firm settled a $377 million lawsuit with the government after a whistleblower claim of overcharging. Howell was the company's chief financial officer. Perhaps a proper, public vetting process could have prevented this. Some good certainly happened at the NFLPA under Howell. The player surveys were a hit and led to tangible change, with owners prompted to improve life and conditions for the players and their families. The timing for the union is not ideal. The CBA expires in 2030, and that may feel distant. Labor negotiations have a funny way of making any timeline feel clustered. The work to avoid labor strife down the road had already been started. The new leader won't have to start from scratch, but Howell's resignation definitely puts the union behind the 8-ball in what is already an unfair fight against ownership. Howell was never the right choice for the job. The original sin, though, is the secrecy of his selection. Hopefully the NFLPA has learned that lesson.
