No more executions for spies, saboteurs as Vietnam slashes death penalty list
The number of offences facing capital punishment will be almost halved from an original 18 to 10 from July, according to the penal code approved by the National Assembly, the official Bao Chinh Phu news portal reported.
According to the amended law, the crimes no longer punishable by death include attempting to overthrow the administration, sabotaging state facilities, production and trade of counterfeit medicine, illegal transportation of narcotics, sabotaging peace and waging war, espionage, property embezzlement and bribe-taking.
Convicts would instead be given the maximum sentence of life in prison.
Minister of Public Security Luong Tam Quang said 'the current structure of capital punishment was problematic and, in some cases, misaligned with evolving socio-economic conditions and the realities of crime prevention.'
One of the reasons for the move given by Minister of Justice Nguyen Hai Ninh was that in most cases people sentenced to death for the above crimes were not actually executed.
'The abolishment of capital publishment for several crimes will also serve international cooperation work, especially when Vietnam is promoting closer relations on the basis of mutual trust,' Ninh was reported as saying.
Vietnam has carried out death sentences by lethal injection since 2013 when it replaced execution by firing squad.
The number of executions has not been made public, but Amnesty International estimates more than 1,200 people were on death row in Vietnam by the end of 2023.
Under Vietnamese law, those sentenced to death for the above eight crimes before July 1 will have their sentences converted to life imprisonment by the chief judge of the Supreme People's Court. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
43 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Thailand's political chaos: what happens next?
Thai Premier Paetongtarn Shinawatra has been accused of breaching ethical standards in violation of the constitution. (AP pic) BANGKOK : Thailand's constitutional court suspended prime minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra today as it considers a petition filed by 36 senators seeking her dismissal. The senators have accused the 38-year-old premier of dishonesty and breaching ethical standards in violation of the constitution over a leaked telephone conversation with Cambodia's former premier Hun Sen. Who will lead the government now? With the prime minister suspended, Suriya Juangroongruangkit, the deputy prime minister and minister of transport, will become the caretaker leader. Suriya, 70, is a veteran of Thai politics, having entered the fray in the 1990s and served in various cabinet positions for multiple parties since, including the predecessor of the ruling Pheu Thai party. What happens with the court case? The court has ordered Paetongtarn to stop performing her duties until it makes a decision. In a statement, the court said the premier will have 15 days to respond to the allegations made by the petitioners, following which proceedings will continue. What can Paetongtarn do in the interim? As part of a cabinet reshuffle announced earlier today, ahead of the court's statement, Paetongtarn was appointed as the minister of culture. Once she is sworn into the position on July 3, she will be able to attend cabinet meetings in her capacity as a minister, despite the suspension from the constitutional court. What about parliament? Thailand's parliament will reconvene on July 3. The Bhumjaithai party, a former member of Paetongtarn's ruling alliance, had previously threatened to straightaway move a no-confidence motion against the premier and her cabinet on Thursday. But such a move cannot take place with the premier now suspended. In any case, for the motion to succeed, Bhumjaithai would need the support of the People's Party, the largest opposition group that is yet to decide on its position. Are there any other cases underway? The national anti-corruption commission, which has a wide remit, is also probing Paetongtarn for any ethical violations emanating from the leaked phone call between her and Hun Sen. This is based on a petition filed by the same group of 36 senators who also moved the constitutional court. It is unclear when the NACC will conclude its investigation, but this process could lead to another case at Thailand's Supreme Court, which may rule to ban Paetongtarn from politics. What about public protests? Several thousand people gathered in the Thai capital on Saturday in the largest anti-government protest since the Pheu Thai party took power in 2023. The organisers, who have called on Paetongtarn to step down, have threatened to escalate protests if she does not quit. Some of those who led Saturday's demonstration are veterans of previous protest movements that played a role in bringing down governments led by Paetongtarn's father, Thaksin Shinawatra, and her aunt, Yingluck Shinawatra. Is Thaksin under pressure? Former premier Thaksin, who remains one of Thailand's most influential but divisive politicians, is currently facing a criminal court case, in which he is accused of violating the country's strict lese majeste law during a media interview in 2015. Thailand has one of the world's harshest lese majeste laws, setting jail terms of up to 15 years for anyone convicted of defaming, insulting or threatening King Maha Vajiralongkorn and his close family. The Supreme Court is also holding a series of hearings on Thaksin's prolonged hospital stay, in lieu of prison, following his return to Thailand in 2023 after years in self-exile. An adverse verdict in this case could see Thaksin, 75, sent to jail.
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Unmasking paedophiles: When silence and secrecy become the greatest crimes — Haezreena Begum Abdul Hamid
JULY 2 — Recent headlines in Malaysia have once again reminded us of the disturbing reality of paedophilia and child sexual abuse. A few months ago, a prominent social media personality was arrested for allegedly grooming and sexually abusing minors. In another case, a male teacher was charged with repeatedly molesting his own students. Such cases shock the conscience, but they are sadly not isolated. Paedophilia is a psychological condition marked by persistent sexual interest in prepubescent children. While paedophiles are often portrayed as predatory men, we must also acknowledge that women, too, can be perpetrators of sexual abuse against children. In 2025, a woman pleaded guilty on two counts of committing sexual assault on a teenage girl last year. In 2023, a woman in Johor was charged under the Sexual Offences Against Children Act for producing child pornography and exploiting her sons. These cases, though rare, are not unheard of, and it is time our public discourse acknowledges this uncomfortable truth. Paedophiles are not confined to any particular gender, age, marital status, or social class. Paedophiles deliberately choose children as their victims for several reasons. The most glaring is the imbalance of power. Children are vulnerable, gullible, and far less able to resist or comprehend the situation. This is especially true in cases of incest, where the perpetrator is often a trusted family member such as the victim's father, uncle, stepbrother, or even a female caregiver. In such situations, the child is not only physically powerless but also emotionally entrapped. The fear of breaking family bonds or being disbelieved keeps many victims silent. Reporting child sexual abuse is fraught with barriers. Many children fear being blamed or accused of lying. — Unsplash pic Another key factor lies in the fantasies and voyeuristic desires harboured by perpetrators. Many struggle to fulfil these deviant urges with adult partners. Some are even married or in relationships but experience a sexual disconnect or lack of arousal with their current partner. Children, in their eyes, become a dangerous and perverse outlet for satisfaction. These distorted psychological patterns are often hidden behind a façade of normalcy. Reporting child sexual abuse is fraught with barriers. Many children fear being blamed or accused of lying. Others lack the vocabulary or emotional maturity to describe the abuse. In incest cases, entire families sometimes engage in deliberate denial or concealment to avoid shame and societal backlash. This creates a toxic silence, where the perpetrator remains shielded, and the victim suffers alone — sometimes for years. Malaysia is not short of legal tools. The Penal Code, Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017, and the Child Act 2001 provide comprehensive provisions to criminalise and punish child sexual abuse. For instance, Section 376 of the Penal Code criminalises rape, including statutory rape where the victim is below 16. Section 14 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act deals specifically with child sexual assault. Section 31 of the Child Act penalises neglect and abuse of children, including sexual harm. However, these laws can only be activated when the perpetrator is identified and the offence is reported. And therein lies the real challenge. The child's fear, the family's silence, and the perpetrator's manipulation all contribute to an environment where justice is easily evaded — revealing that child sexual abuse is not merely a legal issue, but a complex social, psychological, and cultural crisis. To combat this crisis, we must begin by educating children about their rights, bodily autonomy, and how to seek help when something feels wrong. At the same time, teachers, caregivers, and law enforcement officers must be equipped to identify warning signs early and respond appropriately. Equally vital is the establishment of child-friendly reporting mechanisms and accessible therapeutic support systems to help survivors heal. We must also confront and dismantle societal taboos that hinder open conversations about incest and sexual abuse within families — as these silences only serve to protect perpetrators. Importantly, we must also recognise and acknowledge that offenders can be women, ensuring that data collection, research, and awareness campaigns reflect this reality. As a conclusion, we must stop treating paedophilia as a fringe problem or a family embarrassment. It is a crime — a violation of innocence and trust. Until we create an ecosystem that listens to children, believes them, and acts swiftly, paedophiles — male or female — will continue to hide in plain sight. *This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Govt seeks to secure Pulau Ligitan with RM300mil security outpost
Federal and state officials say they want security at Pulau Ligitan fortified in view of the looming external cross-border criminal threats, including terrorism. (X pic) KOTA KINABALU : Malaysia is looking to secure the sovereignty of Pulau Ligitan, a small island and popular diving haven off the Tawau coast, according to top federal and state government officials. Sources from the home and defence ministries, along with the maritime industry, revealed that a two-year study had recommended the establishment of a permanent security control outpost within 1km of Pulau Ligitan, located some 50km away from Tawau. The officials said that the plan was to fortify security at Pulau Ligitan in view of the looming external cross-border criminal threats, including terrorism, given its close proximity to both the Philippines and Indonesia. The state and federal governments are believed to be considering a budget of up to RM300 million to develop a comprehensive outpost, including living quarters for up to 60 personnel on a 24-hour rotation. The project, slated to be carried out by a private contractor, is understood to be awaiting government approval and budgetary allocation. The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, revealed that the environment department is presently conducting an environmental impact assessment, while the Royal Malaysian Navy has been tasked with hydrographic mapping around Pulau Ligitan, where currently only a lighthouse stands. 'We see this as an effort to firmly secure our maritime sovereign assets in view of the growing maritime territorial disputes in the Celebes and Sulu Seas, involving Indonesia and the Philippines. 'Without effectively securing Ligitan, we cannot open the island, smaller than a football field at low-tide, for tourists and develop resorts around it, similar to what has been done at Sipadan about 28km away from it,' the source told FMT. The government, the source added, had 'learnt its lessons' from territorial disputes involving Pulau Batu Puteh with Singapore, Limbang with Brunei and the Ambalat oil and gas sea-block in the Celebes Sea with Indonesia. Following the Abu Sayyaf group's abduction of 21 tourists in Sipadan on April 23, 2000, and the Lahad Datu intrusion by 235 Sulu militants on February 11, 2013, the National Security Council assumed control of Sipadan and Ligitan. The islands were later handed over to Sabah's Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Environment on July 6, 2019. The officials said the proposed outpost on Pulau Ligitan would be modelled after Station Lima, the forward operating facility established in 1983 on Pulau Layang-Layang (Swallow Reef) in the South China Sea. 'Ligitan's outpost is expected to include a power-generator set, reverse-osmosis system to convert salty sea-water into drinking-water, a watch-tower, firearms armoury, kitchen, dining hall, meeting room, launderette, sewage management system, fuel storage and machinery control room, jetty, wave-breaker barrier, helicopter pad and fast-interceptor and marine-park boats,' the source said.
