
Stock markets fall as trade relief fades, eyes on data and earnings
The pact, which followed a similar one with Japan last week, still left many worried about the economic consequences, with auto companies particularly worried.
"The 15 percent blanket levy on EU and Japanese imports may have helped markets sidestep a cliff, but it's no free pass," said Stephen Innes at SPI Asset Management.
"With the average effective US tariff rate now sitting at 18.2 percent... the barrier to global trade remains significant. The higher tail risk didn't detonate, but its potential impact on the global economy hasn't disappeared either."
And National Australia Bank's Ray Attrill added: "It hasn't taken long for markets to conclude that this relatively good news is still, in absolute terms, bad news as far as the near term (through 2025) implications for eurozone growth are concerned."
Traders are also keeping an eye on US talks with other major economies, including India and South Korea.
After a tepid day on Wall Street -- which still saw the S&P and Nasdaq hit records -- Asia turned negative.
Tokyo, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sydney, Singapore, Wellington, Taipei, Manila and Jakarta were all in the red.
The euro held its losses from Monday, having taken a hit from worries about the effects of the trade deal on the eurozone.
The first of two days of negotiations between top US and Chinese officials in Stockholm concluded Monday with no details released, though there are hopes they will agree to extend a 90-day truce that ends on August 12.
The two imposed triple-digit tariffs on each other earlier this year in a tit-for-tat escalation, but then walked them back under the temporary agreement reached in May.
Investors are also looking ahead to a busy few days that includes earnings from tech titans Apple, Microsoft, Meta and Amazon, as well as data on US economic growth and jobs creation.
That all comes as the Fed concludes its policy meeting amid increasing pressure from Trump to slash rates, even with inflation staying stubbornly high.
While it is expected to stand pat on borrowing costs, its post-meeting statement and comments from boss Jerome Powell will be pored over for clues about its plans for the second half of the year in light of the tariffs.
Oil prices extended Monday's rally after Trump shortened a deadline for Russia to end its war in Ukraine to August 7 or 9, following which he vowed to sanction countries buying its crude.
Key figures at around 0230 GMT
Tokyo - Nikkei 225: DOWN 0.9 percent at 40,623.32 (break)
Hong Kong - Hang Seng Index: DOWN 1.1 percent at 25,290.03
Shanghai - Composite: DOWN 0.1 percent at 3,595.46
Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.1592 from $1.1597 on Monday
Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.3354 from $1.3356
Dollar/yen: UP at 148.61 yen from 148.52 yen
Euro/pound: UP at 86.81 pence from 86.80 pence
Brent North Sea Crude: UP 0.1 percent at $70.11 per barrel
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
12 minutes ago
- France 24
Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines moved after Russian 'provocative' comments
01:46 02/08/2025 'Trump is tightening his grip on American economic policy and institutions' Americas 01/08/2025 Trump Tariffs : US President Donald Trump grants Mexico 90-day reprieve Americas 01/08/2025 US tariffs on India: A changing tide in their partnership? Americas 01/08/2025 El Salvador's parliament approves reform to allow Bukele to run indefinitely Americas 01/08/2025 D-Day for Trump's tariffs: 'A complete rewiring of the global trade system' Americas 01/08/2025 US President Donald Trump hits dozens of countries with steep duties Americas 01/08/2025 MAGA global shakedown: Facing tariffs, sanctions, Lula now stands 'good chance of getting reelected' Americas 31/07/2025 Trump slaps 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports over Bolsonaro trial Americas


France 24
40 minutes ago
- France 24
'Trump is tightening his grip on American economic policy and institutions'
01:28 01/08/2025 Trump Tariffs : US President Donald Trump grants Mexico 90-day reprieve Americas 01/08/2025 US President Donald Trump imposes sweeping trade tariffs to many countries Americas 01/08/2025 US tariffs on India: A changing tide in their partnership? Americas 01/08/2025 El Salvador's parliament approves reform to allow Bukele to run indefinitely Americas 01/08/2025 D-Day for Trump's tariffs: 'A complete rewiring of the global trade system' Americas 01/08/2025 US President Donald Trump hits dozens of countries with steep duties Americas 01/08/2025 MAGA global shakedown: Facing tariffs, sanctions, Lula now stands 'good chance of getting reelected' Americas 31/07/2025 Trump slaps 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports over Bolsonaro trial Americas 31/07/2025 Trump's abrupt reversal on climate policy a 'dreadful blow' to the battle against global warming Americas


France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Jury awards over $240 million in damages against Tesla in Autopilot crash lawsuit
A Miami jury decided that Elon Musk's car company Tesla was partly responsible for a deadly crash in Florida involving its Autopilot driver assist technology and must pay the victims more than $240 million in damages. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cellphone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. 'We finally learned what happened that night, that the car was actually defective,' said Benavides' sister, Neima Benavides. 'Justice was achieved.' Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. 'Today's verdict is wrong," Tesla said in a statement, 'and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology,' They said the plaintiffs concocted a story 'blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.' In addition to a punitive award of $200 million, the jury said Tesla must also pay $43 million of a total $129 million in compensatory damages for the crash, bringing the total borne by the company to $243 million. 'It's a big number that will send shock waves to others in the industry,' said financial analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities. 'It's not a good day for Tesla.' Tesla said it will appeal. Even if that fails, the company says it will end up paying far less than what the jury decided because of a pre-trial agreement that limits punitive damages to three times Tesla's compensatory damages. Translation: $172 million, not $243 million. But the plaintiff says their deal was based on a multiple of all compensatory damages, not just Tesla's, and the figure the jury awarded is the one the company will have to pay. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019. But the issue of trust generally in the company came up several times in the case, including in closing arguments Thursday. The plaintiffs' lead lawyer, Brett Schreiber, said Tesla's decision to even use the term Autopilot showed it was willing to mislead people and take big risks with their lives because the system only helps drivers with lane changes, slowing a car and other tasks, falling far short of driving the car itself. Schreiber said other automakers use terms like 'driver assist' and 'copilot' to make sure drivers don't rely too much on the technology. 'Words matter,' Schreiber said. 'And if someone is playing fast and lose with words, they're playing fast and lose with information and facts.' Schreiber acknowledged that the driver, George McGee, was negligent when he blew through flashing lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at 62 miles an hour before slamming into a Chevrolet Tahoe that the couple had parked to get a look at the stars. The Tahoe spun around so hard it was able to launch Benavides 75 feet through the air into nearby woods where her body was later found. It also left Angulo, who walked into the courtroom Friday with a limp and cushion to sit on, with broken bones and a traumatic brain injury. But Schreiber said Tesla was at fault nonetheless. He said Tesla allowed drivers to act recklessly by not disengaging the Autopilot as soon as they begin to show signs of distraction and by allowing them to use the system on smaller roads that it was not designed for, like the one McGee was driving on. 'I trusted the technology too much,' said McGee at one point in his testimony. 'I believed that if the car saw something in front of it, it would provide a warning and apply the brakes.' The lead defense lawyer in the Miami case, Joel Smith, countered that Tesla warns drivers that they must keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel yet McGee chose not to do that while he looked for a dropped cellphone, adding to the danger by speeding. Noting that McGee had gone through the same intersection 30 or 40 times previously and hadn't crashed during any of those trips, Smith said that isolated the cause to one thing alone: 'The cause is that he dropped his cellphone.' The auto industry has been watching the case closely because a finding of Tesla liability despite a driver's admission of reckless behavior would pose significant legal risks for every company as they develop cars that increasingly drive themselves.