Chris Kluwe, fired as football coach, sues Huntington Beach Union High School District
One person not on the gridiron this year at Edison High is former NFL punter Chris Kluwe.
Kluwe, who had been a freshman football coach for the Chargers for six years, was fired on Feb. 27.
'This is the time they're just getting into camp and learning everything, and I'm not there anymore,' he said.
On Monday, Kluwe sued the Huntington Beach Union High School District, alleging his 1st and 14th Amendment rights were violated when he was terminated earlier this year for what the district claimed was an incendiary social media post.
The complaint, filed in the Southern Division of the U.S. District Court Central District, also lists HBUHSD Supt. Carolee Ogata, Board of Trustees President Susan Henry, Asst. Supt. Daniel Bryan, then-Edison Principal Daniel Morris, Edison Assist. Principal Edward Begany and author Chris Epting, a former Los Angeles Times columnist, as defendants.
The ACLU Foundation of Southern California is listed as co-counsel for Kluwe for his claims of retaliatory discharge, violations of his civil rights and deprivation of property and liberty without due process against HBUHSD.
'Rather than responsibly investigating what unmistakably involved 1st Amendment-protected speech about a hotly-debated political issue in the community, the school district played a politically-motivated game of 'gotcha,'' the complaint reads. 'The school district's sham decision-making process did not even include notifying Kluwe of an issue with his post, disclosing the school district policy he allegedly violated and asking for his side of the story. With any level of investigation, the school district would have discovered that a group of politically-motivated MAGA loyalists had launched a campaign to 'cancel' Kluwe — i.e., to get him fired because his liberal politics and calls for him to run for City Council disgusted them.'
The school district declined to comment because the issue is a confidential personnel matter, HBUSHD spokeswoman Noel Anderson said in an email Monday.
Epting is named in the suit, as Kluwe claimed he posted an cropped social media image that placed him in a false light and implied that he was violent.
'I'm comfortable that my 1st Amendment right allows me to offer my opinion on his posts while sharing exactly what he said publicly,' Epting said Monday.
Kluwe was arrested at the Feb. 18 Huntington Beach City Council meeting after engaging in an act of peaceful civil disobedience. His comments at the meeting served to slam a plaque featuring the MAGA acrostic, which was approved to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Central Library.
Five days later, he made a since-deleted post on social media platform Bluesky encouraging people to stop complaining to the library, and start complaining to the City Council.
'Stop [expletive] with the library,' the post read. 'That's what the City Council is doing. The library is great, as are the people who work there. Go [expletive] with the City Council. Find where they work, and blow *those* places up.'
Kluwe said he met with the Edison athletic director and vice principal of supervision on Feb. 27, and was told he was being let go. The district issued a press release on March 3, referencing the post and stating that it 'does not condone or tolerate language that promotes or suggests violence in any form.'
Kluwe said Monday the social media post, which had been paired with a video and was later deleted, was taken out of context and did not promote actual violence, rather the 'blowing up' of phone lines with complaints.
'I was making the comments as a private citizen, and as far as I'm aware, the 1st Amendment is still intact,' said Kluwe, 43. 'That means, as a private citizen, you can speak out on matters of public import … That's why we have the 1st Amendment, right, to make sure that if someone is let go for their speech, then we have to figure out, was that protected speech or not?'
Kluwe, who has announced that he is planning a state Assembly District 72 run next year, is represented by attorneys from Irvine-based Crowell & Moring LLP as well as Anne Brafford of Huntington Beach. The complaint demands a jury trial.
During his time in professional football, Kluwe threatened to sue the Minnesota Vikings after he alleged they released him because he was an LGBTQ+ activist. A settlement was eventually reached, with the team agreeing to donate to groups that support gay rights, implement sensitivity training and set up a national symposium on LGBTQ+ tolerance.
'It's not really a stable society if you can get fired from your job for something you're saying on your free time that really isn't damaging or harmful,' Kluwe said Monday. 'It's just you being a person. And so I think it's indicative of more of a broader problem in American society, that we've kind of weaponized the idea of going after someone's speech … I think it's unfortunate that we've reached a point in our society where it seems like the go-to is for people to instantly try to get someone fired, when they say something that person doesn't agree with.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pardons, positions and power: Trump's donor list raises questions about pay-for-access in his administration
A new financial disclosure from a super PAC supporting President Donald Trump contains the name of the deep-pocket donors who have gained access to the White House. MAGA Inc.'s donor list includes Trump appointees, a mom who managed to get Trump to pardon her son, and cryptocurrency traders, according to a new report by the New York Times. The super PAC managed to pull some major donations for the president; according to the disclosure, MAGA Inc. raised more than $177 million for Trump since January. Some names on the list wound up working for Trump in his administration. Anjani Sinha, a friend of Trump's, was nominated to be the ambassador to Singapore. He donated $1 million to MAGA Inc. He hasn't been approved for the position yet, possibly because he struggled to answer questions about Singapore during his confirmation hearing. Cody Campbell, who is now on Trump's Council on Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition, donated half a million dollars to the super PAC. Josh Lobel, now sitting on Trump's Intelligence Advisory Board, donated $250,000. Several major donors are tied to the crypto industry, which has by and large found a friendly ally in Trump. According to the Times, Trump's inaugural committee raised an enormous $239 million, with approximately $18 million of that coming from crypto-related donors. According to the filing, donors working in cryptocurrencies accounted for $45 million of the donations reported through MAGA Inc. One donor alone — crypto entrepreneur Eric Schiermeyer — donated $1 million, and was given the chance to have dinner with Trump in Mar-a-Lago in March. The pair didn't just eat and chat — during the dinner, Schiermeyer apparently pitched Trump on an idea for a cryptocurrency called the "USA Token" that would be doled out to Americans for use in transactions. He reportedly wanted a government contract for his company to handle the task, according to the Times' reporting. He told the paper that he managed to get his idea in front of Trump face-to-face, so he considers it a win. 'I was able to say my piece, and the idea is clearly making the rounds, so mission accomplished from my view.' he told the Times. And then there's Elizabeth Fago, who handed over $1 million to MAGA Inc. and got herself a dinner with Trump. Three weeks later, her son, Paul Walczak, who pleaded guilty to tax fraud, was pardoned. A White House spokesperson who talked to the Times anonymously said that Fago's words, rather than her cash, convinced the president to give her son a break. 'He spoke directly to a mother who pleaded for her son, and when you're talking to a mother pleading for her son, that's a pretty powerful thing,' the source reportedly said. The Independent has requested comment from The White House. According to MAGA Inc., all of the apparent benefits that come along with shoveling money at Trump are just a coincidence. It told the Times that Trump doesn't treat donors any different from normal Americans. 'President Trump values his supporters and donors, but unlike politicians before him, he cannot be bought and works toward the best interest of the country,' it told the paper.
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Adams trashes $14 M NYC Council-approved law to provide free garbage bins: 'Ax to grind'
NYC homeowners might not be getting the free garbage cans the City Council promised – as legislators and Mayor Eric Adams literally fight over trash. Adams revealed this week he won't sign off on $14.5 million in taxpayer dough to give away hundreds of thousands of specially secure bins to New Yorkers as part of his war on NYC rats. The bins are supposed to go to owners of one- and two-family homes with the city refunding those who already purchased them, provided they are enrolled in the state's School Tax Relief (STAR) program. The giveaway was supposed to begin Friday under legislation sponsored by Yusef Salaam (D-Manhattan) that the Council unanimously approved in February with a veto-proof majority. 3 Mayor Eric Adams is snubbing a new law that is supposed to provide owners of one- and two-family home with city-issued bins. Instead, Council members this week were told to come up with the $14.5 million on their own — enough to cover about 265,000 one-and two family households, by NYC Independent Budget Office estimates. The City Council has its own taxpayer-funded budget that it uses to pay staff, fund pet projects in their district and for other initiatives. It was the latest salvo fired in an ongoing feud between the city's executive and legislative branches, which also this week included Adams vetoing a City Council measure that would have blocked Bally's from opening a Bronx casino and another that would decriminalize illegal vending. 3 'The mayor has an ax to grind,' said Council Minority Leader Joann Ariola (R-Queens). Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post A vast majority of NYC property owners will be required to use city-issued bins with secure lids by June 2026. They range in cost from $43.88 for 25-gallon containers to $53.01 to 45-gallon bins — a tab the Council believes should be picked up by the city for many New Yorkers. Reps for the mayor said the Council should have addressed the bill's funding before agreeing last month on a new $115.9 billion budget for this fiscal year – especially since Adams previously complained the trash-bin giveaway plan was fiscally irresponsible. But Adams has an obligation to abide by the new law, and the Council believed the money for the bins was covered by $32 million of permanent new funding he set aside for the Department of Sanitation to keep NYC clean, some members said. 'The mayor has an ax to grind … This was never supposed to be funded by the City Council,' said Council Minority Leader Joann Ariola (R-Queens). '[Adams] is putting up the middle-finger to middle-class taxpayers.' 3 The trash-bin giveaway was supposed to begin Friday under legislation sponsored by Yusef Salaam (D-Manhattan) Matthew McDermott 'Homeowners in the STAR program are predominantly seniors and one of the most vulnerable groups in the city. That's why the … legislation to provide free garbage bins to these residents was so important,' said Councilwoman Lynn Schulman (D-Queens). 'The city must take care of its most precious constituents.' Salaam did not return messages. Liz Garcia, an Adams spokeswoman, said 'it is unfortunate that the City Council irresponsibly passed an unfunded law and then did not prioritize funding for it during our recent budget negotiations.' 'We will continue to work to provide the most affordable options to New Yorkers and send the rats packing out of our city,' Garcia said.
Boston Globe
8 hours ago
- Boston Globe
FBI redacted Trump's name in Epstein files for privacy reasons
The review was part of a broader effort sparked by Trump's campaign promise to 'declassify' files related to Epstein, which his MAGA base has long requested. In March, FBI Director Kash Patel directed his special agents from the New York and Washington field offices to join the bureau's FOIA employees at the agency's sprawling Central Records Complex in Winchester, Virginia, and another building a few miles away. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Responding to public pressure, FBI personnel were instructed to search for and review every single Epstein-related document and determine what could be released. That included a mountain of material accumulated by the FBI over nearly two decades, including grand jury testimony, prosecutors' case files, as well as tens of thousands of pages of the bureau's own investigative files on Epstein. Advertisement It was a herculean task that involved as many as 1,000 FBI agents and other personnel pulling all-nighters while poring through more than 100,000 documents, according to a July letter from Senator Dick Durbin to US Attorney General Pam Bondi. Advertisement The employees reviewed the records using the Freedom of Information Act as their guide for deciding what information should be withheld. That alone isn't uncommon. In the FOIA, Congress established nine exemptions as a way to balance the public's right to know against the government's need to protect sensitive interests, such as national security, official deliberations, ongoing law enforcement proceedings or privacy. When such competing interests arise in non-FOIA matters, those exemptions are often applied even if the exact language set forth in the FOIA statute doesn't appear in the final record. A photograph of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein at a London bus stop. Leon Neal/Getty While reviewing the Epstein files, FBI personnel identified numerous references to Trump in the documents, the people familiar with the matter said. Dozens of other high-profile public figures also appeared, the people said. In preparation for potential public release, the documents then went to a unit of FOIA officers who applied redactions in accordance with the nine exemptions. The people familiar with the matter said that Trump's name, along with other high-profile individuals, was blacked out because he was a private citizen when the federal investigation of Epstein was launched in 2006. Last month, the DOJ and the FBI concluded that 'no further disclosure' of the files 'would be appropriate or warranted.' Epstein avoided federal sex-trafficking charges in 2008 when he agreed to plead guilty to state charges in Florida for soliciting prostitution. In July 2019, following an investigation by the Miami Herald that also scrutinized the integrity of the government's probe, Epstein was indicted on federal charges of sex trafficking of minors. A month later, he died by suicide in his jail cell, federal law enforcement authorities said, while awaiting trial. Advertisement A White House spokesperson would not respond to questions about the redactions of Trump's name, instead referring queries to the FBI. The FBI declined to comment. The Justice Department did not respond to multiple requests for comment. In a statement on Friday after Bloomberg first reported the redactions, Durbin said that Trump 'has the power to unilaterally help fix this by consenting to the release of his name in the files to the public to fulfill the promises of Attorney General Bondi that the public would see the 'full Epstein files.'' ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
