Barabak: It's not just Biden. There's a history of presidential health cover-ups
Once more we're litigating Joe Biden's catatonic debate performance, his lumbering gait, his moth-eaten memory and his selfish delusion he deserved a second term in the White House while shuffling through his ninth decade on earth.
Biden's abrupt announcement he faces an advanced form of prostate cancer has only served to increase speculation over what the president's inner circle knew, and when they knew it.
"Original Sin," a book by journalists Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, published this week, is chock-full of anecdotes illustrating the lengths to which Biden's family and palace guard worked to shield his mental and physical lapses from voters.
John Robert Greene is not at all surprised.
'It's old news, hiding presidential illness,' said Greene, who's written a shelf full of books on presidents and the presidency. 'I can't think of too many … who've been the picture of health.'
Before we go further, let's state for the record this in no way condones the actions of Biden and his political enablers. To be clear, let's repeat it in capital letters: WHAT BIDEN AND HIS HANDLERS DID WAS WRONG.
But, as Greene states, it was not unprecedented or terribly unusual. History abounds with examples of presidential maladies being minimized, or kept secret.
Read more: Cancer diagnosis and a new book fuel questions about Biden's decision to run in 2024
Grover Cleveland underwent surgery for oral cancer on a yacht in New York Harbor to keep his condition from being widely known. Woodrow Wilson suffered a debilitating stroke, a fact covered up by his wife and confidants, who exercised extraordinary power in his stead.
Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy both suffered serious, chronic ailments that were kept well away from the public eye.
Those surrounding Ronald Reagan downplayed his injuries after a 1981 assassination attempt, and the Trump administration misled the public about the seriousness of the president's condition after he was diagnosed with COVID-19 a month before the 2020 election.
The capacity to misdirect, in Biden's case, or mislead, as happened under Trump, illustrates one of the magical features of the White House: the ability of a president to conceal himself in plain sight.
Read more: Biden is diagnosed with 'aggressive' form of prostate cancer
"When you're in the presidency, there is nothing that you can't hide for awhile," Greene, an emeritus history professor at Cazenovia College, said from his home in upstate New York. "You've got everything at your disposal to live a completely hidden double life, if you want. Everything from the Secret Service to the bubble of the White House."
Greene likened the Neoclassical mansion at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. to a giant fish bowl — one that is painted from the inside. It's highly visible, but you can't really see what's happening in the interior.
That deflates the notion there was some grand media conspiracy to prop Biden up. (Sorry, haters.)
Yes, detractors will say it was plain as the dawning day that Biden was demented, diminished and obviously not up to the job of the presidency. Today, Trump's critics say the same sort of thing about him; from their armchairs, they even deliver quite specific diagnoses: He suffers dementia, or Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease.
That doesn't make it so.
"It's a very politicized process. People see what they want to see," said Jacob Appel, a professor of psychiatry and medical education at the Icahn School of Medicine in New York City, who's writing a book on presidential health.
"You can watch videotapes of Ronald Reagan in 1987," Appel said, "and, depending on your view of him. you can see him as sharp and funny as ever, or being on the cusp of dementia." (Five years after leaving the White House, Reagan — then 83 — announced he was in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease.)
To an uncomfortable degree, those covering the White House — and, by extension, the public they serve — are forced to rely on whatever the White House chooses to reveal.
"I don't have subpoena power,' Tapper told The Times' Stephen Battaglio, saying he would have eagerly published the details contained in his new book had sources been willing to come forth while Biden was still in power. 'We were just lied to over and over again."
It hasn't always been that way.
In September 1955, during his first term, President Dwight D. Eisenhower suffered a heart attack while on a golf vacation in Denver. ""It was sudden," said Jim Newton, an Eisenhower biographer. "One minute he's fine and the next minute he was flat on his back, quite literally."
The details surrounding Eisenhower's immediate treatment remain a mystery, though Newton suggests that may have had more do with protecting his personal physician, who misdiagnosed the heart attack as a bout of indigestion, than a purposeful attempt to mislead the public.
From then on, the White House was forthcoming — offering daily reports on what Eisenhower ate, his blood pressure, the results of various tests — to a point that it embarrassed the president. (Among the information released was an accounting of Ike's bowel movements.)
Read more: 6 doctors on Biden's cancer diagnosis, how it may have arisen and his treatment options
"They were self-consciously transparent," Newton said. "The White House looked to the Wilson example as something not to emulate."
Less than 14 months later, Eisenhower had sufficiently recovered — and voters had enough faith in his well-being — that he won his second term in a landslide.
But that 70-year-old example is a notable exception.
As long as there are White House staffers, campaign advisers, political strategists and family members, presidents will be surrounded by people with an incentive to downplay, minimize or obfuscate any physical or mental maladies they face while in office.
All we can do is wait — years, decades — for the truth to come out. And, in the meantime, hope for the best.
Get the latest from Mark Z. BarabakFocusing on politics out West, from the Golden Gate to the U.S. Capitol.Sign me up.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


E&E News
2 hours ago
- E&E News
Megalaw complicates Trump's plans to quickly ax renewable credits
President Donald Trump wants to quickly ax renewable tax credits. But his One Big Beautiful Bill Act could take years to unwind some Biden-era incentives. The legislation, signed into law by Trump last week, creates a complicated system for phasing out the investment tax credit and production tax credit available to wind and solar projects. Many projects could still see financing for years to come — though confusion reigns over which ones will qualify. Projects already under construction are effectively able to claim the credits if they enter operation through 2030. That threshold is met by roughly a third of onshore wind development projects and more than a quarter of solar projects, according to U.S. Energy Information Administration figures. Advertisement Projects on the cusp of construction will also be able to claim credits. Those that start work before July 4, 2026, can avoid a new congressional requirement that projects be placed in service by the end of 2027 to get federal money. Trump injected uncertainty into those qualifications with an executive order Monday, titled 'Ending Market distorting Subsidies for Unreliable, Foreign Controlled Energy Sources.' The order directed the Treasury Department to tighten the definition for what qualifies as the start of construction. But some renewable developers predict that their projects will weather the changes. 'As long as there's demand for power and not enough supply, we'll have customers to buy our power,' said Nick Cohen, president and CEO of Doral Renewables. 'And, you know, right now the customer market is paying double what it did five years ago, and that's because it needs the power. So our business is actually in a very good position because there's so little supply out there and such strong demand.' Still, the stakes for who qualifies are potentially massive for the country's renewable energy industry and the climate. About two-thirds of wind projects and nearly three quarters of solar projects that plan to come online by 2030 haven't begun construction, according to EIA's figures. The agency's numbers represent a rough estimate of the status of projects as of May. Most energy modelers are forecasting a big drop-off in renewable installations as a result of the GOP megabill. Wood Mackenzie, a consultancy, predicts wind and solar installations will decrease by 20 percent and 17 percent, respectively, over the next decade. Greenhouse gas emissions could be 7 percent higher in 2035, according to modeling done by a research group led by Jesse Jenkins, a Princeton University professor and outspoken climate hawk. That analysis also factors in rollbacks for other clean energy incentives, like tax credits for electric vehicles. And while Trump has long prioritized axing renewable tax credits — which he refers to as part of the 'Green New Scam' — his order Monday shocked renewable developers. Under the order, Treasury will reconsider how it determines whether a project is under construction. Historically, companies that spend 5 percent of a project's total cost or have begun significant construction activities are safe-harbored under federal tax law, making them eligible to receive subsidies. But Republican lawmakers belonging to the ultra conservative House Freedom Caucus maintain the current rules make it too easy for developers to claim they have started construction and receive the money. The Treasury Department has 45 days to issue a report on the topic. Keith Martin, a lawyer specializing in renewable project finance at the firm Norton Rose Fulbright, said he has been inundated with calls this week about how the order could impact project financing. The big fear among developers: Banks won't be willing to lend if companies can't meet Treasury's new guidelines. Renewable developers traditionally have not had enough tax liability to fully claim the value of the federal tax credits. So many have partnered with big banks, who can claim the full value of the credits thanks to their massive balance sheets. So far, it's been business as usual. Martin said he saw one new term sheet signed earlier this week and expected to close on another Thursday. He predicted projects already under construction are likely to continue to receive financing under the tax equity model, as are ones close to the start of construction. 'And then after that, we'll see what Treasury does,' he said. Any change in the rules proposed by the department are likely to be forward looking and only apply to projects yet to enter construction, Martin added. 'The big tax equity investors have told us they are talking internally about what to do.' 'A tough change' Cohen of Doral Renewables said the company plans to forge ahead with the projects it is planning. It will simply raise the power price it is seeking from potential customers if Treasury's new guidance makes it too onerous to pursue the federal tax credits. A large project underway in Wisconsin illustrates how Doral is adjusting to changes in the legislative landscape. The Philadelphia-based renewable developer is waiting on Treasury's new guidance before signing a long-term contract to sell the power generated by Vista Sands, one of the largest planned solar developments in the country. At 1.3 gigawatts, Vista Sands will be able to produce enough electricity to power 230,000 homes. The project was approved earlier this year by Wisconsin utility regulators. It is slated to start construction in the spring of 2026 and come online in 2027. Right now, the project falls within the requirements for receiving federal tax benefits, Cohen said. That would lower Vista Sands' financing costs and make it cheaper to build. But if Treasury's new guidance is too difficult to meet, the company will simply pursue traditional financing to build the project. The big change: It will charge prospective customers more for the power. Whether other developers could do the same is hard to gauge. Five large renewable developers contacted by POLITICO's E&E News declined to comment publicly on the law's impact, with some citing fear that their comments might incite further actions from the Trump administration to curtail the industry. American Clean Power, a major trade association, declined to comment on the record. The Solar Energy Industries Association did not respond to a request for comment. Some developers said they were not impacted by the changes. Power Co. of Wyoming said its plans to build a 3.5-GW wind farm in the state were not affected by the law, even though the project is slated to come online in stages in 2029 and 2030. Chokecherry and Sierra Madre, as the project is known, has been safe harbored under existing Internal Revenue Service rules since it began construction on roads and turbine pads in 2016. Foundation installation is slated to begin next year, according to a project spokesperson. In Oregon, one of the country's largest planned solar projects, the 1.2-GW Sunstone Solar development, is going to be built in stages. A spokesperson for Pine Gate Renewables, the project's developer, anticipates that the early phases of the project will qualify for the federal tax credits. She did not disclose what percentage of the project that entailed. Solar projects on firm financial ground are more likely to get built regardless of the tax credit situation, said Andrew LaScaleia, an analyst at Capstone, a consulting firm. But the picture is more complicated for projects on the financial margins, which likely need the federal credits to proceed, he said. LaScaleia has been fielding calls from clients asking if Democrats might extend the tax credits if they emerge victorious from next year's midterm elections. There's precedent for such an action. The tax credits have been repeatedly extended by Congress since being enacted in 1978, in the case of the investment tax credit, and 1992, in the case of the production tax credit. 'Obviously, that hinges on Democrats winning a chamber and it hinges on them prioritizing this in a tax extenders package, and then you need the president to actually sign that,' he said. 'But, yeah, it's a tough change and is definitely bad for the industry.' This story also appears in Energywire.


Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Marjorie Taylor Greene Asks Trump to Commute George Santos' Sentence
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene is petitioning President Donald Trump to commute the sentence of disgraced former Republican Congressman George Santos of New York. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email for comment Monday night. Why It Matters Santos was convicted of 23 felony counts, prompting widespread scrutiny over the handling and consequences of political corruption cases. Greene's public appeal also tests the norms regarding pardons and commuted sentences for former lawmakers and raises questions about equal treatment under federal law. What To Know Greene took to X, formerly Twitter, on Monday announcing her request to Trump: "🚨BREAKING: I just sent a letter to the Office of the Pardon Attorney urging President Trump to commute the sentence of former Congressman @MrSantosNY. A 7-year prison sentence for campaign-related charges is excessive, especially when Members of Congress who've done far worse still walk free. "George Santos has taken responsibility. He's shown remorse. It's time to correct this injustice. We must demand equal justice under the law! Read my letter 👇," Greene said. The Georgia lawmaker's letter added in part that "Commuting his sentence would acknowledge the severity of his actions and simultaneously provide a path forward in allowing him to make amends for his crimes and strive to better serve the people in his community." Trump was asked last week about potentially pardoning Santos by Newsmax's Rob Finnerty, and he said in part, "He lied like hell, I have to tell you, and I didn't know him, but he was 100% for Trump." The president added that "nobody has talked to" him about the idea of a pardon. This is a developing story that will be updated with additional information.


E&E News
5 hours ago
- E&E News
EPA to defend Biden-era lead drinking water rule
The Trump administration will defend a Biden-era drinking water regulation that mandates the replacement of virtually all lead pipes by 2037, EPA said Monday. In a short legal filing, the Justice Department said it will allow litigation to continue on the regulation, which was paused in February by the Trump administration. Water utilities have sued to overturn the rule. Still, the department and an EPA spokesperson stopped short of saying whether the administration planned to tweak the rule, one of the last major environmental regulations of the Biden administration. Advertisement 'DOJ is now moving forward with the process of defending the rule. At the same time, EPA will develop new tools and information to support practical implementation flexibilities and regulatory clarity,' the EPA spokesperson said in an email, adding that next steps would be announced 'in the coming months.'