In surprise move, RFK Jr.'s vaccine committee votes to recommend RSV shot for infants
In their first vote since appointed by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, the eight members of a vaccine committee voted to recommend a shot that protects infants against respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV.
Clesrovimab, a monoclonal antibody created by pharmaceutical giant Merck, is recommended for use in infants younger than eight months born during or entering their first RSV season.
Martin Kulldorff, who led the June 26 meeting, recently served as an expert witness for plaintiffs who accused Merck of concealing the risks of Gardasil, a vaccine used to prevent cancer from human papillomavirus, or HPV.
The eight new ACIP members met for the first time on June 25. Kennedy fired all 17 original members of the committee on June 9 and appointed its new members a few days later. Given the inclusion of vaccine skeptics, the approval comes as a surprise to close watchers of the panel.
Experts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's workgroup that presented data on the drug universally supported the drug. However, two panel members still voted against it.
RSV infects nearly everyone by the time they're 2. It causes cold symptoms, affecting the breathing passages and lungs, according to the CDC. In the U.S., about 58,000 children younger than 5 are hospitalized for RSV each year, and several hundred die.
ACIP's first meeting: Inside the unusual, RFK-appointed panel that's deciding on childhood vaccines
Merck's shot is the second RSV monoclonal antibody on the market. The first, a shot from Sanofi and AstraZeneca called Beyfortus, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in July 2023 and prevents RSV lower respiratory tract disease in infants entering or during their first RSV season.
It was the first of its kind to be widely available to everyone beyond a small population of immunocompromised children. Data presented during the June 25 ACIP meeting found the shot reduced hospitalizations by about 47% in newborns up to two months old, the population at highest risk of hospitalization.
Dr. Cody Meissner, who voted to recommend the Merck shot, said on June 25 that the result data from Beyfortus in the last RSV season was an 'astonishing accomplishment.'
Beyfortus shot that was recommended by ACIP in 2023 for babies under 9 months old who are entering their first RSV season. It's also recommended for babies 8 to 19 months who are at increased risk of severe disease if they're entering their second season of RSV.
Parents will have the choice between the two shots. If they receive Beyfortus, they're not recommended to get the new monoclonal antibody by Merck.
Pregnant patients also have access to Pfizer's RSV vaccine Abrysvo, which is recommended for pregnant people to protect newborns from lower respiratory infections. The shot is approved for use during the 32nd and 26th weeks of pregnancy during the RSV season, which typically starts in September and runs through January in the U.S.
Adrianna can be reached at adrodriguez@usatoday.com.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: RFK Jr.'s new ACIP votes to recommend RSV shot for infants
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
15 hours ago
- The Hill
RFK Jr. is fighting a two-front war against chronic disease and anti-MAHA partisans
At a certain point, the gruesome reality of war fades into a white noise of fatalism. Hundreds of thousands killed in Iraq; tens of thousands killed in Afghanistan; over 1 million killed or wounded in Ukraine; Israel and Iran at each other's throats, with the fear of the U.S. being dragged into a wider war. Since the end of World War Two, it can be argued that there has been no 'just' war — just needless killing. While most on the left won't want to hear it or acknowledge it, there has been no president more firmly opposed to these 'forever wars' and the slaughter of young soldiers than President Trump. That said, there was one war Trump was anxious to wage — a war that counterintuitively saves lives, while taking none. To command the campaign, Trump selected Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 'Make America Healthy Again.' It's a nice slogan and looks good on the front of a hat, but what is it really about? The reality is that this program has the potential to save more lives than all those lost in the wars since WWII — and then some. As Trump's secretary of Health and Human Services, Kennedy has chosen to dedicate the rest of his working life to this quest. Why? To save lives that should not be lost in the battle against the unchecked and steadily advancing chronic disease epidemic raging in our nation. Tragically, millions of Americans are lost each year to such preventable disease. Depending upon the study, experts say that approximately 1 million Americans die each year from heart disease; over 1,300 per day, or approximately 500,000 per year, from obesity; 1.5 million Americans are newly diagnosed with diabetes each year, with over 100,000 passing away each year from the disease. Many of these deaths overlap; many are preventable; and many are caused by the foods, beverages and food additives we consume each day. But now Kennedy and his team at HHS have illuminated a bright light at the end of this dark and seemingly endless tunnel. On June 19, Kennedy posted, 'Big food brands are listening. From cereals to spices to fast food, artificial dyes and additives are being removed from America's food supply …' Along with that announcement, he attached a video reporting that General Mills was removing artificial food dyes from U.S. cereals and K-12 school foods by summer 2026 and removing all artificial dyes completely by the end of 2027; Kraft-Heinz just announced that they are removing all artificial dyes by the end of 2027; In-N-Out Burger announced that they removed artificial dyes from strawberry shakes and pink lemonade, using beet juice and turmeric instead. Steak 'N Shake will now be using beef tallow instead of vegetable oil to cook French fries, onion rings and chicken tenders; and McCormick spice company announced it is working to remove artificial food dyes and sodium. All of this comes on top of the banning of Red Dye No. 3, which potentially causes cancer. This is huge and truly transformative news for the health of the American people. None of it was really going anywhere until RFK Jr. came on the scene. While great news, little of this progress will hold unless the broken U.S. healthcare bureaucracy is torn down and rebuilt into an aerodynamic, perpetual-motion machine protecting the health of the American people. To this point, as Kennedy pointed out after his testimony before the House Commerce Committee earlier this week, 'We've thrown trillions of dollars at our health agencies — and the American people have only gotten sicker … we're transforming HHS from a bloated sick-care bureaucracy into a streamlined health care agency focused on outcomes—not waste.' He added, 'The path forward is clear: We will restore public trust by restoring public truth.' Unfortunately, while Kennedy was testifying before this committee regarding the president's 2026 Health and Human Services budget, we also got a troubling look at the other war he is forced to wage to 'Make America Healthy Again.' It is a war that Kennedy would like to avoid. Sadly, but quite predictably, a number of the Democratic members used the hearing for partisan purposes to fire loaded trick questions at Kennedy while demanding 'yes' or 'no' answers based on false premises. Most of them pompously went out of their way to prevent Kennedy from getting a word in edgewise in response. Why? Because they didn't care about any of his answers. That was not the point of the exercise. It was all partisan performance art. It was all about fundraising letters and voters back home. Kennedy is a well-known personality, they wanted to badger and harass him into getting the soundbite needed for their next reelection effort. The ironic part is that Kennedy would very much like to work with all the members taking partisan shots at him for self-promotion. He knows many of them and has worked with some in the past. Rather than be at 'war' with them, Kennedy desperately wants to enlist them as allies in the greater war which, as Kennedy has repeatedly stated, has made America 'the sickest nation in the world.' The American people are sick of being sick — and sick of the partisan nonsense that has put them at greater risk. Tens of millions now believe Kennedy is a prayer answered when it comes to combating those issues. They want and need their congressional representatives to join with Kennedy to make them and their children healthier. A 'war' that takes no lives but could potentially save millions. Kennedy is waging it but needs help from every power center to win it. Douglas MacKinnon is a former White House and Pentagon official.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Member of RFK Jr's new vaccine panel withdraws over conflict of interest
A member of the health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr's newly overhauled federal vaccine advisory panel withdrew after a conflict of interest review, a spokesperson has told the Guardian. Dr Michael Ross, who was involved in multiple private healthcare companies, withdrew after review of his financial holdings. Kennedy unilaterally fired all 17 members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP) in June, arguing they had too many conflicts of interest. Related: Who are the eight new vaccine advisers appointed by Robert F Kennedy? Ross was among eight of Kennedy's ideological allies appointed to the committee, after the secretary argued the old members of the committee were subject to too many conflicts of interest. 'Yesterday, Dr Michael Ross decided to withdraw from serving on ACIP during the financial holdings review,' a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said. 'The sacrifice to serve on ACIP varies from member to member, and we appreciate Dr Ross's willingness to go through this rigorous process.' The spokesperson made the comments after Guardian inquiries about conflict of interest disclosures for new members of ACIP. Although the Trump administration and Kennedy developed a conflict of interest tracker specifically for ACIP members, Kennedy's appointees have not been added. The HHS spokesperson did not respond to Guardian inquiries about when and where new, written conflict of interest disclosures would be published. Instead, the spokesperson said the department has, 'comprehensively reviewed all newly appointed ACIP members for conflicts of interests in accordance with federal law, regulations and departmental polices', and that the members were provided 'ethics training prior to discharging their duties'. The new members of the committee were asked to disclose conflicts of interest before the meeting began on Wednesday. The committee chair Dr Martin Kulldorff and committee member Dr Robert Malone omitted widely reported work in vaccine litigation, and nurse Vicky Pebsworth said she was 'asked to read' a statement disclosed ownership of a healthcare stock but said it was below the government ethics office threshold for reporting. Ethics review of the new members was also the subject of Senate testimony on Wednesday. Under questioning by the Democratic senator Patty Murray of Washington, the Trump nominee to head the CDC, Dr Susan Monarez, said she was 'not familiar whether or not the members that are participating in the meeting this week have or have not gone through the ethics review necessary to allow them to participate in those meetings'. 'If it is known that they have not gone through the ethics process and they issue recommendations, would you accept them as valid?' asked Murray. 'If they have not gone through an ethics approval process, they shouldn't be participating in the meetings,' said Monarez.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
US pediatricians criticize RFK Jr's new vaccine panel: ‘Truly an embarrassment'
Robert F Kennedy Jr's newly appointed vaccine advisory panel is facing criticism from pediatricians after its announcement of plans to reassess the current vaccination schedules for children and adolescents. Experts warn that the move appears designed to undermine public trust in immunization. The chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Infectious Diseases, Dr Sean O'Leary, said during a Wednesday press briefing that the rest of the world is looking at the US and its new Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) 'in horror'. 'It is truly an embarrassment at this point, what's happening with ACIP,' said O'Leary. Related: RFK Jr's vaccine panel recommends new RSV treatment for infants While the new ACIP has instigated chaos among vaccine policy infrastructure during their Wednesday meeting, the AAP emphasized a need to continue a commitment to publishing independent, science-based vaccine guidelines. Wednesday marked the first ACIP meeting since health secretary Kennedy dismissed all 17 existing voting members and installed eight new ones, a group that reportedly lost one member before the meeting convened. Some of these new appointees have been associated with the spread of vaccine misinformation. The AAP representatives abstained from participating because they view the new ACIP as 'illegitimate'. The AAP's own meeting was scheduled to immediately follow the ACIP session, giving pediatric experts an opportunity to respond to the new committee's statements and direction. 'What we heard in this meeting was really a false narrative that the current vaccine policies are flawed and that they need fixing. That's completely false,' said O'Leary. 'Vaccine policies have saved millions of lives, trillions of dollars, and our immunization system is a model for the rest of the world.' Among the ACIP's early initiatives is a separate working group that plans to examine vaccines that have not undergone a recent review, specifically those not studied in over seven years. One vaccine that drew immediate attention is the hepatitis B birth dose. O'Leary criticized the focus on reviewing vaccine schedules, which he says 'has been an anti-vaccine trope for many, many years'. A schedule review 'sounds good at first glance, but the fact is, these vaccines are essentially always being reviewed in real time through a number of different mechanisms, safety surveillance mechanisms, as well as disease surveillance mechanisms', O'Leary said. 'The hepatitis B birth dose is one of the cornerstones of our hepatitis B prevention policy here in the US, and it has been highly successful in reducing the rate of perinatally acquired hepatitis B,' he added. An AAP article says that infants infected with hepatitis B at birth face a 90% likelihood of developing chronic infection. Without medical intervention, roughly 25% of those children will die from the disease. Kennedy's decision to overhaul the ACIP has sparked concern among medical professionals. The new panel's review includes vaccines like the MMR shot, which protects against measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (chickenpox), as well as the hepatitis B vaccine given at birth. 'We do still need to maintain higher coverage in the US of MMR, you're seeing the measles outbreaks in real time,' O'Leary said. 'We need to maintain very high measles vaccination coverage. And this ACIP discussion, to me, is designed to sow distrust in measles vaccination.' The US is now enduring the largest measles outbreak in decades. Centered in west Texas, the measles outbreak has killed two unvaccinated children and one adult and spread to neighboring states. Measles had been declared eliminated from the US in 2000, but it has been spreading in undervaccinated communities.
