Report outlines why plane landed nose-down at Charlotte Douglas International Airport
Channel 9 reported when Delta Flight 1092 from Atlanta had to land on its belly at CLT; that happened on June 28, 2023.
RELATED >> Plane makes emergency landing at Charlotte airport; all passengers safe
The National Transportation Safety Board released its findings this week, and it says a fractured gear in the plane led to the issue.
The report says Boeing issued a service bulletin on the part in 2001. After the crash, the part was inspected and had been marked to indicate that the service 'had been performed' in 2009. But according to the report, it's likely that the 'service bulletin was not adequately complied with.'
ABC News Aviation Expert John Nance looked at the report with Channel 9 to explain what happened.
'For the nose gear, especially, it's a matter of landing on the means and slowly putting the nose down. This is the type of emergency everybody trains for. It's startling when it occurs, but it's really not lethal,' Nance said.
According to the NTSB report, an examination after the crash revealed that the 'landing gear upper lock link failed from a fatigue fracture.'
Inspectors say the fatigue cracks were found along scratches 'consistent with tool marks, such as from filing or grinding.' According to the report, the scratches came from a ratchet.
Once the cracks had gone a third of the way across, the part broke, and the nose gear wouldn't extend.
'This is basically a metal fatigue situation, this is what the NTSB is so good at, taking a piece of metal that failed and figuring out how it failed. And in this case, if a service bulletin had been followed, this wouldn't have happened,' Nance said.
All 104 people on board got off safely.
According to FlightAware, the plane is still in service and even flew in and out of CLT Tuesday morning.
Delta sent Channel 9 the following statement on Tuesday: "As a result of the investigation Delta ... performed the following safety actions: Completed an inspection of all upper lock links installed on their fleet of Boeing 717 airplanes and all spare lock links in their inventory with no reported crack findings."
(VIDEO: New apartment complex could be built under CLT airplane path)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
Tensions Flare Between Two Federal Agencies Charged With Aviation Safety
The relationship between the National Transportation Safety Board, the government entity that investigates civilian airplane accidents, and the Federal Aviation Administration, the agency responsible for aviation safety, can frequently be contentious, especially after a major national tragedy. Last week, a rift between those two main regulators of aviation safety spilled out into public view. Frustrations — and sometimes tempers — flared in uncommonly raw fashion during the board's marathon of investigative hearings into the deadly midair crash between a military helicopter and a commercial jet near Ronald Reagan National Airport in January. Board members grilled witnesses, including air traffic controllers and F.A.A. managers, over three days and 30 hours of public testimony. Jennifer Homendy, the N.T.S.B. chair, led other board members in accusing the F.A.A. of knowingly stymieing efforts to improve safety at Reagan National Airport and stonewalling parts of the board's investigation into the crash. And Ms. Homendy directly accused the agency of fostering a culture among the air traffic control operation that discouraged employees from raising legitimate safety concerns, including by wielding the threat of retaliation. 'There is and always has been a healthy tension between the two agencies,' said Jeff Guzzetti, a former accident investigator for the F.A.A. and the N.T.S.B. And while the level of public outrage on display during board hearings depends largely on the proclivities of its members, he added, 'in this particular case, it's a shift.' Ms. Homendy and the other board members were careful not to direct their ire toward Sean Duffy, the transportation secretary, or Bryan Bedford, the F.A.A. administrator. Still, the very public airing of grievances raised questions about the working relationship between the two agencies at a critical juncture. The N.T.S.B. makes safety recommendations, but it is up to the F.A.A. to put them into place. The crash at Reagan National Airport, and a series of near misses and tower outages at major airports in the months since, have dampened public confidence in the safety of flying, intensifying the need for cooperation. 'Warning signs were ignored, or just not known or identified or sought, which is quite tragic,' Ms. Homendy told reporters late Wednesday, after the first day of testimony. In a statement, the F.A.A. said officials 'have and will continue to fully support the N.T.S.B.'s investigation,' stressing that the agency had been proactive about addressing concerns and adopting the board's early recommendations. The statement added that 'if there has been any stonewalling, withholding of information or intimidation — those actions will be identified and remedied without hesitation.' The gloves had already begun to come off in the final hours of the hearing on Wednesday. Ms. Homendy lost her patience with F.A.A. managers who claimed they never knew that air traffic officials from Reagan National Airport had urged higher-ups to address the potential risks posed by a helicopter route, known as Route 4, that crossed under the descent path for airplanes landing on a supplementary runway, No. 33. The Army Black Hawk that crashed into the commercial jet on Jan. 29 was flying along Route 4, and at the time of impact, was 78 feet higher than the F.A.A.-mandated ceiling of 200 feet. A number of witnesses testified that the devices pilots relied upon to measure their altitude frequently were off by about 100 feet of helicopters' actual flying height. Air traffic controllers, knowing the risks, sought to make changes as part of a helicopter-focused working group at the airport — but were told by district managers that doing so would be seen as 'too political,' according to the transcript of an interview included in an N.T.S.B. report. 'Every sign was there that there was a safety risk, and the tower was telling you that,' Ms. Homendy told F.A.A. officials. She accused agency managers of routinely dismissing safety concerns raised by employees in the airport's air traffic control tower and of reassigning people who had previously voiced concerns after the accident. She also said they used F.A.A. bureaucracy as an excuse to avoid making needed changes. 'Are you kidding me? Sixty-seven people are dead,' she said, denouncing the F.A.A.'s process for reviewing safety recommendations. 'Fix it. Do better,' she added. By the last day of the hearings, Ms. Homendy was accusing F.A.A. officials outright of trying to stymie the N.T.S.B.'s investigation by withholding documents and data the board had been requesting for months. 'I think you're interfering in the investigation,' she charged, 'because you're basically telling us 'no' every way you can.' Aviation safety experts said it was understandable for tensions to run unusually high after the collision because of the magnitude and rarity of the tragedy — it was the first fatal crash involving a major American airline in over 15 years. But part of the N.T.S.B.'s visible agitation in the hearings could also be strategic, those experts said. The fact that the crash happened just outside the nation's capital — along with the fact that power brokers from the Trump administration and Congress are eager to respond — has created a unique opportunity for the board to influence sweeping changes. 'The intensity has increased partly because of the visibility of this particular catastrophe and the proximity to Washington,' said Alan Diehl, a former aviation safety official with the N.T.S.B. and the F.A.A. 'By doing that, the N.T.S.B. hopes to convince both the F.A.A. and Congress that we need a revolution,' he added, 'in both personnel policies within the F.A.A. as well as the funding policies.' Ms. Homendy, who spent more than 14 years on Capitol Hill before President Trump nominated her to fill one of the Democratic slots on the board, has a keen understanding of Washington dynamics, according to board watchers. She is known for being more public-facing and, at times, being more comfortable adopting an adversarial posture than some of her predecessors. But she was not alone last week in being pointedly critical of the F.A.A. J. Todd Inman, a Republican member of the N.T.S.B, also accused the agency of stonewalling the investigation. The F.A.A. withheld documents about staffing at the control tower for months, he charged, dumping thousands of pages on the board on the Friday before the hearing, only after Ms. Homendy appealed to agency and Transportation Department leaders for help. At another point, Mr. Inman lost his patience with officials' promises to do better. 'We'd like to be treated privately the same way we are publicly,' he said. Mr. Inman also accused the F.A.A. of refusing to share critical data about real-time flight tracking technology, forcing the safety board to spend $50,000 annually to evaluate it 'because the F.A.A. does not consider N.T.S.B. a trusted government partner.' F.A.A. officials in the hot seat frequently defended their agency. Nick Fuller, the F.A.A.'s acting deputy chief operations officer, responded to allegations that the agency had withheld documents and data by arguing that some of the board's requests had been unclear, and that 'in fact, we just gave you the latest and greatest' information. Mr. Fuller also pushed back on accusations from all three presiding board members that after the Jan. 29 accident, the F.A.A. had removed managers at Reagan National's control tower who had previously raised concerns about traffic, staffing or other safety pitfalls. He argued that staffing changes had not been retaliatory, but rather executed in the interest of solving the problem quickly. 'I was given a task to fix the facility risk between helicopters and fixed wing,' Mr. Fuller said, referring to airplanes, 'and it wasn't to work through a collaborative process and allow a few months — it was to get the job done immediately.' On several occasions during the hearings, Ms. Homendy sought assurances that F.A.A. employees who were called as witnesses in the investigation would not be retaliated against for their testimony — a step prompted by reports that some who had critical things to say were being harassed, she told reporters on Thursday after that day's testimony. 'Nobody can take what is clearly a safety issue and get it up through the offices that should be making the decision to ensure safety in the airspace — or somebody's ignoring them,' she told reporters. 'You raise a red flag, and two things happen: You don't get it, you don't get the safety change that you have asked for, or you're transferred out after an accident occurs.' But experts warned against assuming that the acrimony of the hearing would disrupt the two agencies' expert staff members from being able to work together. 'Overall, the process is healthy,' said John Cox, a former airline pilot who runs a safety consulting firm. 'Is there friction? Yes. Is it normal? Yes. Was last week a little more so than normal? Yes,' he added. 'Will that encourage F.A.A. to move more quickly? I hope.'
Fast Company
10 hours ago
- Fast Company
Research reveals how Delta and other airlines use AI to set ticket prices
Booking your last minute summer getaway? Delta recently revealed to what extent it's using artificial intelligence to set ticket prices. And while this is just the beginning of the AI revolution in pricing, here's some insight into how it's working so far, and may expand to other industries in the future. What happened? Delta recently made headlines, sparking backlash from consumer groups and concern from Congress, when president Glen Hauenstein revealed in the airline's latest earnings call it's currently using AI for 3% of domestic pricing, with the goal of about 20% by the end of the year. 'So, we're in heavy testing phase. We like what we see. We like it a lot and we're continuing to roll it out,' Hauenstein said. 'But we're going to take our time and make sure that the rollout is successful… the more data it has and the more cases we give it, the more it learns. And we're really excited about partnering with Fetcherr.' When Fast Company reached out to Delta about how this might affect consumers, the airline referred to its letter to Senators Ruben Gallego, Richard Blumenthal and Mark Warner which stated it is not 'using, and [does not] intend to use, AI for 'individualized' pricing or 'surveillance' pricing, leveraging consumer-specific personal data, such as sensitive personal circumstances or prior purchasing activity to set individualized prices… There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized prices based on personal data.' What AI will likely end up doing, according to ThePointsGuy's Clint Henderson, is create ' dynamic pricing model on steroids ' pinpointing flight prices with greater accuracy and a whole lot faster. What variables go into AI airline flight pricing? Delta has partnered with Israel-based software startup Fetcherr, which utilizes its Large Market Model (LLM) to decode intricate market behavior and forecast financial trends, and coupled it with historical and current data. Fetcherr's approach encompasses a comprehensive range of factors that influence market dynamics, and its recent white paper lists a few of those variables that go into airline flight pricing, namely, 'seat availability, current news, weather conditions, significant events, flight schedules, and even fluctuating oil prices, among others.' The question on most passengers' minds is whether working with companies like Fetcherr will lead airlines to use personalized pricing. Like Delta, Fetcherr told Fast Company its technology has been developed to streamline processes already in place at companies and 'does not allow for individualized or personalized pricing.' 'Our Generative AI system does not and will not use, collect or receive any Personally Identifiable Information (PII) [and] remains steadfast in our commitment to transparency and to our compliance with applicable regulations,' a spokesperson for Fetcherr said in a statement. Delta isn't the only airline using AI In its white paper, Fetcherr said it has also partnered with: Virgin Atlantic, UK; Viva Aerobus, Mexico, West Jet, Canada; and Royal Air Maroc—with the primary focus on optimizing key aspects such as pricing and inventory management. What's next for Fetcherr AI after airline pricing? Looking ahead, Fetcherr said it plans to expand into other industries like hospitality, insurance, commerce, and capital markets; with their models expanding beyond pricing and inventory decisions, to more complex challenges like making supply chain decisions and engaging in B2B strategic decision making.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
What To Expect From Lindblad Expeditions's (LIND) Q2 Earnings
Cruise and exploration company Lindblad Expeditions (NASDAQ:LIND) will be reporting results this Monday before market open. Here's what you need to know. Lindblad Expeditions beat analysts' revenue expectations by 18.8% last quarter, reporting revenues of $179.7 million, up 17% year on year. It was an exceptional quarter for the company, with an impressive beat of analysts' EPS estimates and a solid beat of analysts' EBITDA estimates. Is Lindblad Expeditions a buy or sell going into earnings? Read our full analysis here, it's free. This quarter, analysts are expecting Lindblad Expeditions's revenue to grow 16.5% year on year to $159 million, improving from the 9.4% increase it recorded in the same quarter last year. Adjusted loss is expected to come in at -$0.29 per share. The majority of analysts covering the company have reconfirmed their estimates over the last 30 days, suggesting they anticipate the business to stay the course heading into earnings. Lindblad Expeditions has only missed Wall Street's revenue estimates once over the last two years, exceeding top-line expectations by 5.8% on average. Looking at Lindblad Expeditions's peers in the travel and vacation providers segment, some have already reported their Q2 results, giving us a hint as to what we can expect. Carnival delivered year-on-year revenue growth of 9.5%, beating analysts' expectations by 1.7%, and Delta reported flat revenue, topping estimates by 1.5%. Carnival traded up 5.9% following the results while Delta was also up 11.9%. Read our full analysis of Carnival's results here and Delta's results here. Investors in the travel and vacation providers segment have had steady hands going into earnings, with share prices flat over the last month. Lindblad Expeditions is down 7.4% during the same time and is heading into earnings with an average analyst price target of $15 (compared to the current share price of $11.73). Here at StockStory, we certainly understand the potential of thematic investing. Diverse winners from Microsoft (MSFT) to Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO) to Monster Beverage (MNST) could all have been identified as promising growth stories with a megatrend driving the growth. So, in that spirit, we've identified a relatively under-the-radar profitable growth stock benefiting from the rise of AI, available to you FREE via this link. StockStory is growing and hiring equity analyst and marketing roles. Are you a 0 to 1 builder passionate about the markets and AI? See the open roles here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
