
The Surprising Reason Rural Hospitals Are Closing
The hospital now stands empty: its pristine hallways dark, its expensive machines gathering dust. 'It's almost like the apocalypse happened,' says Sheldon Day, the mayor of Thomasville, who had worked for almost a decade to get a hospital to open there.
This apocalypse is happening throughout rural communities across the country. More than 100 rural hospitals have closed in the past decade, according to the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform (CHQPR), a national policy center that works to improve health care payment systems and whose data have been cited by the Bipartisan Policy Center. About one-third of all rural hospitals in the country are at risk of closing because of financial problems. In Alabama, 23 rural hospitals—about half of all of them in the state—are at immediate risk of closing, according to CHQPR.
Even more rural hospitals might be in trouble if Congress passes the huge piece of legislation before it, called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which includes significant cuts that would slash Medicaid spending in rural areas by $119 billion over 10 years, according to KFF. Thom Tillis, the U.S. Senator from North Carolina who said he couldn't support the bill in its current form, said in a statement on June 28 that Congress needed to achieve the tax cuts and spending in the bill 'without hurting our rural communities and hospitals.'
Why rural hospitals are closing
People often blame rural hospital closures on poor reimbursement rates from Medicare and Medicaid. There's a reason for that assumption: Just about every hospital loses money on Medicaid and Medicare, since reimbursement rates are low nationwide. But hospitals like the one in Thomasville are struggling not because they serve a large share of poor patients or elderly people on these plans.
'When you look at the data, what you see is that Medicare and Medicaid are not the problem,' says Harold Miller, president and CEO of CHQPR. 'The problem is private insurers.'
Rural hospitals depend on private insurers for the majority of their patient costs, Miller says. In Alabama, for instance, CHQPR's data shows that most rural hospitals depend on private insurers for anywhere between 65-80% of patient costs; in Thomasville, 18.4% of patients were using Medicare to pay for their coverage, 16.2% were using Medicaid, and 65.4% were using private insurance.
But many rural hospitals are losing money on what private insurers will pay for patient care. The one in Thomasville, for instance, was getting paid by private insurers roughly half of what it was costing to deliver services, according to federal data compiled by CHQPR.
This is a very different situation than what is happening between private insurers and urban hospitals, he says. Urban hospitals and large rural hospitals are able to make up for the losses from Medicare and Medicaid patients with what they can charge private insurers. Small rural hospitals can't do that.
Rural hospitals actually need higher compensation than urban hospitals, Miller says, because they have the same fixed costs like 24-hour staffing, but have a lower volume of patients to cover those costs.
Why small rural hospitals get less from private insurers
One reason why small hospitals get less money: Insurers demand discounts. Larger hospitals have more leverage to negotiate with private insurers over those discounts because they have higher patient volumes. Smaller hospitals have less wiggle room to negotiate.
Another problem in Alabama in particular is that just one health insurer, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, has an estimated 94% of the large-group private insurance market, which most people with private health insurance fall under. Hospitals can't negotiate as well because they have to accept Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama patients, and losing those patients would be financially ruinous. That's how one small rural hospital in Alabama, Medical Center Barbour in Eufaula, gets paid just $65 for an X-ray by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, compared to $97.03 by Aetna, according to Miller's data.
'Alabama Blue Cross could single-handedly save all the rural hospitals in Alabama,' Miller says. 'It just has to pay adequately.'
Read More: Medicaid Expansions Saved Tens of Thousands of Lives, Study Finds
In a statement, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama said that it works each year with the Alabama Hospital Association to evaluate the care rural hospitals provide and to compensate those facilities. It disputed CHQPR's assertion that private insurers are responsible for 65-80% of patient costs in rural hospitals in Alabama, saying that Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama patients comprise only a small share of patient volume at rural hospitals in Alabama (while declining to offer specific numbers). 'Thus, the largest financial impact to rural hospitals is the government payer sector,' the company said. A Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama spokesperson said the company's market share statewide is 'different for different market segments'—but referred TIME to federal data showing that it, and not any other insurer, covers the vast majority of Alabamans.
The company launched a medical scholarship program in 2016 to promote access to quality health care in rural areas of Alabama, a spokesperson said, and 38 medical students have now graduated and are practicing in rural parts of the state.
The challenges facing rural hospitals nationwide have gotten worse in the last year or two, Miller says, because costs have gone up after the pandemic as labor became scarce and many doctors and nurses quit the field after getting burned out. What's more, the federal government offered many pandemic-era grants to hospitals so they could stay open, but those have run out. One reason the Thomasville hospital failed is that it could not get any of those federal grants because it had not been open long enough.
What happens when a rural hospital closes
On a recent weekday afternoon, Dr. Daveta Dozier, a family physician who has practiced in Thomasville for 40 years, walked me through the closed Thomasville hospital. The hallways and patient rooms should have been buzzing with beeps and medical conversations, but the building was eerily quiet, like it had flatlined. She pointed out the MRI machine where she'd send patients so they could avoid the 90-minute roundtrip drive to Mobile, and the laboratory where her patients could get blood work done.
Now, she says, when she tells her patients to get complicated lab work or imaging, they can't do it locally. So many don't do it at all.
'Half the time they don't go,' she says. 'Either they can't find family to take them or they're working and they can't get off.'
This means by the time they end up seeking health care, they are sicker than they would have been had the hospital stayed open. That corresponds to what doctors have been seeing across the country after isolated rural hospitals close. One study found that following a closure, the hospitalization rates and average length of hospital stays increased for locals. When hospitals were more isolated, rural patients were more likely to be readmitted to a hospital after an initial stay.
Dozier is in private practice with her husband, who is also the medical director for the local nursing home. In the past few weeks, she says, the nursing home had eight separate patients with medical needs like urinary tract infections and pneumonia that required them to be transported to hospitals in Mobile. Had the hospital in Thomasville been open, they could have been treated there.
Now, their families have to make the trek to visit them. 'The first thing you hear them say is, 'I don't want to go to Mobile,'' she says.
Read More: When Fighting with Your Insurance Company Becomes a Full-Time Job
Barbara Smith, 78, knows what it's like to drive frequently to Mobile for care. Her husband, who recently passed away, had bladder cancer, and the nearest treatment center was nearly 2 hours from their home. 'It sure was a lot of driving,' she says.
With closures of rural hospitals like the one in Thomasville, some hospitals' emergency rooms in urban areas of Alabama become full and send patients to other hospitals—and sometimes other states—to be seen, Dozier says. Emergency department crowding is a growing problem across the country.
There is another hospital 20 minutes south of Thomasville called Grove Hill Memorial Hospital. But it is also financially struggling and recently made the decision to convert to what's called a rural emergency hospital, which means it will only have an emergency room and not inpatient care. With that conversion, it receives federal funding to help it stay open—but patients won't be able to get much there except for emergency services.
I asked Stacey Gilchrist, chief operating officer of the Thomasville hospital in receivership, why Thomasville needed a hospital when patients could go to Grove Hill for emergency services. She gave the example of a 40-year old woman who rushed to the Thomasville hospital when she was having chest pains; doctors there stabilized her, but other physicians in Mobile who later treated her said she would likely have died if she needed to drive further. 'If you're having a heart attack, do you want to ride 20 minutes down the road, or five minutes?' she says.
Many of Thomasville's patients come from even more rural areas. Riding 20 more minutes could be the difference between life and death for them, she says.
What's more, she says, Thomasville's hospital was much more than an emergency room. It had 29 rooms where patients could stay overnight and be treated for serious conditions, a lab, and the newest equipment that isn't in any other rural hospital in the region.
Shrinking access, less health care
Thomasville is located in Alabama's 7th Congressional District, which stretches between Birmingham and the state's border with Mississippi. A Harvard study from 2022 found that the district ranked last in terms of life expectancies nationwide.
Officials like Mayor Day say this is partly because it's so hard to access health care. 'People just simply don't go to the doctor until they get real sick,' he says.
He had hoped that opening the Thomasville hospital would help. He and local officials had worked for years to put together an incentive package to encourage someone to reopen a hospital in Thomasville, after the last one closed in the wake of the Great Recession.
'We really wanted to change the dynamic of health care here,' he says.
Read More: They Hated Health Insurance. So They Started Paying For Each Other's Care
Thomasville is not the only community optimistic enough to try to open a rural hospital at a time when many were closing. Between 2017 and 2023, 11 acute care general hospitals were opened in rural areas, according to data from KFF. But 61 hospitals closed during the same time period.
The city gave the investors who built the Thomasville hospital a discount on the land and approved a one-cent sales tax that would go to the hospital to help it stay open. The investors bought new equipment, knowing that money can be made in diagnostics if they could get people to come to Thomasville rather than going elsewhere for tests like MRIs and CT scans.
Specialists from Mobile started coming up a few days a week to see patients, sparing residents the long drive. A physical therapy practice opened in the building, and Day had plans to expand the campus and open a cancer treatment center.
But then the pandemic hit, and costs spiraled out of control because the hospital could do fewer money-making procedures and had to spend more on personal protective equipment and other pandemic-related services. Compensation by private payers remained stubbornly low at rural hospitals across the country during the pandemic, according to CHQPR.
Finally, the Thomasville hospital's owners ran out of money, filed for bankruptcy, and shut it down.
The hospital closure had an impact on the local economy. Businesses think twice about opening in a rural location without health care, Day says. And existing businesses that can't move, like farms who need lots of rural land, have to deal with sicker workers.
How rural hospitals can succeed
A new owner has bought the Thomasville hospital's assets out of bankruptcy, and Day says they plan to reopen the Thomasville hospital soon. He's hoping they can do things differently this time so that they can figure out a way to keep the rural hospital from losing money.
One idea is to join a network with a big, urban hospital so they can more effectively negotiate reimbursement from insurers. Another is to create a network of rural hospitals that can band together to negotiate.
And Day is hoping that Congress will act. One bill, the Rural Hospital Stabilization Act of 2025, was introduced in April and would give grants to rural hospitals to help them stay out of the red.
U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has talked about being more proactive to prevent chronic diseases before they happen, and Day thinks the Thomasville hospital could play a role in that by making it easier for patients to get preventative care close to home.
Day is already talking about using AI in the hospital and creating a medical campus to attract people from across the region, adding assisted living services and dementia care. Details are thin, and all of that takes money. But as a mayor who has seen a hospital close twice in his town, he hopes that, working with elected officials, he can figure out a way to change the hospital's fate this time.
'Every rural community in the country is facing this battle,' he says. 'But closing hospitals is not an option. If you don't have basic health care, you're going to kill your community.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Why People Delay Dental Visits, and What It Means for Their Health
Missing or putting off dental appointments may seem harmless in the short term but over time those delays can have long term consequences – not just for your teeth but for your overall health. From cavities in toddlers to infections in cancer patients, understanding why people put off treatment is the first step to changing those habits. Research shows those delays are rarely about laziness – they're more often about cost, anxiety, lack of support and access barriers with lack of dental insurance or not being covered by a dental plan being a common reason for delay. Table of Contents Dental delays are more common than you think. A 2025 cross-sectional study found that over 71% of preschoolers with cavities didn't get treated right away. The average delay? Nearly four months—117.5 days [1]. Reasons ranged from financial hardship and logistical challenges to caregivers not knowing their child had a problem until it got worse. Dependents like children rely on caregivers to find the right dental care and meet the requirements for timely treatment. And it's not just kids. During the COVID-19 pandemic, nearly half of U.S. adults admitted to putting off dental care [4]. What's interesting is that urban residents—despite having more dentists nearby—were more likely to delay treatment than those in rural areas. That means it's not just about distance; stress, work schedules and transportation logistics may be just as big of a factor. Fear is a powerful barrier. A 2023 study found that dental anxiety and low self-efficacy—the belief that one can't handle the stress or logistics of dental treatment—were stronger predictors of delay than simple procrastination [3]. In plain terms, some people aren't avoiding the dentist because they don't care—they're overwhelmed, nervous, or unsure how to take the first step. In older adults, social support can make all the difference. Research from China on oral cancer patients found that those who lived with their adult children were less likely to delay treatment [2]. When people feel supported, they're more likely to seek care promptly. We hear all the time about the importance of early dental visits for kids but the data tells a more complicated story. A 2012 Medicaid study found no significant difference in outcomes between kids who had their first dental visit before 18 months and those who started later [5]. Early care is important but maybe not as early as some programs suggest. Dental benefits and dental coverage for kids are based on state Medicaid policies and kids have to qualify for these services according to specific criteria. That could help us target our prevention efforts more effectively. Meanwhile dental neglect—intentional or not—remains a big problem. States vary in how they provide dental services and preventive services to kids through Medicaid. A global review found 34-56% of kids and teens are affected by dental neglect [8]. Whether it's financial strain or caregivers not knowing the signs of dental disease, the takeaway is clear: education and access matter just as much as timing. Dental health doesn't exist in isolation. For patients undergoing cancer treatment, a minor dental issue can be life threatening. If a dental problem is left untreated it can complicate or delay cancer therapy. A 2018 systematic review found a high rate of untreated dental infections like pericoronitis in oncology patients [9]. These infections can delay or complicate chemotherapy and radiation. That's why cancer care teams are working more closely with dental professionals – often involving a dental practice to treat emerging oral health issues as they arise – to catch problems early and avoid preventable setbacks. If a tooth has been neglected for too long many people assume the only option is to extract and replace. But is that always the best choice? The goals of dental treatment should include both preserving natural teeth whenever possible and patient preferences for long term outcomes. A 2013 review compared long term outcomes of preserving compromised teeth vs replacing them with implants. Surprisingly well maintained natural teeth lasted longer than implants [10]. This finding supports the value of early conservative treatment – acting sooner means saving teeth rather than replacing them. Not directly related to delays but a 2022 Cochrane review on full-mouth disinfection for periodontitis brings up a related question: timing matters but so does method. Not all periodontitis cases need antibiotics and overtreatment should be avoided. Full-mouth treatment is meant to be aggressive but the evidence didn't show it was superior to step-by-step scaling and root planing [6]. It raises the question of overtreatment especially when antibiotics are involved. This applies outside of dentistry too. A 2025 study on statin therapy in diabetic patients found that delays in preventive care even when not related to teeth led to worse outcomes [7]. The lesson applies across all medical disciplines: proactive care is better. Delaying dental care isn't about being lazy—it's about fear, finances, logistics and sometimes just lack of information. What's clear is that delays are costly in dollars and in health. Fixing this requires a multi-faceted approach: Timely dental care doesn't just save smiles it saves overall health and quality of life. [1] Huang, J., Sun, J., Ji, Y., Chen, C., Yang, Z., & Zhao, H. (2025). Analysis of factors influencing delayed treatment seeking for dental caries in preschool children: a cross-sectional study. BMC public health, 25(1), 1669. [2] Yang, Y., Ning, H., Liang, B., Mai, H., Zhou, J., Yang, J., & Huang, J. (2024). Exploring Factors Influencing Patient Delay Behavior in Oral Cancer: The Development of a Risk Prediction Model in Western China. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 12(22), 2252. [3] Steinvik, L. M., Svartdal, F., & Johnsen, J. K. (2023). Delay of Dental Care: An Exploratory Study of Procrastination, Dental Attendance, and Self-Reported Oral Health. Dentistry journal, 11(2), 56. [4] Kranz, A. M., Gahlon, G., Dick, A. W., & Stein, B. D. (2021). Characteristics of US Adults Delaying Dental Care Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. JDR clinical and translational research, 6(1), 8–14. [5] Beil, H., Rozier, R. G., Preisser, J. S., Stearns, S. C., & Lee, J. Y. (2012). Effect of early preventive dental visits on subsequent dental treatment and expenditures. Medical care, 50(9), 749–756. [6] Jervøe-Storm, P. M., Eberhard, J., Needleman, I., Worthington, H. V., & Jepsen, S. (2022). Full-mouth treatment modalities (within 24 hours) for periodontitis in adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 6(6), CD004622. [7] Shah, N., Lan, Z., Brown, C. J., Martin, S. S., & Turchin, A. (2025). Impact of Statin Nonacceptance on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes. Journal of the American Heart Association, 14(11), e040464. [8] Khalid, G., Metzner, F., & Pawils, S. (2022). Prevalence of dental neglect and associated risk factors in children and adolescents-A systematic review. International journal of paediatric dentistry, 32(3), 436–446. [9] Hong, C. H. L., Hu, S., Haverman, T., Stokman, M., Napeñas, J. J., Braber, J. B., Gerber, E., Geuke, M., Vardas, E., Waltimo, T., Jensen, S. B., & Saunders, D. P. (2018). A systematic review of dental disease management in cancer patients. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 26(1), 155–174. [10] Levin, L., & Halperin-Sternfeld, M. (2013). Tooth preservation or implant placement: a systematic review of long-term tooth and implant survival rates. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 144(10), 1119–1133.


CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Colorado says Republican budget bill will cut billions in federal funding for Medicaid in the state
State says Republican budget bill will cut billions in federal funding for Medicaid in Colorado State says Republican budget bill will cut billions in federal funding for Medicaid in Colorado State says Republican budget bill will cut billions in federal funding for Medicaid in Colorado Colorado is expected to lose up to $2.5 billion dollars annually in federal Medicaid funding under the Republican Party's massive tax and spending cuts bill. The measure passed the U.S. Senate Tuesday after Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote. It would extend Republican 2017 tax cuts permanently, increase funding for defense and immigration enforcement and cut funding for Medicaid, food stamps and green energy programs. The Congressional Budget Office estimates it would increase the deficit by about $3 trillion over ten years. The bill now goes back to the U.S. House of Representatives for approval. Among the differences between the Senate and House versions are changes to Medicaid, which provides health coverage for one in four Coloradans. The Congressional Budget Office says the Senate bill will reduce spending on Medicaid by nearly $1 trillion over the next decade, and maybe nowhere will those cuts be felt more than in rural Colorado, where half of all hospitals are already operating in the red. Lincoln Health in Hugo is among them. It is the only hospital on the I-70 corridor for 160 miles. The survival of those who live in the area depends on the survival of the hospital, which also operates family practice clinics, a nursing home and assisted living center. Lincoln Health CEO Kevin Stansbury CBS CEO Kevin Stansbury says those services are at risk under the bill. "We will have to close down some services," Stansbury told CBS Colorado. "And the challenge will be what services are not essential." Stansbury says 80% of the patients at Lincoln Health are on Medicaid or Medicare. The Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (HCPF) -- which administers Medicaid -- says the bill would mean a loss of between $900 million and $2.5 billion a year in federal funding for Medicaid. It says the state would lose another $550 million a year due to a provision that caps a fee many states assess on hospitals at 3.5%. The bill also creates new verification requirements that HCPF says could cost the state $57 million to administer. It says the red tape will also result in thousands of Coloradans losing coverage. The bill requires recipients to provide proof they're going to school, volunteering, or working every month, and provide proof of their income and citizenship every six months. Stansbury says some recipients in Lincoln County don't have internet and will need to travel 80 miles to Fort Morgan to re-certify in person. He says many will drop off the rolls and end up uninsured. "Our patients have to travel to Fort Morgan for in-person revalidation of their Medicaid," Stansbury explained. "You're cutting access to care, which ironically could drive up the cost of care and put more financial stress on hospitals." Stansbury says Lincoln Health expects to lose about 25% of its Medicaid reimbursement under the bill. While it creates a new $50 billion rural hospital fund, he says it's unclear who would qualify for the money and how it would be distributed. "Where you live shouldn't determine if you live," Stansbury said. He notes many of the people who live in Lincoln County are conservatives. "I'm not sure that's what people out here voted for," Stansbury said. "I don't think they voted to have their hospital decimated." Lincoln Health may have to scale back services, but Stansbury says the hospital will survive. "This is a mission for us, and we're going to stick here. We're going to provide care to our patients," Stansbury said. "All we're asking is that we get paid equitably for it." The Senate dropped a provision in the House bill that would have cut federal Medicaid funding by 10% in states like Colorado that use their own tax dollars to cover Medicaid for non-citizens. The bill could also impact Medicare reimbursement. Because it adds to the deficit, it triggers the "Pay As You Go Act," which makes automatic cuts to federal spending. Medicare reimbursement could drop by an estimated 4%. Stansbury says rural hospitals are not only underpaid by Medicaid and Medicare, but by commercial insurers. He says Lincoln Health receives 100% less reimbursement from commercial carriers than hospitals in the Denver metro area. Both the Senate and House bills allow a subsidy program enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic to expire at the end of the year. It caps premiums for those who buy insurance on the Health Exchange at 8.5% of a household's income. People who live in rural or mountain communities could see their premiums double.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nurses rally against ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Medicaid cuts
DAYTON, Ohio (WDTN) — Registered nurses are teaming up across the nation to push for change. National Nurses United is the nation's largest union of registered nurses. On Tuesday, they planned rallies at lawmakers' offices in eight different states, urging lawmakers to vote against proposed Medicaid cuts in the GOP reconciliation package. Senate passes big, beautiful bill 2 NEWS visited Congressman Mike Turner's office, where dozens of registered nurses showed up to protest against a decision they say could cost thousands of lives. There are almost 80 million Americans enrolled in Medicaid as of March 2025. Medicaid provides healthcare coverage to all types of Americans, including vulnerable populations like the elderly, disabled and children. 'We all know someone who depends on Medicaid, and for many families, this is life or death,' said Irma Westmoreland, National Nurses United vice president. 'For our friends, for our community, for our relatives, Medicaid and Ohio Medicaid provides necessary resources to many, so that they can live a full, productive life.' Specifically, these registered nurses showed up to ask Rep. Turner to vote against the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Act. They said his initial condemnation of attacks of federal works and co-sponsoring the Protect America's Workforce Act gave them hope that he would stand by them. However, in light of his latest votes and the Senate decision today to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill, nurses are now asking him to make a critical choice. 'We've seen you do what's right, and we need you to stand up with us now more than ever. Representative Turner, do you want to be on the side of billionaire donors, or do you want to support the patients and the loved ones that we care for each and everyday?' said Westmoreland. 2 NEWS reached out to Turner's office for comment and are waiting to hear back. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.