Tesla set to roll out human-driven chauffeur service in Bay Area
Unlike Alphabet's Waymo unit, Tesla cannot operate its service using autonomous vehicles because the EV maker does not have the required permits and has not applied, according to a spokesperson for the California public utilities commission (CPUC). Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.
Last week, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said on an earnings call the company was "getting the regulatory permission to launch" robotaxis in several markets, including the San Francisco Bay Area. Business Insider reported on Friday the service would be a robotaxi operation with humans in the driver's seat who would be able to control the car.
Ashok Elluswamy, who leads Tesla's self-driving efforts, said on Tesla's Wednesday earnings call the company would launch a robotaxi service in the Bay Area "with the person in the driver's seat, just to expedite, while we wait for regulatory approval".
Last month, Tesla launched a trial robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, using about a dozen Model Y SUVs. Tesla invited a few passengers to use the service, where human safety monitors sat in the front passenger seat. Tesla's autonomous-driving software controlled the vehicle.
With the Bay Area service, Tesla "is not allowed to test or transport the public" in an autonomous vehicle, even one with a human safety driver, according to the CPUC spokesperson, who added Tesla can only transport people using a human driver in a "non-autonomous vehicle".
The spokesperson said Tesla told the CPUC on Thursday it plans to offer rides to "friends and family of employees" and "select members of the public" under a permit the company has that allows a human driver to transport passengers in a "traditional vehicle" for "charter services".
For the Bay Area service, Tesla may be able to use its full self-driving (Supervised) feature which can perform many driving tasks but requires a human driver to pay attention and be ready to take over at all times.
The CPUC spokesperson did not respond to a question on whether Tesla could use the feature, but such technology does not require an autonomous vehicle permit in California because the human driver is expected to be in control at all times.
Companies need permits from the CPUC and the California department of motor vehicles (DMV) to test and deploy autonomous vehicles in the state. To date, Tesla only has a DMV permit to test autonomous vehicles with a safety driver.
A DMV spokesperson said Tesla recently met with the agency but has not applied for additional permits that would be needed to collect fares or test without a safety driver.
The next step in the process for Tesla would be to apply for a CPUC licence for an autonomous vehicle to pick up passengers with a safety driver, according to a review of California's autonomous driving regulations. However, companies must first operate in a pilot phase in which they cannot charge customers.
Waymo, which offers autonomous ride-hailing in Los Angeles and the Bay Area, logged more than 13-million testing miles and secured seven different regulatory approvals in California over nine years before receiving the go-ahead to charge passengers for rides in driverless robotaxis in 2023.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
5 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Starlink rival Eutelsat beats estimates on Ukraine boost, government demand
French satellite operator Eutelsat reported better than expected annual earnings on Tuesday, driven by growing interest in its satellite internet services from government and corporate customers. Eutelsat gained the spotlight this year as European governments sought home-grown solutions for satellite services, aiming to reduce their reliance on US providers such as Elon Musk's Starlink. Revenues from video, connectivity and government services reached €1.23bn (R25.59bn) in the year ended June 30, up 0.8% from a year earlier. Financial analysts had expected the revenues to total €1.21bn (R25.18bn), according to a consensus poll provided by Eutelsat. The Paris-based group hopes to offset declining income from its video business by gaining a foothold in the satellite internet market, where Starlink dominates. However, CEO Jean-François Fallacher told reporters the company 'won't compete head-to-head with Starlink or Amazon's Kuiper in consumer markets', focusing instead on segments that make it competitive.
TimesLIVE
6 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Autopilot verdict deals Tesla 'black eye', threatens Musk's robotaxi ambitions
A court verdict against Tesla last week, stemming from a fatal 2019 crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, could hurt its plans to expand its nascent robotaxi network and intensify concerns about the safety of its autonomous vehicle technology. A Florida jury ordered Elon Musk's electric vehicle (EV) company on Friday to pay about $243m (R4.37bn) to victims of the crash, finding its Autopilot driver-assistance software defective. Tesla said the driver was solely at fault and vowed to appeal. The verdict follows years of federal investigations and recalls related to collisions involving Tesla's autonomous vehicle technology and comes as CEO Musk seeks regulatory approval to rapidly expand the robotaxi service in the US. 'The public perception of this verdict or things such as this are going to fuel pressure on regulators to say, 'We just can't let this stuff be launched without a lot more due diligence',' said Mike Nelson, founder of Nelson Law and an expert on legal issues in the mobility sector. Tesla could have a tough time convincing state regulators that its technology is road-ready, threatening Musk's goal of offering robotaxis to half the US population by year-end, legal experts and Tesla investors said. Expanding its robotaxi service is crucial for Tesla as demand for its ageing line-up of EVs has cooled amid rising global competition and a backlash against Musk's far right political views. Much of Tesla's trillion-dollar market valuation hinges on his bets on robotics and artificial intelligence (AI). Success in the self-driving realm will require winning the confidence of regulators and potential customers on the full-self driving (FSD) software that underpins Tesla's robotaxis, analysts said. 'The timing [of the verdict] for Tesla in light of the FSD rollouts and robotaxis is awful,' said Aaron Davis, co-managing partner at law firm Davis Goldman. 'Now there's essentially an opinion that some aspect of Tesla's business is not safe and maybe the safety the company advertises isn't what it's cracked up to be.' The FSD is an advanced version of Autopilot. Autopilot, which was been updated since 2019, controls speed, distance and lane centring on highways, while the FSD can operate on city streets, helping the vehicle make automatic turns and change lanes. 'This case does not have direct implications for Tesla's FSD rollout,' analysts at Piper Sandler said in a note on Sunday, citing the modern iterations of the software. A spokesperson on behalf of Tesla acknowledged the company had received a request for comment from Reuters but had not provided one by the time of publication. Perfecting autonomous vehicles has been harder than expected. The high cost of hardware, years of trial and error and regulatory hurdles have forced many players to close shop or pivot, including General Motors' Cruise unit. Musk, however, has pursued what he calls a simpler and cheaper path, relying only on cameras and AI instead of pricey sensors such as lidars and radars used by Alphabet's Waymo, Amazon's Zoox and others. After years of missed deadlines, Musk rolled out a small robotaxi trial in June with about a dozen Model Y crossover SUVs in Austin, Texas, each overseen by a human safety monitor in the front passenger seat. While Musk has said Tesla was being 'super paranoid about safety', he has also pledged to expand the service fast and make it available for half of the US population in the next five months — a stark contrast to Waymo's cautious years-long rollout. Until Tesla's entry, Waymo was the only US firm to operate a paid, driverless robotaxi service. Tesla is awaiting approvals in several states, including California, Nevada, Arizona and Florida. California's department of motor vehicles declined to comment on the impact of the verdict on regulatory approval. Nevada said it held talks with Tesla about a robotaxi programme several weeks ago, while Arizona said it was still considering Tesla's request for certification. Both did not comment on the verdict. Florida did not respond. Tesla has typically won other Autopilot litigation or resolved the case with the plaintiffs out of court. The Florida verdict stands out. Several such cases are pending. The case involved a Model S sedan that went through an intersection and hit the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it. The driver had reached down to retrieve a dropped cellphone and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign before the crash. The jury found Tesla's Autopilot had a defect and held the company partially responsible, despite the driver admitting fault. 'It's going to take time to get regulators to move forward and time being more than the end of the year,' said Gene Munster, managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, a Tesla investor. 'From an image standpoint, it's a black eye.'
TimesLIVE
10 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Australia's NBN picks Amazon's Project Kuiper over Starlink for remote internet
Australia's state-owned internet network hired Amazon's untested startup satellite service to link people who cannot access its terrestrial network, rather than tech entrepreneur Elon Musk's Starlink. The deal, whose financial terms were not disclosed, is set to provide high-speed internet access to some 300,000 homes and businesses that NBN Co's terrestrial network does not reach. From next year, low-Earth orbit satellites owned by Amazon's Project Kuiper will start replacing two Australian government-owned satellites due for decommissioning in 2032, NBN and Amazon said in a joint statement on Tuesday. "It is true that Amazon Kuiper has not launched services yet in Australia or globally, but they are reportedly pumping in about $15bn (R270.58bn) into that programme," said Gavin Williams, NBN's chief development officer for regional and remote services. "We have every confidence that we've got a partner in Kuiper that will do what they say they're going to do." NBN said its decision followed a rigorous procurement process, but did not say why it had chosen the Amazon service over Starlink.
