Universal Credit households warned claims at RISK over ‘mis-sold' savings accounts
NOT TO YOUR BENEFIT Universal Credit households warned claims at RISK over 'mis-sold' savings accounts
SAVERS are being warned that opening a certain type of savings account could affect their eligibility for Universal Credit.
When you apply for the key benefit, the Government will take into account how much you have in savings.
Advertisement
1
The Government takes into account your savings when you apply for Universal Credit
Credit: Alamy
One of the factors taken into account is whether you have savings in a Lifetime ISA (LISA).
A committee of MPs has just completed a review into Lifetime ISAs - and concluded the accounts may have been improperly sold to people who could be eligible for Universal Credit.
The Lifetime ISA lets you save up to £4,000 a year either towards a first home or for retirement.
The Government adds a 25% bonus of up to £1,000 a year on top of everything you save annually.
Advertisement
Under the current system, any savings held in a LISA can affect your eligibility for Universal Credit or Housing Benefit.
That's despite this not being the case for other personal or workplace pension schemes.
The report said: "If the Government is unwilling to equalise the treatment of the Lifetime ISA with other Government-subsidised retirement savings products in universal credit assessments, Lifetime ISA products must include warnings that the Lifetime ISA is an inferior product for anyone who might one day be in receipt of Universal Credit.
"Such warnings would guard against savers being sold products that are not in their best financial interests, which might well constitute mis-selling."
Advertisement
The committee said the inclusion of the Lifetime ISA in the eligibility assessment for these benefits is "inconsistent" with other retirement products and "nonsensical".
It comes as Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to reform ISA savings.
Disability benefit explained - what you can claim
ISAs are accounts that let you save away up to £20,000 every tax year without paying any tax on your interest or earnings.
However the Government is hoping to push more savers towards investments rather than cash savings.
Advertisement
What is a Lifetime ISA?
FIRST-time buyers saving into a LISA can stash up to £4,000 into this account each year tax-free.
The government will add a 25% bonus to your savings, up to a maximum of £1,000 per year.
For example, if you save £4,000, you'll get a £1,000 bonus.
The amount you pay in is linked to your annual ISA allowance (£20,000 for 2023/24) – for example, if you pay £1,000 into your LISA, you can still pay £19,000 into other ISA products.
Any bonus you earn doesn't count towards your ISA allowance.
You can open a Lifetime ISA with any bank, building society or investment manager that offers the product.
You can only open a LISA if you're aged 18–39.
You can hold multiple Lifetime ISAs, although you can only pay into one each tax year.
You can also transfer your Lifetime ISA to another provider, for example, to get a better interest rate.
If you want to use a Lifetime ISA to buy a home, there are a few restrictions you need to keep in mind: Only first-time buyers can use Lifetime ISAs to buy a home, which means you can't own, or have owned, a home in the UK or anywhere in the world.
You'll need to be buying a home for no more than £450,000.
You must be buying a home you plan to live in – the scheme isn't for buying a home you want to rent out, or a holiday home.
If you don't use it to buy your first home, you can continue paying into a LISA until you're 50.
You can then make full or partial withdrawal from your LISA, without paying a fee, when you turn 60.
Savers might be making 'poorer decisions'
The review also found that Lifetime ISAs could be contributing to people making poorer financial decisions.
Many use the accounts to boost their deposit savings for their first home.
But experts have argued that restrictions placed on LISA customers have led to thousands missing out.
You can only use a LISA to purchase a home worth up to £450,000, which in many parts of the country is feasible but in the South East and London this is increasingly pricing people out.
Advertisement
The £450,000 limit has not changed since the LISA was first introduced in 2017.
On top of this, people withdrawing money from a LISA for any reason other than retirement or buying a first home face a 25% withdrawal charge.
At face value this looks like just losing the bonus offered by the Government, but in reality you end up losing 6.25% of your own savings too.
In the 2023-24 financial year, 99,650 people were charged the penalty.
Advertisement
That's nearly double the number of people who used their LISA to buy a home (56,900).
The Treasury Committee, which released the report, said this was a possible indication the LISA is not working as intended.
The report said: "Many people have lost a portion of their savings due to a lack of understanding of the withdrawal charge or because of unforeseen changes in their circumstances, such as buying a first home at a price greater than the cap.
"However, the case for reducing the charge must be balanced against the impact on Government spending.
Advertisement
"The Lifetime ISA must include a deterrent to discourage savers from withdrawing funds from long-term saving."
The Office for Budget Responsibility predicts spending on bonuses paid to account holders will cost the Treasury around £3billion over the five years to 2029-30.
Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier said: "The committee is firmly behind the objectives of the Lifetime ISA, which are to help those who need it onto the property ladder and to help people save for retirement from an early age.
"The question is whether the Lifetime Isa is the best way to spend billions of pounds over several years to achieve those goals.
Advertisement
"We know that the Government is looking at ISA reform imminently, which means this is the perfect time to assess if this is the best way to help the people who need it."
Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at Lifetime ISA provider Moneybox, said the accounts have "proven particularly valuable for first-time buyers on lower to middle incomes, with 80% of Moneybox Lisa savers earning £40,000 or less".
"We firmly believe that by future-proofing the house price cap and amending the withdrawal penalty, the LISA would continue to serve as a highly effective product, helping young people build and embed positive saving behaviours early in life, get more people onto the property ladder, and prepare for a more secure retirement," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
38 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Pound drops and UK bonds suffer big selloff after finance minister cries in parliament
British prime minister Keir Starmer's office rushed to give finance minister Rachel Reeves his full backing on Wednesday after she appeared in tears in parliament following a series of U-turns on welfare reforms that blew a hole in her budget plans. Reeves looked exhausted and appeared to brush away tears during the half-hour session of prime minister's questions in the House of Commons. Her spokesperson said it was a personal matter. Advertisement British borrowing costs rose and the pound fell as the weekly question-and-answer session unfolded on TV, with market analysts saying the moves reflected fears that Reeves would be replaced, throwing the government into further turmoil. Asked about Reeves, a Treasury spokesperson said: "It's a personal matter, which – as you would expect – we are not going to get into." Starmer's press secretary told reporters: "The chancellor is going nowhere, she has the prime minister's full backing." The pressure on Reeves comes after the British government managed to pass its welfare reform bill, but only after it removed measures that would have led to savings in the long run. Advertisement Reeves has repeatedly emphasised her commitment to self-imposed fiscal rules, limiting the amount Britain will borrow to try to build the confidence of investors. But that ambition collided with Labour members of parliament who were opposed to the scale of the cuts to welfare, and who said Reeves was being cruel in pushing for billions of pounds of savings from some of the most vulnerable people in society. Opposition politicians and economists said the decision to sharply scale back the welfare reforms meant the government would have to raise taxes or cut spending elsewhere to balance the public finances in the annual budget later this year. Looking miserable One Labour member of parliament, who asked not to be named, said Reeves was upset after an argument with the House of Commons speaker Lindsay Hoyle. A spokesperson for Hoyle declined to comment. Advertisement The opposition Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch singled out Reeves during the weekly set-piece parliamentary session, in which lawmakers put questions to the prime minister in often-raucous exchanges, saying: "She's pointing at me, she looks absolutely miserable." Reeves animatedly gestured back. Badenoch said: "She is a human shield for his incompetence. In January, he said that she would be in post until the next election. Will she really?" Starmer then responded that Badenoch would not be in her job by then, but did not explicitly back Reeves. Business Michael O'Leary says Rachel Reeves 'hasn't a clue'... Read More The appearance of Reeves in tears put British government bonds on track for their biggest daily selloff since October 10th, 2022, when financial markets were still reeling from former prime minister Liz Truss's decision to announce big, unfunded tax cuts. The pound fell almost 1 per cent on Wednesday. Starmer's press secretary later said the prime minister had expressed his confidence in Reeves many times and did not need to repeat it every time a political opponent speculated on her position. The Treasury spokesperson said Reeves would be working out of Downing Street on Wednesday afternoon. Asked if Reeves had offered her resignation, Starmer's press secretary said: "no".
Daily Mirror
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP confirms Winter Fuel Payment dates details
Updated guidance has been issued on the website The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has announced that 9 million individuals born on or before September 22, 1959, will receive a financial boost of between £100 and £300 to assist with increased heating costs during the winter months. Eligible pensioners can expect the Winter Fuel Payments to be automatically deposited into their accounts in November or December. Updated guidance on the website indicates that letters detailing the payment amounts will be sent out in October and November. The eligibility window for these payments, based on age and household circumstances, is set from September 15 to 21. It is crucial for senior citizens in Scotland to note that the Winter Fuel Payment has been replaced by the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment. This new scheme follows similar criteria as the DWP's and will be distributed by Social Security Scotland on November 30 without the need for an application. Eligibility for Winter Fuel Payments To qualify for a Winter Fuel Payment, you must have been born on or before September 22, 1959, and reside in England or Wales, reports the Daily Record. Circumstances affecting eligibility You are ineligible for the payment if you: live outside England and Wales were in hospital getting free treatment for the whole of the week of 15 to 21 September 2025 and the year before that need permission to enter the UK and your granted leave says that you cannot claim public funds were in prison for the whole of the week of 15 to 21 September 2025 If you live in a care home You can get Winter Fuel Payment if you live in a care home, however, you will not be eligible if both of the following apply: you get Universal Credit, Pension Credit, Income Support, income-based Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA) or income-related Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) you lived in a care home for the whole time from 23 June 2025 or earlier READ MORE: New driving rule sees motorists slapped with extra £1million in fines Payments DWP guidance explains: 'You'll get a letter in October or November telling you how much Winter Fuel Payment you'll get, if you're eligible. 'If you do not get a letter but think you're eligible, check if you need to make a claim.' It's important to be aware that scammers may try and trick you into making a claim by text, prompting you to click on a link. This is not an official DWP message and should be deleted. If you think you need to claim, follow the guidance on here. The amount you get is based on when you were born and your circumstances between 15 to 21 September 2025. This is called the 'qualifying week'. Any money you get will not affect your other benefits. If you live alone or no one you live with is eligible for the Winter Fuel Payment You will get either: £200 if you were born between September 22, 1945 and September 21, 1959 £300 if you were born before September 22, 1945 If you live with someone else who is eligible for the Winter Fuel Payment Your payment may be different if you get one of the following benefits: Pension Credit Universal Credit income-based Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA) income-related Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) Income Support If you do not get any of the benefits You will get a payment of: £100 if you and the person you live with were both born between September 22, 1945 and September 21, 1959 £100 if you were born between September 22, 1945 and September 21, 1959 but the person you live with was born before September 22, 1945 £200 if you were born before September 22, 1945 but the person you live with was born between September 22, 1945 and September 21, 1959 £150 if you and the person you live with were born before September 22, 1945 If you and your partner jointly claim any of the benefits One of you will get a payment of either: £200 if both of you were born between September 22, 1945 and September 21, 1959 £300 if one or both of you were born before September 22, 1945 The money will be paid into the bank account your benefits are usually paid into. If you get any of the benefits (not as part of a joint claim) You will get a payment of either: £200 if you were born between September 22, 1945 and September 21, 1959 £300 if you were born before September 22, 1945 If your income is more than £35,000 HMRC will take back all of your Winter Fuel Payment through either PAYE or your Self Assessment tax return. If you live in a care home If you are eligible you'll get either: £100 if you were born between September 22, 1945 and September 21, 1959 £150 if you were born before September 22, 1945 When you will get paid DWP said most payments will be made automatically in November or December. You should get a letter telling you: how much you'll get which bank account it will be paid into - this is usually the same account as your State Pension or other benefits DWP added: 'If you do not get a letter or the money has not been paid into your account by 28 January 2026, contact the Winter Fuel Payment Centre.' Opting out of Winter Fuel Payment You can choose to opt out of getting all future Winter Fuel Payments. To opt out you need to contact the Winter Fuel Payment Centre before September 15, 2025. Full details on what you will need before contacting the Winter Fuel Payment Centre can be found on here.
The Guardian
44 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK bond yields rise sharply amid speculation over future of Rachel Reeves
UK government borrowing costs have risen sharply amid speculation over Rachel Reeves's position as chancellor, as City investors warned Labour's welfare U-turn had blown a multibillion-pound hole in the public finances. After Keir Starmer failed initially to give his full backing to a tearful chancellor at prime minister's questions on Wednesday, the yield on 10-year UK government bonds had its biggest jump in a day since Liz Truss was in No 10, while the pound slumped. The yield – in effect the interest rate – rose by as much as 0.2 percentage points to trade close to 4.7%, climbing by the most in one day since October 2022 when investor confidence in Britain remained shaken after Truss's mini budget. Highlighting investor unease over the government's tax and spending plans, the pound also fell by more than 1% against the US dollar. Downing Street later insisted that Reeves would remain in her post and had not offered her resignation after a major rebellion by Labour MPs forced the government to withdraw a planned £5.5bn cut to disability benefits. However, investors warned the backtracking, which follows an earlier U-turn on winter-fuel payments for pensioners costing £1.25bn, put Reeves in danger of smashing her self-imposed fiscal rules without sweeping tax rises. 'A fiscal crisis now appears to be on the horizon unless tough decisions (such as tax rises) are enacted. Markets will be on high alert over the next months,' said Neil Mehta, a hedge fund manager at RBC BlueBay Asset Management. 'Last night's parliamentary chaos underscores the government's waning control over public spending. Reeves's October budget has already increased 2025-26 public spending by nearly £100bn compared to the previous government's plans, leading to higher borrowing and worsening inflation.' Reeves has repeatedly pledged to stick to her 'iron-clad' fiscal rules – which require day-to-day spending to be matched by receipts within five years – despite mounting spending pressures and rising debt interest costs. Having committed against further large tax rises after the autumn budget, the chancellor turned to welfare savings in her spring statement to rebuild the headroom against her primary target to £9.9bn after a deterioration in the outlook for the government finances. However, the threat of a backbench Labour rebellion and rise of Nigel Farage's populist Reform UK in the opinion polls has led the government to reverse some of its planned cuts, leading to questions over Reeves's authority. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Investors warned that Starmer swapping his chancellor and adopting a looser approach to the public finances would probably be poorly received in financial markets, while economists said that tax rises at the autumn budget could be required to rebuild confidence. Kathleen Brooks, research director at trading platform XTB, suggested the rise in bond yields was linked to speculation over Reeves's position during PMQs. 'The PM might be keeping his options open at this stage, but the chancellor is a strange choice to axe from a market perspective.' Benjamin Caswell, a senior economist at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, said the relatively limited headroom the chancellor had left against her fiscal rules had created problems as the economic outlook turned. 'Once you've established the rule the most important thing is to set yourself credibility against it. If you're having to change course and tinker and make piecemeal ad-hoc adjustments every six months that doesn't convey credibility,' he said. 'There should be serious consideration of raising one of the big three taxes [VAT, income tax, and national insurance] in the autumn budget.'
