
There's now a 50-50 chance this galaxy will crash into ours
For more than a century, astronomers have watched the Andromeda galaxy, a massive swirl of neighboring stars, speed toward the Milky Way. And in recent years, measurements using the Hubble Space Telescope seemed to confirm a long-held prophecy: In about four or five billion years' time, the two galaxies will clash, ultimately merging into a colossal and unrecognizable new galaxy.
A fresh survey of both galaxies and—crucially—several of the other weighty galaxies in the same corner of the cosmos has now cast doubt on that calamitous outcome. The new forecast looked billions of years into the future and found that the odds of an Andromeda and Milky Way merger is about fifty-fifty.
'A coin flip is the more accurate description,' says Till Sawala, an astrophysicist at the University of Helsinki and a co-author of the new study.
A messy galactic apocalypse is no longer a guarantee. As noted in the team's new study, published today in the journal Nature Astronomy, 'proclamations of the impending demise of our galaxy seem greatly exaggerated.'
Earth won't be around in five billion years' time; it'll likely be scorched and swallowed up by our expanding, dying Sun. But if the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies successfully swerve around one another, that's good news for future worlds. A merger on this scale often sees the supermassive black holes at their hearts of each galaxy unify and expand into a fearsome, hyper-energetic astrophysical monster. That prevents nearby gas cooling down and gathering up to form new stars—and without new stars, you won't get new planets.
The possibility of a galactic near-miss is 'somehow comforting,' says Alister Graham, a galaxy researcher at the Swinburne University of Technology in Australia and who wasn't involved with the new research. It's nice to think the Milky Way 'still has a long, planet-forming future ahead of it.' This animation depicts the collision between our Milky Way galaxy and the Andromeda galaxy, which will merge into a single galaxy. The video also shows the Triangulum galaxy, which will join in the collision and perhaps later merge with the "Milkomeda" galaxy. NASA, ESA, and F. Summers (STScI) Galaxy merger mayhem
Astronomers witness galaxy mergers happening throughout all of space and time. Two similarly massive galaxies uniting is referred to as a major merger, whereas if a larger galaxy ingests a smaller one, it's known as a minor merger.
Although some stars get torn apart by the extreme gravitational interactions of the two galaxies churning about—and some, including their planets, will be scattered like confetti in all directions—but the spaces between individual stars are so vast that most of them don't collide. And although the smaller galaxies can vanish into the maws of the larger ones, the result is often constructive. 'Minor mergers deliver both stars and gas—the raw material for future star formation—into the host galaxy. The stellar winds from newly formed stars enrich the interstellar medium with dust and metals, further fueling the star formation cycle,' says Graham. Even the Milky Way shows evidence of having been assembled via multiple galactic smash-ups.
'Up to 50 percent of the mass in galaxies today come from previous galaxies cannibalized,' says Christopher Conselice, an extragalactic astronomer at the University of Manchester in England and who wasn't involved with the new research. Andromeda is visible to the naked eye from Earth. Here it can be seen as a bright spot in the night sky rises above Tufa formations in Mono Lake, California. Photograph by Babak Tafreshi, Nat Geo Image Collection At 2.5 million light-years away, Andromeda, also known as M31, is our closest large galactic neighbor. Photograph by ESA/NASA/JPL-Caltech/GBT/WSRT/IRAM/C. Clark (STScI)
Though astronomers have known that Andromeda is careening toward the Milky Way since the turn of the 20th Century, they weren't sure how direct, or glancing, the clash would be. But in 2012, a landmark study using Hubble came to a definitive conclusion: Based on the motions of their stars, and the galaxies' hefty masses, both would be gravitationally drawn into one another for a head-on collision in four to five billion years. (Later studies have come up with slightly earlier or later timelines for when the merger would happen, but never cast doubt on its inevitability.)
And about two billion years after the tempestuous major merger, the two ink-like star spirals would settle down and coalescence. 'It would be an elliptical blob,' says Sawala. Both galaxies can be visible in the night sky: The Milky Way, which stretches across the night sky from the constellations Cassiopeia to Cygnus, and the Andromeda Galaxy appears above this 3000-year old bristlecone pine tree. Photograph by Babak Tafreshi, Nat Geo Image Collection
Since 2012, this outcome became gospel among the scientific community, and a textbook fact. 'Should the Milky Way and Andromeda be all that matter—sorry about the pun—then they would be heading straight at each other,' says Graham.
But the possibility of a future smash-up depends on the behavior of everything else in our Local Group, too: the panoply of at least 100 galaxies hanging about in this part of the universe. Other big galaxies in our neck of the woods might push or pull on the two voyagers over time.
Sawala's team decided to simulate the evolution of the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies ten billion years into the future. But while doing so, they also accounted for other major players in the Local Group: specifically, the spiral-shaped (and third-largest) Triangulum galaxy and the Large Magellanic Cloud (or LMC), an irregular galaxy that orbits the Milky Way.
The team used data from both Hubble and the European Space Agency's stargazing Gaia space observatory to more precisely determine the motions of these galaxies, as well as their masses—comprised of both ordinary matter and the invisible, but more prevalent, dark matter.
Although the Triangulum Galaxy was already known to be quite massive, the LMC was thought to be a bit of a lightweight. But the new data suggest that it's surprisingly massive—equivalent to 10 to 20 percent of the mass of the Milky Way. 'And that will have an effect on how the Milky Way moves through space,' says Sawala.
The team simulated the motions of these four heavyweight galaxies thousands of times. While the Triangulum galaxy's gravitational influence conspired to bring the Milky Way and Andromeda together, the LMC had a repellent effect. And when all four danced together, the odds of an eventual major merger was just one-in-two. This scientific illustration of the Earth's horizon 3.75 billion years in the future shows Andromeda filling the field of view and the Milky Way beginning to show distortion due to tidal pull from Andromeda. Illustration by NASA, ESA, Z. Levay and R. van der Marel (STScI), T. Hallas, and A. Mellinger A scientific illustration of the Earth's horizon 3.85 to 3.9 billion years in the future shows the first close approach of Andromeda. The sky is ablaze with new star formation, which is evident in a plethora of emission nebulae and open young star clusters. Illustration by NASA, ESA, Z. Levay and R. van der Marel (STScI), T. Hallas, and A. Mellinger
'There are going to be uncertainties in how and when the Milky Way and Andromeda would merge,' says Conselice. Dark matter may act as a binding force. But dark energy, a mysterious force that seems to push everything the universe apart, will also play a role—and recent data suggests it's strength can change over time. That makes forecasting a far-flung galactic merger somewhat tricky. But it's safe to say that it's no longer a certainty that these two galaxies will collide.
Some astronomers have suggested that if they do, the new galaxy could be named Milkomeda. That moniker doesn't exactly roll off the tongue. Don't worry, Sawala says: 'We will have billions of years to think of a better name.'
Either way, galactic pandemonium will shape the Milky Way's future. Even though the LMC is pushing Andromeda and our own galaxy apart, the team's simulations also show with that, within the next two billion years, the LMC will spiral into us and be gobbled up by a merciless Milky Way.
'It's basically 100 percent that this will happen,' says Sawala. 'There's no escaping that.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gizmodo
22 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
The ‘Hail Mary' That Saved NASA's Juno Camera From Jupiter's Radiation Hell
NASA's Juno spacecraft, which launched in 2011 to investigate Jupiter's origin and evolution, travels through the solar system's most intense planetary radiation fields. When the spacecraft's JunoCam—a color, visible-light camera—began to suffer the consequences in December 2023, the mission team back on Earth had to think of a remote fix before they lost their chance to photograph the Jovian moon, Io. A relatively simple process was ultimately what enabled the long-distance save: heating the instrument before slowly cooling it down (I trust they tried turning it off and on again). The experience has provided insightful lessons on spacecraft radiation tolerance for mission scientists beyond the Juno team, according to a Jet Propulsion Laboratory statement published yesterday. Scientists estimated that JunoCam, whose optical unit is located outside of a protective radiation vault, could resist radiation for the spacecraft's first eight orbits around Jupiter. It wasn't until Juno's 47th orbit, however, that the scientists began to observe radiation damage. The team identified evidence suggesting that the radiation had damaged the voltage regulator, which is crucial to JunoCam's power supply. From hundreds of millions of miles away, their options were limited. As such, they decided to try a lesser-known process called annealing, which consists of heating a material for a given amount of time to reduce its defects before slowly cooling it down. 'We knew annealing can sometimes alter a material like silicon at a microscopic level but didn't know if this would fix the damage,' Jacob Schaffner, a JunoCam imaging engineer from Malin Space Science Systems, said in the statement. 'We commanded JunoCam's one heater to raise the camera's temperature to 77 degrees Fahrenheit [25 degrees Celsius]—much warmer than typical for JunoCam—and waited with bated breath to see the results.' While their approach successfully enabled JunoCam to capture clear photographs for several orbits, the spacecraft continued to barrel into Jupiter's radiation fields, and the damage was soon apparent again. 'After orbit 55, our images were full of streaks and noise,' explained JunoCam instrument lead Michael Ravine, also from Malin Space Science Systems. 'We tried different schemes for processing the images to improve the quality, but nothing worked. With the close encounter of Io bearing down on us in a few weeks, it was Hail Mary time: The only thing left we hadn't tried was to crank JunoCam's heater all the way up and see if more extreme annealing would save us.' At first, the more extreme annealing didn't seem to produce any improvements, but as the Io approach got nearer, and with just days to go, the images suddenly improved significantly. On December 30, 2023, JunoCam successfully captured detailed photographs of Io's north polar region, including previously undocumented volcanoes. Scientists presented the accomplishment at the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Nuclear & Space Radiation Effects Conference in Nashville on July 16. Jupiter's 'Tortured Moon': Astronomers Uncover Surprising Source of Io's Intense Volcanic Fury Despite the fact that the image corruption returned during its recent 74th orbit, 'Juno is teaching us how to create and maintain spacecraft tolerant to radiation, providing insights that will benefit satellites in orbit around Earth,' explained Scott Bolton, Juno's principal investigator from the Southwest Research Institute. 'I expect the lessons learned from Juno will be applicable to both defense and commercial satellites as well as other NASA missions.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hundreds of Nasa workers rebuke ‘arbitrary' Trump cuts in scathing letter
Almost 300 current and former US Nasa employees, including at least four astronauts, have issued a scathing dissent opposing the Trump administration's sweeping and indiscriminate cuts to the agency, which they say threaten safety, innovation and national security. The formal letter, titled The Voyager Declaration, is addressed to the acting Nasa administrator, Sean Duffy, a staunch Trump loyalist appointed on 7 July who is also his transportation secretary. The declaration, which is dedicated to 17 astronauts who have died in past spaceflight incidents, warns of catastrophic consequences if the proposed cuts to science grants, staffing and international missions are implemented. 'Major programmatic shifts at Nasa must be implemented strategically so that risks are managed carefully,' the letter said. 'Instead, the last six months have seen rapid and wasteful changes which have undermined our mission and caused catastrophic impacts on Nasa's workforce. Related: 'A disaster for all of us': US scientists describe impact of Trump cuts 'We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political momentum over human safety, scientific advancement, and efficient use of public resources. These cuts are arbitrary and have been enacted in defiance of congressional appropriations law. The consequences for the agency and the country alike are dire.' The letter sounds the alarm over suggested changes to Nasa's Technical Authority, a system of safety checks and balances established in the wake of the 2003 Columbia shuttle disaster that killed seven astronauts. 'The culture of organizational silence promoted at Nasa over the last six months already represents a dangerous turn away from the lessons learned after the Columbia disaster,' the declaration states. The declaration has 131 named signatures – including at least 55 current Nasa employees – and 156 anonymous signatories. Interim administrator Duffy, a former television host who was appointed after the ousting of a longtime Nasa employee, Janet Petro, is the final step in the chain of Technical Authority command. Trump's billionaire donor and former ally Elon Musk oversaw the loss of at least 2,600 of Nasa's 17,000-plus employees, according to Politico, before the billionaire businessman stepped back from the so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge). So far, at least $120m in Nasa grants have been terminated, and the White House has proposed slashing a quarter of the agency's total budget for next year. International missions have been cancelled, and almost half the agency's science budget could be cut in 2026. The signatories said they dissent from the indiscriminate cuts to Nasa research which supports national security by ensuring the US role as a global leader in science and technology. 'Basic research in space science, aeronautics, and the stewardship of the Earth are inherently governmental functions that cannot and will not be taken up by the private sector,' the letter says. The Voyager Declaration, named after the twin Nasa spacecraft that are exploring interstellar space, is only the latest formal dissent against Trump's unprecedented assault on science and federal agencies. In June, at least 300 employees at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) published a declaration calling for the restoration of grants into life-saving treatments that the Trump administration had 'delayed or terminated for political reasons'. Earlier in July, 140 workers at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) were placed on administrative leave after signing a letter highlighting key concerns including a culture of fear at the agency, the cancellation of environmental justice programs and grants, undermining public trust and 'ignoring scientific consensus to protect polluters'. The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post See our guide at for alternative methods and the pros and cons of each. Solve the daily Crossword


Scientific American
an hour ago
- Scientific American
NASA Staff Rebuke White House Cuts in Rare Public Dissent
More than 280 NASA employees past and present, including at least 4 astronauts, have signed a declaration of opposition to the many drastic changes that the administration of US President Donald Trump is working to enact. The declaration also urges the acting head of NASA not to make the unprecedented budget cuts Trump has proposed. 'The last six months have seen rapid and wasteful changes which have undermined our mission and caused catastrophic impacts on NASA's workforce,' reads the employees' letter to interim administrator Sean Duffy. It argues that Trump's changes threaten human safety, scientific progress and global leadership at NASA. The Voyager Declaration joins similar protest documents by employees at other US federal agencies, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The appeals stem from Trump's sweeping campaign to overhaul the federal government, which has led to mass firings of workers and the proposal of steep cuts to agency budgets. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. The declaration is 'about getting our dissent out to the public and saying, hey — this is what's happening at NASA, and this is not OK', says Ella Kaplan, who has signed the document. Kaplan works on a contract basis as a website administrator at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and was speaking on her own behalf and not that of her employer or of NASA. Kaplan says she does not expect Duffy to read the document or to care much about it if he does. When Duffy ran for a seat in the US Congress more than a decade ago, he released a campaign advertisement that featured him wearing lumberjack clothing and saying he would bring his axe to 'topple the big spending in Washington'. The agency is not interested in sustaining 'lower-priority missions', said NASA spokeswoman Bethany Stevens. 'We must revisit what's working and what's not so that we can inspire the American people again and win the space race.' Staff exodus The Voyager Declaration, named after the twin NASA spacecraft that are exploring interstellar space, protests against staffing cuts at the agency and Trump's proposed cuts to science funding and other NASA budgets. The agency has fired some employees and pressured others to leave, resulting in the loss of more than 2,600 of the 17,000-plus NASA employees, according to news platform Politico. At least US$118 million in NASA grants has been cancelled outright, and the White House has proposed slashing nearly half of the agency's science budget for next year. Congress, which sets US spending, might reject at least some of those proposed cuts. But the managers of many NASA science projects have been asked to draw up plans for winding down their programmes even though Congress hasn't finalized the budget — drawing dissent from the declaration's signers. 'Once operational spacecraft are decommissioned, they cannot be turned back on,' the document says. NASA, like other agencies, is supposed to follow spending priorities laid out by Congress, and Duffy, as interim administrator, could theoretically ignore the White House requests until a budget is finalised. The declaration asserts that since Trump took office, safety has taken a back seat to politics, marking a 'dangerous turn' away from NASA's efforts to make human space flight less risky. Stevens responded that 'NASA will never compromise on safety.' The document's signers also disapprove of the agency's withdrawal from international missions, saying that such actions threaten partnerships with other nations' space agencies. The White House budget proposal, for instance, would cancel NASA participation in European Space Agency missions to Mars and Venus. Dissent by employees at other federal agencies has met with mixed reactions. At the NIH, where more than 480 employees signed a Bethesda Declaration, director Jay Bhattacharya has said he intends to foster respectful dissent. But EPA administrator Lee Zeldin has placed more than 100 signatories to a dissenting document on administrative leave, saying he will not tolerate employees undercutting the president's agenda. Staff at the US National Science Foundation are also planning a declaration, according to a leaked version of the document. Of the 287 signatories to the NASA document, 156 are anonymous.