As activists accuse Kraft campaign of breaking election law, Kraft campaign alleges violations by Wu
Advertisement
The allegations related to the Kraft campaign center on Jonathan Karush, a political operative with a leadership role in organizations that are working for both the Kraft campaign and the super PAC. Super PACs are independent spending groups that can raise and spend unlimited money, but may not coordinate directly or indirectly with the campaigns or candidates themselves. In the wake of
Advertisement
Karush is the president of
Additionally, Karush is a principal owner of CP Campaigns LLC, which performs digital ad buying work for the Kraft-aligned super PAC. The PAC has reported paying CP Campaigns $425,000 so far. The company has existed only since March of this year, state business records show.
Karush said in an email to the Globe that he 'has no personal involvement with the operations of the super PAC.'
'There is a firewall put in place to any engagement to ensure compliance with Massachusetts election law,' he said in the email.
He did not respond to Globe questions about who at CP Campaigns is performing work on behalf of the super PAC, nor a request for a copy of any written 'firewall' policy.
O'Connor, a spokesperson for the Kraft campaign, said in a statement
that Karush is a 'subcontractor' 'not an employee,' at Keyser Public Strategies, and said his work on the Kraft campaign is 'limited to website and digital/graphic work — non-strategic activities which will be reflected in public filings.'
State
Advertisement
Geoff Foster, executive director of the good government group Common Cause Massachusetts, said the close ties between the organizations working for the Kraft campaign and the Kraft-aligned PAC raise 'important questions about what firewalls are actually in place.'
State officials should quickly, thoroughly investigate any credible claims of wrongdoing, Foster said.
Asked about the Kraft campaign allegations that public employees are improperly working on the Wu campaign, Foster noted that there are important conflict of interest laws in place regulating what public employees may do on political campaigns.
'There's a need for OCPF to be the referee in the ring right now,' Foster added.
The Kraft campaign on Wednesday asked OCPF to launch an investigation into Wu for a litany of alleged violations, including what it said was 'impermissible coordination' between Wu's campaign and a super PAC in 2021, when she first ran for mayor. The Kraft campaign also alleged that Wu is improperly relying on City Hall staff to perform the work of her political campaign.
In Massachusetts, public employees are permitted to make political contributions and work on campaigns, but
Advertisement
The Kraft campaign claimed that members of the mayor's staff engaged in political activity during office hours and using public resources.
Julia Leja, a spokesperson for Wu's campaign said the campaign is following the law and called the letter 'a transparent attempt to distract from illegal campaign spending by Josh Kraft and his Trump megadonors.'
'Boston voters will not be fooled,' she added.
Emma Platoff can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Josh Kraft is defining himself — the wrong way
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up It makes what was already an uphill climb against an incumbent mayor an even tougher battle for Kraft — one that if she wins, will leave Wu with an even loftier platform than she had after her testimony last March in Washington. The mayor who faced down Republican lawmakers on the hot topic of immigration with Advertisement Kraft, who has never before run for political office, has squandered much of his reputation as a decent guy who did good things for young people in Boston as the head of the nonprofit Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston. Instead of emphasizing that positive story from the start, he went on the attack. The topics — from bike lanes and school safety to the cost of Wu's White Stadium renovation plans and lingering drug and homeless problems at the intersection of Massachusetts Avenue and Melnea Cass Boulevard — are fair game. But too often, Kraft's proffered solution is further study rather than a substantive alternative. Advertisement Meanwhile, he tapped into Meanwhile, by accepting the money that flows to a political action committee through his father's connections, Josh Kraft gets the baggage that goes with it, too. As Wu puts that baggage before Boston voters, no one can say she is taking reelection for granted. Advertisement The Kraft campaign It is true, as the Kraft campaign has also noted, that Wu has her own transparency problems. She has been less than forthcoming about estimated costs for the White Stadium renovation. Information about other city matters, such as the death of a 5-year-old boy who was hit and killed by a Boston school bus, is also slow in coming. That is Kraft's case to make. But despite the millions at his disposal and the name recognition that goes with his family, so far he has not been able to do it in a way that makes a difference in this race. Advertisement The poll that put Wu 30 points up also asked those surveyed to respond to this statement: 'Michelle Wu has had some challenges, but Josh Kraft is not the answer.' Sixty percent agreed. Just 25 percent did not. Only Kraft can change that conclusion and it's getting late for that. Joan Vennochi is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at
Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
US State Department launches investigation into Harvard's participation in visa program
A Harvard spokesperson said that the Advertisement 'Harvard continues to enroll and sponsor international scholars, researchers, and students, and will protect its international community and support them as they apply for U.S. visas and travel to campus this fall,' the spokesperson said in a statement to the Globe. 'The University is committed to continuing to comply with the applicable Exchange Visitor Program regulations.' The investigation is just the Trump administration's Harvard sued the Trump administration over the efforts in May, arguing at the time that it did respond to the government's requests and that the attempt to bar the university from hosting international students was an act of retaliation for rejecting a list of sweeping demands from the Trump administration. Advertisement The government demanded that Harvard overhaul its admissions policies, hiring practices, and governance in an April letter. After the university rejected the demands, calling them an unlawful attempt to exert influence over a private university, the Trump administration canceled nearly $3 billion in research funding, threatened the university's accreditation, and attempted to bar international students from campus. Federal district judge Burroughs is also overseeing Harvard's case challenging the government's cancellation of nearly $3 billion in research funding. At a hearing in federal district court in Boston earlier this week, she appeared skeptical of the Trump administration's justification for canceling nearly every grant because of its determination that the university failed to combat antisemitism across campus, at one point calling the government's argument Aidan Ryan can be reached at
CNN
6 hours ago
- CNN
Skydance pledges to Trump's FCC it'll eliminate DEI, install ‘ombudsman' to root out ‘bias' at CBS News
Donald Trump Corporate news Federal agencies MediaFacebookTweetLink Skydance Media needs the approval of President Donald Trump's Federal Communications Commission in order to take over Paramount Global. It's now promising to root out 'bias' at CBS News in order to get it. In a pair of letters filed Tuesday with the FCC, Skydance committed to a post-merger 'comprehensive review of CBS,' including a promise to install an ombudsman to evaluate complaints of 'bias or other concerns' at the news network and report their findings to the new Paramount's president. Skydance also committed to eliminating Paramount's diversity, equity and inclusion practices at the entertainment giant once it takes over. The letters touted that Skydance does not and will not have any DEI programs in place. The letters demonstrate Skydance CEO David Ellison's eagerness to complete the deal to merge with Paramount, which was first agreed upon in July 2024. Ellison, the son of billionaire Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, was spotted meeting with Trump ringside at multiple UFC events this year. Amid its push for Trump administration approval of the merger, Paramount agreed to pay $16 million earlier this month to settle a lawsuit filed last year by President Trump over a '60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris. The settlement generated outrage both inside and outside Paramount, not least because legal experts believed the lawsuit to be frivolous. Critics of the settlement used words like 'bribe' to describe the payment because of the leverage President Trump held over the pending merger. However, Paramount maintained that 'this lawsuit is completely separate from, and unrelated to, the Skydance transaction and the FCC approval process.' FCC chairman Brendan Carr, a Trump loyalist, has also said the merger review process is separate — despite previously stating the '60 Minutes' case would be 'likely to arise' in his agency's review. Less than two weeks after the settlement, Ellison met with Carr and other FCC officials. Those meetings took place amid reports that Skydance had made a 'side deal' with Trump for an additional $15 million or more in airtime for public service announcements promoting Trump-aligned causes. In Skydance's first letter to Carr, Stephanie Kyoko McKinnon, the entertainment company's general counsel and co-president of business operations, committed to a 'comprehensive review' of CBS, stressing Skydance's recognition that the broadcast network is 'charged with operating in the public interest.' Kyoko McKinnon further said that Skydance will 'make any necessary changes to ensure compliance' and ensure CBS upholds 'viewpoint diversity.' 'After consummation of the proposed transaction, New Paramount's new management will ensure that the company's array of news and entertainment programing embodies a diversity of viewpoints across the political and ideological spectrum, consistent with the varying perspective of the viewing audience,' Kyoko McKinnon wrote to Carr — promising to install the ombudsman for at least two years. Such a commitment plays directly to President Trump and the MAGA movement's long-held belief that news outlets like CBS are biased against conservative viewpoints. Similarly, the second letter's signaling that the new Paramount will eliminate the company's existing DEI policies speaks to a key conservative initiative of Trump's second term. Over the last six months, the Trump administration has rolled back DEI policies, largely through threats to investigate the private companies that maintain them. The most recent high-profile example of this was Verizon's merger this spring with Frontier, which was greenlit only after the telecom giant made DEI concessions. Paramount and Skydance did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
