Hamas issues statement on developments related to ceasefire agreement
The meeting addressed key issues related to the ceasefire agreement and prisoner exchange, as outlined in a statement issued by Hamas.
The delegation expressed its appreciation for Egypt's efforts to counter displacement plans and reaffirmed its support for the decisions made at the Arab Summit, particularly the Gaza Reconstruction Plan.
The Hamas delegation stressed the importance of fully adhering to the terms of the ceasefire agreement and called for immediate negotiations on the next phase. This includes the opening of border crossings and the unrestricted entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza.
Additionally, the delegation announced its approval for forming a community support committee, made up of independent national figures, to manage Gaza until general Palestinian elections take place.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Roya News
6 hours ago
- Roya News
Hamas open to Gaza truce but rejects terms of US proposal: Report
Hamas said Wednesday it is open to reaching a ceasefire agreement with 'Israel', but stopped short of accepting the latest US-backed proposal unveiled by President Donald Trump, reiterating its demand that any deal must guarantee a complete end to the war in Gaza, according to an AP report. The group's statement came just hours after Trump announced that 'Israel' had agreed to the terms of a new 60-day ceasefire and urged Hamas to accept the deal 'before conditions worsen.' Trump added that the ceasefire period would be used to work toward ending the war, a condition 'Israel' has so far rejected unless Hamas is defeated. Speaking to the press, Hamas spokesperson Taher al-Nunu said the group is 'ready and serious regarding reaching an agreement,' but emphasized that Hamas would only accept 'any initiative that clearly leads to the complete end to the war.' A Hamas delegation is expected to meet with Qatari and Egyptian mediators in Cairo on Wednesday to discuss the proposal, according to an Egyptian official who spoke on condition of anonymity. The latest ceasefire plan reportedly includes a partial 'Israeli' withdrawal from Gaza and a significant increase in humanitarian aid. According to an 'Israeli' official familiar with the proposal, the mediators, along with the US, would provide assurances that negotiations toward ending the war would take place, though 'Israel' is not formally committing to that outcome as part of the deal. Details on the potential captive release remain unclear, but earlier proposals called for around 10 captives to be freed during the initial stage. 'Israel' has not officially commented on Trump's remarks. However, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is expected to visit the White House on Monday for talks with Trump, following a recent visit by Netanyahu's adviser Ron Dermer for high-level discussions with US officials on Gaza, Iran, and regional security. Since the war began in October 2023, repeated ceasefire initiatives have failed to yield lasting results, with both sides sticking to conditions the other has so far refused to meet. While Trump's renewed push adds diplomatic weight, Hamas' insistence on a full end to hostilities suggests significant hurdles remain.
Roya News
6 hours ago
- Roya News
Hamas orders Gaza clan leader 'Yasser Abu Shabab' to surrender, accuses him of treason
Gaza's Revolutionary Court has issued a 10-day deadline for a man accused of serious national security offenses to turn himself in, warning that failure to do so will result in a trial in absentia. The court identified the suspect as Yasser Jihad Mansour Abu Shabab, born February 27, 1990, and residing in Rafah. In a formal statement released Wednesday, the court announced that Abu Shabab faces the following charges: Treason and collaboration with hostile entities, in violation of Article 131 Forming an armed gang, under Article 176 Armed insurrection, as per Article 168 The ruling stated that the accused has until July 12, 2025, to surrender to the competent authorities for prosecution. If he fails to comply, he will be declared a fugitive and tried in absentia, the court stated. Authorities also warned that anyone found harboring or concealing Abu Shabab would be considered complicit in aiding a fugitive and subject to legal consequences. Shortly after the court's announcement, a statement was released by Abu Shabab's supporters in a post on the Facebook page that usually carried the group's announcements, denouncing the charges as politically motivated and rejecting the authority of Hamas' judiciary. 'Brother Yasser Abu Shabab is safe and will return soon with major national projects aimed at justice, dignity, and service to our people,' the statement said. It dismissed the court as a 'theatrical farce issuing orders from hideouts in hospitals and schools,' accusing Hamas of using the judiciary to suppress dissent. 'These illegitimate courts are tools of repression with no popular legitimacy,' the statement continued. 'They should prosecute those responsible for dragging our people into the catastrophe of October 7, leading to famine and the attempted erasure of our cause.' The message also called on Hamas to hold its own members accountable for corruption and abuses since its 2007 takeover of Gaza, pointing to exploitative financial practices, mismanagement of aid, and sheltering of armed gangs. Hamas has not responded publicly to the statement. Broader controversy: Alleged coordination with 'Israel' The charges come amid heightened controversy following a rare public admission by 'Israeli' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who previously claimed that 'Israel' has 'activated' certain Palestinian clans in Gaza to counter Hamas. While Netanyahu offered few details, an 'Israeli' official later confirmed the move was directed at supporting the Popular Forces, the very group led by Abu Shabab. According to reports, the Popular Forces have been active in 'Israeli'-controlled zones of Rafah, helping secure food convoys run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a body tied to the ongoing humanitarian aid efforts in southern Gaza. However, the group has also been accused by aid workers and Palestinian officials of attacking and looting those very shipments. Nahed Sheheiber, head of Gaza's private transport union, previously accused Abu Shabab's supporters of repeated attacks on aid trucks. 'The ones who looted aid are now the ones protecting it,' he said. As a response to these allegations, the Abu Shabab family itself has previously disavowed Yasser Abu Shabab, saying he and his followers no longer represent them and denouncing his alleged ties with the 'Israeli' military.
Ammon
7 hours ago
- Ammon
Can Israel survive without the West? The answer reveals our collective power
The Israeli genocide in Gaza, along with the escalating regional wars it has ignited, has brought two chilling truths into our focus: first, Israel is deliberately and aggressively undermining the security and stability of the entire Middle East and, second, Israel is utterly incapable of surviving on its own. These two assertions, though seemingly distinct, are inextricably linked. For if those who relentlessly sustain Israel, militarily, politically, and economically, were to finally withdraw their support, the Middle East would not be the powder keg it has been for decades, a situation that has catastrophically worsened since October 7, 2023. Though no oversimplification is intended, the brutal reality is that all it would take is for Israel to withdraw from Gaza, allowing the devastated, genocide-stricken Strip the faintest chance to heal. Over 56,000 Palestinians, including more than 17,000 children and 28,000 women, have been brutally slaughtered since the commencement of this war, a horrifying tally expected to surge dramatically when comprehensive investigations into the missing are finally conducted. Only then could the process of returning to some semblance of normalcy begin, where the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people must be fiercely championed within an international system built, at least theoretically, upon unwavering respect for basic human rights and international law. The abhorrent "might makes right" maxim would have to be utterly expunged from any future political equation. Middle Eastern countries, both Arab and Muslim, must finally rise to the occasion, stepping up decisively to aid their brethren and to ensure that Israel is powerless to divide their ranks. For Israel, this demand is simply impossible, a non-starter and, understandably so, from its colonial perspective. Why? "Invasion is a structure, not an event," the influential scholar Patrick Wolfe has famously asserted. This profound statement unequivocally means that Israel's wars, commencing with the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, the Nakba, of 1948, and all subsequent wars and military occupations, were not random historical coincidences, but rather integral components of an enduring structure of power designed to eliminate the indigenous population. This renders as simply false the notion that Israel's behavior after October 7 was solely driven by revenge and devoid of strategy. We are perhaps excused for failing to initially grasp this distinction, given the grisly, unspeakable nature of the Israeli actions in Gaza and the palpable sense of perverse pleasure Israel seems to derive from the daily murder of innocent people. Yet, the language emanating from Israel was chillingly clear about its true motives. As Benjamin Netanyahu declared on October 7, 2023, 'we will turn Gaza into a deserted island'. That has always been an intrinsic, unchanging part of Israel's colonial structure, and it will remain so unless it is decisively reined in. But who possesses the will and power to rein in Israel? Israel operates through a network of enablers, benefactors who have long viewed Israel's existence as an indispensable colonial fortress serving the interests of Western colonialism. 'The connection between the Israeli people and the American people is bone deep. (...) We're united in our shared values,' Joe Biden declared with striking conviction in July 2022. Without even bothering to question those "shared values" that somehow permit Israel to perpetrate a genocide while the US actively sustains it, Biden was undeniably honest in his stark depiction that the relationship between both countries transcends mere politics. Other Western leaders blindly parrot the same perception. The unfolding genocide, however, has spurred some Western, and a multitude of non-Western, governments to courageously speak out against the Israeli war, Netanyahu, and his extremist ideology in ways unprecedented since Israel's very establishment. For some of these countries, notably Spain, Norway, Ireland, and Slovenia, among others, the proverbial 'bond' is demonstrably 'breakable' and their support is most certainly not 'unequivocal'. There are various theories as to why some Western governments dare to challenge Israel, while others stubbornly refuse. That important discussion aside, shattering the bond between Israel and the West is absolutely critical, not only for a just peace to finally prevail, but for the very survival of the Palestinian people. The nearly 21 agonizing months of unrelenting Israeli genocide have taught us a brutal lesson: Israel is, after all, a vassal state, utterly unable to fight its own wars, to defend itself or even to sustain its own economy without the direct, massive support of the US and others. Prior to the war, there were occasional outbursts from Israeli officials proclaiming that Israel is an independent country, not 'another star on the US flag'. These voices have since been largely silenced, replaced by a constant stream of begging and pleading for the US to come to Israel's rescue. While Palestinians continue to stand with legendary courage to resist the Israeli military occupation and apartheid, those who genuinely care about international law, justice, and peace must take decisive action by directly confronting governments that persist in helping Israel sustain the genocide in Gaza and the destabilization of the Middle East. Governments like Spain and others are doing what many had not expected only years ago: Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez is powerfully advocating for the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, an extensive trade deal in place since 2000, due to "the catastrophic situation of genocide." If more such governments were to adopt a similar, uncompromising stance, Israel would be choked off, at least from acquiring the very murder weapons it uses to carry out its barbaric genocide. It is our collective responsibility to march in lockstep behind such courageous voices and demand uncompromising accountability, not only from Israel, but from those who are actively sustaining its Israeli settler colonial structure. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is 'Our Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak Out'. His other books include 'My Father was a Freedom Fighter' and 'The Last Earth'. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA).
