
Prison service ‘closed ranks' after young offender took his own life, FAI finds
Mr McKenzie was pronounced dead in his cell at 7.57am on September 3, after taking his own life which was deemed 'unpredictable' in a fatal accident inquiry (FAI) determination by Sheriff Simon Collins, after hearing evidence at Falkirk Sheriff Court.
Mr McKenzie had been confined to his cell following an 'aggressive' outburst attributed to drugs on September 1.
His death could have occurred between 3am and 7.36am, the inquiry found, however, two prison officers tasked with a 'hatch check' just after 6.30am did not do so sufficiently, and a total of seven recommendations were issued to Scottish Prison Service (SPS) regarding improvements.
Sheriff Collins said in his determination 'poor practice must be investigated and sanctioned, not ignored and therefore – apparently – condoned'.
It was a response which sends a message... to the public that the first response of SPS to poor staff practice in the context of the death of a prisoner is to close ranks and protect its own Sheriff Simon Collins
It added: 'The purpose of imposing a sanction is not to criticise prison officers for the sake of it, but to seek to drive up standards in the hope – in the present context – of preventing the deaths of further young prisoners by suicide.'
A six-month deadline was set for SPS to reduce 'abusive and bullying verbal behaviour, drug dealing, and to respond to physical disturbances' during the night, in the sheriff's determination.
Mr McKenzie was described as a 'chronic drug user' who had been remanded four times in three years in Polmont YOI, however, his death was described as 'impulsive' and a report called for improvements to cell environments.
Sheriff Collins, who presided over the Katie Allan and William Brown FAI, which also investigated Polmont, said 10 young prisoners died by suicide there between 2010 and 2023, while more than 120 prisoners died by suicide in Scottish prisons between 2011 and July 2024.
A total of seven recommendations were made, and the report said: 'Jack's death was spontaneous, unpredicted and unpredictable. But it is well known that prisoner suicides can be so.
'Accordingly prisoners should, insofar as reasonably possible, be detained in environments which are safe, in the sense of minimising the risk of such suicides.'
The report said an audit had been done of potential suicide risks in equivalent cells and using the Manchester Tool Kit (MTK), Mr McKenzie's cell would have 'indicated the highest level of risk'.
It said: 'If a young, vulnerable prisoner was accommodated, without regular observation, the resulting overall MTK scoring for the cell would have indicated the highest level of risk, calling for remediation.'
The sheriff wrote it 'would have been a reasonable precaution for the Scottish Prison Service prior to September 2021, to have removed and replaced the toilet cubicle door in Jack's cell, or to have modified it, such that it was not readily capable of being used… without significant ingenuity or adaptation'.
Jack McKenzie took his own life at HMPYOI Polmont in September 2021 (Andrew Milligan/PA)
Mr McKenzie was perceived by staff as 'jovial, funny, likeable and talkative' but on drugs could be 'aggressive, agitated and anti-authority' and traded substances. However, he had never been assessed as suicidal, the report added.On September 1, Mr McKenzie smashed two phones and was restrained and confined to his cell due to becoming 'non-compliant' and intoxicated – using an order which would have expired on September 4 just after 3pm.
The report said: 'There was simply nothing to indicate, prior to September 3 2021, that Jack had any thoughts or intention of dying by suicide'.
Accounts from neighbouring cellmates suggested 'that Jack was still alive at around 3am to 4am' on September 3, the report said.
At 6.37am on September 3, two prison officers failed to carry out a hatch check at Mr McKenzie's cell to ensure he was safe and failed to take steps to ascertain his whereabouts, and did not log concerns on a handover, it added.
A recommendation said: 'A sanction should have been imposed on both officers and/or corrective training required of them.'
Governor Gerry Michie did not issue any 'disciplinary action, reprimand, warning or sanction' and neither officer was 'offered, nor required, to undertake additional training '- which was branded 'unacceptable' in the report.
The report said: 'The absence of any disciplinary action, given the seriousness of the breach, and the possible seriousness of the consequences of it, is incongruous and unacceptable.
'I do not accept, as SPS submitted, that this was within the range of reasonable responses open to governor Michie.
'Rather, it was a response which sends a message to prison officers that they will not be held to account for a failure to 'do the basics well', and a message to the public that the first response of SPS to poor staff practice in the context of the death of a prisoner is to close ranks and protect its own.'
Procurator fiscal Andy Shanks said: 'The sheriff's determination, which makes significant recommendations in relation to reduction and prevention and the checking of cells, is extensive and detailed.
'The FAI followed a thorough and comprehensive investigation by the procurator fiscal who ensured that the full facts of Jack's death were presented in evidence. My thoughts remain with Jack's loved ones.'
An SPS spokesperson said: 'We would like to offer our sincere condolences and apologies to the family of Jack McKenzie for his sad death and the failings identified in this report.
'We are grateful to Sheriff Collins for his recommendations, which we will fully consider as we continue to deliver systemic change, at pace, in a way which keeps young people in our care safe, during one of the most challenging and vulnerable periods of their lives.'
Justice secretary Angela Constance said: 'I wish to express my deepest condolences to the family of Jack McKenzie, I am deeply sorry about his death.
'Deaths from suicide in custody are as tragic as they are preventable, and Jack's death should not have happened whilst he was in the care of the state.
'I have been clear that there needs to be systemic change and action at pace to ensure we prevent avoidable deaths in custody. Work is well underway to put in place the necessary reforms to make our prisons safe and rehabilitative.
'I thank Sheriff Collins for his detailed determination which has highlighted a number of reasonable precautions that should have been taken and systemic failures that must be addressed to help prevent other deaths in custody.
'His recommendations will be given very careful and detailed consideration and responded to formally by July 11.
'Delivering lasting change must be underpinned by accountability and transparency at every stage which is why I have established a ministerial accountability board to provide oversight and drive progress.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Ryanair told widow to have dead husband ask for £827 flight refund
Colin was tetraplegic after he had an accident 14 years ago and needed two essential carers to accompany him on the flight, whose tickets he paid for. A widow was left in tears when Ryanair refused to refund her dead hubby's £827 flights - telling her he needed to complain from beyond the grave. Yvonne Shields' husband Colin Shields booked his flights to Venice, Italy, last year and was meant to fly out in September to represent Scotland at a powerchair football match. Colin was tetraplegic after he had an accident 14 years ago and needed two essential carers to accompany him on the flight, whose tickets he paid for. But when Colin tragically passed away due to brain bleed in April 2025, Yvonne contacted Ryanair customer support to notify them and request a refund. The 44-year-old said she was told she could not get a refund for the carers' tickets as it was against Ryanair's policy despite Colin having paid for them. She was promised a refund of only £258 for his ticket but claims she has not even received that either. When Yvonne got back in touch to chase the refund, she was reportedly told they could not disclose any information unless they speak to the original booker - despite being informed the 'booker is dead'. The mum said she even provided Ryanair with Colin's death certificate and proof that she is the will executor, but they still refused to speak with her and ended the chat. Ryanair have since apologised for the ordeal and said that she was 'regrettably incorrectly advised wrongly' by their customer service agent. Yvonne, from Glasgow, said: "He was captain of the Scottish power football team and they were playing against other national teams. He is tetraplegic so he couldn't go by himself and he had two essential carers. He often travelled with carers. "He booked them through a company, it's not like it's personal carers, we don't know these people. He paid for their tickets too, it was all through him. Colin passed on April 12th and I contacted them in April. I filled out the form to get a refund for Colin and the caters. They authorised part of the refund but they didn't send it. "I sent the death certificate and proof I am the will executor. They said a refund would come in the next 24-48 hours. They said their policy is to refund only Colin's ticket, not the carers'. But I've not had it, there's nothing. "I emailed them to say I haven't received the refund and it's been over 48 hours. They said that they have to speak with the booker. My sister contacted them and said the booker is dead. It's so upsetting and trivial. I told them back in April that he passed so there should be no reason why they can't refund it. "I can't get in contact with these carers because the contract ended, but they didn't pay for the tickets, Colin paid for the tickets. They said 'I can't disclose any information with someone not tied to the booking', even though they were discussing it with me in the past. "They said 'we would need the passengers to contact us to process', but I don't have passengers to contact. They said there's nothing else we can help you with and ended the chat." Yvonne said the lack of empathy and understanding from Ryanair is frustrating and caused her to burst into tears. The mum-of-two said it is a lot for her to deal with while also handling grief and feels like she is 'bashing her head on a brick wall.' Yvonne said: "I burst into tears because I have quite a lot to deal with right now since Colin passed. It's a lot. It's not like you're getting this clean slate to start again. I constantly have to deal with things. "I've got two kids as well, 14 and 17, and it's dealing with their emotions as well. The fact they're not even giving me the money back is infuriating. It's like bashing your head on a brick wall. They're trying to speak to someone that isn't here, it's an unreasonable request. "It's frustrating, it's devastating, you feel like you're nothing. We've dealt with so much because of his disability. Things are always that little bit tougher, harder." Colin was paralysed from the chest down after an accident in 2010 and developed a condition called autonomic dysreflexia, which meant his blood pressure could soar and cause a stroke if not treated - which is what led to his brain bleed. Yvonne said: "Colin had an accident 14 years ago, a month before our youngest was born. It's just constant battling and I feel tired, I feel drained, sometimes I want to just ignore it but my sister says 'you're not ignoring this, they stole from you.' "It's the lack of empathy, lack of understanding, it's not a box-standard person going on a flight, it's a disabled person. If you had a family member who died, surely you would think it's all cancelled." A Ryanair spokesperson said: "Mr Shields was due to travel from Edinburgh to Venice on 16 Sep' 25 but passed away prior to this flight. Mrs Shields attempted to submit a refund request (26 Apr) and was advised to submit a death cert and proof of executorship. "On 30 Jun, Mrs Shields was informed that a refund (£257.58) was issued and was regrettably incorrectly advised by a customer service agent who wrongly believed that the other two passengers on the booking were not entitled to a refund. Our Customer Service Department would be happy to further assist this passenger to correct this customer service agent's error and assist this passenger with their refund." Ryanair admitted that the customer service agent also incorrectly informed Yvonne that the refund of £257.58 would be sent to her husband's Ryanair wallet, instead of the card used to pay for the booking.


Scotsman
4 hours ago
- Scotsman
Appeal court decision has raised questions over liabilty claims
Andrew Gilmour expects further guidance will follow as cases addressing the issues proceed Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Every day, members of the public enter offices, shops, supermarkets, restaurants and gyms. An issue that has arisen of late is how the Scottish courts deal with accidents caused by the condition of something in such premises that is defective. In the case of McCormack v Fitness Limited, the Sheriff Appeal Court provided guidance on how to analyse and determine whether an occupier of premises containing defective items should be liable for such an accident. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It has long been a feature of Scots Law that in certain circumstances, the maxim res ipsa loquitor could apply to an accident. The claimant should establish that the thing which caused damage was under the defender's management and control, and that the accident was of a type that does not ordinarily occur if proper care is taken. An inference of negligence is then accepted only if the defender can offer no explanation consistent with absence of fault on their part. Andrew Gilmour is a Partner, Horwich Farrelly In McCormack, the claimant was injured by a ragged edge on the outer rim of a weight plate in a gym that cut his hand when he tried to place it onto a shoulder press machine. How the damage to the plate occurred was unknown. At first instance, the court decided that res ipsa loquitor applied to the accident circumstances and found for the injured party. The view taken was that the gym owner could not provide a reasonable explanation for how the accident occurred without negligence. The court held the gym owner had exclusive management of the premises, controlling access by way of membership and subscriptions. The owner employed staff on reception and on the gym floor. Seeking to place a weight plate onto a machine should not ordinarily cause injury to a user. There was no evidence of any inspection of the plate on the morning of the accident and no faults were recorded. However, the appeal court decided the court had erred in focusing over the control exerted over the gym premises, rather than the weight plate itself. The court was bound to consider and decide the question in this way, as if there was no control over the thing that caused the accident, then res ipsa loquitor did not apply and liability would not be established. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The court had regard to the well-established observation that the principle only applied where the incident suggests negligence on someone's part and, because of exclusive management and control in the defenders at the time when the negligence occurred, it can be presumed it was the defenders who were negligent. In this case, the free weights and shoulder press machine were not in the exclusive control of the gym. The gym was open to members of the public who had a membership or subscription to use the premises. Those members had free use of the weight plates during the course of their exercise. Therefore, the appeal court overturned the decision and absolved the gym from any liability, as the exclusive management and control over the weight plate had not been established. The decision raises questions about exclusive management and control of items in premises. Does the presence of members of the public mean that few items in the premises could be under such control? When should a claimant seek to establish a case based on a failure to take reasonable care, rather than risking establishing that res ipsa loquitor applies? A number of cases are addressing this issue and no doubt further guidance will follow.


Daily Record
11 hours ago
- Daily Record
Scots beauty spot compared to 'Skid Row' as rowdy tourists drink and party
The site has been branded 'Skid Row' by furious locals as it has been invaded by tourists who camp beside the water and party through the night A picturesque Scottish site, Loch of Clunie in Perthshire, has been dubbed "Skid Row" as it's been overrun by unruly tourists indulging in alcohol-fuelled parties and criminal activities. The once tranquil spot has suffered from over-tourism in recent years, with party-goers flocking to camp by the water. Local residents have voiced their concerns about antisocial behaviour, including violence and littering. Some visitors have even brought along generators, gazebos and a flatbed truck equipped with its own fresh water supply for camping and outdoor enjoyment. However, the constant blaring of loud music throughout the night and drunken misbehaviour has resulted in locals being subjected to physical and verbal abuse, reports the Scottish Daily Express. Perth and Kinross Council have been accused of not doing enough to discourage troublemakers from wreaking havoc in the scenic area. Reports of nudity and drug use have also surfaced, with campers neglecting to clean up their rubbish after overnight stays. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Local resident Emma Crichton told the BBC: "Earlier this month there was a flatbed truck with a fresh water supply on it for three generations of campers who were there for 10 days with a generator with loud music. "I have people wandering into my garden asking if they can park there, people coming in and asking if they can use my loo. We have people having raves, it's like a music festival. I'm not a shrinking violet. I like a drink and I like loud music, but it's intolerable and I don't feel safe." Rangers have increased patrols in the area, collecting discarded items such as soiled nappies and a hypodermic needle. The locale typically teems with visitors between October or whenever the sun makes an appearance. Ms Crichton criticised the council and police response, stating: "Some of the rangers have been doing the job since before I got there so they know the area well and they're very invested in it. Every time I make a complaint, I'm told there's no law being broken. I cannot accept that." Negative feedback has also appeared on the Loch Clunie Facebook page, including a recent post from a man who visited the loch with his 10 year old daughter. He penned: "It was like Skid Row. Drunks everywhere - one or two being quite aggressive. Rubbish everywhere. Maybe half a dozen cars abandoned with parking tickets on them. Stayed for five minutes and left." Strathtay Councillor Ian James described the situation as an "absolute nightmare" for local residents. He commented that they were "putting up with loud music and drunken behaviour. Although it's a beautiful area, it's just not a nice place to be when it's like that." He alleged that a friend of his had been stabbed after requesting people not to camp in his garden. He added: "If this was Perth city centre, we'd have the police turning up and everybody would be trying their best to stop it, but this is in the countryside so it's unseen by most." A spokesperson for Perth and Kinross Council has stated that the local authority is keen for both visitors and residents to enjoy areas such as Loch of Clunie in a "safe, responsible and courteous manner". The spokesperson further added: "Parking attendants patrol the clearways, issuing guidance and penalty notices as appropriate. "We fully recognise the community's ongoing concerns about repeated incidents of irresponsible camping near residential properties. Given the understandable feelings of vulnerability and anxiety this has caused, we have advised residents not to engage directly with visitors and to report any threatening behaviour to Police Scotland." A representative from Police Scotland said: "We understand the impact anti-social behaviour and disorder has on the local community, and we would like to thank locals who continue to bring these incidents to our attention. Officers continue to work with local partners to address any concerns in the area, and where criminality is established, those responsible will be dealt with appropriately."