Third of renters 'could be forced out by rent hikes' despite landmark reforms
Labour's significant Renters' Rights Bill, which is currently passing through Parliament, will ban landlords from evicting renters for no reason from their homes - but fears remain
As many as a third of renters could be forced out by rent hikes despite landmark legislation to protect their rights, research shows.
Labour 's significant Renters' Rights Bill, which is currently passing through Parliament, will ban landlords from evicting renters for no reason from their homes.
But despite Section 21 evictions being abolished, campaigners have raised concerns that landlords would still be able to use unfair rent hikes to push people out of their homes.
Polling by the Renters Reform Coalition (RRC) has found 34% of renters, and 29% of renters with children, said they would "definitely" be forced to move home by a rent increase of £110 per month.
Analysis by the campaign group suggests the average rent increase recommended at first-tier rent tribunals is more than double this at over £240 per month.
RRC said the government recognises 'unreasonable rent increases' and had promised to 'empower' renters to challenge them through tribunals.
But its polling showed more than half of renters (54%) were unaware that rent tribunals exist and only 14% said they were 'very likely' to use one to challenge a rent increase in future - even after the government has made changes to improve the process.
The RRC is calling on the government to introduce a cap on in-tenancy rent increases so renters can remain in their homes.
The Renters' Rights Bill is in its final stages of the House of Lords and so is due to become law soon. Peers have attempted to amend the legislation to limit rent increases.
Tom Darling, Director at the RRC, praised the 'long overdue' Bill to improve renters' rights but said 'the rent rise eviction loophole is a serious gap in the legislation'.
'Even after section 21 is abolished, our research suggests as many as a third of renters will still face being pushed out of their homes and communities by rent increases, and landlords will be able to use rent hikes they know tenants cannot afford to threaten or intimidate,' he said.
"The government's proposed solution will not address this - our analysis shows rent tribunals will do nothing to protect the large proportion of renters who already cannot afford average market rents, even if they were willing to take their landlord to a tribunal in the first place.'
A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesman said: 'Our landmark Renters' Rights Bill will ensure that landlords are only be able to increase rents once a year to the market rate, and tenants will be able to challenge unreasonable rent increases through the First-tier Tribunal.
'This will prevent unscrupulous landlords using rent increases as a backdoor means of eviction, while ensuring rents can be increased to a fair rate.'
The Government has been clear it does not support rent caps. Officials say heavy-handed controls tend to mean higher rents at the start of a tenancy. It was also highlighted that MHCLG secured a £39billion investment for affordable housing at the Spending Review.
::: The RRC commissioned polling from More in Common, who surveyed 1,076 private renters through three separate polls between April 25 - May 5.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
25 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Glasgow councillor wants commitment to extend £200k project
Paul Carey BEM says choosing just four Glasgow secondaries for a £200,000 pilot project that will see 400 youngsters given a healthy lunch means that many living in poverty elsewhere will be left hungry. Castlemilk, Drumchapel and Lochend high schools, as well as pupils at Springburn Academy, have been chosen to participate, with those whose parents are carers or in receipt of the Scottish Child Payment qualifying. Cllr Carey says the scheme does not go far enough to help those in Glasgow living on the breadline. He said: 'The reality is that we need to secure better funding from the Scottish Government to ensure that no child is going hungry at school, especially those living in areas of high deprivation and unemployment. 'I want to see the initiative extended to every high school in Glasgow, including pupils in fourth year. We need to ensure that as many youngsters as possible are getting at least one healthy hot feed every weekday. 'We know how important it is to fuel youngsters with nutritious food and for many this might be the only decent meal they get. It's important that this is offered to every youngster from S1 to S4.' Paul Carey BEM (Image: supplied) Councillor Carey, Labour's elected member for Drumchapel and Anniesland, says that working poverty is very real for many families in his constituency who are struggling to make ends meet. He added: 'Drumchapel has one of the highest poverty rates in Glasgow. Parents here are struggling to keep a roof over their heads, pay bills and put clothes on their back They often have no option but to turn to cheap, unhealthy foods. Clearly the Scottish Government knows that this is an issue, that why this pilot is being tested in areas with high deprivation. 'I welcome the scheme being rolled out at Drumchapel High, however we need to ensure this doesn't come to an end when the funding runs out next year. Kids can access free school meals from P1 to P5, but what happens when they go to high school and are not eligible for a free lunch.' At a full council meeting last week, Councillor Christina Cannon, convenor of education and early years, advised members that the pilot will last for one year and that money had been awarded to eight local authorities across the country. READ NEXT: Community rallies amid fears Glasgow branch could be axed Cllr Cannon said: 'Of course, we want everyone in these schools who are eligible at S1 to S3 to take up the free meals on offer. 'This is great news for Glasgow and families in the city because we know school meals are essential for fuelling our pupils' learning and allowing them to flourish. 'We are continuing to put children, young people and families first and this investment will also complement the commitment the SNP group made in our budget in February this year to deliver free school meals to all primary six pupils, starting in August this year, then expanding to all primary seven pupils in August 2026.' Speaking about the scheme, First Minister John Swinney, said: 'It's a measure designed to tackle the cost-of-living challenges families face, to tackle child poverty and to make sure that children have good health, nutritious food to strengthen their ability to learn in school.' 'The free school meals programme is key in our national mission to eradicate child poverty, which saves families who take up the offer around £450 per eligible child per year. 'This next phase of the rollout will ensure that this offer is available to more families across the country. 'We know the positive impact that access to a healthy and nutritious meal can have on a pupil's learning and achievement in school.'
Scotsman
33 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Labour's cynical attempt at concession on social security cuts
Disabled people wake up every day in fear of what the UK Government will announce next. The news that their cruel social security cuts will only affect new recipients is not a U-turn. It is a sad and cynical attempt at concession following a rebellion of Labour MPs, and it will still have a horrific impact on the lives of disabled people across the UK. Also in 2021 a BBC investigation included the case of Errol Graham who starved to death in 2018 after his benefits were stopped when he failed to attend a work capability assessment due to his ill health. Even the former Conservative welfare secretary Iain Duncan Smith resigned following the publication of a similar plan to Labour's saying that it would be 'indefensible' and that 'top slicing never works'. Following the backlash there appeared to be a deal made between Starmer and over 100 MPs who rebelled which confirmed that people already in receipt of PIP and UC will continue as normal. It will only be new claimants facing harsh eligibility assessments which will see people go without the crucial support they need. This is not good enough. How does this help people who acquire disabilities in later life? How does this help people who are disabled in accidents? Anyone can become disabled in their lifetime, and with our ageing population, more and more people will experience disability in old age. Starmer has created a two-tier benefits system. It's astonishing that a Labour Government would contemplate such cruel and inhuman cuts at all. However, we've seen over the past 11 months of Starmer in No.10 that he's nothing more than a Tory in Labour clothing. We don't know how these reforms will impact our society long term. But we do know now that disabled people are not safe, respected, or supported under Labour in Holyrood or Westminster.
Daily Record
38 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Labour contingent urged by Lanarkshire MSP not to back 'shameful' disability cuts
The SNP's Clare Adamson says they are 'playing games with people's lives' Motherwell and Wishaw MSP Clare Adamson is calling on Scotland's Labour MPs to stand up to Keir Starmer over "shameful" cuts to disability payments. The SNP MSP blasted the UK Government saying they are 'playing games with people's lives' ahead of a crunch vote on Labour plans to cut critical disability support. A vote on Labour's welfare Bill is due to come before Westminster on Tuesday and there is significant opposition to Labour's cuts. Ms Adamson has emphasised warnings that the Labour deal amounts to £3 billion in cuts and the creation of a two-tiered system. Labour's planned cuts will hit future claimants of PIP and the health element of Universal Credit, which the MSP says will 'punish' young and newly sick and disabled people. Disability Rights UK warned the newly proposed cuts to disability and sickness benefits will create 'a two-tiered' system. Speaking on Times Radio on Friday, Mikey Erhardt warned: 'The idea that you will be less in need, or less deserving of support depending on when the condition that necessitates that support, is something you just have to reject out and out'. The Scottish Government has confirmed it will not follow Labour's two-tiered system and it will protect Adult Disability Payments in Scotland. But Ms Adamson pointed out that any UK cuts will affect spending available in Scotland. She highlighted that Labour MPs in Scotland have failed to indicate if they back the Bill. Anas Sarwar has consistently backed Keir Starmer's disability cuts, but has yet to indicate how he will instruct Scottish Labour MPs to vote. Pamela Nash, Labour MP for Motherwell, Wishaw, and Carluke previously criticised cuts to disability welfare proposed under the Conservative government – arguing that such a move would disproportionately disabled people in her community. She has yet to speak out against Labour's cuts to disability welfare which will drive thousands into poverty, according to the UK Government's own figures. Ms Adamson, MSP for Motherwell and Wishaw, said: 'None of this sorry saga is about protecting or supporting sick and disabled people. Labour announced billions in welfare cuts, saving money on the backs of people who can't afford it. 'And now, at the 11th hour, after months of pressure from anti-poverty charities and disability groups, Keir Starmer has rushed through a deal to save himself. 'From the start, these proposals were not properly consulted upon. Labour needs to go back to the drawing board; disabled people affected by these cuts have been completely dismissed. 'Labour plans will create a discriminatory two-tier system which treats people with exactly the same condition in different ways - depending on when they became ill or disabled. 'That is senseless, unfair, and possibly unlawful. If the cuts are pushed through tomorrow, you had better not become sick or disabled in future because Labour has made it clear they won't support you. 'For the Labour MPs who found some principle and joined the chorus of backlash against these cuts, I'd urge you to hold firm. This hasty deal will drive poverty, deny opportunity, and deepen inequality for sick and disabled people. 'For Scottish Labour politicians who vowed to stand up to Keir Starmer, your silence is a rank betrayal of the people you're supposed to represent. Labour is rushing legislation through with backdoor deals – while disabled people are fearful for their future. "MPs must oppose these shameful cuts tomorrow because it is the right thing to do.' *Don't miss the latest headlines from around Lanarkshire. Sign up to our newsletters here.
