Waikato police officer makes 1700 off-duty database queries
By Al Williams, Open Justice reporter of
Photo:
123RF
A police officer made around 1700 checks of a person on the police database while off-duty for non-work-related reasons, claiming they believed doing so would make them a "good cop".
The Waikato officer's actions led to an investigation that involved an audit of their use of the database.
It identified around 1700 queries conducted by the officer between March 2023 to October 2024 while off-duty, according to a report by the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA).
The investigation found that, except for "a check that was probably work-related", the officer did not have a work-related reason for any of the queries.
As a result, it was found their actions breached police policy and the code of conduct.
The officer acknowledged that their use of the database was wrong.
They said the checks were for their own information, as they mistakenly believed it would make them a "good cop".
An employment process was undertaken to address the breaches.
The IPCA's investigation report said the authority oversaw the police investigation and agreed with the outcome, which was not mentioned in the report.
But the authority considered there was sufficient information available to suspect the officer had committed an offence under the Crimes Act by accessing the database for non-work-related reasons.
"Accordingly, the Authority recommended that Police conduct a criminal investigation as well as an employment investigation at the start of their process," the report said.
Relieving Waikato District Commander Superintendent Scott Gemmell said police considered the case did not meet the threshold for prosecution and the officer was subject to an employment process.
"NZ police rightly hold all staff to high standards. The misuse of the National Intelligence Application [NIA] is not tolerated and if an employee is found to have inappropriately accessed or misused information, a disciplinary process with appropriate sanctions will be applied."
However, Gemmell did not provide the outcome of the process.
"Police have the same privacy obligations as any employer, and as such, does not comment on individual employment matters."
He said police were focused on performance improvement and expectation setting and this year all staff had been "firmly" reminded that NIA searches must be conducted for legitimate work-related purposes only.
The IPCA's report came within days of it being revealed that
50 police employees snooped into the file
relating to the death of Senior Sergeant Lyn Fleming without good reason.
An Official Information Act request released to NZME confirmed there have been 76 instances of misuse of the database this year.
- This story originally appeared in the
New Zealand Herald
.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Ōtara Kāinga Ora tenant evicted after repeatedly abusing agency staff
By Catherine Hutton, Open Justice reporter of An Ōtara Kāinga Ora tenant has been evicted after the agency told him to remove his dogs from the property. Photo: Supplied / NZME A Kāinga Ora tenant has been evicted from his home after repeatedly becoming aggressive and yelling "f*** you" at staff when he was told to remove his dogs from the property. The agency applied to end Vena Funaki's period tenancy at the Ōtara house, arguing that he swore at staff, and was aggressive and intimidating. But to have Funaki's tenancy terminated by the Tenancy Tribunal, Kāinga Ora had to show three incidents of anti-social behaviour had occurred in three months. According to the tribunal's recent decision, it was able to do so. The first incident occurred in a Kāinga Ora office in September last year when Funaki met to discuss his dog allegedly attacking a tradesperson, as well as the condition of the property. As the meeting was coming to an end, Funaki yelled "f*** you" at two staff members and continued to use explicit language in the foyer as he left the building. Two weeks later, two Kāinga Ora staff visited the Bairds Road home to check the dogs had been removed, as discussed at the earlier meeting. The decision stated Funaki was aggressive when he answered the door and during the conversation, became agitated. He told the pair to "f*** off", the decision noted, describing Funaki as yelling and being aggressive and intimidating. A month later, on 31 October, two senior housing support managers visited the property after reports the dogs were still there, and again to discuss the condition of the house. Funaki told the pair he had the dogs and would challenge Kāinga Ora in court. The decision stated that as the pair left the property, Funaki used "unacceptable language", including yelling at them to "f*** off" and waving his arms. Funaki denied receiving two of three notices Kāinga Ora said it had fixed to his front door, as well as leaving a copy in his letterbox after each incident. The tribunal found Kāinga Ora had provided Funaki with the necessary written notice after each incident and hadn't acted in a retaliatory way. It ordered the tenancy to be terminated and for Funaki to be evicted. When approached by NZME about the case, Kāinga Ora said it did not comment on Tenancy Tribunal decisions but referred to information relating to disruptive behaviour on its website. That information stated that as of July last year, the agency had changed its approach to disruptive behaviour by its tenants. It noted this included working to understand what's driving the behaviour and referring tenants to specialist social and health services to address underlying issues if needed. However, if behaviour did not change, it would end tenancies and not offer the tenant another home, it stated. Data on its website showed that in the current financial year, 63 tenancies have been terminated without offering a tenant another home, compared to 12 in the year before. -This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Justice Minister proposes higher penalties for assaults against first responders
The proposed legislation was promised in National's coalition agreement with New Zealand First. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has proposed the introduction of higher penalties for people who assault first responders. Goldsmith's proposal would expand the current assault against police to also cover prison officers and all first responders. The new offence of assaulting a first responder with intent to injure would mean up to five years in prison - two years higher than the standard offence. Actually injuring them would carry a sentence of up to seven years and counts against the three strikes regime, which can impose mandatory minimum sentences. The proposed legislation was promised in National's coalition agreement with New Zealand First. More to come ... Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Sentencing reforms introduced cap potential discounts and bring new aggravating factors
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says the sentencing reforms were about restoring real consequences for crime. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Sentencing reforms which will cap discounts judges can give to an offender and introduce aggravating factors at sentencing, have come into effect as the government targets tougher crime consequences. The Labour Party says the move will only exacerbate an already clogged court system, add huge costs to the taxpayer by increasing the prison population, and will not reduce crime or the number of victims. But Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said the sentencing reforms, which came into effect on Sunday, were about restoring real consequences for crime. Communities and hardworking New Zealanders should not be made to live and work in fear of criminals who had a "flagrant disregard for the law, corrections officers and the general public", he said. "We know that undue leniency has resulted in a loss of public confidence in sentencing, and our justice system as a whole. We had developed a culture of excuses." The tougher stance was part of the government's plan to "restore law and order, which we know is working", he said. "It signals to victims that they deserve justice, and that they are our priority." The changes include: ACT MP Nicole McKee welcomed the new rules saying there had been a steady erosion of public confidence in the justice system. "Offenders faced fewer and shorter prison sentences, while communities paid the price." ACT MP Nicole McKee welcomed the new rules. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone She said police data showed a 134 percent increase in serious assault leading to injury from 2017 to 2023 under "Labour's failed experiment of being kind to criminals". "We've restored Three Strikes , and from today additional measures are coming into force to make the message even clearer." She said the vulnerability of people who worked alone or in a business attached to their home would be "recognised in law" thanks to ACT's coalition agreement to crack down on retail crime with the introduction of the aggravating factors. Labour's spokesperson for Justice Duncan Webb, however, said tough on crime sounded good but did not actually have the effect of reducing crime. "We've got to be smart on crime as well. We've got to address the causes of crime which we know are poverty, family violence, mental illness and addiction, and until we address those, there'll continue to be crime and there'll continue to be victims." Tougher sentences were just one option, he said. "If we're gonna be serious about reducing crime and reducing harm, we've got to address those causes of crime." Labour spokesperson for Justice Duncan Webb said tougher sentences were just one option. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver Evidence showed tough on crime initiatives such as the Three Strikes law, which the government had reinstated, did not reduce victims, Webb said. "Victims are absolutely central to the approach and the best thing we could ever have is avoiding someone becoming a victim and that means addressing the causes of crime before crime occurs. "And absolutely I understand that when people are victims of crime they want to see the perpetrator punished and that's the right thing to happen, but I'd rather see the appropriate amount of resources put into mental health, reducing poverty, [and] eliminating homelessness, because those are things that create crime and we've seen them all increase under this government." The fact white collar crime such as fraud - which was one of the few crimes that responded to deterrents - was not captured by Three Strikes was inconsistent, Webb said. Webb said he had sought feedback from those in the social services, intervention, and criminal justice sectors. "They're all frustrated with the fact the direction that's being taken is going to clog up the courts, it's going to create more offenders, it's going to create more victims and it's not actually going to address what we really want to address which is the things that cause crime." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
