Three accused skip summons by Special Investigation Team in liquor probe
Dhanunjaya Reddy
, former Officer on Special Duty (OSD) to the then Chief Minister's Office Krishnamohan Reddy, and Bharathi Cements director Govindappa Balaji—failed to appear before the
Special Investigation Team
(SIT) despite being served formal notices.The SIT, which summoned the trio for questioning based on evidence linking them to the
liquor scam
case, has intensified efforts to locate them after they skipped the scheduled inquiry.
Officials stated that the three were expected to provide critical information regarding alleged irregularities in liquor policy decisions and financial transactions during the previous government's tenure.According to sources, several attempts were made to contact the accused following the issuance of notices, but there has been no response.
The SIT is now considering stronger legal measures, including the issuance of fresh summons or seeking court directives to compel their appearance.The trio were recently added to the list of accused through a memo submitted to the ACB special court in Vijayawada. Their non-compliance has raised questions about their willingness to cooperate and has intensified scrutiny of their roles in the investigation.So far, 33 individuals have been named in the case, including high-profile political leaders, senior bureaucrats, and corporate executives. The primary accused is Raj Kesireddy (A1), with
YSRCP MP Peddireddy Mithun Reddy
and former MP V. Vijayasai Reddy also listed as co-accused. The SIT has already arrested four individuals and continues to probe a network of alleged kickbacks, money trails, and policy manipulation.With the trio evading questioning, SIT teams have been dispatched to multiple locations to trace their whereabouts, with intelligence inputs being gathered. Officials emphasised that failure to cooperate will be treated as a serious offense and may lead to further legal consequences, including potential arrest.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Mother's Day wishes
,
messages
, and
quotes
!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
State Govt Defends SIT Probe into APMC Corruption as Serving Farmers' Interests
Nagpur: The Maharashtra govt on Tuesday defended its decision to appoint a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe alleged corruption in Nagpur's Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), informing the Nagpur bench of Bombay high court that the law governing such bodies exists "for the benefit of farmers, not for the benefit of office-bearers. " Appearing for the state, government pleader Devendra Chauhan argued that while market committees are autonomous, they ultimately fall under the ambit of the state govt, which has the authority to oversee their functioning and order inquiries. "The APMC Act is not designed to protect office-holders but to safeguard farmers' interests. The argument that the Act bars the appointment of an SIT is untenable," Chauhan submitted. The SIT, headed by collector Dr Vipin Itankar, was tasked with investigating alleged irregularities by the APMC's board of directors. However, committee chairman Sheikh Ahmadbhai Karim Bhai and director Kishor Palandurkar challenged the probe through senior counsel Sunil Manohar and Ajay Ghare, contending it was unlawful. Manohar told the court that the cooperation department had already conducted two separate inquiries into the matter and that two related cases are still pending before the high court. He stressed that the disputed transactions — allocation of shops — took place in 2012 under a different executive committee, making it unfair to hold the current 2021 committee responsible. "The SIT order shows the state wants to investigate APMC's day-to-day functioning. While APMC is under the state's purview, it remains an autonomous body. This SIT is therefore illegal," Manohar said. The bench heard arguments from both sides and reserved its verdict, which is expected within a week.
NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
More Acquittals, Fewer Convictions: 5 Years Of Madhya Pradesh's Anti-Conversion Law
Bhopal: The first five and a half years of Madhya Pradesh's stringent anti-religious conversion law branded in political circles as the 'Love Jihad' law paint a picture far removed from its stated intent. What was introduced as a tough legal shield to stop forced conversions has, in reality, seen more accused walk free than end up behind bars. The Madhya Pradesh Religious Freedom Ordinance, brought into force in January 2020, and its successor, the Madhya Pradesh Religious Freedom Act, 2021, promised uncompromising action against religious conversions through coercion, deception, or marriage. Yet, the figures tabled by Chief Minister Mohan Yadav's government in the Assembly on Tuesday have shaken even seasoned political observers. Between January 1, 2020, and July 15, 2025, a total of 283 cases were registered across the state under the law. Of these 197 cases, nearly 70% are still pending in various courts. In the remaining 86 cases where trials have concluded or settlements have been reached, the numbers tell a story of collapsing prosecutions: 50 acquittals, just 7 convictions, and one case that ended in a mutual compromise. The convictions themselves are scattered. A lone life sentence in a case from Agar-Malwa's Nalkheda police station; a 10-year jail term in a Mandsaur case involving rape charges; two convictions from Dhar, and one each from Burhanpur and Rewa districts. So why is the law faltering in court? According to senior police sources, the primary reasons are flimsy evidence and hostile witnesses. In case after case, women initially presented as victims have told courts they entered into relationships or marriages with men of another religion of their own free will, living with them without fear or inducement. In some cases involving minors, families admitted that FIRs were filed under societal pressure, only to retract their statements later, dismantling the prosecution's case. The data also reveals troubling demographics. Out of the 283 cases, 71 victims were under the age of 18. Most incidents have emerged from the communally sensitive and tribal-dominated Malwa-Nimar region. Indore tops the list with 74 cases (26% of the total), followed by Bhopal (33), Dhar (13), Ujjain and Khandwa (12 each), Chhatarpur (11), and Khargone (10). The government has attempted to project renewed seriousness, informing the Assembly that in May this year it formed a state-level Special Investigation Team (SIT) to re-examine every case filed under the law so far. The Act itself prescribes harsh penalties: forced conversion can attract 1-5 years in prison and a fine up to Rs 25,000; if the victim is a minor, woman, or belongs to SC/ST, punishment rises to 2-10 years and a fine up to Rs 50,000; concealing religion before marriage can result in 3-10 years' imprisonment and a Rs 50,000 fine; and mass conversions carry 5-10 years in prison with fines up to Rs 1 lakh. Despite these provisions, the law's enforcement track record appears weak, a fact critics say undercuts its deterrent effect. And now, the political rhetoric is heating up again. In March, Chief Minister Mohan Yadav declared that the government is considering amending the Act to make 'Love Jihad' punishable by death, a move that would make Madhya Pradesh's legislation one of the harshest of its kind in the country.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
ED searches ex-IAS officer's residence in Rs 105cr SCERT scam
Guwahati: Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Tuesday carried out searches at the residential premises of retired IAS officer Sewali Devi Sharma and some of her accomplices in an alleged Rs 105-crore scam in the Assam State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT), official sources said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The chief minister's special vigilance cell arrested Sharma along with 20 others, including govt employees, RTI activists, and journalists, in May 2023 in connection with the case. Sharma was arrested from Rajasthan a few days after the case was lodged. The alleged misappropriation of the fund took place while imparting training to the schoolteachers and implementing the scheme under the ODL mode (Online Distance Learning mode) of SCERT, Assam. The case came to light in March 2023 after the CM's special vigilance cell registered a case based on the reports of the department of school education. The enquiry by the department of school education revealed that during her posting as the executive chairman and director of the SCERT from 2017 to 2020, she allegedly created five bank accounts without the necessary approvals from state govt, and she was the sole signatory. The report revealed that the Assam Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act was not followed in respect to the bank accounts. The retired IAS officer is also an accused in a case of amassing properties disproportionate to her known source of income. During the investigation, police found that she amassed disproportionate assets amounting to around Rs 6.5 crore. The state govt approved the creation of 59 institutions. However, the ex-IAS officer is alleged to have opened 347 study centres to "collect more funds".
