‘Fishing expedition': NPA criticised for trying to reopen Omotoso rape trial
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) believes that clarification from the courts regarding the acquittal of rape-accused Nigerian televangelist Timothy Omotoso could strengthen its case before the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA).
However, the defence rejected the move, accusing the state of trying to get the court to reconsider its decision.
The Eastern Cape High Court in Gqeberha on Monday began hearing the first phase of the state's application for leave to appeal.
The application follows Judge Irna Schoeman's April ruling, in which she acquitted Omotoso and his co-accused, Lusani Sulani and Zukiswa Sitho, on a range of charges following an eight-year trial.
The court found that the state had failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt and also criticised the poor quality of the prosecution.
Although the NPA is appealing the judgment, Omotoso has since left South Africa, having been declared a prohibited person by the Department of Home Affairs.
NPA seeks clarification on Omotoso acquittal
During proceedings, the state requested that Schoeman clarify the factual findings based on the evidence presented during the trial.
Alpa Bodlani, representing the NPA, stressed that the state was not asking the judge to revise or revisit her ruling.
'We want the clarification so that we may ask the court to reserve questions of law. But that's something that we intend to do once we have received the clarification,' he said.
The lawyer emphasised that the 2 April judgment stands.
ALSO READ: Batohi explains why NPA did not investigate prosecutors in 2021 Omotoso trial
Referring to precedent from another judgment, Bodlani explained that the SCA had outlined three requirements that must be met before a question of law can be reserved under the Criminal Procedure Act including the legal issue must be stated clearly, the underlying facts must be well-established, and the record must reflect both the facts and the legal question.
'Unless the state does this, the court continues. It may not be possible for an appeal court to establish certainty about what the conclusions made by the trial court and the legal court were.
'So when it is unclear from the judgment of the trial court what its findings of fact are, it is necessary for the state to request it to clarify its findings. If this is not done, the point of law is not properly reserved,' he explained.
Bodlani stressed that the state did not know what the factual findings are.
'We don't see those conclusions of that in the judgment.'
Gqeberha High Court: NPA Omotoso Appeal https://t.co/GtxZpsoVz1 — NPASouthAfrica (@NPA_Prosecutes) July 14, 2025
Defence strongly opposes NPA's request
In response, Omotoso's lawyer, Peter Daubermann, argued that Schoeman's ruling was final.
'You discharged your function and cannot now supplement, elaborate or revisit your factual findings,' he said.
Daubermann contended there was no legal mechanism for the NPA's request.
'The Criminal Procedure Act contains no provision expressed or implied allowing the state to request clarification of factual findings after an acquittal.
READ MORE: Omotoso acquittal points to NPA dysfunction, activists say
'The only possible mechanism would be Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Act, which the state has not invoked.
'There is no application to reserve a question of law and only today, as the state stated, an intention to do so.'
The lawyer accused the state of attempting to 'reverse engineer a factual finding in the hope that it might later justify an appeal'.
He maintained that the request for clarification is 'procedurally impermissible', adding that the judgment is not ambiguous.
'It is long, reasoned and careful.'
State accused of trying to reopen Omotoso rape trial
Daubermann further criticised the request, describing it as a 'retrospective fishing expedition'.
'It amounts to an impermissible attempt to reopen the trial, re-litigate the facts, and circumvent the acquittal under the guise of seeking clarity.'
He also argued that the state had missed the deadline to file an appeal.
'In terms of the Criminal Procedure Act, such an application had to be brought within a reasonable time. A reasonable time in the circumstances would be 21 days. It is now more than 90 days after judgment was delivered in this case.'
Moreover, Daubermann warned that granting the state's request would undermine legal certainty.
'If this type of application were entertained, it would mean that an accused person would never know whether the judgment is final, because any court, any judge or magistrate would be entitled to amplify the judgment. There would be no finality.'
Schoeman will deliver her verdict next Tuesday.
NOW READ: Batohi not worried about Omotoso's deportation as NPA plans to bring Gupta brothers back to SA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
10 hours ago
- eNCA
Security on high alert as Nigeria prepares to bury Buhari
ABUJA - Nigeria's former president Muhammadu Buhari was on Tuesday set to be buried in his hometown, as funeral preparations got underway under the watchful eyes of a hefty security detail. The former leader is set to be laid to rest in his family compound in the northwestern town of Daura, where chairs and tents have been set up in the courtyard to welcome mourners and his grave was being dug. The compound security was so tight that some extended family found themselves locked out, according to AFP journalists on the scene. Buhari, who died at the age of 82 in a London clinic on Sunday, ruled Nigeria first as a military putschist in the 1980s and then later as a self-described "converted democrat," serving two terms as president from 2013 to 2025. Residents of Daura have been making their way to his family home in Katsina state to pay their respects ahead of what is expected to be a traditional Islamic burial. But as his body made its way from England on Tuesday, a massive security presence was set up, cutting off what had been a bustling, buzzing house full of mourners over the past two days. Dozens of police and soldiers were guarding his family home Tuesday afternoon, while plainclothes officers patrolled inside. Deployed in advance of the politicians and other high-profile guests expected to attend, the heightened level of security was highly unusual for the typically sleepy town. Nigeria, particularly in the north, has for years suffered attacks from a jihadist insurgency and armed criminal gangs. Although he was elected on a mandate for change, Buhari's time in office failed to put an end to the violence. Family members locked out On Tuesday, security forces blocked the road to the family home, leaving mourners to make their way on foot. The main doors to the home were barred by armed troops, who were only letting in a handful of mourners. The only media access granted was to Nigerian state television, as well as the local Katsina state broadcaster. Even Buhari's family members found themselves locked out, including Fatima Isah, who said she was the ex-president's 78-year-old niece. "Buhari was my provider, but he is no more. To add to my torment, they have refused me entry," said Isah, in between sobs. A man who said he was the nephew of Buhari was denied access to the compound and hurled insults at the soldiers. "Are you the ones who are going to bury him?" he asked in a challenge to the guards, who ignored him. A security source told AFP that Buhari's remains will arrive by helicopter after landing at the Katsina airport. In the meantime, a crowd of more than 300 people had gathered outside the home in anticipation of the funeral prayers. abu/nro/sbk
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
Are Ramaphosa's commissions investigative action or political deflection?
Assessing the effectiveness of President Cyril Ramaphosa's commissions in tackling corruption Image: Jairus Mmutle/ GCIS Since taking office in 2018, President Cyril Ramaphosa has established numerous presidential commissions and task teams in South Africa. While these are intended to investigate corruption and address crises, critics argue that they serve as a costly substitute for decisive action, often leading to minimal progress. Ramaphosa's presidency has been marked by an unprecedented number of formal commissions of inquiry and ad hoc advisory bodies, costing millions of rand. Some critics suggest that this approach has prioritised investigations over prosecution, especially of politically connected individuals. Notable among these are the recent commissions into law enforcement corruption, apartheid-era prosecutions, and the state's response to COVID-19 procurement irregularities. For instance, earlier this week, Ramaphosa announced aims to investigate allegations of police corruption involving Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, national deputy commissioner Shadrack Sibiya, the judiciary, and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). The commission's establishment follows mounting public concern over the integrity of South Africa's law enforcement agencies and the government's ability to hold influential figures accountable. Since 2018, President Ramaphosa has established numerous task forces, committees, and commissions. Some of the most prominent include the Presidential Task Team on Military Veterans, led by the late Deputy President David Mabuza, which focuses on veteran welfare and the Zondo Commission. The Presidential Climate Finance Task Team tasked with mobilising funds for South Africa's energy transition, the National Logistics Crisis Committee, responsible for addressing infrastructure collapse and vandalism in logistics sectors, G20 Task Forces covering inclusive economic growth, food security, and artificial intelligence/data governance during South Africa's G20 presidency are among some of the commissions. In addition, several commissions of inquiry have been set up to probe sensitive issues, including the Inquiry into Law Enforcement Agencies and the Commission of Inquiry into Delayed TRC Prosecutions. Since 2018, more than eight commissions have been established, with some critics questioning their effectiveness. Opposition parties have been vociferous in their criticism. Vuyo Zungula, leader of the African Transformation Movement, argued that 'appointing commissions is often a way for the president to deflect public outrage rather than pursue real accountability.' Zungula strongly advocated utilising existing institutions like the Special Investigating Unit (SIU), which he believes has a proven track record of prosecuting corruption. Similarly, Mmusi Maimane, leader of Build One South Africa, has called for the revival of the now-disbanded 'Scorpions,' an elite police unit known for probing top political figures and corruption allegations. This entity was dissolved amid political controversy. Political analysts interpret Ramaphosa's extensive use of commissions as a strategic move. Dr Ntsikelelo Breakfast suggests that 'this is a well-calculated political response,' highlighting concerns over the pace and effectiveness of these investigations. 'While placing Mchunu on leave is a good move, he prolonged timelines of these commissions risk creating a sense of inertia,' Breakfast warned. Ian Cameron, chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Police, voiced a familiar frustration. 'We've seen this movie before. The Zondo Commission cost taxpayers billions, yet few of its recommendations have been implemented, and no kingpin is behind bars.' In response to mounting criticism of the commission to investigate police corruption, President Ramaphosa's spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, stated the government's commitment to transparency and accountability. 'The commission's reports will be delivered within strict timelines- an interim report within three months and a final report in six,' Magwenya stated. He added, "If any compelling evidence emerges during the process, it will be handed over to prosecuting authorities immediately.' Magwenya insisted that 'the President is not shielding anyone,' reaffirming Ramaphosa's stance that these investigations aim to uncover the truth and restore public confidence. [email protected] IOL Politics
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
Durban man declared unfit to stand trial for alleged murder of pro-Palestine woman
Murder accused Grayson James Beare has been declared unfit to stand trial. Image: Supplied / NPA The Durban Magistrate's Court on Tuesday learned that 45-year-old Grayson James Beare, charged with killing a Durban woman and attempting to kill her entire family for allegedly being pro-Palestine, has been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder and declared unfit to stand trial. Beare allegedly stabbed Halima Hoosen-Preston to death. He also faces two counts of attempted murder against Hoosen-Preston's husband, Shaun, and their 18-year-old son, Adam. On June 2, 2024, he allegedly stormed into the Preston home and attacked Halima, stabbing her 15 times in front of her family in the Glenmore area. Hoosen-Preston's 13-year-old daughter was not physically harmed during the attack. The Hoosen-Preston and Beare families resided in the building and were acquainted with each other. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading As Beare made a brief appearance in court, State senior prosecutor, Calvin Govender, told the court that a medical report from Fort Napier Psychiatric Hospital said Beare would not be able to follow court proceedings and instruct his attorney. Govender added that Beare had been declared unfit to stand trial. He said he would be discussing the report with the Director of Public Prosecutions. Additionally, Govender requested that the matter be referred to the regional court for an inquiry. 'From the available information, the accused was unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of his actions at the time of the alleged offence,' read the report. According to the report, Beare was admitted to this hospital on March 15, 2025, for mental evaluation. He was examined by two State psychiatrists, Dr S Shain and Dr S. V Moodley. During his stay at Fort Napier, Beare had psychiatric interviews, physical and neurological examinations, and a urine multi-drug screening. 'Throughout he was under constant observation by the psychiatric nursing staff,' the report stated. Additionally, the report also revealed that Beare has a tertiary degree and is divorced. Beare has been in custody since his arrest in 2024 and has not applied for bail as he has been waiting for his mental evaluation. His mental state became a point of contention following a State district surgeon's finding that he was fit to stand trial. At the time, his defence challenged this report in an application made in the court, on the basis that the accused had been a psychiatric patient for more than five years, adding that he was not fit to stand trial. The matter was postponed to August 15.
