Taylor Swift's MAGA mayhem! Fans fuming over cozy pic with right-wing podcasters
Pop Star
Taylor Swift
's newly released pictures with MAGA spewing podcasters has created a storm on the Internet, with fans now taking shots at her political fidelities
Taylor Swift and her boyfriend
Travis Kelce
were seen in a picture with podcasters Taylor Lewan and Will Compton. The photo was taken during Kelce's 'Tight End University' event in Nashville. In the picture, all four of them, Taylor, Travis, Lewan, and Compton,were flexing their muscles and posing seriously.
The podcast guys, Lewan and Compton, are known for their 'Bussin' With The Boys' show. These podcasters once posted a video of Donald Trump shaking their hands, writing 'Firm handshakes for The Boys and 47 🇺🇸,' showing their possible Trump support. Taylor Swift has supported Democrats before, so the internet was confused and shocked to see her with possible MAGA guys, as per the report by The Blast.
Fans got angry online
The photo went viral, and many Swifties were upset. A Reddit post called the podcasters 'Barstool MAGA influencer bros.' One fan on X wrote, 'The fact that Taylor now hangs with MAGA folks tells me all I need to know…' Another said, 'I need Tayvis to be over so bad. It has brought nothing but hanging out with MAGA', as stated by The Blast.
ALSO READ:
Did Ryan Reynolds buy his way onto Time magazine? Internet explodes over alleged PR stunt
Someone else joked that Taylor needs to 'wrap up this MAGA wag era.' A fan said she's not even releasing music to distract from the fact she's seen with right-wing people. BUT it's also said clearly, Lewan and Compton's actual political views are not confirmed, and they interview people from all political sides.
Live Events
Many fans stood by her. One said, 'Trump has been throwing tantrums about Taylor since 2019.' Another fan commented, 'So Taylor poses with a few NFL dudes and now she's MAGA? Come on.' Someone else said, 'How would she even know their politics? This is why I want her to break up with Travis', according to The Blast report.
Taylor & Travis are still going strong
Despite the backlash, Taylor and Travis looked happy and very into each other at the event. Even though Travis was busy hosting the event, he seemed super into Taylor the whole time.
Just recently, the couple made their red carpet debut after being together for over a year. A sweet photo showed Taylor with her arms around Travis's neck while he smiled big.
Taylor performed at the event
Taylor performed "Shake It Off" acoustically at the event. It was her first performance in months after her Eras Tour. NFL player George Kittle said she was 'fantastic' and that the small crowd of 1,000 people went wild. Kittle also shared that Taylor chose to sing and said, 'I think it might be fun to go sing 'Shake It Off,'' and everyone loved the idea, according to the report by The Blast.
FAQs
Q1. Why are Swifties mad about Taylor's photo with podcasters?
The podcasters are linked to MAGA, which upset fans since Taylor supports Democrats.
Q2. Are those podcasters really MAGA?
It's not confirmed, but they posted a video with Trump, causing the rumors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
32 minutes ago
- News18
Varun Dhawan Urges Media To Respect Privacy During Grief: 'Everyone Looks So Uncomfortable'
Last Updated: Varun Dhawan urged the media to cover celebrity deaths sensitively. His strong note comes after Shefali Jariwala's death on Friday night. Varun Dhawan penned a strong note, urging the media to cover a celebrity's final journey with the utmost sensitivity. Though he didn't name anyone in his post, the actor's note comes right after Shefali Jariwala's death on Friday night. He also added that this isn't the way someone would want their last journey to be covered. Varun Dhawan took to his Instagram stories and directly addressed paps and the media for their coverage of Shefali Jariwala's death. He wrote, 'Again one more passing of a soul being insensitively covered by the media. I just don't understand why do u have to cover someone's grief everyone looks so uncomfortable with this how is this benefitting anyone. My request to my friends in the media this isn't the way someone would want their final journey covered." Take a look: This comes after photos and videos of Shefali's husband, Parag Tyagi, and her parents crying inconsably during the last rites were widely circulated on the Internet. Earlier today, Parag was spotted bidding his wife a final goodbye as he immersed her ashes into the sea. After Shefali's funeral, a devastated Parag appeared in front of the media and requested privacy with folded hands. He also said, 'Meri pari ke liye pray kijiyega aap sab log, please." Parag was surrounded by police personnel while he urged the media to pray for Shefali's soul to rest in peace. How did Shefali Jariwala die? Shefali Jariwala passed away late Friday night, between June 27 and 28. She was rushed to Bellevue Multispeciality Hospital in Mumbai by husband Parag Tyagi, and three close aides. She was declared brought dead. Shatrughan, the watchman of Shefali Jariwala's residential society, recounted the events that unfolded on the night of her death. He shared that Shefali was taken to the hospital around 10:30 pm on Friday. Still in shock, he remembered seeing Shefali and her husband Parag Tyagi just the evening before, casually walking their dog in the compound. 'It was just like any other day," he said, adding, 'I couldn't believe it when I heard on Friday night that she had passed away." Shatrughan, the security guard on duty, recounted the events of Friday night. While speaking with NDTV, he mentioned, 'Around 10:30 at night, Shefali ji was taken to the hospital. Before that, at around 9 PM, her husband Parag Tyagi came to the society on a motorcycle. I was the one who opened the gate." Initial reports of Shefali's death claimed she died of cardiac arrest. However, Mumbai Police stated that her body was found in her apartment and her mortal remains were sent to Cooper Hospital for a postmortem. The reason behind her death couldn't be confirmed as yet. First Published:
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
How Zohran Mamdani's win in New York City mayoral primary could ripple across the US
Lincoln Mitchell, Columbia University Top Republicans and Democrats alike are talking about the sudden rise of 33-year-old Zohran Mamdani, a state representative who won the Democratic mayoral primary in New York on June 24, 2025, in a surprising victory over more established politicians. While President Donald Trump quickly came out swinging with personal attacks against Mamdani, some establishment Democratic politicians say they are concerned about how the democratic socialist's progressive politics could harm the broader Democratic Party and cause it to lose more centrist voters. New York is a unique American city, with a diverse population and historically liberal politics. So, does a primary mayoral election in New York serve as any kind of harbinger of what could come in the rest of the country? Amy Lieberman, a politics and society editor at The Conversation US, spoke with Lincoln Mitchell, a political strategy and campaign specialist who lectures at Columbia University, to understand what Mamdani's primary win might indicate about the direction of national politics. Does Mamdani's primary win offer any indication of how the Democratic Party might be transforming on a national level? Mamdani's win is clearly a rebuke of the more corporate wing of the Democratic Party. I know there are people who say that New York is different from the rest of the country. But from a political perspective, Democrats in New York are less different from Democrats in the rest of country than they used to be. That's because the rest of America is so much more diverse than it used to be. But if you look at progressive politicians now in the House of Representatives and state legislatures, they are being elected from all over – not just in big cities like New York anymore.
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" Clears 1st US Senate Hurdle, A Look At What's In It
WASHINGTON: Senate Republicans voting in a dramatic late Saturday session narrowly cleared a key procedural step as they race to advance President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks, spending cuts and bolstered deportation funds by his July Fourth deadline. The tally, 51-49, came after a tumultuous night with Vice President JD Vance at the Capitol to break a potential tie. Tense scenes played out in the chamber as voting came to a standstill, dragging for more than three hours as holdout senators huddled for negotiations, and took private meetings off the floor. In the end, two Republicans opposed the motion to proceed, joining all Democrats. There's still a long weekend of work to come. The 940-page "Big Beautiful Bill" was released shortly before midnight Friday, and senators are expected to grind through all-night debate and amendments in the days ahead. If the Senate is able to pass it, the bill would go back to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. Here's the latest on what's in the bill. There could be changes as lawmakers negotiate. Tax cuts are the priority Republicans say the bill is crucial because there would be a massive tax increase after December when tax breaks from Trump's first term expire. The legislation contains roughly $3.8 trillion in tax cuts. The existing tax rates and brackets would become permanent under the bill. It temporarily would add new tax breaks that Trump campaigned on: no taxes on tips, overtime pay or some automotive loans, along with a bigger $6,000 deduction in the Senate draft for older adults who earn no more than $75,000 a year. It would boost the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 under the Senate proposal. Families at lower income levels would not see the full amount. A cap on state and local deductions, called SALT, would quadruple to $40,000 for five years. It's a provision important to New York and other high tax states, though the House wanted it to last for 10 years. There are scores of business-related tax cuts. The wealthiest households would see a $12,000 increase from the legislation, which would cost the poorest people $1,600 a year, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis of the House's version. Middle-income taxpayers would see a tax break of $500 to $1,500, the CBO said. Money for deportations, a border wall and the Golden Dome The bill would provide some $350 billion for Trump's border and national security agenda, including $46 billion for the U.S.-Mexico border wall and $45 billion for 100,000 migrant detention facility beds, as he aims to fulfill his promise of the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history. Money would go for hiring 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, with $10,000 signing bonuses and a surge of Border Patrol officers, as well. The goal is to deport some 1 million people per year. The homeland security secretary would have a new $10 billion fund for grants for states that help with federal immigration enforcement and deportation actions. The attorney general would have $3.5 billion for a similar fund, known as Bridging Immigration-related Deficits Experienced Nationwide, or BIDEN, referring to former Democratic President Joe Biden. To help pay for it all, immigrants would face various new fees, including when seeking asylum protections. For the Pentagon, the bill would provide billions for ship building, munitions systems, and quality of life measures for servicemen and women, as well as $25 billion for the development of the Golden Dome missile defense system. The Defense Department would have $1 billion for border security. How to pay for it? Cuts to Medicaid and other programs To help partly offset the lost tax revenue and new spending, Republicans aim to cut back some long-running government programs: Medicaid, food stamps, green energy incentives and others. It's essentially unraveling the accomplishments of the past two Democratic presidents, Biden and Barack Obama. Republicans argue they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and food stamps, including older people up to age 65. Parents of children 14 and older would have to meet the program's work requirements. There's also a proposed new $35 co-payment that can be charged to patients using Medicaid services. Some 80 million people rely on Medicaid, which expanded under Obama's Affordable Care Act, and 40 million use the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program. Most already work, according to analysts. All told, the CBO estimates that under the House-passed bill, at least 10.9 million more people would go without health coverage and 3 million more would not qualify for food stamps. The Senate proposes a $25 billion Rural Hospital Transformation Program to help offset reduced Medicaid dollars. It's a new addition, intended to win over holdout GOP senators and a coalition of House Republicans warning that the proposed Medicaid provider tax cuts would hurt rural hospitals. Both the House and Senate bills propose a dramatic rollback of the Biden-era green energy tax breaks for electric vehicles. They also would phase out or terminate the various production and investment tax credits companies use to stand up wind, solar and other renewable energy projects. In total, cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy programs would be expected to produce at least $1.5 trillion in savings. Trump savings accounts and so, so much more A number of extra provisions reflect other GOP priorities. The House and Senate both have a new children's savings program, called Trump Accounts, with a potential $1,000 deposit from the Treasury. The Senate provided $40 million to establish Trump's long-sought "National Garden of American Heroes." There's a new excise tax on university endowments. A $200 tax on gun silencers and short-barreled rifles and shotguns was eliminated. One provision bars money to family planning providers, namely Planned Parenthood, while $88 million is earmarked for a pandemic response accountability committee. Another section expands the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, a hard-fought provision from Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, for those impacted by nuclear development and testing. Billions would go for the Artemis moon mission and for exploration to Mars. The bill would deter states from regulating artificial intelligence by linking certain federal AI infrastructure money to maintaining a freeze. Seventeen Republican governors asked GOP leaders to drop the provision. Additionally, a provision would increase the nation's debt limit, by $5 trillion, to allow continued borrowing to pay already accrued bills. What's the final cost? Altogether, keeping the existing tax breaks and adding the new ones is expected to cost $3.8 trillion over the decade, the CBO says in its analysis of the House bill. An analysis of the Senate draft is pending. The CBO estimates the House-passed package would add $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficits over the decade. Or not, depending on how one does the math. Senate Republicans are proposing a unique strategy of not counting the existing tax breaks as a new cost because those breaks are already "current policy." Senators say the Senate Budget Committee chairman has the authority to set the baseline for the preferred approach. Under the Senate GOP view, the tax provisions cost $441 billion, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. Democrats and others say this is "magic math" that obscures the true costs of the GOP tax breaks. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget puts the Senate tally at $4.2 trillion over the decade.
