Transgender netball player hits back after being banned from Victorian league
Manawa Aranui, who transitioned after previously competing in men's netball, was told she could no longer take the court for Melton Central Football and Netball Club in the Riddell District Netball League (RDNL).
The ruling followed a threat from neighbouring club Melton South, which said it would forfeit matches if Aranui or her fellow transgender teammate were allowed to play.
The club cited concerns over player safety.
On Wednesday, the RDNL confirmed the ban under Section 42 of the Sex Discrimination Act, which permits sporting bodies to restrict participation where strength, stamina, or physique is considered a material factor.
The league's statement triggered an impassioned public response from Aranui, who posted to Facebook criticising both the ruling and the motivations behind it.
'I've sat quietly long enough while this narrative brewed and I've been dragged — publicly and without consent — into a conversation where both my character and identity have been attacked,' she wrote.
'This won't be a long novel — because frankly, these bigots don't deserve my time or energy ... Melton South Football Netball Club and your Netball Coordinator/players: you're entitled to your opinions, but let's clear some things up.
'Your head coach tried to recruit me to play for your club. Yes — YOUR HEAD COACH TRIED TO RECRUIT ME.'
Aranui shared what she claimed was a screenshot of text messages from a Melton South official, appearing to ask whether she'd be open to playing A-grade next season 'depending on the rules.'
Now banned, she says her gender identity only became an issue when she wasn't on their team.
'You've played six quarters against me — AND we played all season last year alongside each other for Glen Orden — suddenly NOW I'm 'dangerous'?' she wrote.
'Apparently now, I run full-speed into players and knock them over? We have two umpires on the court to keep the game safe. If I had done what you claim, wouldn't I have been warned, penalised, or reprimanded?'
She insists she has not received a single caution in any competition.
'You're entitled to believe it's 'unfair' for cis women to compete against transgender women. That's your opinion. But the lies? They need to stop.
'You're not out here protecting women's sport. You're being malicious, using false narratives to mask your bigotry and personal agendas behind the guise of 'safeguarding women's spaces.''
She claims the online abuse had been damaging.
'You've spread stories, targeted me, and enabled me to become the sole focus of online abuse and sideline harassment … I hope you're proud of that. And I hope no child in your families ever has to endure what you've subjected me to,' she said.
The RDNL's decision followed the circulation of video footage showing Aranui colliding with a Romsey player.
Netball Victoria has confirmed it is investigating, saying it engaged an independent expert to assess the concerns raised by clubs and players.
In 2018, Netball Victoria amended its bylaws to allow transgender and non-binary players to compete in female competitions based on self-identified gender.
The move aligned with national guidelines developed with organisations such as Proud 2 Play and the Australian Sports Commission (ASC).
Under the Sex Discrimination Act, sports may restrict participation if safety or competitive fairness concerns are objectively proven. But outside those exemptions, gender identity cannot be used to exclude athletes.
The ASC guidelines state: 'It is important that sporting bodies … reflect the diversity in the communities they are a part of, and that together, we ensure every person is treated with respect and dignity and protected from discrimination.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
20 minutes ago
- ABC News
Australia's productivity roundtable should consider what actually makes life harder
Only a fortnight to go before the Treasurer's National Economic Reform Roundtable! With submissions rolling in to the Canberra summit, the nation finds itself in the exciting middle stage of our triphasic national economic policy cycle: "Let A Thousand Flowers Bloom". That is to say, we've moved past Phase One (Grumbling About Why Politicians Don't Do Bold Reform Anymore) and are enjoying the brief efflorescence of Big Ideas before we initiate Phase Three (Methodically Weed-Killing Every Single One Because They All Make Someone Sad). See also: Kevin Rudd's 2020 Summit, Tony Abbott's 2013 Budget, Malcolm Turnbull's Ideas Boom, and whatever it was that Scott Morrison was going to do before the world caught the spicy cough. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has valiantly called for participants to bring budget-neutral ideas that are not motivated by sectoral self-interest. But these are hard habits to kick, and in the Big Ideas so far submitted, the customary palimpsest of tax reform is already evident; big business has some compelling ideas for how they could pay less tax, the unions for how they could pay more, and so on. Here's a submission outlining how we could have more of the things we like, and how those things could be funded by taxing more of the things you like. Thank you, the end. Carbon pricing! A cashflow tax! Retooled R&D incentives! Taxes broadened! Tax rates flattened! If there's one sector where productivity isn't a problem right now, it's economists with big ideas writing beefy submissions on how to address the nation's productivity rate, curving gently earthward these last ten hectic years. Submissions no ordinary citizen will read. Why would we? Productivity is something only economists understand, like the non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment, or the difference between real and nominal GDP. But what if the conversation about productivity didn't start at an economics reform summit? What if it started in the nation's kitchens? At the school gate? In the dentist's waiting room? Because that's where a huge chunk of Australia's productivity gains could be made. And where some of the least-acknowledged productivity engines in the country currently lose a lot of time blowing smoke. What if we reframed our way of talking about drags on productivity so that you wouldn't need an economics degree to whistle along? Even the term "productivity drag" is deceptive. It is, literally, a human phenomenon in economic drag. What it really means, in the baldest terms, is "headache-inducing and unnecessary complication that gets in the way of getting sh*t done." So if we're going to be in the business of asking big questions, let's make sure we ask not just the big economic questions, but the big human ones. Remembering that they're not always the same thing. Questions like: Why does the school day end at 3pm, when in the vast majority of households with two parents and kids aged under 14, both parents now work? In the 1970s, only 40 per cent of such families had both parents in employment. The more common arrangement — in 55 per cent of households even by the late 70s — was that dad worked, and mum took care of the rest. But today, in 73 per cent of two-parent families, mum and dad both work. Which means we are now running a national economy where the backup plan for sick days, school pick-up, dental appointments, and Oh-My-God-I-Forgot-My-Book-Week-Costume is… Well. It's a matter of day-to-day improvisation. And while the human brain's relentless capacity for innovation has coughed up artificial intelligence, and seamless transition to a new iPhone, and a means of firing Katy Perry into space, it hasn't managed to work out a stress-free way of getting a child's teeth looked at in the middle of the day at a dentist across town, with extra time for janky online approvals at both ends to bounce the juvenile owner-operator of the teeth from the custody of the school, plus traffic. Nor can we design a human interface for the Australian aged care system that enables a normally intelligent adult to look after an elderly parent without taking six months off work and feeling like they're the first human on earth to attempt the task. This is a failure of economic design. A brutal one. Because in this country while we have umpteen trained theorists looking at in-built incentives in the tax system or whatever, we still haven't found a way of absorbing the fact that one in seven school children will require mental health assistance every calendar year in Australia, and adding another fact — that children seeking assistance from a trained mental health professional currently wait an average 99 days for an appointment — and deciding that in total this amounts to a national productivity issue. Who's spending hours on the phone chasing appointments for these children? Losing sleep worrying about them, and standing in as best they can in the meantime? Who's forcing themselves through snowdrifts of confusing paperwork for NDIS registration or in-home care or even just the daily Sisyphean task of finding clean socks, or the shirt without the weird paint stain because everyone just remembered it's school photo day? We know who's doing it. Australian Institute of Family Studies researcher Jennifer Baxter asked perceptive questions during her COVID-era research and elicited evidence that in around 78 per cent of heterosexual couples, mum is carrying most or all of the mental load. Every family is different, of course. Many will buck the trend. (Including mine! I'm finishing this column in peace, in a busy week, because my other half has prepped dinner in advance.) But there's no doubt at all about the broader pattern here. Australian women are better educated than their male counterparts, live longer, do more unpaid work and — where they do get paid for work — get paid less than men. In productivity terms, they are a powerhouse waiting to happen. They account for 70 per cent of the part-time work in Australia, and 70 per cent of the housework. Usually, the flexibility of the former facilitates the accomplishment of the latter. Australian women work part-time at internationally-remarkable rates so that they can manage the unpaid work that is still generally understood to be their responsibility. In New South Wales' Public Instruction Act of 1880 — the legislative instrument that established the secular public education system in Australia's largest state and set the school hours that are unchanged to this day — the assumptions are magnificently broad. For instance, clause 79 of the accompanying regulatory schedule provides that: "In schools containing female children but no female teacher, it will be the duty of the teacher's wife to teach needlepoint to the girls during at least four hours in each week." It's funny to read this antiquated text. But also, it's worth remembering that the assumptions underpinning school hours have not changed since 1880. This is kind of wild. And as fast as our assumptions about the rest of the world are changing, there isn't much change to the assumption that women will pick up the extra slack when it comes to caring for other humans, young or old. It's proper work, in that it requires dedication and expertise, and it's not rendered less valuable economically by the mere fact of being powered by love and concern. But because we don't count this work using the usual economic measure (ie, paying for it), it sometimes escapes conventional calculations and is just assumed to happen magically, as if fairies do it. Imagine what could be achieved if the productivity drags were removed from the life of the juggling parent! Imagine — for instance — if schools were serviced by dedicated teams of dentists and psychologists and speech pathologists who were right there to help kids exactly when they needed help! Imagine if managing all this was easy, instead of hard! Imagine if sports and activities were part of the school day, towards the end, so that parents could get their work done and pick up kids who'd made it to footy without having to be ferried there by a distracted parent trying to do a Zoom at the same time, or fretting about having to double back to work later? Productivity is an economic concept, but it's fired — or should be fired — by the universal human experience of being driven mad by unnecessary bullsh*t that makes life harder. Let's lean in to it!
ABC News
20 minutes ago
- ABC News
Palestinian-Australian principal takes six months' stress leave after more than 100 family members die in Gaza
In his lush Gold Coast backyard, Sami Muamar is haunted by a nightmare that's set a world away in Gaza. In a recurring dream, he's safe in Australia while his sister and extended family are drowning in hellfire. "It is literally hell. Hell, because they live in a tent, there is no clean water, and in the tent, it's hot, they can't even have air," said Mr Muamar, the principal at one of Australia's largest Islamic schools on the south side of Brisbane. Every time he picks up his phone, he receives reminders that his family back home is living on a cup of lentils a day — if they're lucky — and he dreams of being able to rescue them. "It's just a nightmare and it's not for one week, two weeks, three weeks. It is for almost two years," he said. Mr Muamar has tried unsuccessfully to secure his sister a visa to join him in Australia and while he sends money overseas, he's wracked with guilt and helplessness that he's not doing more. "When I look at the group chat, I think of my sister, and I can show you her photos, I talked to her the other day, she's skin and bone from hunger, there's no food," Mr Muamar said. "I said, 'What do you eat?' And she started crying." Mr Muamar said he stopped counting the numbers of his extended family who have been killed in the conflict when the total reached 130. He provided the ABC with names for 112 relatives and said all but one had been killed in air strikes. The ABC was able to verify that 103 of those names are listed on a Gaza Ministry of Health database, which contains the names of 58,380 people reportedly killed during the conflict. The database comes with the disclaimer it does not include all of those to die in the conflict. A devout Muslim, Mr Muamar is comforted by his belief that his dead relatives are being cared for in the afterlife, but that's no solace for the living. "The loss is not only for my family, it is for every single family actually. I know people in Brisbane that lost similar numbers to us." Mr Muamar left the Gaza strip in 2002 and said he had no "real connection" with some of his lost relatives. Others, like his cousin Tamim Abu Muammar, he's known since birth and their deaths cut to the bone. Tamim Muammar, his wife and three daughters were reportedly killed in an Israeli air strike while his two young sons survived. "He's the one I grew up with, we played together when we were children, we [went] to school together and he was a really good man," Mr Muamar said. "It hit me so much when I lost him, it's just really difficult to think of him, his wife, his kids, they are like five years old." Another cousin, Salih Mahmood Muamar, was among 14 paramedics killed and buried in a mass grave in March. An Israeli investigation led to the sacking of a deputy commander and a report detailing "professional failures". For Mr Muamar and many others in Australia, these deaths are observed in real time on family group chats. Two weeks ago, he received blow-by-blow updates about his nephew Ahmed Mahmoud Muamar, also a teacher, who was buried under rubble after leaving his tent to seek food. "My nephew … went to go get a kilo or two kilos of flour from the Israeli-American humanitarian station, they call it, and while he was going home — he did not get anything — he is shelled with the rockets," Mr Muamar said. "Luckily he managed to get out of the rubble after six or seven hours, they got him out. He lost two of his kneecaps, two broken legs, lots of bruises." He said that final sleepless night waiting for an update was, "the straw that broke the camel's back". After 22 months of war, Mr Muamar is exhausted and has reluctantly stepped down as principal to restore his mental health after struggling to sleep and focus. He wants the wider community to know other Palestinian Australians are suffering and is speaking up because the current war seems interminable. "What has been happening is literally a genocide. It is an ethnic cleansing," Mr Muamar said. "At the beginning I understand the reaction of Israel, I understand it's a normal revenge." Israel has denied allegations of genocide and ethnic cleansing. An estimated 50 Israeli hostages remain in Gaza, fewer than half of whom are believed to be alive, kidnapped in the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, that started the war. Dr Mohamed Mustafa is a Palestinian Australian and one of the few people in Australia who has seen the destruction inside Gaza. The trainee doctor just returned from the second of two visits since the start of the war volunteering as an emergency doctor. "You're working in a concentration camp, no food, no water, no electricity. You're not allowed to bring in medical supplies with you, 2,000-pound bombs are going off hundreds of metres away from you," Dr Mustafa said. Dr Mustafa also has a wife in Gaza and knows the pain of searching for updates on loved ones. "We have times where the communication goes down for three days and you just look at the news and you see where the bombs drop," Dr Mustafa said. "To watch it unfold in real time, to watch it live-streamed on our phones, I don't think anyone has been in this unique position to watch the destruction of their families and their homes … it makes it very hard to be a Palestinian." Dr Mustafa said his community feels dehumanised by their representation in the media. Back at the Islamic College of Brisbane, CEO Dr Ali Kadri supports Mr Muamar's decision, even though the school starts term three without its principal. Mr Kadri is a leader in his community who turned down an approach to be the federal government's Islamophobia envoy. He said it was an important time to recognise the suffering in parts of the Australian community. He said the most important thing people can do now is empathise. Back at Mr Muamar's house, he's retreated to his garden and is hoping he'll find some peace. "When you plant a seed and you see it coming back it gives you hope of life," Mr Muamar said. "What I've seen of Gaza, it's destructive. I have hope of planting a seed and making something new. It makes you think there is hope for coexistence."
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Automatic systems unlawfully cancelled 964 jobseekers' payments in two years, watchdog finds
Almost a thousand jobseekers had their income support payments unlawfully terminated over two years, the federal watchdog has found, cautioning the breach likely had a "profound if not catastrophic" impact on vulnerable people. The cancellations occurred automatically under the Targeted Compliance Framework, a system set up to monitor "mutual obligations", which are the conditions people have to meet to continue receiving payments, like job hunting and attending interviews. New laws introduced after the Robodebt scandal require agencies to consider the jobseeker's circumstances before cutting off a payment, which did not occur in 964 cancellations between April 2022 and July 2024. "Imagine that if you were already living under the poverty line, so you can't necessarily afford to pay rent, to feed yourself, to clothe yourself, but imagine then that that income is cut off for four weeks or more," Commonwealth Ombudsman Iain Anderson said. "What are you supposed to do? That's the type of catastrophe that we are talking about." The Department of Employment and Workplace Relations paused the cancellation of payments in July last year, but the watchdog found it took too long to act after identifying the issue. It then informed the Commonwealth Ombudsman in December that it had not implemented the new legislation, which was passed two years earlier, sparking an investigation into how the lapse occurred. In his findings, the Ombudsman invoked conclusions from the Robodebt royal commission that warned automated processes in the delivery of support payments can have serious impacts on highly vulnerable people. "[The Robodebt royal commissioner] noted that automation requires a lot of care and skill to make sure that things don't go wrong," Mr Anderson said. "And while this is not the same as Robodebt, in that it wasn't a deliberate intention of doing things wrongly, there just wasn't the adequate care and skill being employed to ensure parliament's instructions in terms of the legislation were properly implemented." The department was involved in developing the new laws, according to the Ombudsman, which shifted the requirement from the secretary "must" cancel payments to "may" if they determine the recipient failed to meet their obligations without an acceptable excuse. "That big change required the individual circumstances of each jobseeker to be considered before their payment was cancelled, and that's the step that they didn't do — instead the system went on automatically cancelling payments," he said. The report makes seven recommendations, including that the department not resume cancellations until the errors have been corrected and that systems are put in place to provide ongoing assurance that the framework complies with the law. All the recommendations be accepted by the department and Services Australia. The Ombudsman is also investigating whether the decision-making process that leads to cancellations is fair and reasonable, and the role of employment agencies, with the findings to be released in a second report later this year. Under the framework, recipients accrue demerit points if they fail to meet their obligations without a valid reason, which can lead to their payments being suspended, reduced or cut off. More than 883,000 Australians are currently on the scheme, according to government data. A separate review by Deloitte into the framework's computer system — which was completed in June but is yet to be publicly released — found it had become "increasingly unstable, with volatility directly impacting compliance function operation" and increasing the possibility of unexpected results "including flawed determinations". Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth did not respond to a request for comment.
