logo
The Seventh Wave: How AI Will Change The Technology Industry

The Seventh Wave: How AI Will Change The Technology Industry

Forbesa day ago
The Seventh Wave: How AI Will Change The Technology Industry
My professional career has spanned six major tech changes: minicomputer, PC, internet, social, mobile, and cloud. Each of these revolutions brought a wave of new providers and destroyed swaths of legacy companies. Now comes the Seventh Wave of major tech change, driven by AI in its modern forms — generative and agentic.
In the '80s and '90s, when faced with a new wave, the legacy tech companies would freeze in the headlights or double down on their suddenly obsolete business models. This allowed new players to gain traction and redefine industries. So the mainframe players largely crumbled in the face of minicomputers, and the minicomputer industry was decimated by the PC. Executives back then were not learning-mindset thinkers, and they defaulted to stonewalling and then responding, but too late. Yes, Wang Laboratories and Digital Equipment did build PCs, but the new market had already been formed. Schumpeterian creative destruction held court.
Then came Clay Christensen and 'The Innovator's Dilemma' — a book that succinctly stated how legacy companies get stuck in their old expensive business model and are bypassed by cheap newcomers. The incumbents protect the fort until the fort is worthless (cliche cf. Kodak).
The new tech guard read Christensen's book. Starting around the turn of the millennium, they began to deploy four legacy defensive strategies when faced with a paradigm change: 1) Buy the interlopers (cf. Instagram, WhatsApp); 2) Block the new wave with regulation, pricing, packaging, consortia, and partnerships (cf. Partnership on AI); 3) Pretend that you are part of the new era (cf. Agentforce); and 4) Link existing dominant products with new offerings to keep challengers at bay (cf. embedding Copilot in Office). These strategies are not always successful, but they are far more effective than the old 'Deny and die' stance of the previous generation of executives.
Will these strategies work for the legacy tech companies as the AI revolution intensifies? Here's my take on what lies ahead.
The Enterprise Software Business
Before AI ever showed up, this tech sector had three problems:
Against this sour backdrop comes AI, which offers three threats to the software industry:
Will buyers listen to these pitches? CEOs and business leaders certainly will — they are desperate for more agility. But development staffs and CIOs who have staked their careers and skill sets on legacy systems will resist. Business is ready to move on; technology teams will drag their feet.
So the enterprise software business won't change quickly, especially as the incumbents deploy their typical arsenal of weapons to defend their positions — Buy, Block, Pretend, and Link. But the promise of AI computing is going to make this old vs. new battle very hard fought.
The Impact On Other Tech Sectors
While software will be most changed by AI, there will be impact across the breadth of the industry.
AI needs cycles, so the hardware segment will get a very big boost from this wave. Yes, there will be a transition away from CPUs to GPUs, and the NVIDIA stranglehold will take another 12 to 15 months to break, but systems from cloud to laptops will be vastly stimulated by this change. Expect this business to grow in the 8%-10% range per year over the next five years.
Technology services, which has been under massive pressure since 2023 due to over-expansion in the 2021–22 timeframe, will experience whiplash from AI. On one hand, the legacy software systems that PwC, Deloitte, and others have implemented for decades and that comprise much of their expertise, will be challenged in the short term and shrink in the long term. Simultaneously, there will be massive demand for expertise in AI. Cognizant, Capgemini, and others will be called on to help companies implement AI computing systems and migrate away from legacy vendors. Forrester believes that the tech services sector will grow by 3.6% in 2025 — I believe that rate could increase to 5% to 6% per year from 2026 to 2030 — driven by AI.
Forrester has telecommunication and communications equipment growing 1.5% and 0.8% globally in 2025. These growth rates could be doubled in the upcoming years by the movement of prompts and answers between users and AI data centers. Yes, there will be good distilled systems sitting on laptops and in edge computing, but at least 70% of AI computing will run off private and public clouds. The Seventh Wave will require and will stimulate communications and network investments and infrastructure.
The Cool Kids
How will AI impact the big five consumer tech companies?
Alphabet/Google. Indexed search is dying, and Google is struggling to reformulate its advertising business to operate in the Seventh Wave. Advertising is like Keith Richards and cockroaches — it will never go away — it evolves and persists. So yes, the surveillance business model will be recreated in the AI world and Google will pull out all stops to retain a portion of its hegemony in that space. Look for Alphabet to deploy the Buy and Link defensive strategies — vacuuming up promising AI advertising startups and offering discounting and packaging deals to extant search customers that want to experiment with the Google AI advertising platform. Three advantages that the company will attempt to leverage are its cloud position, extensive training data, and its deep expertise in generative (remember that Google invented the transformers that make this technology possible).
Meta/Facebook. The images and data that users dump into Facebook on a daily basis give Meta a big training advantage. And Meta AI, because it is embedded in Facebook (and other properties), has over 1 billion users — more than any other LLM. But the company's platform will be challenged by newcomers introducing AI social solutions that will steal users and reformulate the rules of social media — bringing higher trust, faster learning, escape from the Facebook algorithm, better summarizing of daily and weekly content, and better automated moderation. Expect Meta to use all four defensive strategies to defend its citadel — with an emphasis on linking its existing advertising offerings to prevent advertisers from migrating to new AI platforms. The 'Move fast and break things' culture at Meta will engender a particularly chaotic and at times desperate posture as it subordinates customer interests in favor of gaining strategic high ground in the new era.
Amazon. As the Seventh Wave e-commerce world emerges, Amazon will use its hyperdominant retail and cloud position to attempt to aggressively box out challengers. AI commerce will bypass the Web in favor of direct-to-consumer apps and hyperpersonalization, but expect Amazon to attempt to obsolete itself and lead that revolution. Look for the company to deploy the Buy, Block, and Link strategies in the face of challengers and, most importantly, to use its dominance in cloud to finance innovative forays into new AI ground.
Microsoft. Coupling its strong positions in cloud and software, Microsoft will do well in the new world, with the threat of 'Microsoft fatigue' the only real factor that could impede its Seventh Wave prospects. The company has already deployed its Buy and Block strategy, taking a large position in OpenAI (Buy) and engaging in partnerships (Block) to freeze out newcomers. Microsoft's leadership is as fanatical as Meta's in its determination to not fall into the Innovator's Dilemma. So watch for seemingly irrational behavior and erratic tactical moves, as leadership is unafraid to confuse customers and take outsized capital risks.
Apple. An AI phone? Apple is clearly the biggest AI laggard of the cool tech kids. Complex software is not the company's forte, so it is vulnerable, as has been evident in its AI fumbling (cf. Apple Photos). Tim Cook is going to have to use the company's massive cash hoard to buy its way into AI as its internal efforts fail to generate adequate innovation. I would watch this space for a very large deal to acquire one of the independent LLM companies such as Mistral or Anthropic.
Conclusion
Tech CEOs, from Satya Nadella to Marc Benioff to Sundar Pichai, are scrambling. Their products and services are about to be challenged by a new way to do work, and they are determined to not be swept away (or be made zombies) in the Seventh Wave.
It will be a good time for the incumbents to deploy the Buy, Block, Pretend, and Link strategies, as the current administration in Washington will likely loosen antitrust oversight. But given the first six months of this administration, there may be more unpredictability than expected on that front.
Another factor that could help the legacy players is the state of the private equity and venture markets. They are currently holding many illiquid assets (companies) from the pre-AI period — they will have to sell these depreciated assets before they can raise new capital to invest in the Seventh Wave challengers. Confusion in capital markets will work in favor of the incumbents, as will their very large cash reserves.
What are the best strategies for CIOs? 1) Beware legacy vendors bearing AI gifts — they are faking it until they can make it, pretending that their platforms can transition to the Seventh Wave; 2) Increase your artificial intelligence quotient (go here if you are a client, precis if not) so that you and your team can sort the reality from the fantasy that will be assaulting you from your legacy suppliers and from startups; 3) If you can afford to delay, you may want to put off big software changes until AI finance, AI CRM, and AI ERP offerings become available from AI-native vendors. That won't happen until late 2026 and 2027.
This post was written by Forrester CEO George Colony and it originally appeared here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Digital Twins: Medicine's New Crystal Ball?
Digital Twins: Medicine's New Crystal Ball?

Medscape

time23 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Digital Twins: Medicine's New Crystal Ball?

Digital twins are rapidly emerging as powerful tools in personalized medicine and beyond. In healthcare, they serve as virtual representations of a patient's body, body parts, specific organs, and systems, such as the circulatory and nervous systems. Functional modeling of the state and behavior of the body or its components has the potential to provide information for clinical and research applications. The goal is to simulate how an organ, system, or even the entire body responds to stimuli and circumstances of clinical relevance to the patient, thereby deriving useful conclusions. These models may be descriptive, predictive, prescriptive, or even generative, capable of filling in missing or unavailable data. A central challenge is accurately replicating the physicochemical, physiological, anatomical, and, when needed, psychological attributes relevant to each specific use case. Building clinically useful digital twins depends on integrating diverse data sources, which is a technically complex task. However, when successful, it enables a dynamic 'dialogue' with the model to evaluate its current state, forecast evolution, and simulate responses to interventions such as therapies. It is important to emphasize that digital twin simulations are tailored to individual patients — they do not represent a generic or archetypal patient but instead aim to create a personalized model for a specific individual. One example is a project led by the Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), which is developing digital twins of women with advanced cancer using artificial intelligence. This initiative, titled 'High-Definition Oncology in Women's Cancer,' is part of the Precision Medicine Infrastructure Associated With Science and Technology program. These digital twins consist of multiple layers of information integrated into a single model that reflects reality for a specific application. In the aforementioned project, a wide range of data were incorporated into the digital twin models, spanning tumor metabolism, gene and protein expression, physiological indicators such as circadian rhythms, heart rate, and physical activity, emotional well-being, and conventional clinical data from diagnostics to treatment protocols. Adding more 'layers' of information enhances the model complexity and accuracy, enabling incremental improvements and expanded functionality. A notable innovation in this case is the biological clock model developed by the CNIO, which estimates a patient's biologic age. This can help assess whether biologic aging accelerates or slows during disease progression, providing insight into the effect of treatment. This may guide clinicians in adjusting treatment intensity or modifying therapeutic combinations according to the patient's evolving biologic state. The layers of information used and their integration are key aspects of each type of digital twin, ensuring that it is not only functional but also clinically relevant. In many ways, digital twins serve as 'maps,' both literal and figurative. In the most direct sense, they can guide the planning of physical interventions such as surgical procedures. Broader Applications In addition to simulating the effects of therapies, digital twins can model the natural progression of diseases and support long-term care planning. They may help anticipate the onset of certain conditions, particularly hereditary diseases, when risk factors are present but symptoms have yet to appear. These models offer valuable tools for proactive risk prevention and management. In the context of prevention, the ability to present a stronger, data-driven case — even if derived from simulations — could help persuade patients and improve adherence to preventive care guidelines. Integration With Medical Devices From a certain perspective, digital twins resemble a technology-driven 'crystal ball.' Once refined, these models could allow clinicians to explore alternative therapeutic scenarios and identify the most effective treatment strategies. This minimizes reliance on trial and error, enabling faster data-driven decisions in a controlled simulation environment, a kind of clinical sandbox. A key area of synergy lies between the digital twins and medical devices. Wearable technologies, for instance, can supply real-time or periodic health data that dynamically update a patient's digital twin. Conversely, digital twins can enhance the medical device field by enabling the optimization of device configurations or implant placements. Their integration into the body and potential physiological effects can be modeled and simulated in advance, allowing for more precise and personalized interventions. These models also help to synthesize and manage large volumes of complex data. By serving as intelligent filters, they reduce the cognitive load on clinicians, offering clear visualizations and simulations that support more confident decision-making, especially in complex or uncertain clinical situations. Applications and Regulatory Considerations Digital twins hold promise across a wide range of medical applications, from early diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized therapy selection to treatment monitoring and relapse prevention. In fields such as neurology, cardiology, and oncology, these models have already shown potential. Digital twins have already been applied in neurology, cardiology, and oncology. Focusing on Spain-based developments, two recent advances featured by Univadis Spain , a Medscape Network platform, stand out: One involves using digital twins for research on the human brain to uncover mechanisms linked to psychosis remission, and the other demonstrates the use of digital twin improvements in the diagnosis of premature ventricular contractions. While the field is evolving rapidly, it remains in its early stages. Although technical hurdles and regulatory complexities are expected, the long-term potential is significant. Digital twins could enable faster and safer evaluations of multiple treatment paths and support virtual experimentation in a risk-free environment. One major challenge is clinical validation. Digital twins must be tested with real-world longitudinal data and demonstrate that their predictions provide added value compared to current clinical guidelines. Equally crucial is the development of interoperable, cross-border data infrastructure that enables scalable, coordinated adoption across healthcare systems worldwide. A final and crucial aspect to consider is data privacy, ownership, and ethical use of digital twins. Beyond the data itself, fundamental questions arise about digital twin models: Who owns a person's digital twin? Should these models be transferable, and if so, under what conditions? Informed consent is central to addressing these issues and ensuring the responsible use of digital twin technologies in clinical practice. The use of digital twins in clinical trials is already being explored, and their potential extends further to medical training and patient education, particularly in explaining therapeutic options. As technology evolves, the range of future applications continues to expand.

Want Cheaper Solar Panels, Home Batteries or a Heat Pump? Better Act Soon
Want Cheaper Solar Panels, Home Batteries or a Heat Pump? Better Act Soon

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Want Cheaper Solar Panels, Home Batteries or a Heat Pump? Better Act Soon

(Bloomberg) -- The Republican-led US Senate's passage of legislation to eliminate incentives for clean energy means homeowners likely have until the end of the year to install solar panels, batteries and heat pumps before costs soar. NYC Commutes Resume After Midtown Bus Terminal Crash Chaos Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds What Gothenburg Got Out of Congestion Pricing Massachusetts to Follow NYC in Making Landlords Pay Broker Fees California Exempts Building Projects From Environmental Law The bill must still be reconciled with the House of Representatives version and signed into law by President Donald Trump. But the Senate action has dashed advocates' hopes that it might restore some Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) subsidies, or at least give people more time to claim a 30% tax credit on the five-figure cost of installing rooftop solar and home battery storage systems. The Senate bill terminates those subsidies, along with a $2,000 tax credit for buying heat pumps, after Dec. 31 and repeals a $7,500 tax credit for the purchase of some electric vehicles after Sept. 30. A loophole that allowed carmakers to pass that savings to customers who lease EVs also would end then. 'The repeal of the credits takes away an option for households to gain not just climate friendly appliances but appliances and systems that effectively enabled them to cut their energy bills,' said Ari Matusiak, chief executive officer of Rewiring America, a nonprofit that advocates for community electrification. He noted that 3.4 million households claimed IRA tax credits in 2023. Matusiak said the subsidies' original expiration in 2032 gave homeowners long-term assurance that when a fossil fuel furnace or water heater suddenly failed, they would receive financial help to replace them with high-efficiency but more expensive electric versions and could install subsidized solar panels to power the devices. Now with those tax credits disappearing, homeowners and installers are scrambling. Martyna Kowalczyk, chief executive officer of Solartime, a family-owned Dallas area solar installer, said she's been interviewing prospective project managers to handle an expected influx of customers in the coming months. 'I am trying to prepare for the rabbit race,' said Kowalczyk. 'Everyone who is considering solar will try to get in this year. And next year will be a drought.' For homeowners, there's reason to rush to their local installer. The tax credits would save more than $10,000 on an average $35,000 system. Most solar panels and home batteries are imported and their cost is likely to rise due to US tariffs. But the looming deadline to claim the tax credits means it's crucial to choose an installer with the capacity to design a rooftop array and battery system, obtain the necessary permits and complete the job in a matter of months. Under the House version of the tax legislation, only systems installed and 'placed in service' by a utility before the tax credits' expiration qualify for the incentives. That raises an issue beyond the control of the installer — the time it takes for your local utility to connect a completed solar array to the grid. In Northern California, for instance, utility Pacific Gas & Electric says it usually flips the switch on a new solar system in five to 10 business days but the process can take up to a month. The Senate bill softens the blow a bit by deleting the 'placed into service' requirement. But homeowners would have to pay for solar and battery systems by Dec. 31 to be eligible for the tax credit. The risk is that delays push completion and activation of a solar and battery array beyond the deadline to claim tax credits and a homeowner is left on the hook for the full cost of the system. Other factors to consider include the age of your roof and whether it needs to be replaced before installing solar panels. Also, make sure your home's electrical panel has sufficient capacity to accommodate a solar and battery system or heat pumps. Even before the tax bill, A1 Sun, a Berkeley, California-based installer, was already booked through the end of 2025. 'We are placed in the unfortunate position of both not being able to take advantage of any sort of 'gold rush' for new contracts this year, and also having a lot of anxiety about being able to meet our commitments to install those customers who already had contracts in place,' said Reuben Ly, sales manager for family owned A1 Sun. 'It's just pulling the rug out from underneath us,' he said of the tax bill. SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Why OneSpan (OSPN) Outpaced the Stock Market Today
Why OneSpan (OSPN) Outpaced the Stock Market Today

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why OneSpan (OSPN) Outpaced the Stock Market Today

In the latest trading session, OneSpan (OSPN) closed at $17.49, marking a +1.75% move from the previous day. The stock exceeded the S&P 500, which registered a gain of 0.83% for the day. At the same time, the Dow added 0.77%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq gained 1.02%. Shares of the internet security company have appreciated by 7.5% over the course of the past month, underperforming the Computer and Technology sector's gain of 8.25%, and outperforming the S&P 500's gain of 4.99%. The investment community will be closely monitoring the performance of OneSpan in its forthcoming earnings report. The company is predicted to post an EPS of $0.27, indicating a 12.9% decline compared to the equivalent quarter last year. Looking at the full year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates suggest analysts are expecting earnings of $1.45 per share and revenue of $0 million. These totals would mark changes of +9.85% and 0%, respectively, from last year. Investors should also note any recent changes to analyst estimates for OneSpan. These recent revisions tend to reflect the evolving nature of short-term business trends. As a result, upbeat changes in estimates indicate analysts' favorable outlook on the business health and profitability. Research indicates that these estimate revisions are directly correlated with near-term share price momentum. To utilize this, we have created the Zacks Rank, a proprietary model that integrates these estimate changes and provides a functional rating system. The Zacks Rank system, stretching from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), has a noteworthy track record of outperforming, validated by third-party audits, with stocks rated #1 producing an average annual return of +25% since the year 1988. Within the past 30 days, our consensus EPS projection remained stagnant. As of now, OneSpan holds a Zacks Rank of #3 (Hold). In terms of valuation, OneSpan is currently trading at a Forward P/E ratio of 11.85. For comparison, its industry has an average Forward P/E of 28.74, which means OneSpan is trading at a discount to the group. The Internet - Software industry is part of the Computer and Technology sector. This industry currently has a Zacks Industry Rank of 46, which puts it in the top 19% of all 250+ industries. The Zacks Industry Rank gauges the strength of our industry groups by measuring the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks within the groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1. Don't forget to use to keep track of all these stock-moving metrics, and others, in the upcoming trading sessions. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report ONESPAN INC (OSPN) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store