logo
Four males charged after couple (60s) threatened with firearm in Dublin

Four males charged after couple (60s) threatened with firearm in Dublin

BreakingNews.ie14-06-2025
The four males, one aged in his 60s, one in his 20s, and two juvenile youths, who were arrested in connection with aggravated burglary at a residence in Shanganagh Cliffs, Shankill, Co Dublin, on Wednesday, have since been charged.
During the course of the aggravated burglary, four individuals entered the home of a couple in their 60s and assaulted and threatened the couple with a firearm.
Advertisement
The four individuals left the scene in a vehicle and an electric bike.
The owner of the home, a man in his 60s, was removed from the scene to St Vincent's University Hospital for non-life threatening injuries.
Gardaí immediately responded to the incident and a search of the area took place by gardaí attached to Shankill Garda station.
Gardaí arrested three individuals when they stopped a vehicle and a fourth individual was arrested a short distance away who was on a electric bike.
During the course of the search of the area a semi-automatic firearm was recovered.
All four are due to appear before Dublin District Court at the Criminal Courts of Justice on Saturday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tommy Robinson is the last thing Epping needs
Tommy Robinson is the last thing Epping needs

Telegraph

time16 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Tommy Robinson is the last thing Epping needs

Much of the reporting on the anti-migrant protests at the Bell Hotel in Epping has focused on the violence and disorder. But from speaking with residents, I believe the vast majority of protestors are peaceful, although some blame the police for provoking the situation by allowing 'counter-protestors' from Stand Up To Racism into the area on Thursday night. Orla Minihane is a local mum of three who has lived in the area since she was 12 years old. She is also a Reform council candidate and a leader of the peaceful protests around the Bell Hotel, which began as a result of increasing local concern about the behaviour of migrant men living there. The arrest and charging of Hadush Kebatu, a 38-year-old migrant who arrived in the UK on June 29, for the alleged sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl has amplified these fears. This was the final straw for the people of Epping, who feel their once safe town has become plagued by shoplifting and threatening behaviour from the hotel's tenants. Orla told me how on Thursday night the locals were determined to keep the protest peaceful. She described their surprise at seeing 'so many police everywhere ... on all the side streets' and that they 'came in heavy-handed'. Despite this, and as hundreds of locals gathered, the protest stayed calm. But within an hour Orla said that reports began to come in of masked Stand up to Racism protestors travelling to Epping via public transport. That night Essex Police, the Met and British Transport Police were present. All three forces have denied escorting these masked men towards the Bell, although the Met and Essex police have confirmed their vehicles were used to transport these protestors away after the violence had begun. Even taken at face value this seems very strange. Why would the police allow these two groups to confront each other, making a conflict inevitable? Is it common practice for violent protestors to be escorted to safety rather than being arrested? As Orla said to me, if masked counter-protestors were 'walking towards a Palestine march, what would happen? They wouldn't let them anywhere near'. Very soon after the violence began, these so-called anti-fascist protestors withdrew, leaving residents and police to clash with each other on the streets of Epping. Despite this, residents gathered again on Sunday night, with the protest led by local women, who stood in a line holding hands as they chanted 'protect our kids'. Homemade signs were held, bearing slogans like 'make England safe again', 'deport foreign criminals' and 'I'm not far-Right – I'm worried about my kids'. This last slogan captures the beliefs of the protestors. They are absolutely clear that this is a group of residents, especially parents, who believe the large number of migrant men housed at the Bell represent a grave threat to local children. This fear is perfectly reasonable. Official figures show that Afghans in the UK are 22 times more likely than Brits to be convicted of sexual assault. Indeed, according to the Centre for Migration Control, Home Office statistics indicate that 87 nationalities have a higher conviction rate for sexual violence than the British population. This shouldn't be surprising, nor is it racist to recognise this reality. Afghan men are raised in a profoundly misogynistic culture, where women are treated like property. In the last 24 hours, Tommy Robinson has suggested he will attend next Sunday's protest at the Bell, before apparently changing his mind in a video posted today. He should stay away. The brave men and women of Epping are sending a powerful message. The local council leader, and the MP, are behind them, both calling for the asylum seekers to leave the Bell Hotel. Outsiders, whether supporters of Robinson or masked 'anti-fascists', will only distract from the real protest, and make women and girls less safe.

UEFA granted extension of illegal streaming blocking order
UEFA granted extension of illegal streaming blocking order

BreakingNews.ie

time16 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

UEFA granted extension of illegal streaming blocking order

UEFA, the governing body for European football associations, has been granted a court order extending for another two years a requirement that internet service providers block illegal streaming of its games. The order is similar to one granted last week to the Football Association Premier League, also extending the requirement to block the streams for its matches. Advertisement Mr Justice Mark Sanfey, head of the Commercial Court, agreed on Monday to an application from the Union Des Associations Europeennes de Football (Union of European Football Associations) for the order. It extends the blocking order for the 2025/26 and 2026/27 football seasons. It applies to Eircom trading as eir, Virgin Media Ireland, Sky Ireland/Sky Subscriber Services and Vodafone. Jonathan Newman SC, for UEFA, said all the defendants were neutral on the application. The providers are "conduits" for the streaming but were not liable for any infringements on their networks, he said. Advertisement Counsel said they are required under the order to block IP addresses which are notified to them in a confidential list. The streams are carried on set-top boxes, TV sticks and websites. This was the fourth extension since the original order, he said. Ireland Married Cork farmer (60) jailed for rape of man Read More The list of infringing platforms is published to providers twice during each match, he said. A very large volume of infringements, running into the hundreds, have been detected, he said. Mr Justice Sanfey said he was satisfied to grant the order. From the evidence, it was clear there are a very large number of streamers, and the blocking orders provided by the court previously demonstrate their effectiveness, he said. It was also clear the order also respected the fundamental right of parties, including internet users, notwithstanding the "enormous number that need to the blocked" and the fact that there has been a minuscule number of complaints about the blocking, which were proved to be unfounded, he said.

I had to defend myself, man accused of police officer assault at airport says
I had to defend myself, man accused of police officer assault at airport says

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

I had to defend myself, man accused of police officer assault at airport says

The brother of a man accused of assaulting three police officers at Manchester Airport has told a jury he struck out himself after he was 'put in a situation where I had to defend myself'. Muhammad Amaad, 26, and Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20, are alleged to have used a 'high level of violence' against Pc Zachary Marsden, Pc Lydia Ward and Pc Ellie Cook after they tried to arrest the younger brother. The Greater Manchester Police officers entered the Terminal 2 car park paystation after reports that a male fitting Amaaz's description had headbutted a member of the public inside the airport just minutes before on July 23 last year. Giving evidence on Monday at Liverpool Crown Court, Amaad said: 'They come in and grab Fahir straight away. They started pushing him forward into the ticket machine. 'I didn't understand the need for the aggression.' He told his barrister Chloe Gardner that nothing was said by any of the officers and that he tried to 'de-escalate the situation' by saying 'easy, easy … no, no, no'. Ms Gardner said: 'Were you trying to be provocative or make things worse?' Amaad said: 'No, I was trying to help, if anything.' Ms Gardner said: 'As far as you could see, did you see any reason why they grabbed hold of him?' 'No,' said Amaad. He said he then saw a male officer, Pc Marsden, grab his younger brother's neck. Amaad said: 'I didn't know where his other hand was. I thought both his hands might be around his neck and he was choking him. 'So, I stepped around and I just placed my hand under the officer's arm.' He denied he pushed Pc Marsden or tried to grab the officer's throat. Amaad said: 'Next, all I can remember is I got a bang in the face. My eyes sort of shut and I put my hands up and thought 'what was that?' 'Then I just remember 'bang, bang, bang'. It caught me by surprise, I was stunned. 'We just sort of fell over on to a chair and I am feeling punches, holding and grabbing, and I had to defend myself during that time.' Pc Marsden went on to fire his Taser at him, the court heard, and he later sat down with his hands on his head after he saw the officer's firearm. Amaad told the court: 'I just felt to myself 'I'm not dying today'. I have been punched, I have been tasered, I am not going to die today.' Ms Gardner said: 'Why did you strike Pc Marsden at the seated area?' Amaad said: 'Because it was at that point I was trying to make him stop and defend myself. I was put in a situation where I had to defend myself'. Earlier, a total of 20 character references for Amaaz were read out by his barrister Imran Khan KC including many citing the defendant's charity work in the local community. Among the testimonials were one from his elder brother, Mohammed Abid, 28, a serving officer with Greater Manchester Police since 2020. He said his youngest brother, 'the baby of the family', looked up to him as a role model and that Fahir had never previously had any interactions with the police or the criminal justice system. He said: 'He lives a clean, honest lifestyle. His dedication to his academic goals and personal development is something I deeply admire. 'Our family has strong moral values instilled in us by our parents at an early age. 'Mohammed Fahir Amaaz is a kind, respectful, upstanding young man with a bright future ahead.' Amaaz is alleged to have assaulted Pc Marsden and Pc Ward, causing them actual bodily harm. He is also accused of the assault of emergency worker Pc Cook, and the earlier assault of a member of the public, Abdulkareem Ismaeil, at a Starbucks cafe in T2 arrivals. Amaad, a former assistant manager at KFC, is alleged to have assaulted Pc Marsden, causing actual bodily harm. Both men, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, deny the allegations. Amaad disagreed with prosecutor Adam Birkby that Pc Marsden posed no threat as the officer fell backwards on to seating close to the ticket machine. Mr Birkby said: 'Do you accept you punched Pc Marsden six times?' Amaad said: 'I was not counting but if it was six then yes.' Mr Birkby said: 'You say those punches were lawful and the force used was reasonable?' 'Yes,' said Amaad. Mr Birkby said: 'You are simply pummelling him with six punches when he was in a position where he couldn't defend himself, do you agree?' Amaad said: 'I disagree.' Mr Birkby put it to Amaad that he realised the officers had come to arrest his brother when they initially surrounded him at the ticket machine. He said: 'You must have put two and two together that this was in relation to the violence your brother had used just five minutes earlier at Starbucks.' Amaad said: 'I didn't have time to think. I just saw them grab him.' Mr Birkby said: 'You knew your brother was resisting and yet rather than allowing the officers to get on with their jobs you physically intervened.' 'No,' said Amaad. Mr Birkby went on: 'Because you didn't want your brother to get arrested.' Amaad said: 'No, that's incorrect.' The trial continues on Tuesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store