Germany designates populist AfD as far-right ‘extremists'
On Friday the BfV said it had passed on this recommendation to the federal interior ministry as part of a 1,100-page report on the party.
Classifying the entire AfD as extremist lowers the legal threshold for the BfV to carry out – or expand – its electronic surveillance of party officials and creates more secure legal grounds for deploying paid informers inside party organisations.
Excerpts from the classified report, released by the BfV, describes AfD politics as 'incompatible' with Germany's 'free democratic order', in particular for the party's 'ongoing' agitation against refugees and migrants.
READ MORE
BfV vice-president Sinan Selen said the organisation had reached its conclusions after three years studying AfD position papers and remarks by party leaders as well as 'new organisational developments', in particular the decline of its once-dominant conservative-liberal faction and the rise of its far-right wing.
'Decisive for our assessment is the AfD's ethnic-based understanding of the population,' the BfV said, 'which denigrates entire population groups in Germany and violates their human dignity. This understanding of the population is reflected in the party's overall anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim stance.'
Outgoing federal interior minister Nancy Faeser said the domestic intelligence agency had been given a 'clear legal mandate to take action against extremism and protect our democracy'. She said the assessment had been carried out 'with no political influence whatsoever', noting that publication of the report was postponed from earlier this year for fear of interfering in February's snap federal election.
Three months on from that poll, in advance of next week's federal government swearing-in, opinion polls show the AfD has gained an additional five points' support and is now Germany's most popular party with 26 per cent backing.
AfD co-leaders Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla attacked the BfV conclusion as defamatory and 'a serious blow to German democracy' and 'targeted interference in the democratic decision-making process that is clearly politically motivated'.
News of Friday's classification has revived demands for the AfD to be banned outright.
Germany's incoming federal interior minister Alexander Dobrindt, whose job it would be to initiate any such procedure, declined to be drawn on a ban on Friday. But he said it was likely that German courts would soon confirm the BfV assessment.
For Daniel Günther, state premier of the north-western state of Schleswig-Holstein, the BfV assessment was 'no surprise, but it brings clarity'.
Mr Günther, a senior centre-right
Christian Democrat (CDU)
politician, said the AfD 'is a threat to our free and democratic basic order and it endangers our social peace'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
6 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Enoch Burke wins court appeal over disciplinary panel bias in dismissal case
Teacher Enoch Burke has won an appeal over the composition of a disciplinary panel set up to hear his appeal against his dismissal from Wilson's Hospital school. Mr Burke claimed a member of the three-person appeals panel, Association of Secondary Teachers in Ireland (ASTI) general secretary Kieran Christie, was a 'promoter of transgenderism'. The appeals panel denied his claim. Ms Justice Mary Faherty, on behalf of the three-judge Court of Appeal, said with "a great deal of reluctance", she would grant an injunction to Mr Burke restraining the appeals panel, as presently constituted, from from holding a hearing. Mr Burke spent more than 500 days in prison for repeatedly disobeying High Court orders not to attend at Wilson's Hospital school in Co Westmeath, where he had been employed as a history and German teacher. When he was dismissed in 2023, he sought an appeal through the normal employment process but then brought a High Court challenge claiming appeals panel member, Mr Christie, was an activist for transgenderism within the ASTI and was personally or objectively biased. In December 2023, the High Court rejected his challenge, saying Mr Burke had not discharged the burden on him of establishing there was a fair question to be tried of a reasonable apprehension of bias. He appealed to the Court of Appeal and the panel opposed his appeal. On Friday, Ms Justice Faherty, for the Court of Appeal, said while accepting Mr Christie does not sit on the appeals panel in his capacity as general secretary of the ASTI, it must nevertheless be the case that Mr Christie's role in the ASTI, which has advised schools to use a transitioning student's preferred choice of pronoun, would be influential to the reasonable independent observer. In those circumstances, she could not agree with the High Court judge that there was not a fair question to be tried in relation to any issue of which it was claimed the ASTI had taken a position. She rejected Mr Burke's suggestion that if his objection to Mr Christie was well-founded, the objection must similarly be well-founded in relation to any other person nominated by the ASTI. The judge said there remained the question as to whether Mr Burke, with his history of contempt of court, "gets to pick and choose how and when he gets to invoke the court's protection and jurisdiction'. Mr Burke, apart from spending more than 500 days in prison over a number of periods, was also the subject of daily €700 and later €1,400 fines for every time he turned up at the school. Recently, the High Court made orders permitting the seizure of money to pay the fines from the bank account into which his school salary continued to be paid pending the Court of Appeal decision. Ms Justice Faherty said she considered his contempt no less egregious now than when he was before the High Court challenging the appeals panel. However, the distinguishing feature of the present case was the spectre of unfairness that will hover over the disciplinary appeal process if he has to face that body as presently constituted given he has made out a case of a reasonable apprehension of objective bias, she said. While it was normal for the loser in a case to pay the winner's costs, the court was "not in normal territory" here. The judge said there would be no costs order in Mr Burke's favour, save an order setting aside the costs order made against him in the High Court.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
France to recognise Palestinian state in September, says Macron
France will recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September, French president Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday, adding that he hoped it would help bring peace to the region. Macron, who announced the decision on X, published a letter sent to Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas confirming France's intention to become the first major western power to recognise a Palestinian state. 'True to its historic commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, I have decided that France will recognise the state of Palestine,' Macron said. 'I will make this solemn announcement at the United Nations General Assembly next September.' READ MORE France, home to Europe's largest Jewish and Muslim communities, will become the first major western country to recognise a Palestinian state, potentially giving greater momentum to a movement so far dominated by smaller nations that are generally more critical of Israel. The decision is likely to spark anger in Israel and Washington. In a diplomatic cable in June, the United States said it opposed any steps that would unilaterally recognise a Palestinian state. France's foreign minister is co-hosting a conference at the UN next week about a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine. Fidèle à son engagement historique pour une paix juste et durable au Proche-Orient, j'ai décidé que la France reconnaîtra l'État de Palestine. J'en ferai l'annonce solennelle à l'Assemblée générale des Nations unies, au mois de septembre prochain.… — Emmanuel Macron (@EmmanuelMacron) Last month, Mr Macron expressed his 'determination to recognise the state of Palestine', and he has pushed for a broader movement toward a two-state solution, in parallel with recognition of Israel and its right to defend itself. – Reuters, additional reporting by AP
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Germany says Israel ‘violating law of war' in Gaza but refuses to sign ceasefire letter
Israel is violating the law of war in Gaza , a senior Berlin official has conceded, while insisting Germany won't be the 29th signatory to a letter demanding Israel 'end now' its military action. Amid reports of an imminent ceasefire, Jürgen Hardt, foreign policy spokesman for the ruling Christian Democratic Union (CDU), argued the letter was 'already being used by Hamas and other parts of the Arab world for propaganda purposes'. 'That doesn't need to happen with German assistance,' he said. However, Mr Hardt admitted German officials no longer believe that Israel is doing everything it can to allow enough humanitarian aid into Gaza. READ MORE 'I tend towards the view that they are clearly doing too little,' he said, 'and that would be in contradiction to the obligations Israel has under the law of war.' Chancellor Friedrich Merz has shrugged off demands that Germany sign the letter and insisted it echoes a recent, critical EU statement he helped devise – and signed. Since taking power in May, Mr Merz has adopted more critical language, distancing himself from the idea of 'unconditional support' for Israel from Berlin. In Thursday's Zeit weekly, German foreign minister Johann Wadephul declined to say whether Berlin had carried out a promised review of weapons deliveries to Israel. However, he said he was anxious to keep open diplomatic channels to his Israeli opposite number, Gideon Sa'ar. 'I have the feeling that I get through and, though I'm not yet happy with that, what we have achieved between the EU and Israeli govermment is a start,' he said. In his Berlin ministry, meanwhile, protest is growing – led by younger diplomatic staff, demanding action to follow critical words. Reportedly at least 150 diplomats have taken the unusual step of forming a protest group under the motto 'loyal, conforming'. A foreign ministry spokesperson confirmed the existence of the group, with members mostly under 40 years old. When they presented their arguments at a ministry staff meeting earlier this month, attended by the minister, attendees say they were 'greeted with applause'. As well as a tougher approach to Israel, the group is demanding the creation of a 'dissent channel' in the ministry, where staff can air protest to official policy line without fearing consequences. Their protest echoes demands by Germany's junior coalition partner, the centre-left junior Social Democratic Party (SPD), to sign the international letter. 'The reports of starving children and a rapidly-escalating famine show we have reached the much-vaunted 'point of no return',' noted two senior SPD officials in a letter to Mr Merz and Mr Wadephul. Opposition Green politician Katharina Dröger accused the German government of being all talk and no action: 'If Friedrich Merz means it with his [critical] words, then Germany should sign the statement'.
