logo
Poilievre calls for 'very hard caps' on immigration to better integrate newcomers

Poilievre calls for 'very hard caps' on immigration to better integrate newcomers

Yahooa day ago
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is calling for a tougher stance on immigration, saying Monday he wants to see "very hard caps" on the number of newcomers allowed into the country.
Speaking to reporters at a news conference in Ottawa, Poilievre said the country has struggled to integrate newcomers and he wants to see more people leaving than coming in "while we catch up."
"We have millions of people whose permits will expire over the next couple of years, and many of them will leave," he said. "We need more people leaving than coming for the next couple years."
Poilievre has been critical of the past Liberal government's handling of the immigration file. In the last election, he promised to "restore order" to what he called a "broken" system.
WATCH | Poilievre calls for lower caps on immigration:
And while he did vow during the campaign to "dramatically" reduce the number of temporary foreign workers and international students if elected, Poilievre is now saying Prime Minister Mark Carney should go even further by calling for negative net migration.
Immigration has been at the centre of his post-election messaging on social media and in his public remarks.
"Our country is divided and we're not able to integrate people at this pace," Poilievre said Thursday of the elevated immigration levels that led to record-high growth rates in the post-COVID era.
At the Calgary Stampede earlier this month, he said the Liberal government has pursued a "failed experiment with open borders."
"Immigration must be controlled. It must be in numbers we can absorb," he said.
While the last government did not have an "open border" policy, the number of people admitted hit levels not seen in decades.
In 2022 and 2023, for example, the population grew by 2.5 per cent and 3.1 per cent respectively — growth rates that were double or triple what was reported in years past, according to Statistics Canada data.
According to population estimates, the country has grown by some 3.6 million people since early 2020.
That growth has been fuelled by a surge in non-permanent residents — many of whom were students and low-wage foreign workers.
Amid signs of stress — record-low rental vacancy rates, higher home prices, elevated youth and immigrant unemployment and troubling health-care access data — the last Liberal government dialled back the number of students and temporary foreign workers.
Those changes seem to be having an impact. StatsCan reported the population growth rate was 0.0 per cent in the first quarter of this year, the second consecutive quarter with a net drop in non-permanent residents.
Carney has vowed to keep those limits in place — and cap the number of non-permanent residents at five per cent of the total population by the end of 2027. That would be well below where it was at the start of the year.
Federal data suggests there were three million non-permanent residents in Canada in the third quarter of 2024. With a population of about 40 million, that works out to roughly 7.5 per cent.
The push to whittle down that figure to five per cent means even fewer international students will be admitted and businesses will be denied permits to import labour, if Carney's plan is fully implemented.
Poilievre said deeper cuts are warranted.
"Our immigration policy should invite the right people in the right numbers in a way that puts Canada and Canadians first," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Tariffs Could Be Triggering New Inflation Woes. Everything You Need to Know
US Tariffs Could Be Triggering New Inflation Woes. Everything You Need to Know

CNET

time14 minutes ago

  • CNET

US Tariffs Could Be Triggering New Inflation Woes. Everything You Need to Know

The off-again, on-again nature of US tariffs in 2025 has many consumers anxious about the future. James Martin/CNET The One Big Beautiful Bill may have been signed into law, but the economic plan of the second Trump administration is still uncertain due to the confusion around tariffs. President Donald Trump unleashed chaos on April 2 ("Liberation Day") when he unveiled a laundry list of heavy tariffs for countries around the world. He then paused them for 90 days after the stock market dramatically tumbled. That 90-day pause was supposed to end this week, but the tariffs have been been extended again through Aug. 1. More recently, the administration hiked tariffs against Canada to 35% and threatened Brazil with a 50% rate, while the US Labor Department announced on Tuesday that consumer prices rose 2.7% in June, the highest spike since February. Amid the uncertainties and upheavals, Trump has barreled forward with his plans, including doubling the tariffs on steel and aluminum imports and announcing a new plan to increase the rate for China to 55%. He also hyped up a trade deal on July 2 that leaves Vietnam's import tax rate at a historically high 20%. The sweeping tariff initiative will likely impact your cost of living, which we know from our surveys is something you're worried about. That all came after Trump's push hit its biggest roadblock yet, when the US Court of International Trade ruled late last month that Trump had overstepped his authority when he imposed tariffs. That ruling was stayed, but the fight is likely to head to the Supreme Court. All the while, major US companies like Apple and Walmart have butted heads with the administration over the tariffs and their bluntness about how tariffs will make affording things harder for consumers. Should You Buy Now or Wait? Our Experts Weigh In on Tariffs Should You Buy Now or Wait? Our Experts Weigh In on Tariffs Click to unmute Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Skip Backward Skip Forward Next playlist item Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 9:42 Loaded : 6.13% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 9:42 Share Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Close Modal Dialog This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button. Close Modal Dialog This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button. Should You Buy Now or Wait? Our Experts Weigh In on Tariffs Amid all this noise, you might still be wondering: What exactly are tariffs, and what will they mean for me? The short answer: Expect to pay more for at least some goods and services. For the long answer, keep reading, and for more, check out CNET's price tracker for 11 popular and tariff-vulnerable products. What are tariffs? Put simply, a tariff is a tax on the cost of importing or exporting goods by a particular country. So, for example, a 60% tariff on Chinese imports would be a 60% tax on the price of importing, say, computer components from China. Trump has been fixated on imports as the centerpiece of his economic plans, often claiming that the money collected from taxes on imported goods would help finance other parts of his agenda. The US imports $3 trillion worth of goods from other countries annually. The president has also shown a fixation on trade deficits, claiming that the US having a trade deficit with any country means that country is ripping the US off. This is a flawed understanding of the matter, many economists have said, since deficits are often a simple case of resource realities: Wealthy nations like the US buy specific things from nations that have them, while those nations in turn may not be wealthy enough to buy much of anything from the US. While Trump deployed tariffs in his first term, notably against China, he ramped up his plans more significantly for the 2024 campaign, promising 60% tariffs against China and a universal 20% tariff on all imports into the US. "Tariffs are the greatest thing ever invented," Trump said at a campaign stop in Michigan last year. At one point, he called himself "Tariff Man" in a post on Truth Social. Who pays the cost of tariffs? Trump repeatedly claimed, before and immediately after returning to the White House, that the country of origin for an imported good pays the cost of the tariffs and that Americans would not see any price increases from them. However, as economists and fact-checkers stressed, this is not the case. The companies importing the tariffed goods -- American companies or organizations in this case -- pay the higher costs. To compensate, companies can raise their prices or absorb the additional costs themselves. So, who ends up paying the price for tariffs? In the end, usually you, the consumer. For instance, a universal tariff on goods from Canada would increase Canadian lumber prices, which would have the knock-on effect of making construction and home renovations more expensive for US consumers. While it is possible for a company to absorb the costs of tariffs without increasing prices, this is not at all likely, at least for now. Speaking with CNET, Ryan Reith, vice president of International Data Corporation's worldwide mobile device tracking programs, explained that price hikes from tariffs, especially on technology and hardware, are inevitable in the short term. He estimated that the full amount imposed on imports by Trump's tariffs would be passed on to consumers, which he called the "cost pass-through." Any potential efforts for companies to absorb the new costs themselves would come in the future, once they have a better understanding of the tariffs, if at all. Which Trump tariffs have gone into effect? Following Trump's "Liberation Day" announcements on April 2 and subsequent shifting by the president, the following tariffs are in effect: A 50% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports, doubled from 25% as of June 4. A 30% tariff on all Chinese imports until the new deal touted by Trump takes effect, after which it will purportedly go up to 55%. China being a major focus of Trump's trade agenda, it has faced a rate notably higher than other countries, peaking at 145% before trade talks commenced. 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and 35% on those from Canada. This applies only to goods from each country that are not covered under the 2018 USMCA trade agreement brokered during Trump's first term. The deal covers roughly half of all imports from Canada and about a third of those from Mexico, so the rest are subject to the new tariffs. Energy imports not covered by USMCA will be taxed at only 10%. A 25% tariff on all foreign-made cars and auto parts. A sweeping overall 10% tariff on all imported goods. For certain countries that Trump said were more responsible for the US trade deficit, Trump imposed what he called "reciprocal" tariffs that exceed the 10% level: 20% for the 27 nations that make up the European Union, 26% for India, 24% for Japan and so on. These were meant to take effect on April 9 but were delayed by 90 days due to historic stock market volatility, and then delayed again to Aug. 1. These rates are subject to change until that new effective date, and some have already been altered: the rate against Japan was upped to 25%, the same as the rate against South Korea; Trump has also threatened a 50% rate against Brazil. Trump's claim that these reciprocal tariffs are based on high tariffs imposed against the US by the targeted countries has drawn intense pushback from experts and economists, who have argued that some of these numbers are false or potentially inflated. For example, the above chart says a 39% tariff from the EU, despite its average tariff for US goods being around 3%. Some of the tariffs are against places that are not countries but tiny territories of other nations. The Heard and McDonald Islands, for example, are uninhabited. We'll dig into the confusion around these calculations below. Notably, that minimum 10% tariff will not be on top of those steel, aluminum and auto tariffs. Canada and Mexico were also spared from the 10% minimum additional tariff imposed on all countries the US trades with. On April 11, the administration said smartphones, laptops and other consumer electronics, along with flat panel displays, memory chips and semiconductors, were exempt from reciprocal tariffs. But it wasn't clear whether that would remain the case or whether such products might face different fees later. How were the Trump reciprocal tariffs calculated? The numbers released by the Trump administration for its barrage of "reciprocal" tariffs led to widespread confusion among experts. Trump's own claim that these new rates were derived by halving the tariffs already imposed against the US by certain countries was widely disputed, with critics noting that some of the numbers listed for certain countries were much higher than the actual rates and some countries had tariff rates listed despite not specifically having tariffs against the US at all. In a post to X that spread fast across social media, finance journalist James Surowiecki said that the new reciprocal rates appeared to have been reached by taking the trade deficit the US has with each country and dividing it by the amount the country exports to the US. This, he explained, consistently produced the reciprocal tariff percentages revealed by the White House across the board. "What extraordinary nonsense this is," Surowiecki wrote about the finding. The White House later attempted to debunk this idea, releasing what it claimed was the real formula, though it was quickly determined that this formula was arguably just a more complex version of the one Surowiecki deduced. What will the Trump tariffs do to prices? In short: Prices are almost certainly going up, if not now, then eventually. That is, if the products even make it to US shelves at all, as some tariffs will simply be too high for companies to bother dealing with. While the effects of a lot of tariffs might not be felt straight away, some potential real-world examples have already emerged. Microsoft has increased prices across the board for its Xbox gaming brand, with its flagship Xbox Series X console jumping 20% from $500 to $600. Kent International, one of the main suppliers of bicycles to Walmart, announced that it would be stopping imports from China, which account for 90% of its stock. Speaking about Trump's tariff plans just before they were announced, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said that they would generate $6 trillion in revenue over the next decade. Given that tariffs are most often paid by consumers, CNN characterized this as potentially "the largest tax hike in US history." Estimates from the Yale Budget Lab, cited by Axios, predict that Trump's new tariffs will cause a 2.3% increase in inflation throughout 2025. This translates to about a $3,800 increase in expenses for the average American household. Reith, the IDC analyst, told CNET that Chinese-based tech companies, like PC makers Acer, Asus and Lenovo, have "100% exposure" to these import taxes, with products like phones and computers the most likely to take a hit. He also said that the companies best positioned to weather the tariff impacts are those that have moved some of their operations out of China to places like India, Thailand and Vietnam, singling out the likes of Apple, Dell and HP. Samsung, based in South Korea, is also likely to avoid the full force of Trump's tariffs. In an effort to minimize its tariff vulnerability, Apple has begun to move the production of goods for the US market from China to India. Will tariffs impact prices immediately? In the short term -- the first days or weeks after a tariff takes effect -- maybe not. There are still a lot of products in the US imported pre-tariffs and on store shelves, meaning the businesses don't need a price hike to recoup import taxes. Once new products need to be brought in from overseas, that's when you'll see prices start to climb because of tariffs or you'll see them become unavailable. That uncertainty has made consumers anxious. CNET's survey revealed that about 38% of shoppers feel pressured to make certain purchases before tariffs make them more expensive. About 10% say they have already made certain purchases in hopes of getting them in before the price hikes, while 27% said they have delayed purchases for products that cost more than $500. Generally, this worry is the most acute concerning smartphones, laptops and home appliances. Mark Cuban, the billionaire businessman and Trump critic, voiced concerns about when to buy certain things in a post on Bluesky just after Trump's "Liberation Day" announcements. In it, he suggested that consumers might want to stock up on certain items before tariff inflation hits. "It's not a bad idea to go to the local Walmart or big box retailer and buy lots of consumables now," Cuban wrote. "From toothpaste to soap, anything you can find storage space for, buy before they have to replenish inventory. Even if it's made in the USA, they will jack up the price and blame it on tariffs." CNET's Money team recommends that before you make any purchase, especially a high-ticket item, be sure that the expenditure fits within your budget and your spending plans. Buying something you can't afford now because it might be less affordable later can be burdensome, to say the least. What is the goal of the White House tariff plan? The typical goal behind tariffs is to discourage consumers and businesses from buying the tariffed, foreign-sourced goods and encourage them to buy domestically produced goods instead. When implemented in the right way, tariffs are generally seen as a useful way to protect domestic industries. One of the stated intentions for Trump's tariffs is along those lines: to restore American manufacturing and production. However, the White House also says it's negotiating with numerous countries looking for tariff exemptions, and some officials have also floated the idea that the tariffs will help finance Trump's tax cuts. Those things are often contradictory: If manufacturing moves to the US or if a bunch of countries are exempt from tariffs, then tariffs aren't actually being collected and can't be used to finance anything. This and many other points have led a lot of economists to allege that Trump's plans are misguided. As for returning -- or "reshoring" -- manufacturing in the US, tariffs are a better tool for protecting industries that already exist because importers can fall back on them right away. Building up the factories and plants needed for this in the US could take years, leaving Americans to suffer under higher prices in the interim. That problem is worsened by the fact that the materials needed to build those factories will also be tariffed, making the costs of "reshoring" production in the US too heavy for companies to stomach. These issues, and the general instability of American economic policies under Trump, are part of why experts warn that Trump's tariffs could have the opposite effect: keeping manufacturing out of the US and leaving consumers stuck with inflated prices. Any factories that do get built in the US because of tariffs also have a high chance of being automated, canceling out a lot of job creation potential. To give you one real-world example of this: When warning customers of future price hikes, toy maker Mattel also noted that it had no plans to move manufacturing to the US. Trump has reportedly been fixated on the notion that Apple's iPhone -- the most popular smartphone in the US market -- can be manufactured entirely in the US. This has been broadly dismissed by experts, for a lot of the same reasons mentioned above, but also because an American-made iPhone could cost upward of $3,500. One report from 404 Media dubbed the idea "a pure fantasy." The overall sophistication and breadth of China's manufacturing sector have also been cited, with CEO Tim Cook stating in 2017 that the US lacks the number of tooling engineers to make its products. For more, see how tariffs might raise the prices of Apple products and find some expert tips for saving money.

AOC hosts far-left's new star Trump brands ‘communist' and more top headlines
AOC hosts far-left's new star Trump brands ‘communist' and more top headlines

Fox News

time15 minutes ago

  • Fox News

AOC hosts far-left's new star Trump brands ‘communist' and more top headlines

1. AOC hosts far-left's new star Trump brands 'communist' 2. Senate Republicans advance $9B spending cut bill despite Democratic opposition 3. Late congressman's daughter wins Arizona Democratic primary DIGITAL GHOST HUNT – Any tie Bryan Kohberger has to 'Pappa Rodger' could become clear when gag order is lifted. Continue reading … TOXIC VOWS – Doctor accused of murdering wife confronts courtroom allegations of serial cheating. Continue reading … LOCKED UP – Details emerge after suspect in anti-ICE Texas ambush case gets captured by FBI. Continue reading … HOLLYWOOD HORROR – 'American Idol' exec, husband may have been killed days before bodies were discovered. Continue reading … SPIDER'S WEB – Customs officials left 'speechless' after finding what was crawling inside cake shipment. Continue reading … -- DIPLOMATIC DEMOLITION – Officials flag surprising revelations from deep State Department cuts. Continue reading … POLICY SHIFT AHEAD – Trump admin refines EEOC approach to transgender workplace discrimination claims. Continue reading … 'BALANCED APPROACH' – Bipartisan immigration bill offers legal status for migrants without citizenship path. Continue reading … CASH IN YOUR POCKET – Here's the money people in each state could pocket under Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' Continue reading … 'FEEL ANY REMORSE?' – Gavin Newsom drops F-bomb after he's surprised by Joe Rogan question on podcast. Continue reading … BLAME GAME – 'The View' co-hosts fire back at Obama: 'Pointing the finger at the wrong person.' Continue reading … MALE VOTE MATTERS – Former NBC host Chuck Todd rips Democratic Party for struggling with men. Continue reading … CAMPUS CRACKDOWN – Trump urged to create new contract with universities as voter trust plummets. Continue reading … SAXBY CHAMBLISS – If America doesn't shape the world, our rivals will. Continue reading … CHAD WOLF – Retailers caught red-handed using Trump's tariffs as cover for price gouging. Continue reading … -- RESCUE MISSION – Business owner offering one-way flights to get homeless out of California. Continue reading … NATURAL BOOST – The key to living longer could be tied to a surprising substance. Continue reading … AMERICAN CULTURE QUIZ – Test yourself on space steps and racing roots. Take the quiz here … EPIC HISTORY – MLB All-Star Game gets decided in incredible swing-off. Continue reading … SKY'S THE LIMIT – Wellness advocate pushes to make America's air healthy again. See video … VIVEK RAMASWAMY – Trump will always put America first with immigration. See video … KATIE PAVLICH – Pam Bondi should do a press conference to answer some of these questions. See video … Tune in to the FOX NEWS RUNDOWN PODCAST for today's in-depth reporting on the news that impacts you. Check it out ... What's it looking like in your neighborhood? Continue reading… Thank you for making us your first choice in the morning! We'll see you in your inbox first thing Thursday.

5 things to know for July 16: Epstein files, DOGE cuts, National Guard, DoD contracts, All-Star Game
5 things to know for July 16: Epstein files, DOGE cuts, National Guard, DoD contracts, All-Star Game

CNN

time15 minutes ago

  • CNN

5 things to know for July 16: Epstein files, DOGE cuts, National Guard, DoD contracts, All-Star Game

The airspace above Vancouver International Airport had to be shut down on Tuesday after someone 'hijacked' a small plane. The suspect flew a stolen Cessna 172 north for about 40 miles and then began circling, prompting air traffic controllers to divert nine planes to other airports. Here's what else you need to know to get up to speed and on with your day. Many MAGA supporters are frustrated by the Justice Department's latest claims about Jeffrey Epstein. Now, one of President Donald Trump's most loyal allies in Congress is calling for 'transparency.' On Tuesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson became the highest-ranking Republican to say he, too, wants to see more details about the DOJ's investigation of the late, disgraced financier and accused sex trafficker. 'It's a very delicate subject,' Johnson said. 'We should put everything out there and let the people decide it.' Last week, the DOJ issued a memo that said Epstein had not been murdered in prison, nor did he leave a client list. The memo contradicted some of the conspiracy theories previously promoted by Trump and his top lieutenants. According to a CNN poll that was conducted after the memo's release, half of Americans say they are dissatisfied with the amount of information the Trump administration has revealed about the Epstein case. The Senate is one step closer to a final vote on spending cuts proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency. The bill, known as a 'rescission package,' would slash billions in federal funds that Congress had already approved for foreign aid and public broadcasting. Full Congressional approval would codify the DOGE cuts into law so that they couldn't be reversed by the next administration and would help to insulate the Trump administration from legal challenges. Although three Republican senators joined Democrats in voting against advancing the package, the final tally for both votes was 51-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breakers. The package must pass the Senate and the House by Friday. The Trump administration has released 2,000 National Guard members from their 'federal protection mission' in Los Angeles. On June 7, President Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard members — against the wishes of California's governor and LA's mayor — in response to immigration protests. Several days later, he deployed an additional 2,000 members to help quell demonstrations. LA Mayor Karen Bass praised the cut in National Guard ranks and described it as a 'retreat.' 'I hope the administration heard that,' Bass said. 'Our soldiers are trained to fight to kill foreign enemies in foreign lands. There was never a need for them here before and there isn't a need for them now.' The Department of Defense has awarded contracts of up to $200 million each to OpenAI, Alphabet's Google, Anthropic and Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI, the agency said on Monday. Doug Matty, the DoD's chief digital and AI officer, said the deals will help the agency develop AI workflows that will address critical national security challenges. Musk's xAI also announced on Monday that it was making a suite of its products called 'Grok for Government' available to federal, local, state and national security customers. Just one week ago, xAI's chatbot Grok pushed antisemitic tropes in its responses to some users' queries. When asked by a user 'who is controlling the government,' the bot replied with an answer containing even more anti-Jewish tropes. The National League defeated the American League at the MLB All-Star Game in a historic fashion: a home run swing-off tiebreaker. After nine innings, the game at Truist Park in Atlanta was tied 6-6, so each team chose three batters. Brent Rooker, Randy Arozarena and Jonathan Aranda were tapped to hit for the AL, and Kyle Stowers, Kyle Schwarber and Pete Alonso were selected to swing for the NL. Each player was then allowed to take three swings and whichever team hit the most home runs won the game. By the end of the nail-biting swing-off, the NL had triumphed, smashing four homers to the AL's three. This was the first time a swing-off has happened since the rule was instituted in 2022. GET '5 THINGS' IN YOUR INBOX If your day doesn't start until you're up to speed on the latest headlines, then let us introduce you to your new favorite morning fix. Sign up here for the '5 Things' newsletter. The suspect, who is from Australia, has been charged with 'malicious mischief.'. Danone US announced a recall of all flavors and sizes of YoCrunch products with expiration dates between early July and early September. The US Postal Service has announced plans to sell four new forever stamps featuring SpongeBob SquarePants and the gang from Bikini Bottom. The ancient shoes are calling into question what we know about Roman soldiers. A 23-year-old librarian said she felt a 'thunderbolt' when she first locked eyes with a tall, handsome yacht captain while on vacation. 75+That's how many former federal and state judges have called on the Senate Judiciary Committee to reject the nomination of Emil Bove, President Trump's former personal attorney, to an appeals-court judgeship. 'What you are looking at, right now, in America is a government of the billionaire class, by the billionaire class and for the billionaire class.' — Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, on how the wealthy few are redefining the US. 🌤️ Check your local forecast to see what you can expect. An ad promoting tourism in Canada has gone viral for its compassion. Today's edition of 5 Things AM was edited and produced by CNN's Andrew Torgan.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store