A Scary Encounter Inspired Her to Become a Rattlesnake Wrangler. Now, She's Dedicated Her Life to Saving Them (Exclusive)
While California's animal control laws require captured rattlesnakes to be euthanized, Wall sends them away from properties without harming them. She does not charge for her services at all
Wall supplements her reptile management volunteer work with paid gigs handling animals on TV and film sets, and she's also gained a following of over 116,000 on social mediaIt was August 2018. Danielle Wall was in college at the time and trying to make ends meet. She worked jobs at a wedding venue and took tutoring gigs to pull in some cash. She was driving to her home in Joshua Tree, Calif., after yet another long day when something in the middle of the road made her suddenly swerve her Honda Civic.
Sprawled out in the center of the street was a rattlesnake, something Wall had never seen in her two years living out in the desert. She didn't know much about snakes, but she knew she didn't want to crush it. Wall maneuvered her car directly over the reptile so the tires would pass by it on either side, but when she looked back, the rattlesnake wasn't moving.
"I pulled over, and I was like, 'Oh God, did I kill it?' Because it was just laying there, not moving, not doing anything," she recalls to PEOPLE almost seven years later. But looking at it from outside of her car, she realized it was alive.
With no cell service or any experience with snakes, Wall was scared. Terrified, in fact, but not paralyzingly so. Her empathy for the living creature took over. She broke off a stick from a nearby bush and returned to the road to poke the snake. After a jab, the rattlesnake took off, slithering away from the road and out of danger.
"That's the grand story," says Wall, now 31. The next chapter of her life unfolded from there, the moment she simply poked a rattlesnake on the road. She's since dedicated herself to safely removing rattlesnakes from dangerous places, where they may be threatened or where they may pose a threat to others. In most scenarios, Wall explains, the latter only occurs after the former.
"People think they're aggressive, but on paper, they have the same behavioral defenses as feral kittens. And a feral kitten's not going to attack a human or bite a human for no reason," she tells PEOPLE. "But if you trap it, the feral kitten's going to try to run past you before jumping on you. And the snakes are all the same ... Most bites are completely preventable."
Of course, Wall didn't know that back in 2018. But when she got home after her first rattlesnake encounter in the round, she decided to familiarize herself with the species and find out how others handle such encounters.
Her search yielded chilling information, findings that didn't sit right with Wall at all. California animal control's typical protocol was — and still is, legally — to euthanize found and caught rattlesnakes. The violence of it all got to her. A born nature-lover, Wall was appalled to learn that people were killing wildlife out of fear.
Wall wasn't just going to sit with the horror. She felt compelled to fix the problem. "I was like, 'How hard could it be? I'll teach myself or reach out, see if anyone will teach me,'" the SoCal resident recalls.
"I found no resources. And then the few people I did reach out to that answered were like, 'No,'" says Wall. "One guy said, 'Sit down, little girl, you're going to get hurt.'"
Rejection after rejection, Wall resolved to just put herself out there. She educated herself on reptile husbandry and rattlesnake anatomy, reading research published by the likes of Loma Linda Medical University's herpetology department. And she watched local Facebook groups, waiting for a post by someone looking for help with a rattlesnake.
Her interest was piqued by one woman's post about a snake on her property. In her caption, she specified, "I don't want it killed." The replies completely dismissed the woman's wishes.
"Out of the 30 comments saying, 'Kill it,' I'm the one comment saying, 'I've moved one off the road before. I've got a stick and a bucket. Can I come try?'" Wall remembers. The woman agreed, and Wall was able to successfully, safely send off a second snake.
It wasn't just how easy it was for her to catch and release the snake. It was seeing how happy and calm the woman was as Wall helped her out. "That was the pivot of, 'I can f------ do this,'" says Wall. "And then it built up from there."
At first, she expected it to be a "little bit of a side thing," Wall explains, especially since she doesn't charge for her rattlesnake wrangling service at all. It's donation-based, and she was lucky enough to nab a tire sponsor after she once caught a snake for a man who owns a tire company. He gave her a $2,000 set of tires to help her drive the lengths of Joshua Tree.
The new tires came at the perfect time, too, because it didn't take long before Wall's phone was constantly blowing up with requests for her to wrangle on various properties across the desert. COVID hit during year three of her business, and with so many people staying home — and plenty of city folk heading out to quieter Joshua Tree residences — they started to notice more and more snakes.
"The population was getting higher. The building rates were exponential, just so many houses being built. So a lot of territory for the snakes was demolished," she explains to PEOPLE.
That's not to say there were never any roaming snakes to start with, though. Snakes are all over the desert, hiding in plain sight, especially in Joshua Tree National Park, where people regularly hike and hang out without noticing any vipers. In fact, Wall nods to their widespread presence to illustrate just how mild these creatures really are.
"There's no such thing as an aggressive rattlesnake towards people, because if they were aggressive, no one could live in Joshua Tree. It'd be like the movie Zombieland, but snakes," she says. "If the snakes actually decided to say, 'F--- people,' they could run everyone out of this desert."
Wall continues, "They're plentiful out here, but they're so peaceful and they don't ambush us. It's nothing like that. People just think, 'Oh, well, I don't see them. So, they're not there.'"
During lockdown, her phone started ringing nonstop. She was constantly dropping everything to go visit properties and remove visiting reptiles. It got to the point where she could no longer keep up with her busy lifestyle, balancing school and full-time paid work. She dropped out of college and pointed all her efforts toward snake wrangling.
In place of a steady income, she picks up odd jobs on the side, usually cleaning houses. She used to offer classes on rattlesnakes, charging people $150 to attend a session, but wrangling got in the way of that, too.
"I'd book an hour-and-a-half class, then 10 minutes in, I'd get a snake call. I send my assistant, and then two minutes later, I get another call," she says. "It got to the point where the anxiety I was getting trying to schedule classes to make money was making it so I couldn't go save the snakes, which is my whole purpose."
Legally, she's not able to officially turn her work into a business, but even if she could charge for rattlesnake wrangling, Wall says she wouldn't. She looked at non-profit options, but the California Department of Fish and Wildlife doesn't grant third-party permits.
She's come to terms with the unsteady income, but even with acceptance, Wall admits that times do get tough.
"I struggle financially, big time. People have no idea. They have no f------ clue, and maybe I should be a bit more transparent about it," she tells PEOPLE. "I've had my electricity cut off because I'm more worried about making sure there's gas in my car to go and get snakes instead of paying my own bills."
In place of money, however, Wall soon gained something else: notoriety. "You post one picture of a small tattooed chick holding a rattlesnake," she chuckles, admitting, "It got a lot of attention, and I didn't anticipate that."
Wall's Instagram page, @High_Desert_Dani, has over 116,000 followers. The attention has paid off in a literal sense, too. She works in the entertainment business every so often, with sets hiring her to handle snakes featured in film and television.
"I can charge upwards of a thousand dollars a day. So, if I get two or three really good set gigs over the year, it'll help me make my bills," Wall explains. "But I'm still in the red every year on terms of upkeep on just the snake stuff."
It's an uphill battle, but it's worth it to the California native. She wants to see the state's animal control laws evolve toward a more humane approach. Other parts of the country don't require the vipers to be killed when caught. Elsewhere, there are wildlife facilities that offer rattlesnake relocation training classes and seminars.
"There's other states that are already doing this, and that's how California should be. It shouldn't be that it is just me," she says.
Wall admits that she gets anxiety doing publicity for herself, whether she's speaking to the press, appearing on a screen or posting for her substantial social media audience. She pushes on because she knows more attention will help her change her state's Fish and Game official protocol for handling rattlesnakes.
"When I did some research, that's how a lot of other states ended up getting laws changed: Publicity," she notes. "Enough of the community was in an uproar over the killing. They were able to push for each individual county and eventually the state to uphold those laws."
Sometimes her means of advocacy is misread. People challenge her motives. "I get people online that are like, 'You do this for the fame and money,'" says Wall. "And I love that people do question me, because there are people that claim to do good and they're evil. So I always say, 'Please question me.' I love to be able to prove that I'm doing this for the right reasons over and over and over."
She can sense when someone is in the rattlesnake wrangling business for the wrong reasons. Those people usually wave the bright red flag of a competitive attitude.
"People are like, 'Well, Danielle, you must not want more snake wranglers coming out and taking your job.' I'm like, 'What do you mean f------ taking my job?'" Wall says. "There's always snakes to save. I could use 10 helpers that I could trust, and I would be so grateful."
In Wall's experience, men can be particularly competitive with her, though the snake wrangling is generally a male-dominated field. Wall has had her fair share of sexist remarks since that first "Sit down, little girl." But she's also learned that snake biting is a male-focused area, too. While she was researching the reptiles, she learned that hospital data largely shows snake bites on men 75% to 80% of the time.
"There's a guy at Loma Linda [University] that does the presentations and lectures and seminars on snakes, and he's like, 'The two main reasons for rattlesnake bites are testosterone and booze,'" Wall explains. "And he is a middle-aged man, and he has no shame of being like, 'Men are dumb sometimes.' Because that's how it is in the bite world."
Not unlike the rattlesnakes that lash out, Wall calls men the "number one" thing that scares her. But having grown up with brothers, it's not that she's intimidated, nor that she hates men in general.
"It's more so the fact that these other male snake wranglers have to be better than me," she says. "If that's your goal, you're in it for the wrong reasons. Because I didn't get into this to be the best, I got into it to have a purpose in life."
That really is how it boils down. Rattlesnakes came into Wall's life when she needed something bigger to guide her, something that she could do and feel good doing. Somehow, the timing has always made sense; in addition to her advocacy motive, these reptiles continue to pull her out of her lowest lows.
One December saw Wall deeply depressed. She was going through a "pretty gnarly" breakup, and snakes rarely come out in the winter months. Without wrangling requests on her phone, she really couldn't bring herself up and out of bed. Over the course of months, she lost weight and fell further into that dark place.
On the other side of winter, the sun warmed up the desert again. Snakes started to come out of hiding, and Wall's sense of happiness returned with the snake calls.
"It was a very pivotal moment of just figuring out what makes me happy, why I do what I do, why I am the way I am," she recalls to PEOPLE, with an emotional catch to her voice. "I didn't realize how much the snakes actually gave me the purpose to get up ... I saved snakes and they saved me."
Read the original article on People
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
11 minutes ago
- News24
Diary vs accusation: The timeline battle in Judge President Mbenenge's tribunal
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now Show Comments ()


News24
26 minutes ago
- News24
Pretoria High Court reserves judgment in MaMkhize's fight against PSL
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now Show Comments ()
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
13 Things You Should Never Say—They Can Sound Like Gaslighting
Navigating conversations with grace and empathy is an art form that often takes a lifetime to master. Yet, in the heat of the moment, we can sometimes unwittingly utter phrases that come across as dismissive or manipulative, sometimes even resembling the toxic patterns of gaslighting. While intent and impact may not always align, it's crucial to be aware of words that could inadvertently undermine someone's reality. Here are 13 things you should never say if you wish to maintain a respectful and genuine dialogue. Labeling someone as paranoid is dismissive and can inflict emotional harm, especially if their fears are rooted in past experiences. This phrase casts doubt not on an isolated thought but on the entire cognitive framework of the person you're addressing. By questioning their mental state, you imply a lack of credibility in their ability to interpret situations. A more compassionate route is to explore their concerns with curiosity and validate any underlying feelings. Fear and concern often stem from legitimate past experiences or learned behaviors, making it necessary to approach with empathy. Dismissing these feelings as mere paranoia overlooks the complexity of human emotions and the factors that drive them. Opening a dialogue about what underpins their feelings can lead to a deeper understanding and mutual respect. It's about offering assurance that you're a partner in navigating these emotions, not an opponent. Blaming someone else for your actions is a classic deflection technique that denies personal accountability. This phrase shifts responsibility from your behavior to their influence, which is neither fair nor constructive. It undermines the person's sense of agency and can create an unhealthy dynamic in the relationship. Taking ownership of your actions demonstrates maturity and a willingness to address conflicts collaboratively. Personal accountability is a cornerstone of meaningful relationships, and shirking it in favor of blame can erode trust. By attributing your actions to someone else's influence, you create a dynamic where manipulation and control are subtly reinforced. Instead, own your choices and engage in a dialogue that explores the underlying issues together. This approach fosters mutual respect and a commitment to healthier interactions going forward. Dismissing someone's emotions by telling them they're overreacting can be incredibly invalidating. Psychotherapist Dr. Leslie Becker-Phelps emphasizes that emotions are complex and valid, even if they seem disproportionate to you. By dismissing them, you undermine the other person's experience and convey that their feelings are not worthy of attention. Instead, acknowledge their emotions and offer a safe space for them to express themselves without judgment. Emotions do not exist in a vacuum; they are intricately tied to personal experiences and perceptions. When you dismiss these emotions, you inadvertently dismiss the person's entire narrative, which can be deeply damaging to trust and open communication. Opt for a more empathetic approach by asking questions to understand rather than dictate how they should feel. Considering their perspective can deepen your empathy and strengthen the relationship. Telling someone to calm down when they're visibly upset is akin to throwing water on a grease fire. Rather than soothing the situation, it often exacerbates it, as it implies they should dampen their emotions to accommodate your comfort. This phrase assumes an air of authority over their emotional state, which can be both patronizing and controlling. A more constructive approach would be to ask how you can assist or support them through their emotional upheaval. Emotional expressions are not switches that can be turned off at will, and suggesting otherwise can make someone feel as if they're being unreasonable. The reality is that emotions require processing, and your role should be to offer a supportive environment for that process. By actively listening instead of instructing, you empower the other person to work through their feelings at their own pace. True support lies in your willingness to be present without imposing timelines or expectations. What might seem trivial to you could be monumental to someone else. Dr. Elizabeth Lombardo, a psychologist and author, points out that minimizing someone's concerns can make them feel belittled and unimportant. It turns the focus away from their feelings and projects your insensitivity to their experience. A more effective strategy is to acknowledge their feelings and validate their importance, which fosters a sense of understanding and connection. By downplaying their concerns, you risk eroding the trust that is the bedrock of any meaningful relationship. This phrase can make the other person feel isolated, as if their perspective is invalid or irrelevant. Instead, express genuine curiosity and empathy by asking open-ended questions to better grasp their viewpoint. This not only enriches your understanding but also demonstrates that you value their perspective, no matter how minor it may initially seem to you. Denying something you've said, particularly when there's evidence to the contrary, can be gaslighting in its purest form. According to Dr. Robin Stern, associate director of the Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence, this phrase erodes trust and distorts reality, leaving the other person confused and uncertain. It shifts the conversation from the issue at hand to a debate over memory and perception, which can be deeply unsettling. If you misspoke or changed your mind, own it and clarify your current stance instead of rewriting history. Mistakes happen, and owning up to them is far more constructive than deflecting responsibility. By denying your previous statements, you suggest that the other person's recollection is faulty, which can destabilize their confidence in future interactions. Acknowledge past statements and use them as a stepping stone for more transparent and honest communication. This not only builds trust but also shows a commitment to integrity in your dialogue. Telling someone that their feelings or perceptions are all in their head is a dismissive tactic that minimizes their lived experiences. It implies that their thoughts and emotions lack legitimacy and are merely figments of their imagination. This phrase can make them question their sanity and damage self-esteem, which often leads to further internal conflict. Opt for validating their experience and exploring the roots of their feelings together. The mind is complex, housing both conscious and subconscious elements that shape our perceptions and emotions. Invalidating someone's mental or emotional state dismisses this complexity and undermines their sense of self. Instead, engage with their perspective and encourage deeper exploration of their feelings. This not only promotes personal growth but also solidifies your relationship as one rooted in mutual respect and understanding. While perspective can be important, telling someone that their situation could be worse minimizes their current struggles. This phrase can come off as callous, suggesting that their emotions are unworthy of empathy or attention. It dismisses their feelings in favor of a hypothetical scenario, which is neither helpful nor compassionate. Instead, focus on providing support and validation by acknowledging their current dilemma and offering help. Everyone experiences hardship differently, and comparing struggles rarely brings comfort or clarity. Invalidating someone's feelings by suggesting worse scenarios can create distance and alienation in your relationship. Remember that empathy doesn't require comparison but rather an understanding and acknowledgment of someone's current reality. By showing up for them in the present moment, you strengthen the bond and facilitate an open, trusting dialogue. When your words hurt someone, explaining your intent doesn't negate the impact. By focusing on your intention, you shift the dialogue from their feelings to your defense, disregarding their emotional response. It's crucial to recognize that words carry weight, and their interpretation matters just as much as intention. Apologize for the harm caused and engage in a conversation about how to communicate more effectively in the future. Intentions are important, but they don't erase the emotional fallout from your words. Insisting that you didn't mean it "like that" can invalidate the other person's experience and make them feel unheard. Instead, acknowledge the impact of your words and commit to understanding why they may have been hurtful. Taking responsibility fosters an atmosphere of mutual respect and understanding, allowing for growth and improved communication. Labeling someone as too sensitive implies that their emotional responses are flawed or excessive, which can be incredibly invalidating. It suggests that they should alter their emotional baseline to suit your comfort, which is neither fair nor reasonable. Instead of judging their sensitivity, try to understand the depth of their emotions and what triggers them. This approach encourages a more empathetic understanding of each other's emotional landscapes. Emotional sensitivity is a natural part of the human experience, varying from person to person based on a multitude of factors. By dismissing someone's sensitivity, you overlook the richness of their emotional experience and the reasons behind it. Rather than focusing on changing their emotional responses, engage in a dialogue that explores and appreciates their unique perspective. This fosters a deeper connection and allows for a more nuanced understanding of each other. Telling someone they're being dramatic is a dismissive critique of their emotional expression. It implies that their feelings are exaggerated and unwarranted, which can be deeply invalidating. This phrase often stems from a lack of understanding or discomfort with the intensity of the other person's emotions. Rather than dismissing their expression, offer support and seek to understand the underlying causes of their emotional state. Drama in emotional expression often signals a need for attention and understanding, not ridicule. By labeling their emotions as drama, you discount the genuine feelings that fuel their expression. Instead, encourage open dialogue about what they're experiencing and how you can provide support. This reframing fosters empathy and allows for a more genuine connection, reducing the need for heightened emotional expression. Disputing someone's recollection of events can be deeply invalidating, especially if trust is already fragile. It implies that their memory is unreliable, which can lead to self-doubt and confusion. Instead of contesting their version of events, express your perspective and seek common ground. This approach opens a dialogue rather than closing off communication, fostering a more respectful and empathetic exchange. Memory is a complex and subjective phenomenon, often colored by emotions and perspectives unique to each individual. Dismissing someone's recollection can undermine their confidence and disrupt the mutual trust necessary for healthy communication. Instead, share your own perspective without negating theirs, creating a space where both sides feel validated. This promotes a more inclusive dialogue and strengthens the relationship by honoring both narratives. Using absolutes like "always" or "never" can corner someone into a defensive stance, detracting from productive conversation. In a study conducted by the Gottman Institute, it was revealed that criticism using absolutes is one of the predictors of relationship dissatisfaction. By generalizing their behavior, you obscure the nuances of the current issue and paint their character in an unfairly negative light. A more effective approach would be to focus on the specific behavior in question, avoiding sweeping generalizations. People are complex and capable of change, making it crucial to address actions, not inherent qualities. When you label someone with absolutes, you offer no room for growth or redemption, effectively trapping them in a perpetual cycle of blame. Instead, articulate how a particular action affects you, leaving room for constructive change and dialogue. This approach fosters an environment where both parties feel empowered to address concerns and grow together.