Berkshire pharmacist warns about unregulated weight loss drugs
'Image-conscious'
Research from the NPA found 35% of 16-34 year olds had attempted to access weight loss treatments in the last year, either through an online or in person pharmacy."We think that this is primarily driven by online social media platforms, younger people are maybe more image-conscious and therefore desperate to access a treatment for one reason or another," said Mr Picard.But he said people were only eligible for the drugs if their BMI was over a certain number, or if they had certain comorbidities."What we're seeing is a lot of young people coming in for the treatment who are not eligible," he said."People then still have that desperation of thinking that this is the holy grail of weight loss and go and access it online."
The repercussions of this can be "horrendous", he said."Someone who came to my pharmacy having purchased something on a social media platform, received four syringes with some fluid in it, injected it - it was pure insulin," he said."Luckily for that patient, whilst she went into a hypoglycaemic coma, she had family with her, they called an ambulance, she is fine."But... buying from social media platforms, you don't know what you're getting and this is why we're putting out these warnings."The MHRA spokesperson said: "Our Criminal Enforcement Unit works tirelessly with partners to prevent, detect and investigate illegal activity involving medicines and medical devices... this can lead to the removal of social media posts illegally selling medicines and, where necessary, the suspension of accounts and the taking down of websites."
You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
GPs warned using AI to record patient notes can lead to dangerous inaccuracies
GPs have been warned to look out for 'inaccurate or fabricated' information when using AI to write their medical notes. Family doctors are increasingly using tools that listen to their consultations with patients and automatically add summaries to their records. But the Royal College of GPs has warned AI can misinterpret the nuance of conversations, with potential dangerous consequences. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) also says there is a 'risk of hallucination which users should be aware of, and manufacturers should actively seek to minimise and mitigate the potential harms of their occurrence'. The safety watchdog is now urging GPs to report issues with AI scribes through its Yellow Card Scheme, which is typically used to report adverse reactions to medicines. This should include 'suspected inaccuracies', trade publication GP Online reports. The British Medical Association's GP Committee said earlier this year that 'the adoption of passive scribes in general practice has gathered significant pace', with practices using standalone systems or tools rolled out with other common software. Dr Phil Whitaker, a UK GP who recently moved to Canada, wrote in the New Statesman that an AI tool he used was 'not to be trusted'. He said it misinterpreted conversations with patients who asked him about his move from the UK - and recorded notes suggesting patients had recently moved to Canada instead. He added: 'I've caught it recording findings of examinations I haven't performed and detailing advice I haven't given. 'The company that makes it advises users to check its output carefully. 'For me, the time spent reading and editing outweighs any productivity gains.' And an article published by Fortune last month outlined a case in which 'a patient in London was mistakenly invited to a diabetic screening after an AI-generated medical record falsely claimed he had diabetes and suspected heart disease'. However, despite this growing use of AI and the recognition of potential problems, the MHRA said a search of its database revealed 'no adverse incident reports related to the use of AI scribes'. The government's 10-Year Health Plan says it intends to 'accelerate the adoption and spread of AI technology, such as AI scribes, by streamlining AI regulation'. A new national procurement platform will be set up next year to support GP practices and NHS trusts to adopt new technology safely. Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the RCGP, said: 'AI has enormous potential for transforming the future of our health and patient care. Fewer than one in three Britons are comfortable with the prospect of using new AI features in the NHS App to diagnose their issues, a poll reveals. Health secretary Wes Streeting announced plans to revamp the app as part of Labour's 10-Year Health Plan so every patient could have a 'doctor in their pocket'. But a new survey found 44 per of the public are 'uncomfortable' with trusting the diagnosis and management of their conditions to artificial intelligence, with this figure rising to 60 per cent among pensioners. Only 31 per cent of the 2,030 respondents to the Savanta poll, for the Liberal Democrats, said they are 'comfortable' with the idea. Helen Morgan, the Liberal Democrat's health spokesperson, praised Labour for tackling bureaucracy but added: 'Making the NHS more efficient is of course welcome but it cannot come at the cost of leaving people behind as they try to grapple with digitised services rather than a real life doctor. 'Ministers need to allay these fears by offering support to those who are not digitally literate and older people to ensure that these sweeping changes benefit everyone.' Speaking at the Plan's launch last month, Mr Streeting said: 'The NHS App will become a doctor in your pocket, bringing our health service into the 21st century.' It will use patients' medical records and artificial intelligence to provide instant answers to users' questions and direct them to the best place for care. Dennis Reed, director of Silver Voices, which campaigns for elderly Britons, said at the time 'Elderly people will be sceptical about whether the plan will be delivered and concerned that greater reliance on the app could exclude them from accessing timely care. 'For some, the doctor in their pocket will be padlocked.' 'However, its use is not without risks and so its implementation in general practice must be closely regulated to guarantee patient safety and the security of their data. 'GPs are always open to introducing new technologies that can improve the experience of patients and help cut the administrative burden, and an increasing number of GP practices are now using AI scribing tools to improve the quality and efficiency of their consultations. 'While these tools can offer real benefits, particularly at a time of significant GP workforce pressures, there are some important concerns - particularly around data security of sensitive patient records, data controllership and the risk of inaccuracies. 'We are aware that AI scribes can produce inaccurate or fabricated details, and that they can also misinterpret the nuance of conversations. 'It is important that clinicians review AI-generated documentation for accuracy before adding it to the patient record.' The MHRA said: 'The MHRA is aware of this potential issue in AI enabled tools generally and this includes AI scribe tools. 'We recommend that GPs and healthcare professionals only use tools which are registered medical devices which have been determined to meet the required standards of performance and safety. 'Recently published MHRA guidance clarifies how these technologies qualify as medical devices and while this is specific to digital mental health, the principles apply across digital health applications. 'While not published by the MHRA, NHS England guidance encourages the use only of registered medical devices when used in a clinical context. 'We strongly encourage that all suspected adverse incidents, including suspected inaccuracies are reported to the MHRA via the yellow card scheme.' The watchdog said the yellow card scheme website had been updated to include 'a standalone page for software and AI as medical device'. Earlier this year, the BMA advised practices to pause use of AI scribes until they had carried out data protection and safety checks and sought assurances that the products meet NHS standards.
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'I'm a personal trainer and there's 3 signs your body is storing fat'
Shedding body fat is a popular fitness goal for many people but it's not always a simple task. A personal trainer has shared three signs that your body might be holding on to excess fat. A common fitness aim for many people is to lose weight or trim down the fat. The two main methods of doing this are through diet and exercise, which means maintaining eating less by sticking to a calorie deficit, choosing nutrient-rich foods, and taking part in regular workouts. But, some people find their fat loss journey challenging even when focusing on these aspects, so an expert has shared some indicators that your body might be hoarding fat. Helen Laverick, a women's online fitness coach from the UK with a large Instagram following, regularly posts fitness and nutrition tips, along with exercise guides. In one of her posts, the personal trainer gave some information to help those struggling to reduce body fat. The fitness instructo r shared her insights in the post's caption, stating: "I used to think that cutting back on food would automatically lead to fat loss, but I eventually learned that sometimes eating less doesn't mean you're burning fat. "In fact, I noticed a few key signs that my body wasn't allowing me to see the desired change and preventing me from losing fat..." She then listed three signs that your body "might be preventing you from losing fat." 1. Persistent energy slumps and sluggishness after meals Helen observed that despite lowering her calorie intake she would "always feel sluggish after meals." She found herself experiencing energy dips post-meal and also had bouts of low energy that didn't align with her levels of activity or sleep patterns. The fitness coach explained: "This post-meal lethargy can sometimes be related to how your body handles insulin and holds onto fat, particularly if your diet is high in simple carbs or isn't balanced with enough protein and healthy fats." 2. Increased waist circumference and tighter-fitting clothes Helen remarked: "Even though I was cutting calories, my jeans began to feel tighter around the midsection. It was confusing at first...l was eating less, yet my waistline was expanding. "This change in measurements is a clear indicator that I wasn't losing fat, especially around the abdomen, even if the scale doesn't show a dramatic shift!". Harvard Health Publishing has suggested a reason for an increasing waistline without weight gain. It notes that as we age, our muscle mass typically decreases, meaning our core muscles aren't as firm as they once were. Also, a reduction in elastin and collagen in the skin makes it more susceptible to gravity's effects, causing sagging. These changes can lead to a broader waistline. 3. Loss of muscle definition despite consistent training Helen added: "I noticed that despite my regular workouts and lifting heavy, my muscles weren't as defined as they used to be. "This lack of definition can occur when fat accumulates over the muscle, masking the hard work l was putting in at the gym." She concluded her post by reminding that tracking body fat "isn't always obvious on the scale." The personal trainer suggests checking how your clothes fit, your energy levels, and the definition of your muscles.
The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
Calvin Harris and Vick Hope appear to share ‘placenta capsules' photo – here's what the experts say
Vick Hope and Calvin Harris recently announced they'd welcomed a baby boy into the world in a series of Instagram posts. The posts showed photos of Harris and the baby, named Micah, and photos of Hope in a birthing pool. There were also photos of Hope's placenta and some capsules that looked like the product of placenta encapsulation. Harris wrote, '20th of July our boy arrived. Micah is here! My wife is a superhero and I am in complete awe of her primal wisdom! Just so grateful. We love you so much Micah.' Many women opt to consume their own placenta after their baby is born, and although many animals do this, experts disagree about whether this is a worthwhile practice for humans. The placenta is a temporary organ that provides a baby with nutrients during pregnancy, and it looks as though Hope decided to have hers encapsulated – a practice that is growing in popularity. Hillary Duff opted to drink a portion of her placenta in a smoothie after giving birth. 'I know it sounds gross, but it's so badass a woman can grow a temporary organ – and then you can eat it!' she said. Millie Mackintosh also posted that she had 'decided to get my placenta made into pills' after the birth of her second daughter, and Kourtney Kardashian also opted for placenta encapsulation. Many women choose to consume their placenta after giving birth, sometimes raw but otherwise cooked, dehydrated, processed, drunk as tea or encapsulated as a supplement. We asked the experts whether there are any benefits to doing this and, if so, are placenta pills the best way to do it? What is Placentophagy? Placentophagy is the postpartum ingestion of the placenta, which can be eaten in a variety of ways. Placenta tablets, also known as placenta capsules, are pills created by drying and grinding up a placenta into a powder, then encapsulating it. Placentophagia is a common mammalian behaviour observed in rats, sheep and primates, and studies have shown the benefits in these animals. However, there is little evidence that the practice is beneficial for human health. Women who choose to consume their placenta after birth believe it provides health benefits associated with hormones and nutrients that might have been depleted during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Some people consume a portion of or the whole placenta immediately after giving birth, and some might take capsules each day during the postpartum period. A 2020 research paper explains that, 'the supposed benefits' of eating placenta are '[an] increase in milk production quality and quantity, improving weight gain of the newborn, as well as decreasing postpartum depression rates'. However, the same paper cites reports disputing these supposed benefits. Researchers found that 'Placebo-controlled studies of placental capsules have not shown significant effects on hormonal levels, milk production, and weight gain in the newborn.' In fact, there is also evidence that eating a placenta could be harmful. Placentas exchange nutrients and waste products between a mother and her baby, so placentas have been known to contain trace elements of toxic elements like arsenic and cadmium, particularly if the mother is a smoker. Placentas also need to be prepared safely to prevent disease. This 2020 paper states that if a mother chooses to eat or drink her placenta, there is also a present risk of 'bacterial or viral infections, hormonal, or trace elements that could become toxic for both the mother and baby.' 'It can be very appealing thinking that the placenta that has helped you nourish your baby inside your womb, can then also nourish you after birth. In one sense, it feels right because that is its job – to nourish and grow your child, ' adds consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist Dr Shazia Malik. 'But we shouldn't forget that the equally important role of the placenta is to remove toxins and chemicals from the baby via your circulation, so you could inadvertently be giving yourself a concentrated dose of heavy metals, toxins, and also bacteria. Cases of babies getting GBS infections from placenta capsules have been described, and as there is no universal screening for this, you would not know if this is present in your placenta.' Placenta pills: Are there any health benefits? Despite the increasing popularity of placenta pills, some research has debunked the theory that consuming the placenta offers health benefits. In 2015, the BBC reported that a review by Northwestern University found no proven benefits and no research on the potential risks. Lead study author Cynthia Coyle says, 'Women really don't know what they are ingesting.' A 2018 study showed that women who were given placebo capsules or placental capsules had no significant differences in mood, fatigue, or the emotional bond between mother and newborn. Another paper from 2017 compared placenta capsules with a beef placebo and found that, despite the placenta being higher in iron, there was no difference in the iron levels of the women consuming the capsules. Some experts suggest that the way the placenta is prepared – whether raw, cooked, dehydrated, processed, or encapsulated – alters its components, and thus the desired effects. However, the level of digestive absorption of the different hormones present in the placenta has never been studied. 'The science for any benefit just isn't there,' says Malik. 'It's an expensive, unregulated business to encapsulate placentas. Women should not be made to feel that they are missing out by not doing it, and the concerns regarding potentially passing on harmful infections are valid.'
