logo
Kolhapur residents hold 45-km silent march for elephant's return

Kolhapur residents hold 45-km silent march for elephant's return

Hindustan Times9 hours ago
MUMBAI: After the transfer of Mahadevi, an elephant belonging to a Jain shrine in Kolhapur, to Vantara, an animal rescue and rehabilitation initiative by the Reliance Foundation in Jamnagar, those who were unwilling to let go staged a march on Sunday. Thousands of locals and leaders from the ruling Mahayuti alliance in Kolhapur marched for 45 km from the shrine to the collector's office, demanding that Mahadevi be brought back, following which CM Devendra Fadnavis said he would hold a meeting on this on Tuesday. Starting from the Jain Shrine where the elephant, Mahadevi, was kept for the last 30 years, thousands walked together to the collector's office.
Mahadevi, 36, was transferred from the Swastishri Jinsen Bhattarak Pattacharya Mahaswamy Sanstha to Vantara, following a Bombay high court order on July 16. The court's decision came after hearing a petition by the People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), which had earlier raised concerns about the elephant's health and psychological condition with the Maharashtra forest department and the High-Powered Committee (HPC) appointed by the Supreme Court to look after the transfer and welfare of captive elephants.
PETA had pointed out that the elephant had painful arthritis and foot rot and was kept in solitary confinement. The Supreme Court upheld the HC order on July 22.
After initial resistance, Mahadevi was given a tearful farewell at the temple and shifted to Vantara on July 28, but plans by politicians and the people were afoot. Kolhapur residents reportedly began to boycott the Reliance Group's JIO mobile service and launched a signature campaign signed by 200,400 people to be sent to the President of India. After the outcry, Vantara's CEO Vivaan Karani met guardian minister Prakash Abitkar on Friday, following which the latter announced that the state government would move the Supreme Court to hand Mahadevi back to the Jain shrine.
The march on Sunday began under the leadership of former MP Raju Shetti, which people joined en route. Other politicians who participated were BJP MLA Rahul Aawade, his father, former minister Prakash Awade, Shirol MLA Rajendra Patil-Yadravkar, Congress leader Satej Patil, Sangli MP Vishal Patil, MLA Vishwajit Kadam and local leaders. A memorandum was submitted to the authorities, urging them to bring the elephant back to the Jain math, where she was kept for over three decades.
Addressing the crowd, Raju Shetti called the 'chronology of events leading to the transfer' of Mahadevi to Jamnagar a 'conspiracy'. He also alleged that fake health reports were submitted to the court by PETA and other concerned authorities to obtain an order for Mahadevi's transfer, and called for action against those responsible for submitting the reports. He also demanded that the President cancel the Supreme Court ruling and ensure the elephant's return to Kolhapur.
Meanwhile, Vantara also issued an official statement on Sunday and said that it had played no role in seeking Mahadev's transfer. Rueing the 'considerable misinformation' that was being spread about this, the trust pointed out that it was named as a recipient by the HPC, based on its track record in elephant welfare. 'If the math feels it is entitled to the custody of the elephant despite enough proof and the final decision of the court, it should ask the Supreme Court to give it the elephant,' said the statement. 'What is the point of blaming Vantara? The promoter family, which supports Vantara philanthropically… were not party to the proceedings at any stage. Vantara reiterates its commitment to lawful, ethical animal care and has only acted in accordance with judicial and regulatory directives.'
The Vantara statement also pointed out that the elephant had been transported 13 times from Maharashtra to Telangana between 2012 and 2023, often without proper forest department permissions. Reports and photographs documented that the elephant was being used commercially. 'She was sent for public processions, including Muharram, used for begging, and publicly paraded,' added the official statement. Using elephants for begging is unlawful and there are many conditions that have to be met before they can be paraded.
Congress politician Satej Patil said that although Vantara had agreed to cooperate in transferring the elephant back to the Jain shrine, the state government should also intervene in the matter. Fadnavis, on his part, pointed out that the elephant was transferred to Vantara on a Supreme Court order and announced that he would hold a meeting on the issue on Tuesday. 'I will look into the legal aspects related to bringing Mahadevi back,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress, 'China guru' Rahul Gandhi hate Indian armed forces: BJP
Congress, 'China guru' Rahul Gandhi hate Indian armed forces: BJP

Business Standard

time7 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Congress, 'China guru' Rahul Gandhi hate Indian armed forces: BJP

After the Supreme Court rapped Rahul Gandhi over his alleged derogatory remarks about the Army, the BJP on Monday claimed that the "China guru" and his party hate Indian armed forces and that he is being remote controlled by foreign forces. The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the proceedings against Gandhi before a Lucknow court over his remarks about the Army during his December 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra. The court, however, censured the leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha, saying if he is a true Indian, he would not say such a thing. Reacting to the development, BJP IT department head Amit Malviya said in a post on X, "The Supreme Court has once again reprimanded 'China Guru' Rahul Gandhi for making irresponsible statements concerning India's national security and territorial integrity." "Imagine, a leader of the opposition being repeatedly rebuked for speaking such recklessly," he said. Malviya also took on the Congress leader over his recent "dead" economy remark, calling it "a diplomatic disaster on multiple fronts". "His recent 'dead economy' jibe is just the latest in a long series. In doing so, he implicitly admitted that Russia, a long-standing ally, is struggling, while bizarrely endorsing a hostile state like Pakistan as having a robust economy," he said. Echoing US President Donald Trump's criticism of the Indian economy, Gandhi said on August 1 that everybody except Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman know that the country's economy is "dead". Referring to Gandhi's remarks on the surgical strike and Operation Sindoor, BJP national spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla alleged that the Congress leader and his party "hate" Indian armed forces. "Sena ka Apman Congress ki pehchan (Insulting the Congress is the hallmark of the Congress)," he said in a post on X. "Rahul and Congress hate Indian Armed Forces," he charged, adding, "Today SC has slammed him." Another BJP national spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari said on X that the Supreme Court's poser to Gandhi about his claim exposed him. He said, "Supreme Court asks Rahul Gandhi - 'How did you know that China had occupied land?'" This question by the Supreme Court has not only "exposed" Gandhi, but further got the attention back on the "secret MoU that Gandhi-Vadra family had with China", he said.

Supreme Court agrees to examine plea to repeal Bodh Gaya temple law
Supreme Court agrees to examine plea to repeal Bodh Gaya temple law

Economic Times

time7 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Supreme Court agrees to examine plea to repeal Bodh Gaya temple law

PTI Mahabodhi Temple, known as Mahabodhi Mahavihara, in Bodh Gaya, Gaya district, Bihar. The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine a plea for repealing the Bodh Gaya Temple Act, 1949 and replacing it with a central law for the proper control, management and administration of Mahabodhi temple in Bihar. The Mahabodhi Temple Complex in Bihar's Bodh Gaya, a UNESCO World Heritage site, is one of the four holy areas related to the life of Lord Gautam Buddha. Bodh Gaya is a place where Lord Buddha is believed to have attained enlightenment. The plea, which has also challenged the validity of the 1949 Act, came up for hearing before a bench of Justices M M Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh. The petitioner's counsel said a plea with identical prayers was pending in the apex court. The bench issued notice to the Centre and others seeking their responses on the petition and tagged it for hearing along with the pending plea. The plea has sought to declare the 1949 Act as unconstitutional alleging it was "inconsistent" with Article 13 of the Constitution. Article 13 relates to laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights. The petition has also sought a direction to the authorities concerned to remove encroachments made in the premises of the Bodh Gaya temple for the exclusive worship of Buddhists around the world in order to manage, control and administer the religious, faith, belief and worship in the interest of justice. On June 30, the apex court refused to entertain a separate plea challenging the vires of the 1949 Act and asked the petitioner to moved high court concerned. The 1949 Act relates to the better management of the temple. The Mahabodhi Temple Complex comprises a 50-metre high grand temple, the Vajrasana, the sacred Bodhi tree and six other sacred sites of Buddha's enlightenment, surrounded by numerous ancient votive stupas, well maintained and protected by inner, middle and outer circular boundaries. A seventh sacred place, the Lotus Pond, is located outside the enclosure to the south. Both the temple area and the Lotus Pond are surrounded by circulating passages at two or three levels, and the area of the ensemble is 5 metres below the level of the surrounding land.

SC questions Uttar Pradesh's ‘tearing hurry' in promulgating Banke Bihari temple ordinance
SC questions Uttar Pradesh's ‘tearing hurry' in promulgating Banke Bihari temple ordinance

Scroll.in

time7 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

SC questions Uttar Pradesh's ‘tearing hurry' in promulgating Banke Bihari temple ordinance

The Supreme Court on Monday questioned the 'tearing hurry' with which the Uttar Pradesh government promulgated the 2025 Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, which permitted it to take over the management of the shrine in Mathura district's Vrindavan, Live Law reported. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi was hearing petitions against the ordinance. It also expressed disapproval of the 'clandestine manner' in which the state government, by filing an application in a civil dispute, secured permission through a May 15 judgement to use temple funds for the development of a corridor. The May 15 verdict permitted the state government to use temple funds to acquire five acres of land to develop a corridor that is estimated to cost Rs 500 crore, India Today reported. However, this was allowed on the condition that the land should be registered in the name of the deity. On Monday, the bench verbally proposed to recall the directions in the May 15 verdict, Live Law reported. It also proposed the formation of a committee headed by a retired judge to oversee the management of the temple while the validity of the ordinance was being decided by the High Court. The bench then adjourned the hearing of the petitions against the ordinance till Tuesday. During the proceedings, advocate Shyam Divan, appearing for the former management of the temple, told the court that the ordinance ejected the Goswamis, who were earlier managing the temple, and vested the state government with the management, Live Law reported. He added that the directions in the May 15 judgement were passed 'behind the back of the management' as they were not heard. The verdict came in a case that dealt with a private dispute between two sects, the advocate added. The state government intervened in the private dispute and secured the orders for the utilisation of the temple funds, he added. The lawyer for the former management of the temple urged the court to issue a status quo order and further questioned the need for the state government to urgently promulgate an ordinance. 'Ordinance is for emergency measures,' Live Law quoted Divan as having said. The bench then asked Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, representing the state government, how the May 15 judgment could be justified when the affected parties were not heard. Kant criticised the manner in which the directions were passed without notice to the affected parties. 'A public notice could have been issued,' Live Law quoted Kant as having said. 'It was not a case of No Man's Land. Someone had to be heard on the behalf of the temple… Temple funds will have to be utilised for pilgrims, can't be pocketed by private persons.' He also added that the state government had filed an application in the dispute in a 'clandestine manner', adding that this was unacceptable. The judge asked why the state government did not acquire the land as per the law after paying compensation. 'What was the tearing hurry for the ordinance?' Live Law quoted Kant as having asked. The case The Banke Bihari temple in Vrindavan has historically been managed privately. In 2023, the Allahabad High Court permitted the development of a corridor that was proposed by the Uttar Pradesh government, Live Law reported. However, it restrained the state government from using Rs 262.5 crore from the temple fund for its construction. In March, the High Court appointed advocate Sanjay Goswami as an amicus curiae to assist in resolving management-related issues. Subsequently, the state government promulgated the 2025 Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance. It proposed the creation of a statutory trust with several state government officials as ex-officio trustees. On May 15, the Supreme Court modified the 2023 order issued by the High Court. The bench allowed the state government to use temple funds to acquire five acres of land around the temple for the development of the corridor. The verdict came in a private dispute between two sects

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store