Kubota & Craig Earns Prestigious Tier 1 National Ranking From Best Lawyers
06/27/2025, Irvine, CA // KISS PR Brand Story PressWire //
Kubota & Craig, a trusted name in personal injury law in Irvine, CA, is pleased to announce that it has received Tier 1 national ranking from Best Lawyers. This prestigious recognition highlights its exceptional legal expertise and strong reputation within the legal community.
Tier 1 rankings are typically awarded to full-service firms with highly experienced attorneys and a proven track record of success. The evaluation process is rigorous and involves peer reviews, client feedback, and an assessment of the firm's overall performance. Best Lawyers considers nominations from attorneys nationwide and surveys clients and peers to assess respect, integrity, and legal skill. Kubota & Craig's inclusion among Tier 1 firms shows its leadership in personal injury law and dedication to client advocacy.
Kubota & Craig handles a wide range of personal injury cases, including motor vehicle accidents, slip-and-fall incidents, traumatic brain injuries, and wrongful death claims. It guides clients through every step of the legal process, from insurance negotiations and medical expense recovery to courtroom representation when necessary.
What sets Kubota & Craig Irvine apart is its team of seasoned trial attorneys. Founding partners Yoshiaki C. Kubota and Cynthia A. Craig bring over 50 years of combined courtroom experience. Kubota is widely recognized as one of Southern California's premier trial lawyers, while Craig has earned several industry awards for her skill in handling complex auto accident and wrongful death cases. For anyone seeking a skilled car accident lawyer Irvine residents trust, their experience and results speak volumes.
Kubota & Craig is committed to making legal representation accessible to all injury victims by offering services in both English and Spanish. Clients also benefit from a contingency-based fee structure, meaning they only pay if the firm wins their case.
Based in Irvine, California, Kubota & Craig proudly serves clients across Orange County, including Tustin, Lake Forest, and surrounding communities. Its expertise extends to specialized areas, such as truck accident lawsuits, where the firm tackles complex liability issues against commercial carriers, construction site injury claims that often involve multi-party negligence, and workplace compensation cases governed by California labor regulations. In each case, the team conducts in-depth investigations, collaborates with medical and technical experts, and pursues every available legal avenue to maximize client recovery.
With a client-first approach rooted in compassion and determination, Kubota & Craig has achieved significant settlements and received positive testimonials from satisfied clients. The firm is available 24/7 and offers free consultations to those in need of an experienced injury lawyer Irvine .
To learn more about Kubota & Craig and its services, visit its website at https://www.kubotacraig.com .
About Kubota & Craig
Kubota & Craig is a trusted personal injury law firm based in Irvine, CA, that provides strategic and compassionate representation to accident victims. With years of experience, the firm handles cases involving car accidents, slip and fall incidents, and other personal injury claims, helping clients pursue maximum compensation. Serving clients across Orange County, Kubota & Craig is committed to justice, integrity, and personalized service.
###
Media Contact
Kubota & Craig
16530 Bake Pkwy Suite 100, Irvine, California, 92618
(949) 218-5676
https://www.kubotacraig.com
newsroom: news.38digitalmarket.com
Source published by Submit Press Release >> Kubota & Craig Earns Prestigious Tier 1 National Ranking From Best Lawyers
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
Senate braces for first big vote on Trump agenda – with support still unclear
Senate Republicans are about to face a major test of loyalty to President Donald Trump, as the chamber braces for its first vote on whether to advance the president's giant tax cuts and spending bill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune and his team have been fiercely lobbying their members to get in line behind the measure, with Trump and White House officials also leaning heavily on the remaining GOP holdouts. Trump met with two key holdouts — Sen. Rick Scott of Florida and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin — on Saturday, just hours before GOP leaders hoped to hold the vote, according to those senators' close colleague, Sen. Mike Lee of Utah. He has also spoken to other critical votes, like Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, who earlier Saturday declared his support for the bill. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, another critic of the bill, golfed with the president on Saturday morning, according to Sen. Lindsay Graham. But it's not yet clear whether Thune will be able to limit defections on a procedural vote, to start centrists like Sen. Thom Tillis and a small group of GOP hardliners — Lee, Scott and Johnson — still pushing for changes to the bill. But GOP leadership believe they will ultimately succeed, thanks, in part, to immense pressure from Trump. Already two Republicans, Tillis and Johnson, have said they would block the bill from moving ahead. That leaves Thune just one more vote to lose. It all amounts to an intense Saturday scramble for Trump and GOP leaders, who are intent on passing the president's agenda as quickly as possible. Trump has told GOP leaders he wants to sign the bill at the White House on July 4 – but that would still require approval from the narrowly divided GOP-controlled House, which is also no guarantee. This story is breaking and will be updated.
CNN
9 minutes ago
- CNN
Senate braces for first big vote on Trump agenda – with support still unclear
Senate Republicans are about to face a major test of loyalty to President Donald Trump, as the chamber braces for its first vote on whether to advance the president's giant tax cuts and spending bill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune and his team have been fiercely lobbying their members to get in line behind the measure, with Trump and White House officials also leaning heavily on the remaining GOP holdouts. Trump met with two key holdouts — Sen. Rick Scott of Florida and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin — on Saturday, just hours before GOP leaders hoped to hold the vote, according to those senators' close colleague, Sen. Mike Lee of Utah. He has also spoken to other critical votes, like Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, who earlier Saturday declared his support for the bill. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, another critic of the bill, golfed with the president on Saturday morning, according to Sen. Lindsay Graham. But it's not yet clear whether Thune will be able to limit defections on a procedural vote, to start centrists like Sen. Thom Tillis and a small group of GOP hardliners — Lee, Scott and Johnson — still pushing for changes to the bill. But GOP leadership believe they will ultimately succeed, thanks, in part, to immense pressure from Trump. Already two Republicans, Tillis and Johnson, have said they would block the bill from moving ahead. That leaves Thune just one more vote to lose. It all amounts to an intense Saturday scramble for Trump and GOP leaders, who are intent on passing the president's agenda as quickly as possible. Trump has told GOP leaders he wants to sign the bill at the White House on July 4 – but that would still require approval from the narrowly divided GOP-controlled House, which is also no guarantee. This story is breaking and will be updated.
Forbes
13 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why The Washington Post Is Drowning In Bad Headlines
The Washington Post Building at One Franklin Square Building in Washington, DC. (Photo by Andrew ...) I didn't think I'd be back writing about the troubles at The Washington Post so soon, following my last piece from just a few days ago, but here we are. That earlier piece, which you can read here, focused on the Post having lost tens of thousands of subscribers over the last several years, with the paper's current average daily paid subscriptions now at a new low. Despite the financial backing of owner Jeff Bezos, the reality is that Post hasn't been able to convert fleeting interest from readers into long-term loyalty; worse still, internal dysfunction and shifting editorial strategies continue to cloud the Post's identity and future. And, unfortunately, two new developments suggest the challenges aren't letting up anytime soon. Another misstep at The Washington Post Let's start with a newsroom experiment that executive editor Matt Murray detailed in a company memo. It's a new initiative that will allow individuals mentioned in the Post's stories to annotate those articles directly on the site. The movie is being framed as a way to 'deepen the conversation' and keep reader engagement on the Post's platform, rather than that discussion migrating away to X, Reddit, or elsewhere. But, come on: It's an absolute certainty that this is going to end up backfiring in spectacular fashion. This initiative is the kind of idea that looks fantastic on a whiteboard: Start letting some of the sources who are quoted in articles add annotations to the articles they're mentioned in. More engagement = everybody wins. Or something like that. In reality, the idea of real-time rebuttals next to reported journalism opens up an unnecessary Pandora's box. What happens when a powerful figure – or anyone, really – uses the feature in bad faith to undermine verified facts? Or tries to insert spin into the conversation? Will readers trust the original reporting, or will the very presence of a sidebar reply create the illusion of 'two sides' to a matter of fact? Reporters will technically be able to respond, but as I see it this risks adding 'debate monitor' to their job description. That the paper's management decided to embark on such an initiative at all, meanwhile, should also put this next bit of negative news into context. A rebuke of The Washington Post's Bezos era Pamela Alma Weymouth, granddaughter of the late Post publisher Katharine Graham, has written a personal and extremely scathing commentary in The Nation about the situation at the Post — among other things, accusing Bezos of systematically dismantling the institution her grandmother once protected. She lays the blame for much of the Post's woes at the feet of the Amazon founder. 'In the face of a more tyrannical Trump,' she writes, 'Bezos has retreated. He's muzzled his editorial page. Exceptional writers, editors, cartoonists have fled. Eight days before the election, the Post canceled a scheduled endorsement of Kamala Harris — breaking with decades of precedent. Four hundred Post journalists signed a protest letter. Two hundred and fifty thousand readers canceled their subscriptions.' Things got worse earlier this year, she continued, when Bezos dictated that Opinion writers would be expected to align with 'personal liberties and free markets,' leaving little or even no room for dissenting views. Editor David Shipley and others resigned, and another wave of subscription cancellations followed. Weymouth continues: 'If the free press can be manipulated by politicians, if truth is viewed as optional, if The Washington Post goes dark under Bezos, then we lose more than a legend. We lose the very thing that makes America a democracy.' Weymouth's commentary is particularly damning in light of recent revelations about Bezos' companies engaging with Trumpworld while the Post, at the same time, shifted its own editorial voice. It's the kind of rebuke that ought to cut deep, given that it's rooted in the legacy of the family that once owned The Washington Post — their ownership now relegated to a bygone era of journalism. To be sure, none of this means the Post is finished. There are still plenty of talented reporters who fill its newsroom, but decisions from the leadership have nonetheless put the paper in a precarious spot. Legacy isn't a business model. Without a clear editorial mission and a bold plan to rebuild reader loyalty, the fact of the matter is that even a paper as storied as The Washington Post won't be able to successfully right the ship — and avoid the inevitable.
